Physicists still divided about quantum world, 100 years on
PARIS: The theory of
quantum mechanics
has transformed daily life since being proposed a century ago, yet how it works remains a mystery and physicists are deeply divided about what is actually going on, a survey in the journal Nature said Wednesday.
"Shut up and calculate!" is a famous quote in
quantum physics
that illustrates the frustration of scientists struggling to unravel one of the world's great paradoxes.
For the last century, equations based on quantum mechanics have consistently and accurately described the behaviour of extremely small objects.
However, no one knows what is happening in the physical reality behind the mathematics.
The problem started at the turn of the 20th century, when scientists realised that the classical principles of physics did not apply to things on the level on atoms.
Bafflingly, photons and electrons appear to behave like both particles and waves. They can also be in different positions simultaneously -- and have different speeds or levels of energy.
In 1925, Austrian physicist Erwin Schroedinger and Germany's Werner
Heisenberg
developed a set of complex mathematical tools that describe quantum mechanics using probabilities.
This "wave function" made it possible to predict the results of measurements of a particle.
These equations led to the development of a huge amount of modern technology, including lasers, LED lights, MRI scanners and the transistors used in computers and phones.
But the question remained: what exactly is happening in the world beyond the maths?
A confusing cat
To mark the 100th year of quantum mechanics, many of the world's leading physicists gathered last month on the German island of Heligoland, where Heisenberg wrote his famous equation.
More than 1,100 of them responded to a survey conducted by the leading scientific journal Nature.
The results showed there is a "striking lack of consensus among physicists about what quantum theory says about reality", Nature said in a statement.
More than a third, 36 per cent, of the respondents favoured the most widely accepted theory, known as the
Copenhagen interpretation
.
In the classical world, everything has defined properties, such as position or speed, whether we observe them or not.
But this is not the case in the quantum realm, according to the Copenhagen interpretation developed by Heisenberg and Danish physicist Niels Bohr in the 1920s.
It is only when an observer measures a quantum object that it settles on a specific state from the possible options, goes the theory. This is described as its wave function "collapsing" into a single possibility.
The most famous depiction of this idea is
Schroedinger's cat
, which remains simultaneously alive and dead in a box, until someone peeks inside.
The Copenhagen interpretation "is the simplest we have", Brazilian physics philosopher Decio Krause told Nature after responding to the survey.
Despite the theory's problems, such as not explaining why measurement has this effect, the alternatives "present other problems which, to me, are worse," he said.
Enter the multiverse
But the majority of the physicists supported other ideas.
Fifteen per cent of the respondents opted for the "many worlds" interpretation, one of several theories in physics that propose we live in a multiverse.
It asserts that the wave function does not collapse, but instead branches off into as many universes as there are possible outcomes.
So when an observer measures a particle, they get the position for their world -- but it is in all other possible positions across many parallel universes.
"It requires a dramatic readjustment of our intuitions about the world, but to me that's just what we should expect from a fundamental theory of reality," US theoretical physicist Sean Carroll said in the survey.
The quantum experts were split on other big questions facing the field.
Is there some kind of boundary between the quantum and classical worlds, where the laws of physics suddenly change?
Forty-five per cent of the physicists responded yes to this question and the exact same percentage responded no.
Just 24 per cent said they were confident the quantum interpretation they chose was correct.
And three-quarters believed that it will be replaced by a more comprehensive theory one day.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
What lies under: A massive hot blob is approaching New York city; here's what it means
1 2 3 A mysterious geological formation deep beneath the Earth's surface is catching the attention of scientists around the world. It is nicknamed as the 'hot blob,' and this vast mass of heated rock lies beneath the Northern Appalachian region. Surprisingly, this appears to be slowly making its way toward New York City. Though it may sound like a scene from a disaster movie, scientists assure us this is natural. What is the ' hot blob '? The so-called 'hot blob' is officially referred to as the Northern Appalachian Anomaly (NAA). It sits about 200 km beneath the Earth's surface and stretches around 355 km across the northeastern US, including parts of New England. It's a patch of unusually hot rock moving very slowly under the Earth's crust. Researchers originally believed it was a remnant from 180 million years ago, when North America separated from Africa. But new findings suggest it actually formed around 80 million years ago, during the breakup of ancient land masses that became Canada and Greenland. Why and how is it moving? According to a study published in Nature, the hot blob forms when molten rock from the mantle rises into cracks in the Earth's crust created by ancient rifting. Over time, as it cools, the material begins to sink or "drip" downward, causing ripple-like movements known as mantle waves. 'Heat at the base of a continent can weaken and remove part of its dense root, making the continent lighter and more buoyant, like a hot air balloon rising after dropping its ballast,' explained Professor Tom Gernon, lead author of the study and Professor of Earth Science at the University of Southampton. This uplift effect might explain why the Appalachian Mountains have remained so tall despite millions of years of erosion. Could it be dangerous? The answer is not anytime soon. The blob is moving at about 19 km per million years, meaning it would take roughly 10 to 15 million years to reach New York City. Still, it may have geological impacts, possibly explaining why rare volcanic eruptions in the region sometimes bring diamonds to the surface.
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
Mysterious underground ‘hot blob' moving towards New York? Scientists puzzled
A mysterious 'hot blob' is moving towards New York City, leaving scientists puzzled. UK scientists have found a massive 'blob' of rock under the Appalachian mountains, and it is headed towards the Big Apple, a study published in the journal Geology claimed. The 'hot blob' heading towards NYC was originally thought to have formed 180 million years ago, when North America had broken away from Africa. New research says different. (X/@newyorkcitykopp) "This thermal upwelling has long been a puzzling feature of North American geology,' Tom Gernon, the study's lead author and Professor of Earth Science at the University of Southampton, said. What is this mysterious 'hot blob'? The 'hot blob' is officially called Northern Appalachian Anomaly (NAA), and lies 125 feet deep underground and extends 220 miles across New England. This was originally thought to have formed 180 million years ago, when North America had broken away from Africa. Now, new research suggests that it appeared only 80 million years back, when the precursor landmasses to Canada and Greenland were splitting apart. 'It lies beneath part of the continent that's been tectonically quiet for 180 million years, so the idea that it was just a leftover from when the landmass broke apart never quite stacked up,' Gernon added. The team, in a study published in the Nature journal, detailed how molten mantle molasses get created when the hot rock, sitting just outside the earth's core, rises to fill cracks in the crust caused by land rifts. Once it cools, the material sinks or 'drips', which causes a ripple effect along lower surfaces of continents. This has been called 'mantle waves'. What scientists know about the 'hot blob' Scientists were able to replicate the formation of a hot blob, 1120 miles northeast of the Appalachians, using a combination of direct geological observations, model plate tectonics and geodynamics, and computer simulations. The blob seems to be moving at a speed of 12 miles every million years. At this rate, it would take the blob 10 to 15 million years to reach New York City. The simulation further showed that the blob might have helped raise the Appalachians. This explains how the mountain range has remained so high, despite erosion over 20 million years. 'Heat at the base of a continent can weaken and remove part of its dense root, making the continent lighter and more buoyant, like a hot air balloon rising after dropping its ballast,' Gernon said, adding, 'This would have caused the ancient mountains to be further uplifted over the past million years.' As per the study, this blob might also be the reason why rare volcanic eruptions bring diamonds to the surface.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Computer science research papers show fastest uptake of AI use in writing, analysis finds
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Researchers analysed the use of large language models in over a million pre-print and published scientific papers between 2020 and 2024, and found the largest, fastest growth in use of the AI systems in computer science papers -- of up to 22 %.Powered by artificial intelligence (AI), large language models are trained on vast amounts of text and can therefore respond to human requests in the natural from Stanford University and other institutes in the US looked at 1,121,912 pre-print papers in the archives 'arXiv' and 'bioRxiv', and published papers across Nature journals from January 2020 to September on how often words commonly used by AI systems appeared in the papers, the team estimated the involvement of a large language model -- ChatGPT in this study -- in modifying content in a research published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour "suggest a steady increase in LLM (large language model) usage, with the largest and fastest growth estimated for computer science papers (up to 22%)."The researchers also estimated a greater reliance on AI systems among pre-print papers in the archive 'bioRxiv' written by authors from regions known to have a lower number of English-language speakers, such as China and continental papers related to mathematics and those published across Nature journals showed a lower evidence of use of AI in modifying content, according to the study team said that shorter papers and authors posting pre-prints more often showed a higher rate of AI use in writing papers, suggesting that researchers trying to produce a higher quantity of writing are more likely to rely on LLMs."These results may be an indicator of the competitive nature of certain research areas and the pressure to publish quickly," the team researchers also looked at a smaller number of papers to understand how scholars disclose use of AI in their inspection of randomly selected 200 computer science papers that were uploaded to the pre-print archive 'arXiv' in February 2024 revealed that "only two out of the 200 papers explicitly disclosed the use of LLMs during paper writing".Future studies looking at disclosure statements might help to understand researchers' motivation for using AI in writing example, policies around disclosing LLM usage in academic writing may still be unclear, or scholars may have other motivations for intentionally avoiding to disclose use of AI, the authors said.A recent study, published in the journal Science, estimated that at least 13% of research abstracts published in 2024 could have taken help from a large language model, as they included more of 'style' words seen to be favoured by these AI from the University of Tubingen, Germany, who analysed more than 15 million biomedical papers published from 2010 to 2024, said that AI models have caused a drastic shift in the vocabulary used in academic writing.
