Stop posting about Gaza, police tell woman with Jewish family
Heidi Bachram, who had Jewish family members murdered and taken hostage by Hamas during the Oct 7 attacks, was the subject of attacks by another user on X.
The account was eventually suspended for violating X's rules with the posts, which contained anti-Semitic comments and cartoons showing stereotypically Jewish figures.
But Ms Bachram, from Brighton, said that instead of investigating who was responsible for the abuse, Sussex Police suggested she stop posting about 'controversial subjects' such as Gaza.
Ms Bachram has been prominent in raising the plight of hostages still held by Hamas. On Oct 7, Tsachi, the cousin of Ms Bachram's husband, and his wife and two children were held at gunpoint on the floor of their home on Kibbutz Nahal Oz.
Mayan, Tsachi's 18-year-old daughter, was murdered and Tsachi taken hostage. His family received confirmation in February that he had been killed in captivity.
Cruel jibes about Oct 7 victims
An account operated under the name NJimmytree is accused of bombarding Ms Bachram with abuse, calling her a 'scumbag', 'ugly Zionist' and 'ugly faced pig'.
One message stated: 'You have a face only a genocidal Zionist pig could like. Your brother-in-law should thank Hamas, because of them he never has to see your monstrosity of a face again.'
Another of NJimmytree's posts showed a photograph of Mia Chem, a young woman kidnapped by Hamas at the Nova festival, with the jibe 'check out the beak on this one'.
One particularly offensive post in November last year showed two images of a young woman's profile and the comment: 'Imagine getting a nose job because your captors made you feel ugly because they didn't want to rape her.'
The material posted also included stereotypical cartoons of Jewish men with large noses rubbing their hands, together with the comment: 'Why do you all look like this?'
Ms Bachram told The Telegraph: 'The constant abuse was scary. He seemed obsessed with posting my face and being nasty about my appearance. It just felt relentless. When he posted about my husband's murdered relative, I felt sick. We are still in shock from Tsachi's death and it's a very painful time.
'I couldn't believe someone would be so deliberately cruel.'
But Ms Bachram says police were reluctant to investigate the abuse. Instead, she says, she was told by a sergeant that what she tweets is 'politically sensitive' and asked: 'Why don't you stop posting about it?'
She added: 'He said I was making myself a target. I feel like I've been victimised twice. Once by this cruel troll and secondly by the police. It was classic 'blame the victim' stuff.'
Ms Bachram said the Sussex force's attitude to anti-Semitic posts appeared inconsistent.
Just two weeks before she reported the NJimmytree posts, an officer contacted her in order to alert her to an anti-Semitic message posted by a far-Right troll.
In response to a photograph shared by Ms Bachram of a memorial to Gaza hostages erected in Brighton which had been smeared with faeces, a user called NoticeBanned wrote on X on June 23: 'None of these people died in Brighton. F--- off Jew.'
Sussex Police invited Ms Bachram to make a complaint about this abusive post, which she did, and officers are understood to have asked X to provide the ID of the NoticeBanned account, which has a history of anti-Semitic and racist abuse.
Force is reviewing complaint
Alex Hearn, of Labour Against Antisemitism, said: 'The inconsistency in policing these cases beggars belief. How can they be so proactive in one case and dismissive of another?'
A Sussex Police spokesman said: 'We are aware of concerns which have been raised by Ms Bachram, and we can confirm that we have received a formal complaint.
'Officers will review this complaint, and we are unable to comment further at this time.
'Sussex Police takes a zero-tolerance approach to hate crime and there is no place for hate across the county.
'We urge anyone impacted by hate crime to report it to Sussex Police, and remain committed to ensuring any reported offences are fully investigated in line with relevant legislation and taking all factors into account.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Solve the daily Crossword

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asylum seekers to be removed from Essex hotel as council granted injunction
Asylum seekers to be removed from Essex hotel as council granted injunction Asylum seekers will be removed from an Essex hotel after a council was granted a temporary High Court injunction blocking them from being housed there. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel in Epping. The injunction sought by the council meant the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, would have had to stop housing asylum seekers there within 14 days. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment. In his judgment, he said that while the council had not 'definitively established' that Somani Hotels had breached planning rules, 'the strength of the claimant's case is such that it weighs in favour' of granting the injunction. He continued that the 'risk of injustice is greater' if a temporary injunction was not granted. A further hearing on whether the injunction should be made permanent is expected to be held at a later date, and is expected to last two days. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since a then-resident at the hotel was accused of trying to kiss a teenage girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. The council said last week it was seeking an injunction due to 'unprecedented levels of protest and disruption' in connection with asylum seeker accommodation. Chris Whitbread, leader of the council, said the situation 'cannot go on' but the Government 'is not listening'. At a hearing on Friday, barristers for the council said that the site's 'sole lawful use' was as a hotel and that Somani Hotels had breached planning rules by using it to house asylum seekers. Philip Coppel KC, for the authority, said the situation was 'wholly unacceptable' and provided a 'feeding ground for unrest'. He said: 'There has been what can be described as an increase in community tension, the catalyst of which has been the use of the Bell Hotel to place asylum seekers.' Mr Coppel continued: 'It is not the asylum seekers who are acting unlawfully. It is the defendant, by allowing the hotel to be used to house asylum seekers.' He added: 'It really could not be much worse than this.' Piers Riley-Smith, for Somani Hotels, said that 'disagreement with Government policy' did not justify a 'draconian' injunction and that there would be 'hardship' caused to the company and those housed at the hotel. He also said that contracts to house asylum seekers were a 'financial lifeline' for the hotel, which was only 1% full in August 2022, when it was open to paying customers. Mr Riley-Smith said: 'It is clear that recent protests have expanded far beyond the local community and have gone into concerns about wider ideological and political issues from those outside the community. 'Those particular ideological, non-community concerns are not relevant to planning.' Following the ruling, Mr Whitbread said: 'I am delighted. This is great news for our residents. The last few weeks have placed an intolerable strain on our community but today we have some great news.' He continued: 'Home Office policy ignores the issues and concerns of local residents that the council represents. 'Today we have made a step towards redressing the imbalance and showing that local people do have some say, whatever the Home Office thinks.' Before judgment was handed down on Tuesday, barristers for the Home Office asked to intervene in the case, citing the 'substantial impact' caused to the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, in performing her legal duties to asylum seekers. Edward Brown KC, for the department, told the court that moving asylum seekers in 'extremely short order' would cause a 'very significant operational burden' and 'particular acute difficulties' for the Government. But Mr Justice Eyre dismissed the Home Office's bid, stating that the department's involvement was 'not necessary'.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Labour MP Kate Osborne faces inquiry by Commons expenses watchdog
Parliament's expenses watchdog has opened an investigation into Labour MP Kate Osborne. The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) said it had opened an investigation into whether the Jarrow and Gateshead East MP had breached spending rules. Announcing the investigation on Tuesday, Ipsa said the investigation related to spending on travel and subsistence costs and 'miscellaneous costs and financial assistance'. It added: 'No further information will be published until the investigation has concluded.' Ms Osborne, 59, has been an MP since 2019 and was re-elected last year with a majority of 8,964. She is the second Labour MP to be investigated by Ipsa this year, after the watchdog opened an inquiry into spending by Tahir Ali in May. Mr Ali, the MP for Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley, faces an investigation into spending on 'office costs, travel and accommodation'. Ms Osborne has been contacted for comment.


Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
UK Official Calls for Age Verification on VPNs to Prevent Porn Loophole
A U.K. government official wants tougher rules to stop kids from using VPNs to dodge the country's latest online safety laws. The Online Safety Act, which went into effect this summer, puts new legal pressure on online platforms, including search engines and social media sites, to protect users from harmful content. The laws are mostly aimed at keeping children away from porn and other 'harmful' material tied to self-harm, suicide, and eating disorders. One of the act's main provisions is that pornography sites and platforms with user-uploaded content must use technology to verify or estimate a user's age. That typically means requiring people to upload a government-issued ID or a photo of themselves to prove they meet the age requirement. But users have already found ways around these new digital checkpoints. Some crafty gamers discovered they could use the photo mode in Death Stranding to trick age verification systems on Reddit and Discord. Most, though, are simply turning to virtual private networks (VPNs), which reroute internet traffic through servers in other countries and hide a user's real IP address. That makes it easy to get around the age verification requirements. Interest in VPNs spiked in the UK the week after the laws took effect on July 21, according to Google Trends. Now, one official is pushing to close the VPN workaround. Dame Rachel de Souza, England's children's commissioner, told BBC Newsnight on Monday that VPNs are 'absolutely a loophole that needs closing' and called for age checks on the services themselves. In a new report, de Souza recommended requiring age verification for the use of VPNs. The report argues the move would help stop underage users from accessing porn. A survey conducted right before the law took effect found that about 70% of children had seen pornography online, with X (formerly Twitter) cited as the most common source. The report also flagged the violent nature of much of the porn kids are exposed to, with 58% of respondents saying they had seen porn depicting strangulation before turning 18, and 44% reporting seeing depictions of rape of a person sleeping. 'This is having an impact on children's view of what is normal sexual behaviour,' the report argues. A government spokesperson told the BBC that there are no plans to ban VPNs, 'but if platforms deliberately push workarounds like VPNs to children, they face tough enforcement and heavy fines.' In the U.S., nearly half of the states have passed laws requiring porn sites to use age verification systems. Nine states have also approved rules forcing social media platforms to demand either age checks or parental consent for minors.