UK manufacturing downturn eases in June despite continued weak demand
The S&P Global UK manufacturing PMI survey, watched closely by economists, showed a reading of 47.7 in June, up from 46.4 in May.
Any reading above 50 indicates that activity is growing while any score below means it is contracting.
This was in line with predictions by economists.
The survey pointed to a steadying situation for businesses, who said they were also increasingly optimistic.
Rob Dobson, director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said: 'Although the downturn in UK manufacturing continued in June, the latest PMI survey provides signs of conditions stabilising.
'Production, new orders and employment all fell at slower rates, while business optimism picked up to a four-month high.
'That said, any hoped-for stabilisation remains fragile and subject to potential headwinds that could severely impact demand, supply chain reliability and future growth prospects.'
The data showed that UK manufacturing production contracted for the eighth consecutive month as the companies referenced weak market conditions.
New orders were also lower for the month, although this drop was the smallest over the past nine months.
Firms reported that new export business dropped for the 41st month in a row in the face of 'reduced demand from the US, Europe and China'.
Mike Thornton, head of industrials at RSM UK, said: 'The manufacturing PMI increased for the second consecutive month in June, showing signs of improvement across the board.
'The new orders index saw the most notable monthly uptick, rising to the highest level since October 2024, which is contributing to growing industry optimism, a trend that's likely to continue following this week's trade deal between the US and UK coming into force.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar urged to 'come clean' on tax changes in Scotland
The SNP have written to the Scottish Labour leader over comments he made last week signalling his party would seek to bring Scotland's income tax system closer in line with the rest of the UK. In an interview with the Scottish Sun, Sarwar accused SNP ministers of "government by performance" as he suggested he would move to end the tax divergence with the rest of the UK if he becomes first minister. READ MORE: Kate Forbes: Bigger-picture switch is proving key in tackling tourism issues Currently, a majority of Scottish taxpayers pay less income tax than they would elsewhere in the UK. In Scotland, the top rate of tax (45%) comes in at earnings of £75,001, while those reaching £125,140 face a 48% levy. In the rest of the UK, the top rate of tax is 45% and only comes in when earnings reach £125,140. Figures from the Scottish Fiscal Commission suggest that Scotland's tax system generates up to an additional £1.7 billion each year compared to if it had matched the UK Government's policy. The SNP said Labour's plan would risk reversing this additional income and would mean that lower-income Scots would pay more while the wealthiest pay less, resulting in "billions of pounds worth of cuts" from public services to plug the gap. Kevin Stewart MSP (Image: PA) Kevin Stewart, an SNP MSP who sits on Holyrood's Economy Committee, has written to Sarwar to urge him to outline what services he would cut in order to "balance the books". In his letter, he asked Sarwar to clarify his position that those on "very large salaries" should pay less tax, "while also supporting disability benefits cuts". Stewart wrote: 'As you know, a majority of Scots currently pay less income tax than they would if they lived elsewhere in the UK, and Scottish income tax generates well over a billion pounds additional funding to be spent here in Scotland. 'Any changes to the Scottish income tax system puts this at risk – meaning Labour's plans could see the poorest being taxed more, or cutting up to well over a billion pounds from Scottish public services in order to fund these tax cuts. 'Is it really your position that people on very large salaries should pay less income tax in Scotland, while also supporting cuts to disability benefits? 'I am therefore writing to you to ask what spending cuts Labour plan to implement in Scotland in order to bring Scotland's income tax system more in line with the rest of the UK.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) pictured with Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Image: Jane Barlow/PA) Sarwar previously backed the UK Government's decision to cut disability benefits, before Labour conceded to rebels and watered down such plans in a last-minute climbdown. Commenting, Stewart told The National that since Labour took office last year, "they have made it their business to balance the books on the backs of the poor, disabled and older people". 'For a Labour politician to claim there is no money to pay for disability benefits while also arguing that very rich people are being taxed too much frankly beggars belief – and shows how out of touch Mr Sarwar is with traditional Labour voters," he said. READ MORE: Protesters stage demonstration inside Reform UK's headquarters 'Mr Sarwar needs to come clean with people in Scotland – if Labour are in power in Scotland, what services would he cut to fund tax cuts for the rich? Will it be free tuition, prescriptions, childcare, bus passes, the baby box – or will he cut ADP [Adult Disability Payment] – Scotland's equivalent of PIP [Personal Independence Payment] - just like his bosses in London wanted to?" Stewart continued: 'The SNP are proud to have introduced progressive taxation in Scotland which ensures those on lower incomes pay a bit less while people on higher incomes pay more – and everybody benefits from the extra investment in public services. 'The truth is, Scottish Labour just want to bring Scotland in line with the rest of the UK regardless of the cost to the Scottish people – only the SNP can be trusted to stand up for a fairer Scotland that the vast majority of people want to live in.' Stewart's comments came as Scottish Government Finance Secretary Shona Robison urged Starmer to look north of the Border for a more progressive tax system to protect public spending. (Image: PA) Robison said that if Labour had followed the Scottish model, they would not be in the "complete fiscal mess that they are in now". She said: 'When Keir Starmer took office, he could have chosen to ask people on higher incomes to pay a little more in tax in order to protect public spending. 'Choosing instead to target the vulnerable is not leadership – frankly, it is political cowardice. READ MORE: More than 20 people arrested at protest in support of Palestine Action 'If Keir Starmer had done in England what the SNP have done in Scotland with taxation, Labour would not be in the complete fiscal mess that they are in now." Robison added that Labour need "a new direction – and they should look to Scotland". She continued: 'Labour used to tell Scotland that we didn't need independence and we just needed to get rid of the Tory government – but the last year has completely demolished that argument. 'No Westminster government will ever deliver the truly fair society which I believe the vast majority of people in Scotland want to live in – and that is why independence is the best future for Scotland.' Scottish Labour's spokesperson for economy, business and fair work, Daniel Johnson MSP, said: "Unlike the SNP, Scottish Labour won't use higher taxes on workers like nurses and firefighters as a substitute for economic growth. 'A Scottish Labour government will grow our economy, end the SNP's addiction to wasting our money and reform our public services so they are fit for the future. 'Next year Scots have the chance to kick out an SNP Government that can't be trusted with our money and take a new direction with Scottish Labour.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Keir Starmer told not to 'punish' children by keeping two-child cap
The SNP urged the Prime Minister to end the limit amid reports it could stay as a result of Labour watering down most of its welfare reforms. KEIR Starmer has been urged not to 'punish' children by keeping the two-child cap following Labour's partial U-turn on benefit cuts. The UK Government had attempted to save around £5 billion a year by cutting welfare, mostly for those claiming disability and health benefits, but made concessions following a revolt from MPs. READ MORE: At least 42 Palestinians killed by Israel as doctors warn babies facing death The move means the Treasury may not see any savings at all as the welfare budget is still set to rapidly rise in the coming years. Media reports suggest the move could see ministers keep the cap in order to save money. The Prime Minister previously indicated the Government would only abolish the two-child cap, which prevents parents from claiming child tax credit or universal credit for more than two children, when it had the money to do so. Asked in May whether he would scrap the policy, he said: 'We'll look at all options of driving down child poverty.' The SNP, which will mitigate the limit in Scotland by 2026, has urged the UK Government to scrap the cap, which it says is pushing thousands of children into poverty. The party said analysis from the House of Commons Library found that 2.3 million families could be lifted out of poverty if the UK Government matched Scottish Government policies. These included the Scottish Child Payment, abolishing the two-child benefit cap and scrapping the so-called bedroom tax. According to the House of Commons Library, these measures would lift 96,000 families in Scotland out of poverty. The analysis also shows that over the past decade the number of children living in poverty in the UK has risen from 3.7 million (27%) in 2013/14 to 4.5 million (31%) in 2023/24. That number is expected to rise to 4.6 million (33%) by 2029-30, according to the data. SNP deputy Westminster leader Pete Wishart urged the Prime Minister to have a rethink on his welfare plans. Pete Wishart MP (Image: PA) He said: 'Keir Starmer must not punish children for his disastrous mistakes over the Labour Party's cuts to disabled people. 'It is utterly shameful that as a direct result of Labour Party austerity cuts, child poverty is rising to record levels in the UK – and the Prime Minister is failing to lift a finger to tackle it. 'Scrapping the two-child benefit cap is the absolute bare minimum – and it should have been done on the Labour Government's first day in power. READ MORE: Here's why banning Orange marches would be a bad idea 'It's pathetic that senior Labour Party figures now want to keep this punitive welfare cut just to show rebel MPs who's in charge. 'Saving Keir Starmer embarrassment is not more important than tackling child poverty.' Wishart urged Starmer not to 'drag his feet' on the two-child cap and to instead match the SNP's Scottish Child Payment with a similar policy for the entire UK. He added: 'Thanks to SNP action, Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling. 'Unless Keir Starmer urgently follow's Scotland's lead, his lasting legacy will be pushing millions of children into destitution.' A UK Government spokesperson said: 'We are determined to bring down child poverty. We've just announced a new £1 billion package to reform crisis support, including funding to ensure the poorest children do not go hungry outside of term time. 'This comes alongside the expansion to free breakfast clubs and the move to make over half-a-million more children eligible for free school meals. 'We have also increased the national minimum wage and are supporting 700,000 of the poorest families by introducing a fair repayment rate on universal credit deductions. 'We will publish an ambitious child poverty strategy later this year to ensure we deliver fully funded measures that tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty across the country.'
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
M&S' 'fabulous' £35 crossbody bag looks 'just like' £737 Bottega Veneta version
Marks and Spencer's bag looks very similar to a designer version - without the hefty price tag Marks and Spencer is selling a crossbody bag that bears a striking resemblance to a designer version. The retailer is well known for its fashion ranges and there may be a new favourite in stock now. The M&S Faux Leather Cross Body Bag, priced at £35, looks similar to one by designer brand Bottega Veneta - but for a fraction of the cost. The bag is currently only available in red, with the black and cream versions sold out online. Marks and Spencer also stocks the £55 Straw Shoulder Bag, and the Faux Leather Woven Shoulder Strap for £45. The retailer also has the Faux Leather Woven Clutch Bag for £35. Alternatively, shoppers looking for a different style could opt for the Next Tan Brown Leather Fringe Cross-Body Bag, priced at £35. New Look also has the Bright Red Quilted Faux Leather Mini Crossbody Bag for £21.99, while River Island stocks the £36 Cream Metal Handle Quilted Tote. M&S' Faux Leather Cross Body Bag looks similar to the designer version, with matching woven designs and zip fastenings. They both also feature a lined main compartment and a secure slip pouch. However, there are some differences between the two. The M&S version has a slightly thinner strap, while the designer version features flap closure that the cheaper option doesn't have. The Marks and Spencer bag has proven popular online, with many shoppers praising it in their reviews. One person said: "Fabulous. Great bag." A second wrote: "I love this little red bag which is just the right size to hold my essentials, and add a pop of colour to my outfits." A third added: "Stylish bag. Bought this in red and its gorgeous! Can't wait to use it." However, some shoppers were slightly less impressed, with one saying: "I really loved the style of the bag but I didn't like the zip, it kept getting stuck when I tried to open & close it, I don't know if it was a faulty zip but it was a lot of money to just make do." A second wrote: "Poor quality material and zip. Not worth the money." Despite this, others continued to praise the bag. One person said: "Lovely little bag just big enough for my items. Looks good and not cheap. Value for money." While the M&S Faux Leather Cross Body Bag is priced at £35, the Bottega Veneta Small Nappa Intrecciato Olimpia shoulder bag is currently priced at £737 on websites specialising in pre-owned items. This means shoppers could save around £702 by opting for the cheaper alternative.
