
New Orleans archbishop appears in court during contentious clergy sexual abuse bankruptcy case
'I'm here because I'm concerned for the survivors,' Gregory Aymond said in an interview with WWL Louisiana away from the cameras after what is believed to have been his first appearance in person for an open court hearing in the five years since his archdiocese – one of the US's oldest – joined roughly 40 Catholic institutions to file for bankruptcy protection amid the worldwide church's long ongoing clergy molestation scandal.
'And we want to make sure it's reasonable expectations for what we can give them and to make sure the process proceeds.'
But James Adams, a survivor of child sexual abuse by a Catholic priest stationed in New Orleans and the former chairperson of a committee representing survivors, questioned why Aymond hadn't shown up to previous hearings.
'If he was concerned for survivors, truly, I think there would have been a lot of things done differently from the beginning, unfortunately,' Adams said.
Aymond also acknowledged that the bankruptcy he filed for the archdiocese on 1 May 2020 has dragged on too long and prevented abuse survivors from being compensated.
'We want that wait to end as soon as possible,' Aymond said. '[Survivors] have had terrible crimes committed against them, and we want to make sure to respect them and the pain they've been through. One way to do that is to expedite negotiations.'
Aymond declined to answer additional questions or to comment on camera outside the courthouse.
He didn't say anything in court on Friday either – but sat and listened quietly from the gallery as attorneys representing about 200 of the 600 abuse claimants blasted the settlement plan proposed days earlier, including one who called the deal 'dead on arrival'. Since the basic outline of the proposed settlement was announced on Wednesday, proponents and opponents have been jockeying for position and laying the groundwork for a vote by all claimants to confirm or reject it, which is expected this fall.
Two-thirds of everyone making a claim in the church's bankruptcy must agree to the settlement terms for it to be finalized.
The full details of the deal proposed on Wednesday haven't been presented yet. But it would provide $130m in cash and up to $110m more from insurance carriers and potential church property sales. That's about $100m short of a similar church bankruptcy case in Long Island, New York, cited by both sides as a good precedent for the New Orleans case, which was recently settled and finalized for $323m.
The Long Island settlement, between the archdiocese of Rockville Centre and about 600 abuse survivors, netted the claimants there an average of about $540,000. Under the terms disclosed this week, survivors in New Orleans would get between $300,000 and $383,000 per claim, on average. The amount paid to each claimant depends on a formula based on the severity and evidence of abuse, among other factors.
Even after five years, both the church and negotiating survivors say they still need more time to hammer out details before bringing the proposed agreement to an official vote of all 600 survivors and other creditors.
The attorneys who spoke against the proposal in court on Friday – Soren Gisleson and Taylor Townsend – said they and associated attorneys represent more than 180 survivors, and they believe there are others who are as dedicated to voting to stop the deal. They hope to return their clients' cases to individual lawsuits for damages against the church in state court, which were stopped five years ago when the church sought bankruptcy protection.
'This deal is never going to get passed,' Gisleson said in front of Judge Meredith Grabill. 'They don't have the votes. And they're never going to get the votes.'
Jim Stang, the lead attorney for the survivors' committee that negotiated the proposed deal, bristled at those assertions, saying he's handled many other complex bankruptcies, including the Rockville Centre archdiocese on Long Island – and the proposal this week was something the two sides could build on.
'This is far from over. This is a starting point,' Stang said.
In an interview with WWL, Adams said: 'The starting point, if my math is correct, was five years ago.'
Rick Kuebel, another attorney for the survivors' negotiating committee, estimated it could be late August before a final plan could be presented for a vote.
It would then take two months to properly notify survivors and hold a vote, attorneys said Friday. Judge Grabill suggested an accelerated timeframe might be possible, and Kuebel said that could bring a final settlement to a vote by September at the earliest.
Douglas Draper, attorney for the church's parishes, schools and other affiliates, suggested checks could go out to survivors in the first quarter of 2026 if a plan is approved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump threatens Colorado with ‘harsh measures' unless far-right election conspiracy theorist released from prison
Donald Trump is demanding the release of a prominent far-right conspiracy theorist and former state elections official who is serving a nine-year jail sentence after she was found guilty of crimes connected to a nationwide scheme to overturn election results in states Trump lost in 2020. He threatened 'harsh measures' against the state of Colorado if officials refuse his command. 'FREE TINA PETERS, a brave and innocent Patriot who has been tortured by Crooked Colorado politicians, including the big Mail-In Ballot supporting the governor of the State,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday. 'Let Tina Peters out of jail, RIGHT NOW. She did nothing wrong, except catching the Democrats cheat in the Election,' he added. 'She is an old woman, and very sick. If she is not released, I am going to take harsh measures!!!' Peters is among the only officials who have been convicted of crimes stemming from far-right plots to illegally reverse Trump's loss to Joe Biden in 2020, using positions of power to amplify bogus claims of fraud and launch spurious investigations into voting machines and software. Because she was tried in state court, Trump cannot order her release or issue a pardon. In May, he ordered the Department of Justice 'to take all necessary action' to get her out of jail. Peters, a former Mesa County clerk, was accused of breaching the county's elections systems during a 2021 security update to prove her unfounded fraud claims. She was accused of helping a man gain access to secure areas of her office using someone else's security badge to covertly copy a Dominion Voting Systems hard drive — the contents of which were shared with pillow salesman and conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell. She later unsuccessfully ran for Colorado secretary of state in 2022, coming in second in a Republican primary election. Last year, she was found guilty of three felony counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one felony count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, one misdemeanor count of official misconduct, one misdemeanor count of violation of duty in elections, and one misdemeanor count of failure to comply with the secretary of state. Peters has continued to promote baseless claims of election fraud and supports Trump's ongoing false narrative that the 2020 election was 'rigged' and 'stolen' from him. After she pleaded for leniency during her sentencing hearing last year, the judge presiding over her case called her a 'charlatan' who 'betrayed' her oath to public service. 'You're no hero, you abused your position, and you're a charlatan who used and is still using your prior position in office to peddle a snake oil that's been proven to be a snake oil time and time again,' Judge Matthew Barrett said at the time. 'I'm convinced you'd do it all over again if you could,' he added. 'You are a privileged person. You are as privileged as they come. You used that for power and fame.' Colorado's Democratic Attorney General Jena Griswold called Trump's commands an 'embarrassment.' 'Donald Trump and Tina Peters are election-denying criminals who put their need for power ahead of the American people,' she wrote. 'Trump's feeble attempts to put pressure on the justice system to re-write history is an embarrassment. … While he keeps digging himself lower and lower to free a criminal convicted by a jury of her peers, I will continue to uphold the law and our free and fair elections.' Trump escalated his specious crusade against election administration this week with a threat to 'end' mail-in voting before 2026 midterm elections, with the fate of the balance of power in Congress at stake. The president — whose false and inflated claims about early voting span more than a decade — called to 'lead a movement' to 'get rid of' mail-in voting and the use of voting machines that process ballots, which would radically change how voters participate in elections and could disenfranchise tens of thousands of people. 'We're going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country to end mail-in ballots because they're corrupt,' Trump said in the Oval Office this week. Trump cannot legally end state and local rules for election administration, though White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested this week that the president is pressing Republicans in Congress to change federal law.


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ant smuggling into the US is out of control since Trump's cuts – and it could have dire impacts on the country
The smuggling of ants and other insects in the U.S. could be on the rise due to recent cuts to the USDA under the Trump administration, a new report says. The Department of Government Efficiency, the agency once led by billionaire Elon Musk, issued widespread layoffs and buyouts to federal employees this spring. This impacted several members of the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, which helps restrict the smuggling of invertebrates like ants, Wired reports. While some of those staff were later rehired, other positions have remained vacant, according to the outlet. These cuts have alarmed experts, and sources familiar with the industry say ant smugglers have been emboldened by the recent cuts under the Trump administration, according to Wired. 'It's getting out of hand,' one ant seller said. 'They realize the U.S. market is a gold mine.' Some members of the ant-selling community also told Wired that the process to sell ants legally has become harder, which in turn is contributing to an uptick in illegal sales. 'Smuggling ants hasn't gotten easier from the cuts to federal services, trading ants across state borders legally has gotten harder,' one former black market ant seller told Wired. This could pose a problem because invasive ants can have devastating impacts on the environment. In Florida, millions of tawny crazy ants — an invasive species from South America — are forming super colonies and driving out local wildlife, the Herald-Tribune reports. The ants are also invading residents' homes and damaging electrical equipment. Areas of the southeast U.S. also saw an increase in invasive Asian needle ants this summer. The venomous species has been found in the U.S. for 90 years, but its population exploded recently. A single sting can send someone to the hospital with life-threatening symptoms. Some experts say they're concerned about cuts to infrastructure that detects and prevents invasive species. 'There's been a lot of cutting of the inspectors as part of the quote-unquote 'efficiency' moves from the government recently,' Chris Stelzig, executive director of the Entomological Society of America, told Wired. 'A reduced infrastructure to detect invasive species can be problematic.' However, this isn't an entirely new problem. Retired USDA entomologist Carlos Blanco told Wired there were enforcement problems even before the DOGE cuts, too. Armando Rosario-Lebrón, the former co-chair of the Federal Interagency Committee on Invasive Terrestrial Animals and Pathogens, told Wired that the 'illegal market rapidly has become much more aggressive because of the lack of enforcement.' 'The invasiveness potential is off the charts,' he added. 'It's just ridiculous.' USDA spokesperson Heather Curlett told Wired that the agency has the 'same number of entomology staff within the pest permitting unit as we did before' and that the agency's enforcement of federal plant pest regulations 'has not changed or diminished.' 'We work to address all instances of noncompliance both from permit holders who fail to follow the terms and conditions of their permits and those who move plant pests without obtaining the proper permits,' Curlett added.


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU pushes for reduced US autos tariff from August 1 as joint text limits exemptions
WASHINGTON/BRUSSELS, Aug 21 (Reuters) - The European Union will work to ensure lower U.S. tariffs on its car exports are applied retroactively to August 1, the bloc's trade chief said on Thursday, as the transatlantic partners set out details of a framework trade deal struck in July. In a 3-1/2-page joint statement, the two sides spelled out that 15% U.S. tariffs would apply to most EU imports and listed the commitments made, including the EU's pledge to eliminate tariffs on U.S. industrial goods and to give preferential market access for a wide range of U.S. seafood and agricultural goods. Washington will take steps to reduce the current 27.5% U.S. tariffs on cars and car parts, a huge burden for European carmakers, once Brussels introduces the legislation needed to enact promised tariff cuts on U.S. goods, it said. The statement said U.S. tariff relief on autos and auto parts would kick in on the first day of the month in which the EU introduced the legislation. EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said it was the European Commission's "firm intention" to make proposals by the end of this month, meaning the U.S. car tariff reduction would apply from August 1. A senior Trump administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said European carmakers could see relief from the current U.S. tariffs within "hopefully weeks." "As soon as they're able to introduce that legislation - and I don't mean pass it and fully implement it, but really introduce it - then we will be in a position to provide that relief. And I will say that both sides are very interested in moving quickly," they said. U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the deal on July 27 at Trump's luxury golf course in Turnberry, Scotland after months of negotiations. The two leaders met again this week as part of negotiations aimed at ending Russia's war in Ukraine, with both lauding their trade framework deal as an historic accomplishment. The joint statement said the deal could be expanded over time to cover additional areas and further improve market access. The joint statement was "a play to hold each other accountable" and ensure that both sides carried out the pledges announced last month, the U.S. official said. Ryan Majerus, a former U.S. Commerce Department official now with the King and Spalding law firm, said the statement "could serve as a conceptual model for what we will eventually see with Japan and South Korea." The two major U.S. trading partners negotiated similar reductions in Trump's automotive tariffs but are also waiting for them to be implemented. The EU and U.S. said they intended to accept and provide mutual recognition to each others' automotive safety and other standards, but industry officials said this language was more vague than initially announced. The joint statement noted that the U.S. agreed to apply only pre-existing Most Favored Nation tariffs of below 15% from September 1 on EU aircraft and parts, generic pharmaceuticals and ingredients, chemical precursors and unavailable natural resources, including cork. This exemption did not apply to wine or spirits, a key EU demand, but the two sides agreed to consider other sectors and products for inclusions. "So these doors are not closed forever," Sefcovic said, while acknowledging that securing an exemption for alcoholic drinks would not be easy. SpiritsEUROPE trade group Director General Herve Dumesny urged "both sides to remain at the negotiating table and deliver a swift, full return to zero-for-zero" tariffs on spirits. The U.S.-EU statement reiterated the EU's intention to procure $750 billion in American liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear energy products, plus an additional $40 billion worth of U.S.-made artificial intelligence chips. It also repeated the intention for EU companies to invest an additional $600 billion across U.S. strategic sectors through 2028. Both sides committed to address "unjustified digital trade barriers," the statement said, and the EU agreed not to adopt network usage fees. They also agreed to negotiate rules of origin to ensure that the agreement's benefits accrued to both trading partners. The statement also left unchanged the 50% U.S. national security tariff on EU-produced steel, aluminum and goods made with the metals, which were expanded this week to hundreds of additional products. "There will be no exemptions, no exclusions for steel and aluminum tariffs," Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro told reporters at the White House, due to what he said were past exclusion abuses. But the joint statement left the door open to a future tariff rate quota for the EU as the two sides discuss "ring-fencing" their domestic markets from overcapacity, a reference to Chinese production. Navarro called the Trump administration's agreement with the EU a "magnificent achievement" for both sides of the Atlantic that U.S. courts should not criticize. A federal appeals court is expected to rule any day on a legal challenge that could strike down a significant portion of Trump's tariffs, those invoked under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.