No legal requirement to update heating in new bill
Acting Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin scrapped the previous plan last month, saying it would "make people poorer".
The revised Heat in Buildings Bill sets targets for decarbonisation but it stops short of legally requiring homeowners and businesses to replace their heating systems by 2045, as outlined in the previous version.
Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie, who drafted the previous bill, warned that the government was "watering down" the legislation and and "stripping away almost all of its serious policy measures".
Acting Climate Action Minister Alasdair Allan said the Scottish government would bring forward the revised bill for consideration by the Scottish Parliament later in 2025.
Ministers scrap green heating plans for new homes
Scottish government scraps climate change targets
The production of heat accounts for more than half of Scotland's energy demands and is the largest contributor to the country's carbon emissions.
MSPs have already passed legislation committing the country to achieving net-zero emissions by 2045.
Proposals drawn up while the Scottish Greens were still in the government would have required property owners to switch from "polluting" heating systems, such as gas boilers, to more environmentally-friendly alternatives like heat pumps.
Mr Allan said the 2045 target sends a "strong signal to homeowners, landlords and other building owners on the need to prepare for change".
However, he accepted the upfront costs customers have to pay for "clean heating systems remain higher than those for fossil fuel systems".
He told MSPs at Holyrood that the new approach "moves away from penalising individuals and instead commits to collective action".
Mr Allan added: "Instead of placing prohibitions on every homeowner, we will establish targets for government to reach."
Harvie - who recently announced plans to step down as co-leader of the Scottish Greens - said his original legislation was being "gutted" and warned that the government's new approach was "very clearly going to fail".
He added: "If there is one thing that we have learned about climate policy in recent years, it is that setting targets without decisive action to meet them is meaningless."
He also claimed that not including a "property purchase trigger" - which would have required people buying a home to commit to changing the heating system to a greener alternative within a fixed time period - would mean a "dramatically slower uptake of clean heating in Scotland".
Labour also raised concerns, with Paul O'Kane highlighting how the Scottish government had abandoned its target of cutting emissions by 75% by 2030.
He said: "Given the government has failed to deliver on their climate change targets, and literally broke their own legislation on it, how can the people and industries of Scotland have faith that they will deliver and meet heat in building targets?"
Conservative housing spokesperson Meghan Gallacher said the "rehashed bill still provides no clarity on the costs to the public".
She said: "Rather than continually setting net-zero targets that they fail to meet, the SNP must finally outline a fair and affordable transition for hard-pressed, over-taxed Scots."
Charities have warned that the legislation "risks being a toothless bill".
Io Hadjicosta, from WWF Scotland, said Scots were seeing "yet more targets without meaningful measures to provide certainty to industry or to reduce emissions".
Lewis Ryder-Jones, from Oxfam Scotland, said: "Weakening Scotland's clean-heat plans risks leaving people to struggle with sky-high bills and cold, draughty homes while pouring cold water on the transition to a greener Scotland that works for everyone."
What is a heat pump and how much do they cost?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Turkey Set for Gas-Exploration Deal After Wooing Ex-Libya Foes
Libya's eastern parliament is poised to let Turkey explore for energy in the North African nation's waters, according to people familiar with the matter, in what would be a dramatic about-face that's the latest sign of warming ties between Ankara and the region. The House of Representatives in Benghazi is set to vote in the coming weeks on the 2019 pact that set out the terms of an exploration agreement, said people in Turkey and Libya familiar with the deliberations. Most obstacles to the accord have been removed, they said, declining to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Philip Cross: Why is youth unemployment so high? Government policies
Young people have borne the brunt of the recent deterioration in Canada's labour market. Youth unemployment usually runs at about twice the rate for adults, reflecting young workers' lower productivity and inexperience at searching for a job. But now it's nearly three times the rate for adults, which puts it at 'crisis levels' according to some commentators. The likely cause of this crisis? Government programs that have raised the minimum wage and sharply increased the supply of low-skilled foreign workers. The unemployment rate for those between 15 and 24 years of age shot up 5.4 percentage points from its recent low of 9.2 per cent in March 2023 to 14.6 per cent in July 2025. Over the same period unemployment for those 25 years and older rose just 1.3 points, from just 4.4 per cent to 5.7 per cent. The rise in their unemployment does not fully convey the deterioration of labour market conditions for young people, however. Disappearing job opportunities discouraged many from even looking for a job, which means they aren't counted as either in the labour force or unemployed. Moreover, in July a majority of those who did have jobs were in part-time, not full-time work, only the second month that's ever happened outside the 2020 COVID pandemic. Among those 15- to 24-year-olds, teenagers have been the biggest losers in the labour market lately. Their unemployment rate has nearly doubled over the past two years, from 11.9 per cent to 20.0 per cent, a level more typical of Europe's sclerotic labour market rather than North America's usually dynamic one. And, again, many teens have simply dropped out of the labour market, resulting in their participation rate falling from 52.0 to 46.5 per cent. Young people aged 20 to 24 have fared better, with the increase in their unemployment at about three percentage points over the past two years. And their labour force participation rate has remained stable near 78.0 per cent. Why has the labour market for youths, and especially teenagers, deteriorated so badly in recent years? Government policies that raised minimum wages while at the same time allowing a flood of low-skilled foreign workers into the country. Driven by the misguided slogan of providing a 'living wage,' most governments in Canada have raised the minimum wage to at least $15 an hour, double what it was in 2005 and with growth twice the rate of inflation. Many economists, including me in a 2021 paper published by the Fraser Institute, warned that such increases would be devastating for youths, and especially teenagers. Higher minimum wages support increased incomes for only the very small number of adults who are paid it — and if you are 40 years old and still earning the minimum wage, you should probably spend time reflecting on your career choice, your skill set or your motivation. Even as higher wages were pricing young people out of the job market, a surge in the number of low-skilled workers entering Canada meant supply was rising to take their place. Ottawa relaxed the rules governing low-skilled, temporary immigrant workers in 2023, triggering a flood of two million entrants since then. Recognizing it opened the floodgates too wide, the government last fall cut the number to be let in this year and next. And last week it announced it was reviewing its 2024 initiative to allow these temporary foreign workers an easier path to permanent residency. The combined impact of higher minimum wages and a rising supply of low-skilled immigrants has crippled job opportunities for youths, especially teens. When compelled to pay a minimum of $15 an hour or more, employers usually prefer hiring a highly-motivated and more mature immigrant worker over an inexperienced youth with no résumé. Philip Cross: Trump's conspiracy theory about 'rigged' U.S. jobs data doesn't add up Philip Cross: Buckley showed conservatism needs a moral foundation The sudden worsening of labour market outcomes for young people compounds their frustration at being shut out of Canada's prohibitively expensive housing market. It should not have surprised anyone that young Canadians, hoping to remedy the damage caused by government policies, were increasingly open to voting for Pierre Poilievre's Conservative party at the past election. Philip Cross is a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jesse Kline: CUPE made dupes of us all with phoney 'unpaid work' claims
'Canada's biggest airline is hiding a secret,' warned a website campaigning on behalf of Air Canada flight attendants and their union during recent contract negotiations. 'Their cabin crew is being forced to work for free during the most critical moments of your flight experience.' Except it wasn't exactly true that they were being forced to work for nothing, and it was never a secret. In the end, it didn't matter that the Unfair Canada campaign wasn't being completely honest. What mattered was that the union's message — 'Tell Air Canada and the Carney government unpaid work is a true crime' — had its intended effect on Canadians and their elected officials. On Monday, before the labour dispute was resolved, Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu said that the flight attendants' claim that they were forced to work for free when planes weren't in the sky was 'deeply disturbing' and announced a probe into 'unpaid work in the airline sector.' If the inquiry finds the allegation to be well-founded, Hajdu pledged to introduce legislation to outlaw the practice. Whether the announcement was simply a means of placating the labour movement after Hajdu ordered the Canada Industrial Relations Board to force the flight attendants back to work, prompting allegations that the Liberals were siding with management, is an open question. It's very possible that the probe will be swept under the rug now that the airline is resuming operations. But should the government follow through on its promise, it will find that Air Canada's pay structure was the industry standard, and that the practice dates back around four decades. It only became an issue in 2022, when Delta Air Lines agreed to pay its cabin crews for boarding in a bid to prevent them from unionizing. In 2024, the union representing flight attendants at American Airlines lobbied hard for a similar pay structure and announced last August that it had reached an agreement to become 'the first unionized workgroup to lock in pay for boarding.' Workers at Alaska Airlines ratified a similar collective agreement in February. Given this trend, it's no surprise that the Unfair Canada campaign was launched late last year, months before the flight attendants' collective agreement was due to expire on March 31. By making it sound as though your friendly stewardesses were being treated no better than the children at a Bangladeshi garment factory, the union knew it had a winning public-relations strategy. It certainly helped that many press reports repeated the union's claims verbatim. To bolster its cause and increase political pressure, CUPE also commissioned a poll showing that the majority of Canadians sided with the flight attendants (59 per cent) over the company (12 per cent), and that 88 per cent think 'flight attendants should be paid for all work-related duties, not just time in motion.' Yet no one should be shocked that the public tended to support the people who serve them drinks and clean up their children's vomit over the company responsible for their cancelled flights and lost baggage. And some of the survey's findings were based on some fairly loaded questions. The one about compensation, for example, was setup as follows: 'Some people say that because boarding, deplaning, delays and safety checks are all part of a flight attendant's workday, they should be paid for that time. Others say flight attendants' pay should only start once the plane is moving, as is current practice. Which is closer to your own view?' It's little wonder that only 12 per cent of respondents chose the latter. But although these positions may have represented the views of the parties at the bargaining table, it's unlikely that too many Canadians were arguing in favour of unpaid labour at the dinner table. Nor does this question fully encapsulate how flight attendants were paid under the previous agreement. According to a press release issued by Air Canada at the start of the month, 'Time spent onboarding and similar tasks performed on the ground (are) captured within the formula pay defined by the collective agreement, which covers the duty period (commencing one hour prior to flight departure / ending 15 minutes after flight arrival). If the employee is requested to be on duty outside of these times or to perform service to passengers on the ground, the collective agreement provides for additional compensation.' The text of the agreement also says that, 'Where an employee is required to report for duty prior to or remain on duty following the termination of a duty period … s/he shall be paid at one-half of the hourly rate of pay.' Similar terms were offered when employees were required to 'provide meal, bar or beverage service to passengers on the ground.' Other parts of the agreement discuss hourly wages, which started at $25.13 for new hires and rose to $87.01 for some in-flight managers, along with meal allowances and incentives, such as discounted flights, pensions and health benefits. Being a stewardess is certainly not the most lucrative career, but painting them as destitute labourers forced to dumpster dive for food is a bit of a stretch. And although flight attendants can be forgiven for wanting a better deal, let's not pretend as though they didn't agree to the pay structure outlined in the last agreement, or the ones before that. The risk for flight attendants, however, is that if they get too greedy, many of their jobs could one day be automated, at least as soon as someone realizes that much of what they do could be replaced by a vending machine strapped to a Roomba and sent down the aisle to serve food and drinks. Heck, the service on some flights may even improve! Perhaps the solution is to allow them to accept tips. I'm fully aware that we're all sick of being asked to tip every time we reach for our credit cards, but I'd certainly be willing to chip in a few extra bucks if it meant someone would actually come when I press the flight attendant call button and stop giving me excuses about why they can't pour me a double gin and soda. Ultimately, the workers and management settled on a tentative deal that will reportedly guarantee at least an hour of ground pay at half their hourly rate for each flight, with a pay bump of five per cent per year. Which sounds fair enough. But such decisions should always be up to those who are being hired to perform a specific task and the people who are hiring them. Patty Hajdu and her Liberal colleagues should stay on their own runway. National Post jkline@
