Experts solve mystery of ancient ‘mummified dragon' discovered by Japanese shogun
The 'dragon' has been stashed at the Shosoin Treasure House in the historic Japanese city of Nara, according to Pen News.
The remains were reportedly found by Yoshinori Ashikaga, a 15th-century shogun, in 1429.
Legend states that Ashikaga cut a piece from the Ranjatai, a rare and valuable piece of agarwood, at the time of the skeleton's discovery.
The shogun was visiting the Todai-ji temple in Nara at the time.
Shortly after, a monk at the temple claimed to have seen 'something in the shape of a small dragon' that was dried by the sun. Ashikaga took the skeleton and preserved it.
4 The remains were reportedly found by Yoshinori Ashikaga, a 15th-century shogun, in 1429.
Office of the Shosoin Treasure House
4 Researchers used X-ray technology and radiocarbon dating to date the marten back to the 11th or 12th centuries.
Office of the Shosoin Treasure House
But was the skeleton a dragon after all? Researchers say not quite.
A recently published study said the 'dragon' was actually a female Japanese marten.
The fluffy, weasel-like animal is native to central and southern Japan.
'The two premolars are clearly visible, and this characteristic indicates that it is a species of the Martes genus,' the study states.
4 The skeleton was found at the Todai-ji temple in Nara in 1429.
Getty Images
Using x-ray technology and radiocarbon dating, researchers found that the marten dated back to the 11th or 12th centuries.
The Todai-ji temple underwent heavy renovations at the time, according to Pen News.
Experts believe the animal entered the building and was trapped before it died and was mummified.
Pictures show the marten missing its forelegs, making it resemble a dragon.
4 Experts believe the animal entered the building and was trapped before it died and was mummified.
Office of the Shosoin Treasure House
Legend states that rain would descend upon the treasure house every time the skeleton's repository was opened – and during the study, researchers fought heavy downpours that made traveling from Tokyo to Nara difficult.
Mami Tsuru, a conservationist at the Shosoin Treasure House, told Pen News she's certain the skeleton is the same one recorded by the Todai-ji monk.
'The age determination has significantly increased the possibility that the mummy is the sun-dried dragon-looking object recorded in the document from the Muromachi Period,' the expert said.
Tsuru added, 'We believe this is a good example of how Shosoin has protected not only beautiful items, but also all the items inside the repository.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why one of the biggest earthquakes ever recorded caused so little damage
It was one of the largest earthquakes ever recorded, a magnitude 8.8 monster off the eastern coast of Russia. Despite its remote location, the size of the quake immediately brought potential danger of tsunami to a significant swath of the globe, including Japan, Canada and the United States. Tsunami alerts immediately went out, covering millions of people, including the entire U.S. West Coast. But for all its fury, the quake ended up not being a catastrophe. Dangerous waves that rose more than 10 feet never materialized outside of Russia, and even there, officials had no reports of deaths, and damage appeared to be limited. "In this case, we mostly dodged a bullet," said Mike Rademaker, harbormaster for the Crescent City Harbor, a place that saw deadly tsunamis both in 1964 with the Alaska mega-quake and 2011 when the great Japanese quake hit. While those events represent worst-case scenarios, Tuesday's temblor represents a best-case scenario. "With tsunamis, location and directionality is everything," said Nathan Wood, a tsunami scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey. The area near the epicenter off Siberia's Kamchatka Peninsula did see damage, but it was sparsely populated. Video of the town of Severo-Kurilsk, on an island just off the peninsula, showed a building being swept away. But for areas farther out, initial modeling suggests the tsunami's energy was directed into the open Pacific Ocean, roughly between Alaska and Hawaii, and had time to weaken before it hit more populated areas. "It just kind of shot right between the two of those [states]," Wood said. The tsunami "impacted the local community that was right next to the source [earthquake] where it happened," Wood said. "But for everyone else, it kind of just shot right down this empty hallway — in between the Aleutian Islands chain and the Hawaiian Islands — and so there wasn't really a whole lot in its way. "So by the time it got to the West Coast, like California, Oregon, a lot of the energy had been dissipated," Wood said. Russia saw tsunami waves as high as 16 feet, according to news wire reports, but tsunami heights maxed out at 4 feet in Crescent City, 3 feet in Arena Cove in Mendocino County, 2.7 feet at Port San Luis in San Luis Obispo County, 2.6 feet at Point Reyes in Marin County and 1.5 feet in Monterey. The totals were even smaller in Southern California. The highest wave in the U.S. was 5.7 feet in Kahului, Hawaii, on Maui. "It's a relatively good day," state Sen. Mike McGuire, who represents a large swath of the Northern California coast, said Wednesday. The extensive alerts issued after the earthquake struck at 4:25 p.m. Tuesday PDT sparked concern across the Pacific, as scientists raced to forecast how extensive the tsunami could be. A magnitude 8.8 quake ranks as the sixth most powerful earthquake on record in the last 125 years. But by Tuesday evening, the National Tsunami Warning Center's forecasts indicated that Crescent City would see a tsunami that would likely cap out at no more than 5 feet, and with places like San Francisco and Los Angeles harbor at less than 1 foot or so. Dave Snider, the tsunami warning coordinator at the National Tsunami Warning Center in Alaska, said it might be too early to assess how much damage this tsunami did, but "it is true, maybe this one wasn't as bad as it could have been." "If the focus of this tsunami's energy is not pointed right at your coastline, the impacts to you could be pretty limited," Snider said. The magnitude of the earthquake is important, but it's "more about how much of that water moved, and what direction was that energy pointed at the coastline," Snider said. "In this case, it looks like maybe it just wasn't focused at the California coastline with that intensity of other known events." There are other tsunami scenarios that pose far greater risks to California. One involves a near-shore tsunami, such as a magnitude 9 earthquake along the Cascadia subduction zone, just off the coast of California's North Coast, Oregon and Washington. Depending on the strength and location of the quake, life-threatening waves could approach the coastline in as few as 10 minutes, perhaps not even enough time for an emergency alert to be issued, much less arrive on your cellphone. Near-shore tsunami from other offshore earthquakes could result in waves of up to 6 feet above mean sea level at San Francisco's Ocean Beach; 8 feet in Long Beach and the Santa Monica Pier; 9 feet in Malibu and 30 feet on Catalina Island. Read more: An earthquake just off California's coast poses dire tsunami risk for many communities Another worst-case scenario involves a major earthquake in Alaska sending a tsunami to California. Maximum projected distant-source tsunamis could bring waves of 15 feet above mean sea level to the Santa Monica Pier and Marina del Rey and 32 feet at San Francisco's Ocean Beach. Awareness of tsunami alerts has improved over the years in large part thanks to deep ocean pressure sensors that can detect tsunami that are overseen by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said Eric Geist, research geophysicist for the USGS. "There were several, fortunately, in operation right off the Kamchatka subduction zone," Geist said. "So we knew, really quick, that a tsunami — and a fairly sizable one — was generated." One of the tragedies of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami was a lack of warning. Helping matters is that this week's tsunami hit California when there was a lower tide. The extensive warnings offered California officials another chance to handle a tsunami at a time when experts are urging both the public and government agencies to be more prepared. In December, a tsunami warning from an earthquake about 30 miles from the Humboldt County coast prompted a decidedly uneven response across Northern California. It was the first time the San Francisco Bay Area had ever received a warning of a "near-shore" tsunami with little time to evacuate, and the response demonstrated how the public had little awareness of whether they lived or work in a tsunami hazard zone. In the end, only a tiny tsunami, measured at 5 centimeters, was recorded in December. Even Tuesday night, there were problems. The California Geological Survey recently updated its tsunami hazard map — showing places in California that are at risk of tsunami inundation. The state's website crashed, yet again — a repeat of the website failing during the December 2024 tsunami warning, although this time, media outlets, including The Times, made interactive versions available. But other efforts at preparation against tsunami have borne fruit. In Crescent City, officials noted that the one dock that structurally failed — "H" dock — during Wednesday morning's tsunami actually worked as designed. "'H' dock was engineered as a wave-and-current attenuator with closely spaced pilings, which are specifically designed to disrupt and dissipate tsunami energy before it reaches the Inner Harbor," Rademaker said. "So its sacrificial role in the overall design appears to have functioned as intended, absorbing the brunt of the surge, and helping to protect the more interior docks." Crescent City Harbor was totally destroyed during the 2011 tsunami, and also suffered damage from a 2006 tsunami — events that each took a three-year rebuilding process. The statewide total in damage from the 2011 tsunami was estimated at more than $100 million. One person in 2011 died after being swept into the sea while taking pictures of the tsunami. The Crescent City tsunami in 2011 topped out at 8 feet. The 1964 Alaska earthquake set off a catastrophic tsunami that devastated Crescent City, washing away 29 blocks and killing at least 11 people. Surges reached 21 feet above the average low tide. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Solve the daily Crossword
Los Angeles Times
9 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Why one of the biggest earthquakes ever recorded caused so little damage
SAN FRANCISCO — It was one of the largest earthquakes ever recorded, a magnitude 8.8 monster off the eastern coast of Russia. Despite its remote location, the size of the quake immediately brought potential danger of tsunami to a significant swath of the globe, including Japan, Canada and the United States. Tsunami alerts immediately went out, covering millions of people, including the entire U.S. West Coast. But for all its fury, the quake ended up not being a catastrophe. Dangerous waves that rose more than 10 feet never materialized outside of Russia, and even there, officials had no reports of deaths, and damage appeared to be limited. 'In this case, we mostly dodged a bullet,' said Mike Rademaker, harbormaster for the Crescent City Harbor, a place that saw deadly tsunamis both in 1964 with the Alaska mega-quake and 2011 when the great Japanese quake hit. While those events represent worst-case scenarios, Tuesday's temblor represents a best-case scenario. 'With tsunamis, location and directionality is everything,' said Nathan Wood, a tsunami scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey. The area near the epicenter off Siberia's Kamchatka Peninsula did see damage, but it was sparsely populated. Video of the town of Severo-Kurilsk, on an island just off the peninsula, showed a building being swept away. But for areas farther out, initial modeling suggests the tsunami's energy was directed into the open Pacific Ocean, roughly between Alaska and Hawaii, and had time to weaken before it hit more populated areas. 'It just kind of shot right between the two of those [states],' Wood said. The tsunami 'impacted the local community that was right next to the source [earthquake] where it happened,' Wood said. 'But for everyone else, it kind of just shot right down this empty hallway — in between the Aleutian Islands chain and the Hawaiian islands — and so there wasn't really a whole lot in its way. 'So by the time it got to the West Coast, like California, Oregon, a lot of the energy had been dissipated,' Wood said. Russia saw tsunami waves as high as 16 feet, according to news wire reports, but tsunami heights maxed out at 4 feet in Crescent City, 3 feet in Arena Cove in Mendocino County, 2.7 feet at Port San Luis in San Luis Obispo County, 2.6 feet at Point Reyes in Marin County and 1.5 feet in Monterey. The totals were even smaller in Southern California. The highest wave in the U.S. was 5.7 feet in Kahului, Hawaii, on Maui. 'It's a relatively good day,' state Sen. Mike McGuire, who represents a large swath of the Northern California coast, said Wednesday. The extensive alerts issued after the earthquake struck at 4:25 p.m. Tuesday PDT sparked concern across the Pacific, as scientists raced to forecast how extensive the tsunami could be. A magnitude 8.8 quake ranks as the sixth most powerful earthquake on record in the past 125 years. But by Tuesday evening, the National Tsunami Warning Center's forecasts indicated that Crescent City would see a tsunami that would likely cap out at no more than 5 feet, and with places like San Francisco and Los Angeles harbor at less than 1 foot or so. Dave Snider, the tsunami warning coordinator at the National Tsunami Warning Center in Alaska, said it might be too early to assess how much damage this tsunami did, but 'it is true, maybe this one wasn't as bad as it could have been.' 'If the focus of this tsunami's energy is not pointed right at your coastline, the impacts to you could be pretty limited,' Snider said. The magnitude of the earthquake is important, but it's 'more about how much of that water moved, and what direction was that energy pointed at the coastline,' Snider said. 'In this case, it looks like maybe it just wasn't focused at the California coastline with that intensity of other known events.' There are other tsunami scenarios that pose far greater risks to California. One involves a near-shore tsunami, such as a magnitude 9 earthquake along the Cascadia subduction zone, just off the coast of California's North Coast, Oregon and Washington. Depending on the strength and location of the quake, life-threatening waves could approach the coastline in as few as 10 minutes, perhaps not even enough time for an emergency alert to be issued, much less arrive on your cellphone. Near-shore tsunami from other offshore earthquakes could result in waves of up to 6 feet above mean sea level at San Francisco's Ocean Beach; 8 feet in Long Beach and the Santa Monica Pier; 9 feet in Malibu and 30 feet on Catalina Island. Another worst case scenario involves a major earthquake in Alaska, sending tsunami to California. Maximum projected distant-source tsunamis could bring waves of 15 feet above mean sea level to the Santa Monica Pier and Marina del Rey and 32 feet at San Francisco's Ocean Beach. Awareness of tsunami alerts has improved over the years in large part to deep ocean pressure senors that can detect tsunami that are overseen by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said Eric Geist, research geophysicist for the USGS. 'There were several, fortunately, in operation right off the Kamchatka subduction zone,' Geist said. 'So we knew, really quick, that a tsunami — and a fairly sizable one — was generated.' One of the tragedies of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami was a lack of warning. Helping matters is that the tsunami hit California when there was a lower tide. The extensive warnings offered California officials another chance to handle a tsunami at a time when experts are urging both the public and government agencies to be more prepared. In December, a tsunami warning from an earthquake about 30 miles from the Humboldt County coast prompted a decidedly uneven response across Northern California. It was the first time the San Francisco Bay Area had ever received a warning of a 'near-shore' tsunami with little time to evacuate, and the response demonstrated how the public had little awareness of whether they lived or work in a tsunami hazard zone. In the end, only a tiny tsunami, measured at 5 centimeters, was recorded in December. Even Tuesday night, there were problems. The California Geological Survey recently updated its tsunami hazard map — showing places in California that are at risk of tsunami inundation. The state's website crashed, yet again — a repeat of the website failing during the December 2024 tsunami warning, although this time, media outlets, including The Times, made interactive versions available. But other efforts at preparation against tsunami have borne fruit. In Crescent City, officials noted that the one dock that structurally failed — 'H' dock — during Wednesday morning's tsunami actually worked as designed. ''H' dock was engineered as a wave-and-current attenuator with closely spaced pilings, which are specifically designed to disrupt and dissipate tsunami energy before it reaches the Inner Harbor,' Rademaker said. 'So its sacrificial role in the overall design appears to have functioned as intended, absorbing the brunt of the surge, and helping to protect the more interior docks.' The Crescent City harbor was totally destroyed during the 2011 tsunami, and also suffered damage from a 2006 tsunami — events that each took a three-year rebuilding process. The statewide total in damage from the 2011 tsunami was estimated at more than $100 million. One person in 2011 died after being swept into the sea while taking pictures of the tsunami. The Crescent City tsunami in 2011 topped out at 8 feet. The 1964 Alaska earthquake set off a catastrophic tsunami that devastated Crescent City, washing away 29 blocks and killing at least 11 people. Surges reached 21 feet above the average low tide.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Syncing With Your Chronotype Can Maximize Sleep and Productivity
zeljkosantrac/Getty Images Most people acknowledge that there are two types of sleepers in the world—early birds and night owls—but research has shown that there are actually four or more sleep-wake cycles. The time you naturally open your eyes in the morning and doze off in the evening is the individual expression of your circadian rhythm, a.k.a. your chronotype, which also drives when you feel most alert or sleepy throughout the day. Your chronotype is based on natural daily fluctuations in your body temperature and hormones. Generally, body temp rises as daylight increases. Alertness-boosting cortisol also notches upward in the morning, and then levels off and dips as daylight fades, coinciding with your level of mental awareness. As the sun sets, the sleepiness-promoting hormone melatonin replaces cortisol. The exact cadence of this flux varies based on genetics, Jennifer Martin, PhD, spokesperson for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and professor of medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, tells SELF. The morning larks among us have a faster-ticking body clock, so this whole schedule kicks off earlier, she explains, while the night owls have a slower clock, pushing the pattern later. Most people fall somewhere in the middle. If you sync up your everyday schedule with your chronotype, you could find it easier to get quality sleep and also get things done. Read on to find expert advice for determining your chronotype and using this intel to align your activities with your body's innate rhythm. 3 ways to figure out your chronotype There's debate among researchers about exactly how many chronotypes there are, but Dr. Martin says it's helpful to think of these schedules as a continuum spanning from the earliest-rising larks to the latest-sleeping night owls. You might intuitively know if you have a strong inclination toward one extreme or the other, but sometimes the requirements of work and other daily obligations can overshadow our true preferences. So Dr. Martin suggests thinking about how you act on vacation (when you're not jetlagged). 'If you love staying up late and sleeping in until 10 or 11:00 a.m., you probably have night-owl tendencies,' she says. Whereas, 'if you go on vacation, and you're super excited about a 6:00 a.m. tee time, for example, you're likely a morning person.' To get more precise, you can also take a chronotype questionnaire. The Morningness Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) includes 19 questions—about when you'd ideally choose to wake up, do physically or mentally tough work, and go to sleep—and categorizes you as one of five types based on your score: definitely morning, moderately morning, neither type, moderately evening, and definitely evening. Michael Breus, PhD, a clinical psychologist and sleep medicine specialist, also created the popular ChronoQuiz, which assesses both your habits around and feelings about sleep—and groups people into four camps, each named after an animal with similar behaviors: the lions (which are the morning people), the wolves (a.k.a. the night folks), the bears (who fall in between), and the dolphins, who Dr. Breus explains have some 'genetic irregularity' and an erratic sleep pattern that doesn't fit neatly into the other camps. How to optimize your schedule based on your chronotype Sleep within your ideal window. Since chronotype is based on genetics, morning people can't typically sleep in to make up for late nights, and night people can't generally doze off sooner to account for earlier rise times, Dr. Martin points out. So, if your eyes usually open around dawn, do your best to turn in early enough to still clock the recommended seven-ish hours of sleep; and if you tend to stay awake until the wee hours, aim to sleep in late enough to hit that number. This way, you can get ahead of sleep deprivation and the full slate of health detriments that comes along with it. Of course, aligning your sleep schedule with your chronotype can be a struggle with life obligations—especially for the night owls, whose schedules conflict with societal norms around workday start times. In this scenario, do what you can to slide back your wakeup time and minimize the need for brain power before work: prep breakfast, lay out clothes, get a jump on other morning admin in the evenings. For the early birds (and neutral folks), standard work schedules tend to fit more easily. If you find that social and home tasks are creeping into your evenings and nudging your bedtime back, see how you can spread out plans (so you aren't hit with late nights back-to-back) and reallocate to-dos for before-work time. Do mentally challenging tasks during energy 'on' times. If you're a morning type, you don't just rise with the sun—your body's arousal level also peaks early, between 7 and 10 a.m.; whereas, nighttime types hit max alertness around 7 to 10 p.m., Cindi May, PhD, a professor of psychology at College of Charleston who studies chronotypes, tells SELF. Her research suggests your brain is also primed to do its best work during your respective 'on' period, particularly if you have a strong chronotype. That doesn't apply to every task. 'If you're using a highly practiced skill or rote responses, then you're probably going to be fine whenever,' she says. 'But if you are engaged in a task that requires analytic thinking or attention to detail, that demands that you filter out distraction in order to pay attention, then you'll likely perform best during your optimal zone.' These include activities like making a decision or having a tough conversation, recalling things, reasoning through a complex problem, or weighing the pros and cons of an idea. Practically, it can help to think of the day in two chunks: Morning types tend to experience their most productive hours in the first half of the day, and nighttime types, in the back half, Dr. Martin says. Neutral types can flex a bit in either direction. That said, there's generally an 'off' time for everyone, Dr. Martin says, which tends to fall around 2 to 4 p.m. All chronotypes may lose some alertness in this window, triggering difficulties with creativity and concentration. It's an ideal time for a nap or lower-lift tasks. Eat on a consistent schedule. The optimal timing of meals and snacks depends on your lifestyle and energy needs—but sticking to the same pattern each day (whatever it may be) is a boon for your circadian rhythm, Dr. Breus says. It's more important to eat your first meal of the day at a consistent time that aligns with your internal clock, say, shortly after you wake up, rather than at a specific hour on the wall clock, Dr. Martin says. Also, aim to wrap up eating a couple hours before your bedtime, Dr. Breus adds, as the workings of digestion could interfere with sleep efficiency and quality. Can you change your chronotype? Experts say it's not possible to switch your chronotype. Your genes are your genes, after all. But while your underlying tendency is set, there are things that can shift your sleep-wake schedule a bit on a given day. If you're a night owl and want to wake up and feel alert sooner, bathing your eyes in light first-thing can help get your daytime hormones flowing, and limiting light in the evening can kickstart the nighttime ones, Dr. Martin says. Vice versa if you're an early bird who wants to push your rhythm back: Avoid light for the first couple hours of your day, and get lots of it later on. Another potential chronotype-adjuster is exercise. Research suggests a dose of physical activity in the morning or afternoon can move your schedule up—so if you're a night owl, working out in the first part of the day could help you conk out earlier. By contrast, doing some movement in the back half of the day may delay your circadian rhythm a bit, which could benefit early birds who are looking to stay awake later into the night. If you're thinking, Doesn't caffeine have this effect, too?, you should know: It mostly masks sleepiness or grogginess, which may temporarily improve your focus, memory, and physical performance when you're running low on sleep, Dr. May says. But there's no evidence to suggest consuming it in the morning could move your circadian rhythm up. If anything, it's been shown to delay that schedule, which could make it even tougher for caffeine-gulping night owls to fall asleep at a reasonable hour. More broadly, caffeine can tamper with the quality of your sleep and make it less restorative, so relying on it to wake up earlier or stay up later than your norm isn't a great long-term strategy. Ultimately, unlocking an ideal schedule comes down to respecting your personal energetic cadence, Dr. Martin says. But for some people—like those with extreme chronotypes or ones that clash with their obligations—it can be super tough to get on track. If that's you, she says, it's best to reach out to a sleep specialist, who can offer targeted therapies to help match your sleep-wake pattern to the structure of your life (or the other way around). Related: 3 Things to Do When You're So, So Tired But Sleeping More Isn't an Option I Have ADHD. Here Are 9 Productivity Tips That Really Help Me 17 Energizing Afternoon Habits for When You Need a Pick-Me-Up Get more of SELF's great service journalism delivered right to your inbox. Originally Appeared on Self
