logo
EXCLUSIVE Library literally split down the middle of US-Canada border will have to pay $215K in war with Trump over ban

EXCLUSIVE Library literally split down the middle of US-Canada border will have to pay $215K in war with Trump over ban

Daily Mail​25-05-2025
A library that straddles the US-Canada border has found itself in the middle of Trump Administration's border debate, and they're not happy about it.
The Haskell Free Library & Opera House is not a border crossing and never has been, but in March, it became involved in a political argument it didn't ask to be in when US President Donald Trump installed new rules restricting Canadian access.
For 121 years, the quaint establishment has proudly sat both in Derby Line, Vermont, and Stanstead in Québec, Canada, with the entrance being on the US side.
A clear black line throughout the building shows the divide between the nations, which politically, has grown much larger since Trump took power in late January and began calling the nation the 51st State and trying to enact high tariffs on them.
Come October 1, the establishment will be forced to bar Canadians from entering its main entrance, and instead, make them to sneak through an emergency exit that is now being converted into a real one.
Sylvie Boudreau, the president of the board, told the DailyMail.com: 'We don't know the future, we don't know what's going to happen.'
But she exclusively revealed that the renovations the library must undergo in order to work around Trump's order will cost an estimated $300,000 CAD ($215,600 USD).
In order to accommodate the US' marching orders, the library will have to undergo a huge infrastructure overhaul so its Canadian guests can still access the facility, which is governed under both countries' law.
The overhaul includes making the side door handicap accessible and creating a separate parking lot for Canadians.
Right now, Canadians are required to show a library card to enter on the Vermont side, but come October 1, they will have to go through an official port of entry to access the main entrance.
Canadians, for more than 120 years, have been able to access the library through a sidewalk leading to the front door - something that both countries peacefully allowed.
But now, signs in the parking lot warn visitors that Canadians could face arrest or prosecution or 'removal from the United States' if they do not have their library card upon entering the Vermont side.
Guests will also have to leave through the same door they came in through, as the library is not a port of entry between the two once-friendly countries.
Besides the astronomical costs, the library faces even more challenges as they have to appease both historical and heritage rules of both Derby Line and Stanstead, meaning the back door needs to be made of oak and other areas require granite.
And before they can do anything, they need approval... after approval... after approval on both sides of the border.
'Everything needs to be in order to these requirements,' Sylvie told the DailyMail.com.
In order to accommodate the US' marching orders under the Trump Administration, the library will have to undergo a huge infrastructure overhaul so its Canadian guests can still access the facility, which is governed under both countries' law.
They're hoping to have a design plan 'very, very soon' and aim to have the construction done by the end of July.
'Our partners are trying to do it as fast as possible,' Sylvie said, saying the library will be prioritized when the ball gets rolling.
In order to make the changes coming down from the White House, the library has started a GoFundMe since it does not have the funds to adjust to the new laws.
Sylvie, who worked in customs for 20 years, knew the closure was coming for some time. For years, US Border Patrol wanted to 'restrict and control a little bit more' and after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem unexpectedly visited in January, she knew.
'I knew the next step was closing the entrance,' she said, before remarking that Noem was 'very cordial, to be honest.'
That didn't stop Noem from joking as she stepped over the thick black line showing the US-Canada border inside the library that she was stepping into the 51st State, a volunteer recalled to Stuck in Vermont.
'I worked at the border for 20 years,' Sylvie told the DailyMail.com. 'I understood their reason, but do I agree with them?
'We live in a scary world right now. It's the worst of the worst.'
She believes her past working near the border helps the library as authorities respect them since she does understand their job to a degree, but that doesn't mean they're willing to tell her what happens in the fall.
She's asked them if they plan on housing more border patrol agents outside the library and if they plan on asking patrons for identification upon entering and exiting the library.
However, she was quite firm that neither the US or Canadian agents will be allowed inside until invited and doesn't believe this is a political stunt.
'They can't do anything unless they're invited in,' she told the DailyMail.com. 'In the library, they have no jurisdiction.'
Haskell librarians and volunteers will not be checking passports or IDs of patrons.
'It's not up to the employees to check that,' she said. 'That's [border patrol's] job.'
They will be vigilant for crime happening in the library, as the Trump Administration has accused them of drug smuggling, which Sylvie said was false.
In 2018, the library did have a gun smuggling incident where at least two Americans hid weapons inside the bathroom for a Canadian to pick up.
Alexis Vlachos, of Montreal, pleaded guilty to smuggling backpacks full of guns into the North American country on at least two occasions. He was sentenced to 51 months.
During the pandemic, families unable to cross the border to see family used the library as a meet-up place - something that staff had to put an end to.
Since then, the library hasn't been the destination of crime, but 'every little incident gives them reason,' Sylvie said.
And the Haskell library is aware it won't win a war against the US government.
'It cannot be more in the middle of what happens at the border,' she said, referring to the fact that the library quite literally sits on it. 'I don't want to scare myself or my visitors, but we need to be aware.
'It's all new, this is a page in history.'
Despite being affected by the new president's border orders, the locals on both sides have been nothing but supportive.
'People are supporting us,' Sylvie told the DailyMail.com. 'People are rising above division.'
Many locals are irritated with the new changes, with Vermonters saying they don't like the upcoming changes.
'For the record, speaking on behalf of Vermont where the library is, nobody wants this. This administration doesn't represent anyone or anything that we stand for or believe in at this point and it gets worse day by day,' one person wrote in the comment section under a video about the library.
Jody Stone, the mayor of Stanstead, said the building is uniquely American and Canadian and 'something that everybody's grown up with.'
'The fact that Canadians could enter an American door without having to report at the border was something that was accepted and tolerated,' he told Stuck in Vermont.
'We need to make sure we keep it a friendly border.'
'I think it's awful that people are trying to separate books from anybody,' Beth Radcliffe, who is American but chose to enter on the Canadian side to avoid border agents, told Stuck in Vermont.
'So, trying to divide this library by nationality is just ridiculous.'
The new rules even brought together Stone and Newport Mayor Rich Ufford-Chase to figure out a way to keep the library a unified place.
'It really touched people on both sides of the border,' Stone said. 'If you live in a border community, you know the bonds that we have between our communities and this is a symbol of that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel, Bloomberg News reports
Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel, Bloomberg News reports

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump administration in talks to take 10% stake in Intel, Bloomberg News reports

Aug 18 (Reuters) - The Trump administration is in talks to take a 10% stake in Intel by converting some or all of the struggling company's Chips Act grants into equity, Bloomberg News reported, citing a White House official and other people familiar with the matter. Shares of Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab fell about 3% on Monday, after rallying last week on hopes of U.S. federal support. A 10% stake in the American chipmaker would be worth about $10 billion. Intel has been slated to receive a combined $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants for commercial and military production, and the figure is roughly enough to pay for the government's holding, according to the Bloomberg report on Monday. Intel declined to comment on the report, while the White House did not respond to a request for comment. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. Media reports said last week that the U.S. government may buy a stake in Intel, after a meeting between CEO Lip-Bu Tan and President Donald Trump that was sparked by Trump's demand for the new Intel chief's resignation over his ties to Chinese firms. Federal backing could give Intel more breathing room to revive its loss-making foundry business, analysts have said, but it still suffers from a weak product roadmap and challenges in attracting customers to its new factories. "The fact that the U.S. government is stepping in to save a blue-chip American company likely means that Intel's competitive position was much worse than what anybody feared," said David Wagner, head of equity and portfolio manager at Intel shareholder Aptus Capital Advisors. Wagner added that while he was skeptical about the U.S. government investing taxpayer money into U.S. companies, it was better than having Intel become a state-owned entity. Aptus Capital Advisors holds 80,581 shares of Intel. Trump, who said the meeting with Tan was "very interesting" one, has taken an unprecedented approach to corporate interventions. He has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths, such as a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and an arrangement with rare earth producer MP Materials (MP.N), opens new tab to secure critical minerals. The U.S. government has previously taken equity stakes in companies under stress. During the 2007-2009 financial crisis, it took a stake in General Motors (GM.N), opens new tab — later exiting the stake in 2013. Intel last year secured nearly $8 billion in subsidies, the largest outlay under the act, to build new factories in Ohio and other states as former CEO Pat Gelsinger bet on them to restore the company's manufacturing edge. Tan, however, pared back such ambitions, slowing construction in Ohio. He plans to build factories based on demand for the services, which analysts have said could put him at odds with Trump's push to shore up American manufacturing.

20 states and DC sue DOJ to stop immigration requirements on victim funds
20 states and DC sue DOJ to stop immigration requirements on victim funds

The Independent

time40 minutes ago

  • The Independent

20 states and DC sue DOJ to stop immigration requirements on victim funds

A coalition of attorneys general from 20 states and Washington, D.C., is asking a federal judge to stop the U.S. Department of Justice from withholding federal funds earmarked for crime victims if states don't cooperate with the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. The lawsuit filed Monday in Rhode Island federal court seeks to block the Justice Department from enforcing conditions that would cut funding to a state or subgrantee if it refuses to honor civil immigration enforcement requests, denies Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers access to facilities or fails to provide advance notice of release dates of individuals possibly wanted by ICE because of their immigration status. The lawsuit asks that the conditions be thrown out, arguing that the administration and the agency are overstepping their constitutional and administrative authority. The lawsuit also argues that the requirements are not permitted or outlined in the Victims of Crime Act, known as VOCA, and would interfere with policies created to ensure victims and witnesses report crimes without fear of deportation. 'These people did not ask for this status as a crime victim. They don't break down neatly across partisan lines, but they share one common trait, which is that they've suffered an unimaginable trauma,' New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin said during a video news conference Monday, calling the administration's threat to withhold funds 'the most heinous act' he's seen in politics. The federal conditions were placed on VOCA funding, which provides more than a billion dollars annually to states for victims compensation programs and grants that fund victims assistance organizations. VOCA funding comes entirely from fines and penalties in federal court cases, not from tax dollars. Every state and territory has a victims compensation program that follows federal guidelines, but largely is set up under state law to provide financial help to crime victims, including medical expense reimbursement, paying for crime scene cleanup, counseling or helping with funeral costs for homicide victims. VOCA covers the cost of about 75% of state compensation program awards. The funds are also used to pay for other services, including testing rape kits, funding grants to domestic violence recovery organizations, trauma recovery centers and more. Advocates and others argue that the system needs to protect victims regardless of their immigration status and ensure that reporting a crime does not lead to deportation threats. They also say that marginalized communities, such as newly arrived immigrants, are more likely to be crime targets. 'The federal government is attempting to use crime victim funds as a bargaining chip to force states into doing its bidding on immigration enforcement,' New York Attorney General Letitia James, who also joined the lawsuit, said in a statement Monday. 'These grants were created to help survivors heal and recover, and we will fight to ensure they continue to serve that purpose … We will not be bullied into abandoning any of our residents.' The Associated Press left a message seeking comment from a DOJ spokesperson Monday afternoon. President Donald Trump's administration has sought to withhold or pull back other federal funding or grant funding midstream, saying awardees and programs no longer agree with its priorities. In April, it cancelled about $800 million in DOJ grants, some of which were awarded to victims service and survivor organizations. And in June, states filed a lawsuit over added requirements in Violence Against Women Act funding that mandated applicants agree not to promote 'gender ideology,' or run diversity, equity and inclusion programs or prioritize people in the country illegally. Several attorneys general said the VOCA conditions appear to be another way the administration is targeting so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, though there is no clear definition of what a sanctuary state or city is. The Trump administration earlier this month released an updated list of states, cities and counties it considers sanctuary jurisdictions. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said in the August announcement that the department would 'continue bringing litigation against sanctuary jurisdictions and work closely with the Department of Homeland Security to eradicate these harmful policies around the country.' As of Monday afternoon attorneys general from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin — all Democrats — had signed on to the lawsuit.

Trump claims no one else in the world uses mail-in ballots during rant after supporting postal voting last year
Trump claims no one else in the world uses mail-in ballots during rant after supporting postal voting last year

The Independent

time40 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump claims no one else in the world uses mail-in ballots during rant after supporting postal voting last year

Donald Trump has falsely claimed that no one else in the world uses mail-in ballots in a lengthy rant while Volodymyr Zelensky sat silently next to him during the Ukrainian leader's visit to the White House. Speaking to reporters on Monday (18 August), the US president said that postal voting was 'corrupt' and other countries did not use it as it leads to 'massive fraud all over the place'. A total of 12 countries, including Canada, Germany, and South Korea, allow all voters to vote by mail in their elections, according to the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. There is no evidence to support Trump's claim that mail-in voting is 'corrupt'. Last year, Trump urged Republicans to request mail-in ballots to get their votes in early ahead of election day to 'swamp the vote'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store