Blake Lively Could Be Part of Taylor Swift's Next Song, but There's a Catch, Says Source
Now, as reported by Rob Shuter's #ShuterScoop, the 'Gossip Girl' alum has been preparing herself as she may find herself becoming a topic in Swift's next song. And, it's allegedly not going to be a positive one.
Blake Lively is 'terrified' Taylor Swift will make her a subject of her next song, says source
Blake Lively is reportedly worried sick that her once BFF, Taylor Swift, will make her a part of her next song. The 'Cruel Summer' singer's songs often take inspiration from her real life. Now that her friendship with Lively has allegedly become sour, she may become a subject matter of her lyrics in her upcoming songs.
Per Rob Shuter's #ShuterScoop, a 'source' told them 'Taylor's been distancing herself since the legal stuff started blowing up.' The person continued, 'Now Blake is terrified she'll be the subject of a song.' They then added, 'and not the flattering kind.'
An 'insider' from pop culture further said that Blake Lively 'went from being Taylor's inner-circle icon to a ghosted contact.' The person also claimed, 'And with Taylor, when you're out… you're a verse away from being dragged.' Meanwhile, a mutual friend told the news outlet that 'Blake's smart enough to know the lyrics before they drop.' 'And she's scared they'll rhyme with 'betrayal'', the person added.
Previously, Taylor Swift and Blake Lively often made headlines for being spotted together at different public events. However, the two celebrities have not been seen together for quite some time now. Neither Taylor Swift nor Blake Lively has made any comments on the matter of their friendship as of now.
The post Blake Lively Could Be Part of Taylor Swift's Next Song, but There's a Catch, Says Source appeared first on Reality Tea.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
19 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
‘Weapons' Runs to Big $70M Global Opening in Debut Weekend
'Are you watching?' asks a creepy voice in the trailer for Weapons. And the answer to that question is a resounding 'yes.' Per Variety, Zach Cregger's sophomore outing earned $70 million worldwide. Domestically, its $42.5 million take was $10 million ahead of projections, and its overall take marks another win for New Line and parent company Warner Bros. Since Minecraft's release in April, the studio has been on a money making hot streak thanks to Final Destination Bloodlines, F1: The Movie, Sinners, and Superman. Like several of those movies, Weapons has had a lot of momentum behind it thanks to its intriguing trailers and glowing pre-release buzz. Audiences sure seem to agree, since it's got an 'A-' consensus on CinemaScore, which is rare for a horror movie. For the family-focused crowd—well, the other part of that crowd, since Weapons is about missing kids—Freakier Friday also did pretty well. Disney's legacy sequel starring Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis made $44.5 million worldwide, led largely by its domestic take of $29 million. This one has also been marketed pretty heavily in recent months, and has the added bonus of bringing back much of the 2003 film's cast and introducing new blood in Manny Jacinto, Sophia Hammons, and Julia Butters, the latter of whom get their bodies swapped with Lohan and Curtis. Meanwhile, older releases like Superman and Fantastic Four: First Steps continue to make some money. Analyst Luiz Fernando reports the Marvel Studios pic added $17.5 million to its international take in its third weekend, bringing its worldwide total to $434.2 million. Despite a 55.8% drop, it's now earned more than Thunderbolts ($382.4 million) and Captain America: Brave New World ($415.3 million), and will likely to reach $490-510 million when all is said and done. And Superman continues to hold strong with $578.8 million worldwide. After becoming the highest-grossing domestic Superman movie last week, it's poised to make (or exceed) $600 million worldwide before it hits streaming on August 26. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sharon Stone on the Moment Robert De Niro ‘Crossed a Line' Filming ‘Casino'
For Sharon Stone, the ultimate dream come true was working with Robert De Niro in 'Casino.' She told Business Insider that she auditioned for De Niro movies 'many times' before she was cast in the 1994 Martin Scorsese classic. Stone had even told an acting teacher years prior that her career goal was to 'work with De Niro and hold my own.' But when Stone finally realized what she called 'the apex,' De Niro ended up setting Stone off while shooting one of the movie's most electric verbal sparring sessions. The 'Basic Instinct' actress recalled, 'There's a scene in the movie where we're sitting across a table arguing, and he says to me, 'You're a good actress, you know that?' And I remember in that scene when he said it, how furious it made me because it was my dream to do it, and then he challenged me at the table. I remember thinking, 'Oh, you crossed a line today, mister.'' More from IndieWire George Clooney Says 'Playing Yourself' Is 'Hard to Do,' Calls 'Jay Kelly' Co-Star Adam Sandler 'Soulful Actor' 'Garbo, by Joan Crawford' - Rare BBC Documentary Resurfaces: Here's How to Watch in the U.S. The challenge, though, ended up bringing layers to the scene and the relationship between the characters. 'He knew every button to go for with me because he is the greatest observational actor. He can crawl under your skin and get in there,' Stone said. It all paid off for Stone, who landed a Best Actress Academy Award nomination for her work in 'Casino.' Stone will next appear in Universal's 'Nobody 2,' the Bob Odenkirk-starring action sequel that adds not just Stone, but also Colin Hanks and John Ortiz to its roster. In discussing her role, described as the film's antagonist, she said she came close to turning it down. 'I just don't want to play a cookie-cutter villain, which is something that I really have a thing about,' she said. The hesitation comes after what she felt was typecasting after her turn as a sultry femme fatale in 'Basic Instinct.' 'But that was not cookie-cutter; it was a villain that touched upon the zeitgeist of the moment,' Stone said. 'That was why it was so specifically successful, and why it remains interesting to watch.' 'Basic Instinct,' too, has a follow-up (or a reboot? or a remake?) in development over at Amazon MGM Studios. In a statement to IndieWire, screenwriter Joe Eszterhas said, 'To those who question what an 80-year-old man is doing writing a sexy, erotic thriller: The rumors of my cinematic impotence are exaggerated and ageist. I call my writing partner the TWISTED LITTLE MAN and he lives somewhere deep inside me. He was born 29 and he will die 29 and he tells me he is 'sky high up' to write this piece and provide viewers with a wild and orgasmic ride. That makes me very happy.' Rumors suggest Stone might join for this new 'anti-woke' 'Basic Instinct,' as she did for its misbegotten 2006 sequel. Meanwhile, 'Nobody' will hit theaters August 15. Watch the trailer below. Best of IndieWire Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See 'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie Nicolas Winding Refn's Favorite Films: 37 Movies the Director Wants You to See Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Phil blasts outrage over Sydney Sweeney ads, plans to buy American Eagle jeans for every woman in his family
"Jews were massacred and murdered, and they equate that to a blue jeans ad for a Hollywood actress?" he said of the response to the campaign. "What an insult." Dr. Phil McCraw is defending Sydney Sweeney amid the ongoing backlash to her controversial American Eagle ad campaign. The TV personality was asked to give his two cents on the issue during his Friday visit to Real Time with Bill Maher, which saw the titular host complain about the reaction to Sweeney's ad. "Sydney Sweeney came out as — not came out — she was exposed as a Republican," Maher began. "And she has the big jeans ad that was controversial. And they reported this like it was a scandal, [that] she's a Republican. I just got to say this is not where I want America to go. It is not a slur that someone is a Republican." Dr. Phil agreed, slamming the outrage Sweeney's ad has received. "For people to go crazy over that ad [that says] 'she's got good genes,' and for them to say that's the equivalent of the Holocaust, is an absolute insult," McCraw said. "Six million people were killed. Six million Jews were massacred and murdered, and they equate that to a blue jeans ad for a Hollywood actress? What an insult." He continued, "That is ridiculous. I'm gonna go out and buy those jeans for every woman in my family, everybody I know just to show support." Though Maher agreed with the sentiment, he wasn't onboard with McCraw's plan to buy American Eagle jeans for every woman he knows. "That's a little creepy," he observed. Dr. Phil only doubled down, replying, "You should go buy 10 pairs of those jeans and just throw them out the window to everybody you know. Do everything you can to support that company and not let them get cancelled because of that ad." Maher laughed, "Don't be buying jeans for the women." The outrage emerged in response to American Eagle pairing blonde and blue eyed Sweeney with the tagline, "has great jeans/genes." The campaign's most criticized promo features the actress reclining on a couch and fastening her jeans as she murmurs, "Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color. My genes are blue." Then a male narrator adds, "Sydney Sweeney has great jeans." The social media response was loud and immediate, with some accusing the campaign of dog-whistling white supremacy, and espousing antisemitic ideology. "It's more than a cheeky wordplay, it's a dog whistle," one TikTok user, jessbritvich said in a video. "In this ad... it's saying that Sydney has a great body and therefore great genes, a product of genetic superiority. Specifically saying these white, thin, traditionally feminine bodies are not just aspirational but symbols of morality, tradition, purity." She added, "It's echoing the language of white purity politics, and purity of blond hair and blue eyes. This language has cultural context... No, I really don't think this is an accident."The criticisms picked up yet more steam following reports that Sweeney is a registered Republican, prompting her to gain the support of President Donald Trump, who said, "If Sydney Sweeney is a registered Republican, I think her ad is fantastic!" In response, conservative pundits like Maher have slammed the outrage as an overreaction from liberals. Sweeney herself has yet to formally address the accusation that the American Eagle ad espouses eugenics ideology, though the brand eventually issued a statement, claiming the ad "is and always was about the jeans." The statement added, "We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone." Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly
