How Safe is Cape Town? City records R9.5bn spend on infrastructure, safety and security
In his 30 July address to City Council, Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis announced that Cape Town invested R9.5 billion in infrastructure in the 2024/25 financial year — the most ever spent by a South African metro.
With 92% of the capital budget delivered, it's a rare feat in South Africa's current municipal landscape.
And at the heart of this record spending? Safety and Security.
Reclaiming the city, street by street
South Africa is often perceived as a risky travel destination, with concerns about violent crime and safety dominating international headlines, despite significant variation in actual risk across regions and cities.
With 99.7% of its R472 million capital budget spent, the City's Safety and Security Directorate was the year's top performer, directing funds toward upgraded fire stations, new vehicles, metro police training facilities, and advanced safety tech like CCTV, bodycams and digital systems.
'This performance really speaks to their intent to do whatever it takes to make our city safer and take back our neighbourhoods from criminals,' said Mayor Hill-Lewis.
There has been a strategic push to make security more visible and responsive, with over 700 new municipal police officers - including ward-based officers and specialised teams to protect infrastructure and service delivery workers planned under the upcoming 2025/26 'Invested in Hope' budget.
Broader Crime Trends & Safety Interventions
With the City's substantial investment in safety and security, the key question remains: has it made Cape Town's streets any safer? Encouragingly, Western Cape crime statistics for the third quarter of 2024/2025 show a notable decline across several key categories
Overall murder rate: Dropped 8% in Q3 of 2024/25, though absolute numbers remain high (1,095 vs 1,198 cases year-on-year).
Significant decreases in murder rates were reported in Gugulethu, Khayelitsha and Nyanga.
In the Cape Town CBD, the Central City Improvement District (CCID) reported over a 50% drop in robbery, theft, and shoplifting between November and January, thanks to visible patrols by 323 Public Safety Officers complemented by law enforcement operations.
Other notable crime decreases included:
- 12% decrease in attempted murder
- 5% decrease in sexual offences
- 7% decrease in common robbery
- 14% decrease in carjacking
Investing in the basics that make cities safer
While safety tech and boots on the ground are critical, Cape Town's broader investment strategy reflects an understanding that infrastructure is safety. A reliable water system, working streetlights, unclogged drains and efficient public transport all create an environment where communities can thrive and crime struggles to take root.
Highlights from the infrastructure investment include:
R4 billion spent by Water & Sanitation, with 95% of budget executed — including pipe replacements, pump station upgrades and future drought-proofing measures.
R3.5 billion earmarked for road upgrades and congestion relief in the coming years.
R1 billion set aside for streetlight repair and upgrades — a key deterrent to crime, particularly in vulnerable areas.
R4.5 billion committed to the MyCiTi South-East Corridor, linking Khayelitsha and Mitchells Plain to Wynberg/Claremont.
R3.4 billion for informal settlement upgrades, and R2 billion for Community Residential Unit (CRU) improvements.
'We are building Cape Town, project by project, into a city of hope,' said Hill-Lewis. 'One with a growing economy that is able to absorb many more people into work.'
Cape Town's record-breaking performance comes at a time when many other South African metros are buckling and eroding public trust. While challenges remain, especially in high-crime neighbourhoods and informal settlements, the trend is clear: Cape Town is not just talking safety; it's building it.
Safety Tips for Travellers to Cape Town
Cape Town is a vibrant, world-class destination, but like many global cities, it's not immune to crime. Here are a few practical tips to help you stay safe and street-smart during your next visit.
Stay alert in busy or crowded areas
Cape Town's CBD and popular tourist zones (such as Long Street, Greenmarket Square, and transport hubs) can attract pickpockets and opportunistic thieves, especially in crowded conditions. Keep your belongings close, zipped up, and ideally in front of you.
Don't display valuables openly
Cell‑phone snatching is a common petty crime, often carried out by quick grab-and-run tactics on sidewalks or near intersections. Avoid walking with your phone out or holding it loosely, particularly in quieter or unfamiliar areas.
Theft from vehicles is a well-known issue, including in parts of the inner city, mountain hike parking areas, and beachfront spots. Always lock your car and never leave bags, jackets, or chargers in plain sight - even for a quick stop.
Avoid walking alone at night. Use ride-hailing apps like Uber, especially after dark, and plan your route in advance to steer clear of less secure areas.
Stay aware, not afraid
While Cape Town has its share of challenges, the risk of petty crime is similar to that in many major cities worldwide. Most visits are incident-free, especially when travellers exercise common sense, avoid high-risk areas, and stay informed through local advice or hotel staff.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
NSW cop reveals chilling reason officers touch your car boot when they pull you over
A NSW police officer has explained the deliberate reason why officers touch a vehicle after pulling it over -and it's all about safety. Sergeant Steven Planinic told listeners of Nova FM 's Fitzy and Wippa with Kate Ritchie that officers often leave their fingerprints on a car before walking back to their patrol vehicle, and it's no accident. The explanation came after a listener named Gemma from Parramatta asked: 'Why is it when you've pulled someone over you tap the car and leave your fingerprints as you walk off back to your police car?' she asked. He confirmed the move is about leaving fingerprints on the pulled-over vehicle. 'I'll let you use your imagination as to why we would leave bits of ourselves on someone's car,' he said. The sergeant went on to explain that if something goes wrong and the driver flees, 'you've left something, a marker on that car that they can't refute.' Mr Planinic confirmed the 'deliberate' act was not just about a police officer's safety. He also revealed the simple move is used to make 'sure the boot's secured so that no one jumps out of it'. He was asked whether a driver should drive through a red light to make way for a police car approaching quickly from behind. The officer confirmed drivers should only ever move out the way if they can do so without crossing the line. Mr Planinic is the founder of Beat the Blue, a yearly event which gives drivers the opportunity to face off against NSW Police Force highway patrol officers. The event returns on Saturday and takes place at the Sydney Motorsport Park.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Fort Stewart army base shooting raises questions about military gun policies
A shooting that injured five soldiers at one of the country's largest military bases on Wednesday has resurfaced questions about a long-standing army policy that largely prevents service members from carrying personal weapons on military installations. Soldiers in the area who witnessed the shooting at Fort Stewart in Georgia 'immediately and without hesitation' tackled the shooter to subdue him before law enforcement arrived, Brigadier Gen. John Lubas said at a news conference Wednesday. But they didn't have firearms to shoot back because of a policy first enacted decades ago to ensure safety by limiting armed members on army bases to military police. The suspect in the shooting, logistics Sgt. Quornelius Radford, used a personal weapon, Lubas said. Questions about why soldiers didn't have weapons were buzzing online after at least one video of the incident on social media appears to show service members in uniform running to safety amid a lockdown that lasted about an hour, instead of firing back at the shooter. While some have questioned why many service members in the area during the shooting didn't use weapons to defend themselves, others have questioned whether existing regulations do enough to prevent shootings on bases. The shooting is the latest in a growing list of violent incidents at American military installations over the years — some claiming upward of a dozen lives. Experts say that there are reasons for long-standing regulations on military bases, despite their limitations. Department of Defense policy in place for decades Department of Defense policy prohibits military personnel from carrying personal weapons on base without permission from a senior commander, and there is a strict protocol for how the firearm must be stored. Typically, military personnel must officially check their guns out of secure storage to go to on-base hunting areas or shooting ranges, and then check all firearms back in promptly after its sanctioned use. Military police are often the only armed personnel on base, outside of shooting ranges, hunting areas or in training, where soldiers can wield their service weapons without ammunition. The federal policy leaves little room for local commanders to use discretion about how the policy is enforced. That means the regulation applies even in Georgia, a state with some of the most lax gun regulations in the country, where Fort Stewart is located. Designed to protect national security Robert Capovilla, a founding partner for one of the largest military law firms in the country, strongly believes in the Second Amendment. But he said that the strict firearm policies on military bases exist for a reason. 'A lot of these installations are involved in top-secret operations, dealing with top-secret information, and because of that you need a heightened security," said Capovilla, a former military prosecutor and defense attorney. 'You simply don't want folks walking around a federal installation with personal weapons.' He said he has traveled to 'nearly every single major military installation' in North America for his work. Whenever he visits an installation, he said armed military police have a visible presence almost constantly on base. He added that he doesn't believe Wednesday's shooting could have been prevented if military personnel had been armed at the time. Limitations to military gun regulation Firearms on military bases are more regulated than most states in some ways, according to former military prosecutor and defense counsel Eric Carpenter. But he said that the limitations on gun control on military bases parallel gun policy debates in the public more broadly. 'You don't forfeit all of your rights when you enter the military,' Carpenter said. ' Outside of a military situation, the service member has just as much Second Amendment right as anyone else.' For example, it could be fairly straightforward for a service member living off-base to bring a weapon onto the military installation, Carpenter said, because a senior commander can't regulate gun ownership off base. There is also scant legal ground for leadership to confiscate a gun when a service member is exhibiting signs of a mental health crisis or post-traumatic stress disorder, potentially posing a threat to themselves or others. In recent years, those gaps have come under more scrutiny because of mass shootings, he said. 'All those rules aren't going to prevent someone from doing what the guy did today,' Carpenter said.
The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
Giant signs painted on Oxford street warn Londoners to get off their phones amid record high snatches
PEDESTRIANS in London's top shopping district are being warned to get off their phones by giant signs painted on the street – after theft rates soared to record highs. Electrical retailer Currys painted purple lines along Oxford Street to remind shoppers to step back from the kerb and keep their mobiles hidden from e-bike thieves. The move is modelled on the Tube's iconic yellow 'mind the gap' lines. It is part of a campaign to help drive down phone thefts on packed high streets. We revealed earlier this year how a phone was stolen on average every seven minutes in the capital last year. The thefts usually involve criminals on mopeds snatching phones straight from people's hands on busy pavements before speeding off. New anti-theft signage will also be installed on Oxford Street – the home of Marks and Spencer's and Adidas ' flagship stores – as part of the 'Mind the Grab' campaign. It has been backed by Westminster Council, the Metropolitan Police, and the charity Crimestoppers. Ed Connolly, the chief commercial officer at Currys, said: ' Phone theft isn't just about losing a device. It's frightening, invasive, and cuts people off from their loved ones, their money, and their daily lives. 'Enough is enough. It's time to draw the line on phone theft (with) a bold pavement marking we believe can make a real difference by encouraging people to step back from the kerb.' Westminster Council has granted permission for the study to be tried on one of the capital's busiest streets. Deputy leader Aicha Less said: 'This campaign is a great example of how we are working with partners to raise awareness about phone thefts and promote simple measures to stay safe in public spaces, such as keeping valuables out of sight and planning routes home in advance.' 1 Met Police seize 1,000 stolen phones in a week and arrest 230 people
