
EPA weighing how to address Lake County asbestos contamination; ‘It's a pretty isolated location'
Currently inaccessible to the public both by physical means — there is a fence — and an EPA ruling, Dave Nadel, the EPA's community involvement coordinator for Region 5, which includes the Chicago area, said he is in the process of finalizing the decision-making.
Adjacent to the Johns Manville EPA Superfund site, Nadel said the contamination occurred years ago — likely in the 1940s or 1950s — before it became part of the nature preserve in 1964. Not part of Manville's property, dumping occurred in the past. The discovery of asbestos was more recent.
'It came to the surface through freeze cycle,' Neal said, referring to the ground freezing and thawing as the seasons change. 'We will decide on remediation and disposal.'
Twice in June the EPA came to Waukegan — June 4 and 26 — to learn the public's ideas about how to handle the site.
The EPA is in the process of preparing the Record of Decision Document on Operable Area 6 of the Superfund site, which is the southwest portion of the nature preserve, with a goal of finishing it by fall.
Presenting three options for public comment during both the June 4 and 26 meetings, one would be no action at all, another is periodic disposal of the asbestos with all public restrictions remaining in place, according to EPA documents. The projected cost is $554,000.
A third option, which Nadel said is the preferred method, is much more detailed. There will be regular removal of asbestos by properly licensed personnel both before and after controlled burns, or after any wildfire that may occur. There will be an air monitoring program.
Existing institutional controls will remain, like restricted access and land-use controls to limit disturbance activities, according to the EPA documents. Any access requires physical protective equipment and 'asbestos awareness training.' The forecast cost is $967,000.
Additional hazard warning signage will be placed around the area's perimeter, according to the documents. Enhanced work project practices during burns, like 'wet method mop-up' and masks, will be part of the program. All removal will be done by hand and taken to approved landfills.
Mayra Mendez, the executive director of Clean Power Lake County, an environmental activist organization, said at the June 27 meeting that her group prefers the enhanced method. Though she wants to see the entire Superfund site gone — not just Operable Area 6 — it provides the most protection.
'We have a lot of endangered spaces that affect our health,' Mendez said. 'The enhanced plan is the best, and the community deserves mitigation in this environmental-justice community.'
Not the only public official at the meeting, Nadel was joined by representatives of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, the Illinois Department of Public Health, the Lake County Health Department and the Illinois Nature Preserve Commission.
A.J. Burlingham, an environmental health specialist with the state Health Department, said he was at the public information session to answer questions people may have about the impact of inhaling asbestos.
'The likelihood is very low at this site,' Burlingham said. 'It's a pretty isolated location that's been unavailable to the public for a long time. It's not like they had an opportunity to breathe much there.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
3 days ago
- Washington Post
Takeaways from AP's report on water quality and safety at US mobile home parks
More than 50 years after the Safe Drinking Water Act was passed to assure Americans of safe water, millions of people living in mobile home parks can't always count on those basic protections. The Associated Press examined an Environmental Protection Agency database on violations by water systems across the country, ranging from the tiniest up to major metropolitan areas. AP also surveyed states for their oversight of water systems.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Florida gets failing grade in new plastic pollution report, calls for stronger action
The Brief A new report from the Ocean Conservancy is giving the United States a failing grade when it comes to fighting plastic pollution. The report comes as new studies show microplastics are increasingly being found in the human body, raising alarms among health professionals. TAMPA, Fla. - A new report from the Ocean Conservancy is giving the United States a failing grade when it comes to fighting plastic pollution. The environmental non-profit gave the Sunshine State a 1.5 out of 5 stars for its current efforts, saying there's significant room for improvement. The release coincides with Plastic Free July, a global campaign urging individuals and governments to cut down on single-use plastics. READ: EPA's research and development office eliminated; thousands laid off What they're saying "Four out of five Americans want to see plastics addressed," said JP Brooker, the director of the Florida Conservation Program at Ocean Conservancy. "And yet, we're only giving states an average score of 1.5 out of 5 stars." Florida earned some points in the report for steps like banning intentional balloon releases and allowing communities to ban smoking on beaches, which helps reduce litter. But, Brooker said the state still has a major roadblock: It prevents local governments from banning single-use plastic items like bags and utensils. Dig deeper Brooker said plastic pollution isn't just an environmental issue, it's also a threat to Florida's economy. MORE: Governor DeSantis signs deal to speed up Florida Everglades restoration projects He also advocates for Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) laws, already passed in seven states, that require manufacturers to help manage the waste they create. Big picture view Florida isn't alone in its low score. The Ocean Conservancy's report found that about 90% of states failed to meet basic standards for plastic waste reduction. "The U.S. is the world's number one generator of plastic waste," Brooker said. "We need to embrace a circular economy, where plastics are reused and recycled, not just thrown away." Currently, the UN is working on global trade to reduce plastic pollution. READ: Temple Terrace residents raise concerns over cancer-causing chemicals in drinking water Why you should care The report comes as new studies show microplastics are increasingly being found in the human body, raising alarms among health professionals. "The problem is even worse now," said Dr. David Berger, a Tampa-based pediatrician. "It's already in our water supply. It's in our food. Even if people start avoiding plastics today, it's still everywhere." The Ocean Conservancy's report compiled the top ten items collected on Florida beaches. The top three items were the following: Cigarettes Butts Plastic bottle caps Food wrappers Plastics straws came in at No. 7. Despite awareness campaigns, cigarette butts have remained the number one item for years, highlighting the ongoing challenge of changing public habits. The Source The information in this story was gathered by FOX 13's Genevieve Curtis. Solve the daily Crossword


Forbes
6 days ago
- Forbes
Leading The Way On Curbside Composting: What It Takes To Succeed
Composting redirects organic waste from landfills, replenishes nutrients in the soil and reduces ... More dependency on chemical fertilizers. When it comes to sustainability, many Americans separate their aluminum cans from their trash without a second thought. But when it comes to food scrap composting – arguably a more impactful climate action than recycling – most households still default to the trash can. Despite mounting evidence of its environmental and economic benefits, curbside composting remains far from mainstream. Editor of BioCycle Nora Goldstein According to BioCycle's 2023 residential food waste collection access survey, only 12% of U.S. households have access to municipally-supported composting, which can include curbside collection or drop-off locations. The Sustainable Packaging Coalition estimates that at least 27% of the U.S. population has access to some form of composting when paid subscription services are included. 'We have a long way to go,' said Nora Goldstein, editor of BioCycle and a decades-long tracker of composting infrastructure in the U.S. 'The easy default for jurisdictions is still just to collect all commingled trash, rather than separate organics that can be composted.' According to the EPA, food waste is the single largest category of material sent to landfills and incinerators, where it generates methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Food waste is the source of more than half of landfill greenhouse gas emissions. Composting redirects organic waste from landfills, replenishes nutrients in the soil and reduces dependency on chemical fertilizers. Economic benefits include lower waste hauling fees and job creation, and finished compost is sold or given away as natural soil amendment for residential and commercial use. Soil degradation and poor soil health are causing significant problems worldwide. So why haven't more cities made curbside composting easier, or even mandatory? Curbside Composting Is Growing, But Access Lags California and Vermont are the only two states that currently mandate some form of household curbside composting access; Washington state's law becomes effective in 2030. But even those laws have their limits. Vermont's composting program is mainly drop-off in centralized locations, rather than curbside. In California, many jurisdictions have struggled to comply with the state's 2022 mandate. Meanwhile, large cities like San Francisco and New York have led the way. New York City recently expanded its curbside composting program citywide and mandated composting compliance effective April 1, 2025, subject to fines. Yet even in jurisdictions where access exists, participation is another story. 'There's a big difference between access and participation,' Goldstein said, explaining that it's not just about handing people an organics collection bin. 'Successful programs are the ones that invest in ongoing outreach and education and treat it as an essential service, not an optional nice-to-have.' Behavior, Not Just Curbside Composting Bins Strategic communications expert Mimi Shah Strategic communications expert Mimi Shah, Principal at Amplify for Change, has seen firsthand what drives – or blocks – household participation in curbside composting. 'A lot of people hesitate to compost for pretty basic reasons,' Shah said. 'They think they don't have space for it in their kitchen, they worry it'll smell, or they're afraid it'll attract pests. But with a little awareness and education, those usually fade.' Goldstein and Shah both emphasized that curbside composting behavior change follows the familiar Rogers innovation adoption curve, and that convincing innovators and early adopters before the general population is most effective. 'You need good policies and consistent messaging that make it feel normal, or even expected, to separate food scraps,' Shah said. 'Fee structures or fines can help tip the scales. And one of the biggest levers is social influence.' Curbside Composting Greenwashing and Misconceptions As curbside composting becomes more visible, so do misleading claims and ineffective tools. Some devices sold as electric countertop composters and 'compostable' packaging that isn't third-party certified are often more marketing than science. 'Greenwashing isn't so much at the municipal level, it's vendors that are taking advantage of growing interest in food scraps and recycling collection,' Goldstein said, noting that there is no oversight of vendors' claims. A comprehensive solution is one that includes smart shopping to reduce food waste to begin with, and composting what can't be consumed. What Will It Take Make Curbside Composting Mainstream? To bring curbside composting into the mainstream, the path is clear: enforceable mandates, consistent education, scalable infrastructure, and smart policies that shift both cost and culture. But perhaps most of all, it takes time and a normalization of the idea that food scraps aren't trash. 'Once folks build the habit,' Shah said, 'it becomes second nature. And honestly, it starts to feel unnatural to throw food scraps in the trash.' In the end, that cultural shift – where tossing food scraps in the trash feels weird – may be the tipping point curbside composting needs. And that's exactly the kind of weird the planet needs. Did you enjoy this story on curbside composting? Don't miss my next column: use the blue 'follow' button at the top of the article near my byline to follow my work, and check out my other columns here.