How Prince William played a crucial role in HUGE drug bust seizing £40m worth of cocaine
When Prince William served in the Royal Navy on a two-month attachment back in 2008, he was involved in a major drug bust.
The Prince of Wales was one of six Navy personnel who intercepted a vessel attempting to smuggle 900kg of cocaine in the Atlantic, north-east of Barbados.
In total, the haul, which was seized in July 2008, was worth a staggering £40million at the time. Adjusted for inflation, it would now be worth over £60million.
William was on board a Lynx helicopter which was tasked with monitoring speedboats off the coast of Barbados attempting to move drugs to west Africa or Europe.
On this particular occasion, an ocean-going speedboat suspecting of smuggling drugs was spotted by the crew - which included William, a pilot and a sniper - and was ordered to stop. It was then boarded by US coastguard officers on board the British frigate HMS Iron Duke and the smugglers detained.
William had only been deployed with the Royal Navy for less than a week when the operation took place - having arrived on June 24 as part of a secondment from the Royal Air Force.
Speaking to The Guardian at the time, the ship's commander, Mark Newland, said: 'This is a fantastic start to HMS Iron Duke's North Atlantic deployment.
'To have had a direct impact on the flow of cocaine into Europe just four days after we arrived in theatre shows the benefit the Royal Navy can have in the area of maritime security and counter-drug operations.'
According to royal author Penny Junor, deployment with HMS Iron Duke saw William experience 'a lot of excitement and a lot of danger'.
The Prince of Wales enjoyed his time with the Navy so much that he extended his Royal Naval short service commission for as long as possible before he returned to the Royal Air Force.
William's stint in the Royal Navy still affects him many years later. In 2020, it came up in conversation when the Prince was on a Remembrance Day video chat with LPT (leading physical trainer) Damon Bell, who was at the time serving on the British frigate HMS Montrose in the Gulf.
During the call, LPT Bell referred to Montrose's recent £20million drugs seizure in the Middle East, and he joked that it was only half the amount of the bust made by HMS Iron Duke.
William responded in jest: 'I wasn't going to bring that up, Damon, but I am glad it's still being talked about.'
The prince's military career began in 2006, when he joined Sandhurst as an Officer Cadet.
He was briefly considered for frontline duty, with the then-Queen Elizabeth II reportedly supportive of his deployment.
However, William's status at the time as second in line to the throne meant the Government decided it was too risky for him to see active duty due to concerns about the safety of him and those around him.
This is why William was instead sent to the RAF and the Royal Navy.
Prince Harry, on the other hand, was allowed to serve in Afghanistan after much debate over whether to send the young prince to the war zone.
He was first deployed to Helmand province as a forward air controller in 2007, but his first tour of duty was cut short when an Australian magazine broke a media embargo by mistake.
However, he returned in 2012 with the Ministry of Defence publicising his second deployment on the understanding that the media would allow him to get on with the job at hand.
In his memoir, Spare, the Duke of Sussex revealed that he killed 25 Taliban fighters during his second tour of duty in Afghanistan, when he flew an Apache attack helicopter.
Harry, who was known as 'Captain Wales' in the military, wrote that he did not think of those killed 'as people' but instead 'chess pieces removed from the board'... 'bad guys eliminated'.
This was the first time that Harry, now 40, had specified the number of insurgents he had personally killed during his time in Afghanistan.
While many soldiers do not know how many enemies they have killed in combat, the Duke wrote in Spare that 'in the era of Apaches and laptops' he was able to say 'with exactness' the number of insurgents he killed.
During Harry's 2012 tour, he also helped provide helicopter support to the International Security Assistance Force and Afghan forces operating throughout Helmand province.
Based out of Camp Bastion, 662 Squadron Army Air Corps, to which he belonged, flew more than a hundred missions over 2,500 flying hours, providing surveillance, deterrence and, when required, close combat attack capabilities as well as escort duties for other aircraft.
Captain Wales, who qualified as a co-pilot gunner in February 2012, was posted to 3 Regiment Army Air Corps, part of 16 Air Assault Brigade, to gain further flying experience and to operate the Apache on a number of exercises before deploying to Afghanistan in September 2012.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
36 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Public Services Card database of millions of Irish people's faces declared illegal
The Data Protection Commission (DPC) has found that the collection of facial (biometric) data for the Public Services Card (PSC) is unlawful. The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) said it partially welcomes the findings, but said the decision is "more than a decade late and inadequate". Advertisement The Government had previously claimed that the facial records were not biometric data. On Thursday, the DPC found that the Department of Social Protection (DSP) unlawfully collected facial records (biometric data) from 70 per cent of the population of Ireland over 15 years. In addition, the ICCL said the department failed to tell people why it was collecting their facial records and whether it was legal. In light of the infringements discovered by the DPC, it reprimanded the Department of Social Protection by issuing administrative fines totalling €550,000. It also issued an order to the department requiring it to cease processing of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration within nine months of this decision if the department cannot identify a valid lawful basis. Advertisement Deputy commissioner, Graham Doyle, said: 'It is important to note that none of the findings of infringement identified, nor the corrective powers exercised by the DPC, pertain to the rollout of SAFE 2 registration by the DSP as a matter of principle. "The DPC did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures deployed by the DSP in connection with SAFE 2 registration in the context of this inquiry. "This inquiry was concerned with assessing whether the legislative framework presently in place for SAFE 2 registration complies with the requirements of data protection law and whether the DSP operates SAFE 2 registration in a data protection-compliant manner, and the findings announced today identify a number of deficiencies in this regard.' 'Illegal facial database' The ICCL said the Data Protection Commission failed to take decisive action on Thursday and said that, after 15 years, its actions are not enough. Advertisement The ICCL is insisting on the immediate deletion of the illegal facial data database. It has also called for the department and the DPC to explain to the Oireachtas and the public how this system was permitted to operate unlawfully for so long. Executive Director of ICCL, Joe O'Brien, said: 'For many years, ICCL and our colleagues at Digital Rights Ireland, have argued that the PSC's mandatory use of facial recognition technology is unlawful. 'This is a partial win for the privacy and data protection rights of people living in Ireland. It confirms what we have advocated for, for many years - that the Public Services Card, which was estimated to have cost the State €100 million, trespassed upon human rights and infringed EU and Irish law. 'The DPC decision is over a decade late and does not go far enough. The Department effectively created a de facto national biometric ID system by stealth over 15-plus years without a proper legal foundation. This illegal database of millions of Irish people's biometric data must be deleted.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
European journalists targeted with Paragon Solutions spyware, say researchers
The hacking mystery roiling the Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni's rightwing government is deepening after researchers said they found new evidence that two more journalists were targeted using the same military-grade spyware that Italy has admitted to using against activists. A parliamentary committee overseeing intelligence confirmed earlier this month that Italy used mercenary spyware made by Israel-based Paragon Solutions against two Italian activists. But the same committee, which launched an investigation into the hacking scandal in March, said it was unable to determine who was behind the targeting of a prominent Italian investigative journalist named Francesco Cancellato, whose news outlet has been critical of the Meloni government. Now a report by researchers at the Citizen Lab has revealed that a close colleague of Cancellato, Ciro Pellegrino, who is head of the investigative outlet Naples bureau, was also targeted by a user of Paragon Solution's spyware, which is called Graphite. The Citizen Lab said a third journalist, who chose to remain anonymous and is described as a 'prominent European journalist', had also been targeted with the spyware. The news comes as Paragon and the Italian government have been engaged in an acrimonious public spat. Haaretz reported this week that Paragon had offered to assist the Italian government in investigating Cancellato's case. Italy reportedly rejected that offer, however, with the Italian department of security intelligence saying that it raised national security concerns. Meloni's office did not reply to a request for comment. A debate on the matter, which has prompted outrage among the Italian opposition and MEPs in Brussels, has been scheduled in the European parliament on 16 June. The Guardian approached Paragon for comment on the latest development. It referred to comments it made to Haaretz, in which it confirmed it cancelled its contract with the Italian government after reports first emerged in February that Cancellato had been targeted. The Guardian first reported that Paragon was terminating its contract with Italy in February. Like other spyware vendors, Paragon sells its cyberweapon to government clients who are supposed to use it to prevent crime. The company has said it sells its spyware only to democratic countries and that its terms of service forbids agencies to use the spyware against journalists or members of civil society. The question now remains who is behind the targeting of the two journalists. John Scott-Railton, a senior researcher at the Citizen Lab, said: 'We found that both journalists phones bore Paragon's unmistakable digital fingerprints. Making matters even more interesting, we found fingerprints matching the same Paragon customer in both cases.' A report released by the Copasir parliamentary committee found that Italy's domestic and foreign intelligence agencies had contracts with Paragon in 2023 and 2024, and that the hacking software was used with the permission of a prosecutor and in limited circumstances. The committee said the spyware had been used to search for fugitives, investigate alleged terrorism, organised crime, fuel smuggling and counter-espionage efforts. It said the pro-immigrant human rights activists who were targeted – they included Luca Cassarini and Giuseppe Caccia – had been spied on due to their connection to 'irregular immigration' and not because they were involved in human rights.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Kate Beckinsale sues producers of thriller Canary Black over ‘unsafe conditions'
Kate Beckinsale is suing the producers of Canary Black, the 2024 action thriller in which she starred, over claims she suffered 'severe and debilitating injuries' as a result of 'unsafe conditions'. In news first reported by Puck, Beckinsale's legal complaint was filed anonymously in June 2024, but has now been refiled under her full name Kathrin Beckinsale. The document claims that Beckinsale was routinely compelled to work 15-hour days during the film's shoot, which began in September 2022 in Croatia. Added to this, Beckinsale alleges that the workout equipment and physical trainers she had requested to 'stay in top shape for the physical demands of the role' were not provided, and she subsequently suffered 'a complex meniscus tear in her left knee' as a result of a scene in which she was thrown into a wall, which was aggravated when she was 'coerced' into performing 'unsafe action sequences' after she returned to work. The document adds that Beckinsale's stunt performer broke her ankle and 'rather than replace her with a competent and qualified stunt [performer]', the producers 'hired an unqualified stunt woman who was simply the girlfriend of the stunt coordinator'. The legal complaint also includes communications between Beckinale's agent Shani Rosenzweig and the film's producers, with Rosenzweig criticising the lack of preparation and training for the film's action sequences. Rosenzweig wrote: 'No one is actually taking real action to put a plan in place to fix this situation …' Before demanding to know: 'How you are … making sure your lead actress works 12 hour days and has time to prep for work on her own when she leaves the set while getting the rest her body so desperately needs. If you're trying to kill a person, you're doing a great job.' A message in response from John Zois, one of the film's producers, reads: 'I don't know what else to say other than you're right … The days are too packed for the pace we are moving and it's CLEARLY not sustainable.' The Guardian has contacted Zois and the film's sales representatives Anton for comment.
