QS World University Rankings By Subject 2025: Find The Best Universities For Your Chosen Field
Eastern Asian countries such as South Korea, mainland China and Hong Kong SAR have made notable growth with their universities.
Here are the top universities providing the best courses as per the QS World Rankings 2025 for each of the five subject areas.
1. Arts and Humanities
Arts and Humanities include a total of 13 subjects including history, modern languages and performing arts. The number one university providing courses in this subject area is Harvard University, US with an Employer Reputation (ER) of 100, followed by:
University of Oxford, UK with an Employer Reputation of 97.4
University of Cambridge, UK with an Employer Reputation of 96.8
Stanford University, US with 96.5 ER
University of California, US with 89.9 ER
Employer reputation reflects how highly employers worldwide regard a university's graduates.
2. Engineering and Technology
Engineering and Technology comprise of eight individual subjects including Electrical and Electronic, Computer Science and Information Systems and Data science and Artificial Intelligence.
The top university providing the best courses in Engineering and Technology is Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), US with an Employer Reputation ER of 98.2, followed by:
University of Oxford, UK with 97.7 ER
Stanford University, US with 95.8 ER
University of Cambridge, UK with 97.1 ER
ETH Zurich, Switzerland with 91.8 ER
Tsinghua University from China has improved the most this year in this subject area, having jumped four places to seventh position.
3. Life Sciences and Medicine
Life Sciences and Medicine cover nine subjects including Agriculture and Forestry, Nursing, Psychology, Dentistry, Anatomy and Physiology and Veterinary Science.
This year also, UK and US continue to dominate the top 10 of this subject area.
The number one university providing the best courses in Life Sciences and Medicine is Harvard University with an Employer Reputation of 100, followed by:
University of Oxford with an ER of 98.6
Johns Hopkins University, US with 83.2 ER
Stanford University, US with an ER of 97.1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), US with 99.8 ER
4. Natural Sciences
Natural Sciences include nine subjects including Chemistry, Geography, Mathematics, Geophysics and Physics. Out of the top 10 universities in this subject domain, eight of them are from US and UK with ETH Zurich (sixth) and Tsinghua University (10th) as the only exceptions.
The top university providing the best courses in this subject area is Harvard University with an Employer Reputation of 99.8, followed by:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) with 100 ER
University of Oxford with 98.1 ER
University of Cambridge with 97.9 ER
Stanford University with 97.3 ER
5. Social Sciences and Management
Social Sciences and Management cover a total of 16 subjects including Business, Marketing, Law, Accounting and Finance, Communication and Media Studies, Politics, Sociology etc.
The top 10 universities in this subject area are dominated by the US and UK with National University of Singapore (ranked 10th) as the only exception.
Employer Reputation is a key indicator of a university's perceived ability to produce employable graduates.
The number one university providing best courses in this subject area is Harvard University with an Employer Reputation of 100, followed by:
University of Oxford with 97.2 ER
Stanford University with an ER of 95.1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) with 97.2 ER
University of Cambridge with 96.4 ER
Each year, more universities continue to improve and prove their excellence in different subject fields. As per the QS Global Rankings 2025, institutions from Western Asia and the Arab Region have also seen a notable growth in these subject areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 hours ago
- Indian Express
How AI is changing the way we discover cosmic events
Astronomers have recorded what could be the first known case of a massive star exploding while interacting with a black hole, a finding that could potentially lead to the discovery of an entirely new class of stellar explosions. The star, named SN 2023zkd, was first observed in July 2023, in California by the Zwicky Transient Facility. About 730 million light-years away, in a galaxy with minimal star formation activity, the star was detected using artificial intelligence (AI) designed to instantly identify unusual cosmic phenomena. According to a statement, the early warning allowed telescopes in space and around the world to begin observations immediately, capturing the event in its initial stages. Ashley Villar, an associate professor of astronomy at Harvard University and a co-author of the study, stated, '2023zkd shows some of the clearest signs we've seen of a massive star interacting with a companion before explosion. We think this might be part of a whole class of hidden explosions that AI will help us discover.' Initially, the star appeared to be a typical supernova — a bright flare gradually diminishing over time, signalling the death of a substantial star. However, astronomers observed that it brightened again months later. Historical data revealed that the system's brightness had been steadily increasing for nearly four years, or 1,500 days, prior to the explosion. Such an extended pre-explosion phase is uncommon and indicates the star was under considerable gravitational stress. Experts suggest that the most plausible scenario is that the star was caught in the orbit of a black hole. Evidence from light curves and spectra shows the star experienced two significant eruptions in the years before its end, releasing large amounts of gas. The initial light peak of the explosion was caused by the blast wave, while a slower, prolonged collision with a dense, disc-shaped cloud produced a second peak months later. Over time, the black hole's gravitational pull may have caused the star to collapse. The team also hypothesises that the star might have been consumed by the black hole before it could explode naturally. In that case, the supernova's light would have originated from debris colliding with the surrounding gas. Either way, a more massive black hole would result. SN 2023zkd 'is the strongest evidence to date that such close interactions can detonate a star,' said Alexander Gagliano, lead author of the study and a researcher at the Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions. 'We've known for some time that most massive stars are in binaries, but catching one in the act of exchanging mass shortly before it explodes is incredibly rare,' he said. The scientists believe these results demonstrate how AI can identify rare cosmic events in time for detailed scrutiny. They also emphasise the importance of future facilities like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which can survey the entire southern sky every few nights from its location in the Chilean Andes, over the next decade. When paired with real-time AI detection, Rubin Observatory's observations will enable astronomers to better understand the lifecycle of massive stars in binary systems by discovering and analysing more of these uncommon and complex phenomena. 'We're now entering an era where we can automatically detect these rare events as they occur, not just afterwards,' Gagliano stated. 'That means we can finally start linking the way stars live with how they die, and that's incredibly exciting,' he added. A report detailing these findings was published in the Astrophysical Journal on Wednesday, 13 August.
Indian Express
18 hours ago
- Indian Express
AI and astronomy: How artificial intelligence is changing the way we discover cosmic events
Astronomers have recorded what could be the first known case of a massive star exploding while interacting with a black hole, a finding that could potentially lead to the discovery of an entirely new class of stellar explosions. This star, named SN 2023zkd, was first observed in July 2023 in California by the Zwicky Transient Facility. About 730 million light-years away, in a galaxy with minimal star formation activity, the star was detected using innovative artificial intelligence (AI) technology designed to instantly identify unusual cosmic phenomena. According to a statement, the early warning allowed telescopes in space and around the world to begin observations immediately, capturing the event in its initial stages. Ashley Villar, an associate professor of astronomy at Harvard University and a co-author of the study, stated, '2023zkd shows some of the clearest signs we've seen of a massive star interacting with a companion before explosion. We think this might be part of a whole class of hidden explosions that AI will help us discover.' Initially, the star appeared to be a typical supernova — a bright flare gradually diminishing over time, signalling the death of a substantial star. However, astronomers observed that it brightened again months later. Historical data revealed that the system's brightness had been steadily increasing for nearly four years, or 1,500 days, prior to the explosion. Such an extended pre-explosion phase is uncommon and indicates the star was under considerable gravitational stress. Experts suggest that the most plausible scenario is that the star was caught in the orbit of a black hole. Evidence from light curves and spectra shows the star experienced two significant eruptions in the years before its end, releasing large amounts of gas. The initial light peak of the explosion was caused by the blast wave, while a slower, prolonged collision with a dense, disc-shaped cloud produced a second peak months later. Over time, the black hole's gravitational pull may have caused the star to collapse. The team also hypothesises that the star might have been consumed by the black hole before it could explode naturally. In that case, the supernova's light would have originated from debris colliding with the surrounding gas. Either way, a more massive black hole would result. SN 2023zkd 'is the strongest evidence to date that such close interactions can detonate a star,' said Alexander Gagliano, lead author of the study and a researcher at the Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions. 'We've known for some time that most massive stars are in binaries, but catching one in the act of exchanging mass shortly before it explodes is incredibly rare.' The scientists believe these results demonstrate how AI can identify rare cosmic events in time for detailed scrutiny. They also emphasise the importance of future facilities like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which can survey the entire southern sky every few nights from its location in the Chilean Andes, over the next decade. When paired with real-time AI detection, Rubin Observatory's observations will enable astronomers to better understand the lifecycle of massive stars in binary systems by discovering and analysing more of these uncommon and complex phenomena. 'We're now entering an era where we can automatically detect these rare events as they occur, not just afterwards,' Gagliano stated. 'That means we can finally start linking the way stars live with how they die, and that's incredibly exciting,' he added. A report detailing these findings was published in the Astrophysical Journal on Wednesday, 13 August.
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
Wrong Climate Choices? Dog Ownership A Surprising Culprit: Study
It turns out many Americans aren't great at identifying which personal decisions contribute most to climate change. A study recently published by the National Academy of Sciences found that when asked to rank actions, such as swapping a car that uses gasoline for an electric one, carpooling or reducing food waste, participants weren't very accurate when assessing how much those actions contributed to climate change, which is caused mostly by the release of greenhouse gases that happen when fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are burned. "People over-assign impact to pretty low-impact actions such as recycling, and underestimate the actual carbon impact of behaviours much more carbon-intensive, like flying or eating meat," said Madalina Vlasceanu, report co-author and professor of environmental social sciences at Stanford University. The top three individual actions that help the climate, including avoiding plane flights, choosing not to get a dog and using renewable electricity, were also the three that participants underestimated the most. Meanwhile, the lowest-impact actions were changing to more efficient appliances and swapping out light bulbs, recycling, and using less energy on washing clothes. Those were three of the top four overestimated actions in the report. Vlasceanu said marketing focuses more on recycling and using energy-efficient light bulbs than on why flights or dog adoption are relatively bad for the climate, so participants were more likely to give those actions more weight. How the human brain is wired also plays a role. "You can see the bottle being recycled. That's visible. Carbon emissions are invisible to the human eye. So that's why we don't associate emissions with flying," said Jiaying Zhao, who teaches psychology and sustainability at the University of British Columbia. Zhao added it's easier to bring actions to mind that we do more often. "Recycling is an almost daily action, whereas flying is less frequent. It's less discussed," she said. "As a result, people give a higher psychological weight to recycling." Of course, there is also a lot of misleading information. For example, some companies tout the recycling they do while not telling the public about the pollution that comes from their overall operations. "There has been a lot of deliberate confusion out there to support policies that are really out of date," said Brenda Ekwurzel, a climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit. Dogs are big meat eaters, and meat is a significant contributor to climate change. That is because many of the farm animals, which will become food, release methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. Beef is especially impactful, in part because around the world, cattle are often raised on land that was illegally deforested. Since trees absorb carbon dioxide, the most abundant greenhouse gas, cutting them to raise cattle is a double whammy. "People just don't associate pets with carbon emissions. That link is not clear in people's minds," Zhao said. Not all pets are the same, however. Zhao owns a dog and three rabbits. "I can adopt 100 bunnies that will not be close to the emissions of a dog, because my dog is a carnivore," she said. The owner of a meat-eating pet can lower their impact by looking for food made from sources other than beef. Zhao, for example, tries to minimise her dog's carbon footprint by feeding her less carbon-intensive protein sources, including seafood and turkey. Planes emit a lot of carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides, as well as greenhouse gases. Additionally, planes emit contrails, or vapour trails that prevent planet-warming gases from escaping into space. A round-trip economy-class flight on a 737 from New York to Los Angeles produces more than 1,300 pounds of emissions per passenger, according to the International Civil Aviation Organisation, a United Nations agency. Skipping that single flight saves about as much carbon as swearing off eating all types of meat a year, or living without a car for more than three months, according to U.N. estimates. Switching to energy that comes from renewable sources, such as solar and wind, has a large positive impact because such sources don't emit greenhouse gases. Some of the biggest climate decisions individuals can make include how they heat and cool their homes and the types of transportation they use. Switching to renewable energy minimises the impact of both. Recycling is effective at reducing waste headed for landfill, but its climate impact is relatively small because transporting, processing and repurposing recyclables typically rely on fossil fuels. Plus, less than 10% of plastics get recycled, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Other decisions with overestimated impact, including washing clothes in cold water and switching to more efficient light bulbs, are relatively less important. That is because those appliances have a relatively small impact compared to other things, such as plane flights and dogs, so improving on them, while beneficial, has a much more limited influence. Experts say the best way to combat the human tendency to miscalculate climate-related decisions is with more readily available information. Zhao said that people are already more accurate in their estimations than they would have been 10 or 20 years ago because it's easier to learn. The study backs up that hypothesis. After participants finished ranking actions, the researchers corrected their mistakes, and they changed which actions they said they'd take to help the planet. "People do learn from these interventions," Vlasceanu said. "After learning, they are more willing to commit to actually more impactful actions."
