Synopsys Gets Conditional FTC Green Light on $34 Billion Deal
Chip-design company Synopsys Inc. won approval from the Federal Trade Commission for its planned $34 billion buyout of software developer Ansys Inc. after agreeing to sell assets.
According to the FTC, Synopsys will sell optical and photonic software tools to Keysight Technologies Inc., an electronics testing and measurement company. Ansys will also sell a power consumption analysis product to Keysight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
First look: Google's Phone app is getting a tasty Android 16 redesign (APK teardown)
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR An Android Authority teardown has revealed Material 3 Expressive design tweaks coming to Google's Phone app. The visual tweaks currently apply to the incoming call and in-call menus. This comes after we discovered visual changes coming to several other Google apps as well. Google is working on a visual overhaul of Android 16, using its Material 3 Expressive design. We've already spotted a few Google apps with similar tweaks, and we've now uncovered a major overhaul of Google's Phone app. Authority Insights story on Android Authority. Discover You're reading anstory on Android Authority. Discover Authority Insights for more exclusive reports, app teardowns, leaks, and in-depth tech coverage you won't find anywhere else. An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. We cracked open the Phone by Google app (version 177.0.763181107-publicbeta-pixel2024) and enabled the app's redesign. The visual tweaks apply to the incoming call and in-call menus. Check out the gallery below for a comparison. New UI New UI New UI New UI New UI Old UI Old UI Old UI Old UI Old UI The redesigned screens reflect the Material 3 Expressive style, featuring much larger contact names and caller photos. The redesigned app mostly eliminates simple circular buttons too in favor of larger, oval-shaped buttons that change shape when pressed. The answer call button still has the same circular icon, though, but the end call button is much larger and pill-shaped. There are several other smaller tweaks too. These include the omitted 'call from' text on the incoming call screen, the phone number being shown after you answer the call, and the redesigned 'more' menu in line with Material 3 Expressive. The Google Phone app also offers a little animation for your incoming caller's profile picture before you answer the call. Check out a slowed-down version of this and other app animations below. These Google Phone tweaks also come after we discovered Material 3 Expressive changes coming to the Google One, Google Meet, and Google TV apps. We expect plenty more Google apps to get visual changes in the coming months. In any event, we're glad to see Google making progress on redesigning its apps. But you won't necessarily need Android 16 to see these overhauled apps, as we're expecting these app redesigns to be available on earlier Android versions too. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Chainsaw politics: How Elon Musk shot up in Trump orbit before flaming out of DOGE
Elon Musk rose rapidly in the Donald Trump orbit. He played a key role in getting Trump elected. But he became disillusioned with obstacles faced by DOGE. Elon Musk stormed into US politics as President Donald Trump's chainsaw-brandishing sidekick. Four turbulent months later it's the tech tycoon himself on the chopping block. Trump hailed Musk as 'terrific' as he announced that they would hold a joint press conference on Friday as the South African-born magnate leaves the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way,' Trump said on his Truth Social network on Thursday. But the warm words could not hide the open frustrations that Musk, the world's richest man, had expressed in recent weeks about his controversial cost-cutting role for the world's most powerful man. READ | Elon Musk unceremoniously leaves Trump administration after criticising tax bill Once a fixture at the Republican president's side, dressed in T-shirts and MAGA baseball caps, Musk had shown growing disillusionment with the obstacles faced by DOGE even as it cut a brutal swath through the US leaves far short of his original goal of saving $2 trillion, with The Atlantic magazine calculating he saved just one thousandth of that, despite tens of thousands of people losing their jobs. Instead, he will focus on his Space X and Tesla businesses, as well as his goal of colonising Mars. It was all very different at first, as the 53-year-old Musk rose through Trump's orbit as rapidly as one of his rockets - though they have been known to blow up now and again. Musk was the biggest donor to Trump's 2024 election campaign and the pair bonded over right-wing politics and a desire to root out what they believed was a wasteful 'deep state'. DOGE was jokingly named after a 'memecoin', but it was no joke. Young tech wizards who slept in the White House complex shuttered whole government departments. Foreign countries found their aid cut off. Saul Loeb/AFP A shades-wearing Musk brandished a chainsaw at a conservative event, boasting of how easy it was to save money, and separately made what appeared to be a Nazi salute. Soon the man critics dubbed the 'co-president' was constantly at Trump's side. The tycoon appeared with his young son X on his shoulders during his first press conference in the Oval Office. He attended cabinet meetings. He and Trump rode on Air Force One and Marine One together. They watched cage fights together. Many wondered how long two such big egos could coexist. But Trump himself remained publicly loyal to the man he called a 'genius'. One day, the president even turned the White House into a pop-up Tesla dealership after protesters targeted Musk's electric car business. Yet the socially awkward tech magnate also struggled to get a grip on the realities of US politics. The beginning of the end 'started (in) mid-March when there were several meetings in the Oval Office and in the cabinet room where basically Elon Musk got into fights', Elaine Kamarck of the Brookings Institution told AFP. Brendan Smialowski/AFP One shouting match with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent could reportedly be heard throughout the West Wing. Musk publicly called Trump's trade advisor Peter Navarro 'dumber than a sack of bricks'. Nor did Musk's autocratic style and Silicon Valley creed of 'move fast and break things' work well in Washington. The impact on Musk's businesses also began to hit home. A series of Space X launches ended in fiery failures, while Tesla shareholders fumed. Musk started musing about stepping back, saying that 'DOGE is a way of life, like Buddhism' that would carry on without him. Finally, Musk showed the first signs of distance from Trump himself, saying he was 'disappointed' in Trump's recent mega spending bill. Musk also said he would pull back from spending time on politics. The end came, appropriately, in a post by Musk on Wednesday on the X network, which he bought and then turned into a megaphone for his right-wing politics. But Musk's departure might not be the end of the story, said Kamarck. 'I think they genuinely like each other and I think Musk has a lot of money that he can contribute to campaigns if he is so moved. I think there will be a continued relation,' she said.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The End Of Privilege - Has The Dollar Peaked And Can The Euro Replace It
A bunch of American dollars banknotes (1$), US, circa 1985. (Photo by) In the last week, I have fielded questions from audiences in Frankfurt and Dublin on the net effect of Donald Trump's economic policies on investment portfolios. Such is the day to day rhythm of policy chaos that many investors likely overestimate the effect of Trump on markets, and the oddity is that as I write, US equity and bond markets are at roughly the same levels they traded at in March….though investor confidence has taken a battering. Indeed, the luxury of financial markets is that some of the risks that Trump has unleashed can be hedged, whereas it is harder for societies, economies, and the body politic to offset the implications of his behaviour on foreign direct investment flows and the quality of political debate for example. From an investment point of view, I term the net effect of Trump on portfolios as 'The End of Privilege' which is to say that the idea of US assets in general and the dollar in particular befitting from what Giscard d'Estaing had famously referred to as 'exorbitant privilege' is coming to a slow end. In concrete terms we can expect investors to question the role of US Treasuries as a safe haven, and for the dollar to slowly weaken (from a very expensive level) over time. The set of economic policies that Trump is pursuing are confusing and damaging to long term American growth and the fabric of its society (his 'big, beautiful' budget bill will disproportionately favour wealthy over poorer households). Moreover, any sense of accountability has been snuffed out and corruption is shamelessly creeping into public life (Evan Osnos' article in the New Yorker on this topic is excellent). In short, America risks taking on the economic traits of a badly run emerging economy (look at how the Turkish lira and bond market have performed in the past five years as an extreme comparison). To take the long view, Trump has decisively smashed the Bretton Woods system that had elevated the US financial system to be first amongst equals. The Bretton Woods conference was a tussle between Britain and America to shape the new world financial order and with it, bodies like the IMF. The US was very much the winner, and effectively the meeting formalised the transfer of 'world power' from Britain to the US, or as Keynes (Britain's chief negotiator) wrote to his mother 'In another year's time we shall have forfeited the claim we had staked out in the New World and in exchange this country will be mortgaged to America'. Keynes job was to negotiate a deal for Britain that would rescue it from 'losing face altogether and appearing to capitulate completely to dollar diplomacy.' From this point onwards, American financial dominance grew, manifested in the broad international use of its currency which has risen to a very particular place as the linchpin of the financial system. Indeed, one of the most important tenets of the twentieth-century world order and the rise of globalization has been the position of the dollar as the international reserve currency. The dollar has become so important to the financial system, that two economists (Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas and Hélène Rey) have taken the notion of 'exorbitant privilege' a step further in a relatively recent paper, and introduced the idea of 'exorbitant duty', which refers to the role that the dollar and US financial system play in times of crisis as the provider of a safe haven, even when those crises emanate from the US itself. Alarmingly, there is a section in the trump budget (sec. 899) that permits the administration to tax holders of US assets in certain circumstances, which can only erode confidence further. The question then is which assets and currencies stand to benefit from a less 'privileged dollar'. First, my sense is that when something goes wrong in emerging countries like Turkey, capital flows to countries like Switzerland (simply because much of it is held by a small number of individuals). As far as much greater institutional flows are concerned, the obvious destination should be the euro-zone. But, this is not the case. At the end of 2024, I spent a week in Singapore and also the UAE and was surprised by the number of investors who considered the euro-zone as barely investable, this might reflect some ignorance on their part, but it is also redolent of a greater problem of international credibility for the euro-zone. In that context I was interested to see that Christine Lagarde, the president of the ECB gave a very good speech on currencies in Berlin on Monday 26th, entitled 'Earning Influence – lessons from the history of international currencies'. In the speech she noted three properties of dominant currencies – they are issued by large economies (zones), they have deep pools of financial assets which foreigners can buy and they are backed by sound legal systems. There are two important contemporaneous facets to the speech – the first is the expectation that the actions of the Trump administration will structurally weaken the dollar and the second is the very grown-up admission by the ECB president that the euro-zone (Bulgaria will become a member in 2026) has failed to deepen its capital markets and become the provider of safe assets in an increasingly unsafe world. The backdrop to these comments is a renewed push by the euro-zone on capital markets union, or the savings and investment union (SIU) as it is now called. In essence it has three components – single regulators across EU financial services, the creation of poles of expertise in different EU financial capitals (i.e. Amsterdam is the equity hub, Paris is where PE is, etc) and the sanctioning of retail savings and pensions flows into private assets. In many respects, SIU is a strange phenomenon – a policy critical to the future of Europe that most Europeans have very little attention span for (who would blame them). Apart from the releasing of hundreds of billions of euros in German savings banks for example, into private and private investments, what Europe also needs is a structural shift in the appetite for risk. For that to happen, we might need a European Donald Trump.
