Nvidia insiders sold over $1 billion in stock amid market surge, FT reports
(Reuters) -Nvidia insiders sold over $1 billion worth of company stock in the past year, with a notable uptick in recent trading activity as executives capitalize on surging investor interest in artificial intelligence, the Financial Times reported on Sunday.
More than $500 million of the share sales took place this month as the California-based chips designer's share price climbed to an all-time high, the report said.
Jensen Huang, Nvidia's chief executive, started selling shares this week for the first time since September, the SEC filing showed.
Nvidia's stock hit a record on Wednesday, and the chipmaker reclaimed the crown as the world's most valuable company after an analyst said the chipmaker was set to ride a "Golden Wave" of artificial intelligence.
Its latest gains reflect the U.S. stock market's return to the "AI trade" that fueled massive gains in chip stocks and related technology companies in recent years on optimism about the emerging technology.
Nvidia did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Nvidia's shares have rebounded over 60% from their closing low on April 4, when Wall Street was reeling from President Donald Trump's global tariff announcements. U.S. stocks, including Nvidia, have recovered on expectations the White House will reach trade deals to soften the tariffs.
Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Want to use crypto to get a mortgage? It may get a lot easier.
Those who want to use crypto assets to help buy a home could potentially get the opportunity to do so. Bill Pulte, the overseer of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, has ordered the agencies to consider letting potential borrowers use cryptocurrency as an asset for reserves when they do risk assessments for single-family home loans. Guaranteed Rate executive vice president of national sales Jennifer Beeston explains what this move could mean for both potential homebuyers and the mortgage industry. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here. right now, you can use crypto when you're buying a house, but it has to be liquidated. So for down payment, it has to be liquidated. For reserves, it has to be liquidated. What Culti has called for, and this isn't effective yet, but he's called for Fanny and Freddie to look at how they can use it as reserves without liquidating it, which is critical, because every crypto person I know never wants to liquidate it. Jennifer, I'm just curious though why traditionally, and you've been in the business a long time, would crypto have been excluded from underwriting frameworks? I mean traditionally, was it because folks thought, listen, it's it's too volatile, there's not enough regulation? What were the reasons? I think that the mortgage industry often moves slower. I also think that in the grand banking sphere, there were quite a few naysayers against crypto, saying it wasn't real money and it was a fad. But as we've seen with BlackRock doing a crypto ETF, Chase is now looking at using Bitcoin ETFs as collateral on loans. The sentiments really changed, and I think that's what's driving this, as well as the president coming out and saying he wants the United States to be the crypto capital of the world. Do you, the actual effects of this, Jennifer, you know, let's say it happens, would you imagine, okay, there's going to be just that many more potential hopeful American home buyers who are going to be able to qualify for a loan? Yeah, I think we're removing more barriers. You know, in terms of reserves, a lot of people don't understand that in situations like, let's say, it's an owner-occupied loan. Sometimes if you have a higher debt income or something's not quite right, more reserves can help get that loan approved. I can have a borrower right now that has $100,000 in crypto, and unless they liquidate that, I can't use that to strengthen them. So Fanny and Freddie looking at a way to do that, it will help people. Do you think, Jennifer, let's say the price of cryptocurrency falls, would that mean a lender would go back to the borrower and say, hey, you know, you got to put up additional collateral here? Uh, I mean it depends. If the loan has not closed yet, yeah, we would be paying attention to that theoretically. But we still don't know what the guidelines and guard rails on this are going to be. Are they going to treat all crypto coins the same, or is it going to be something like only the, you know, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple? You know, I think Trump said there were about five that he was looking at the United States investing in. Is that what they're going to be tying it to? We don't know what the rules are going to be yet, so it's hard to understand the risk. And that's what they're studying is how to do this in a safe manner and still help people get into homes. One question I've heard asked, Jennifer, I'm curious to get your take on this. I've heard some people ask you, you have this sort of established mortgage system and how tough it would be to integrate crypto into that, just tactically and operationally. What do you say to that? I think that what they're talking about right now is more just underwriting. So I don't think that's difficult because it's just going to be, uh, we saw this with restricted stock income. We saw a lot of that in the tech sphere. It's just the way we look at it. Now, if for instance, you started seeing that down payments, instead of being liquidated from crypto, people were expecting to have that go from the exchange straight to escrow. Yes, that would be a change. However, there's companies in that space lining up to do that. So I think tech is moving so fast right now. This isn't the mortgage companies of years back. Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kaltura (KLTR) Pushes Toward Profit and Platform Expansion, Needham Stays Bullish
Kaltura Inc. (NASDAQ:KLTR) is one of the 10 best debt-free IT penny stocks to buy. On May 8, Needham's Ryan Koontz reaffirmed his Buy rating on Kaltura, holding firm on a $3 price target. His positive outlook was based on the company's strong first-quarter performance and encouraging strategic progress. The company reported strong growth in subscription revenue and posted its highest operating margin since 2020. Several key deals closed during the period, lifting core financial metrics compared to the prior year. A large flat-screen TV streaming video from a video hosting platform. While management expects a slight revenue dip in the second quarter due to customer churn, they left full-year guidance unchanged, a sign they remain confident in their roadmap and execution. Regarding the long-term goals, Koontz highlighted the company's aim to double EBITDA by fiscal 2026. It is also targeting to achieve the 'Rule of 30,' a widely used benchmark in the software industry which indicates a good balance between growth and profitability. These goals suggest a shift toward stronger operational discipline. He also noted that better execution, and further consolidation in the enterprise video space could strengthen Kaltura's competitive edge. Kaltura Inc. (NASDAQ:KLTR) provides a cloud-based video platform that powers real-time, on-demand, and live video experiences for enterprises, educational institutions, and media companies. While we acknowledge the potential of KLTR as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Best Tech Stocks to Buy According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social Security and Medicare Are Racing Toward Drastic Cuts—Yet Lawmakers Refuse To Act
Considering recent news, you may have missed that the 2025 trustees reports for Social Security and Medicare are out. Once again, they confirm what we've known for decades: Both programs are barreling straight toward insolvency. The Social Security retirement trust fund and Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund are each on pace to run dry by 2033. When that happens, seniors will face an automatic 23 percent cut in their Social Security benefits. Medicare will reduce payments to hospitals by 11 percent. These cuts are not theoretical. They're baked into the law. If nothing changes, they will be made. I have nothing against cuts of this size. In fact, if it were up to me, I would cut deeper. Medicare is a terrible source of distortions for our convoluted health care market and needs to be reined in. Social Security was created back when being too old to work meant being poor. That's no longer the case for as many people. Thanks to decades of compound investment growth, widespread homeownership, and rising asset values, seniors are no longer the systematically vulnerable group they once were. The top income quintile includes a growing number of retirees who draw substantial incomes from pensions and investment portfolios with Social Security benefits layered on top. These programs have become a transfer of wealth from the relatively poor to the relatively wealthy and old. Of course, America still has some poor seniors, so cutting across the board is bad. This is why the cuts should be targeted, not the automatic effects in 2033. And Congress should get started now. The size of the problem is staggering. Social Security's shortfall now equals 3.82 percent of taxable payroll or roughly 22 percent of scheduled benefit obligations. Avoiding insolvency eight years from now would require an immediate 27 percent benefit cut, according to former Social Security and Medicare trustee Charles Blahous. Alternatively, legislators could raise the payroll tax from 12.4 percent to 16.05 percent. That's a 29.4 percent increase. Or they could restructure Social Security so that only people who need the money would receive payments. But because facing this problem in an honest way is politically toxic, legislators are ignoring it. Blame does not rest solely with Congress. The American public has made it abundantly clear that they don't want reforms. They don't want benefit cuts or tax increases, and they certainly don't want higher retirement ages. So politicians pretend everything is fine. Congress does deserve fresh criticism for making things worse. Last year, legislators passed the misnamed "Social Security Fairness Act," giving windfall benefits to government workers who didn't pay into the system—which enlarges the shortfall. This year, the House proposed expanded tax breaks for seniors in the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," which would further worsen the problem. The cost of political giveaways is steep. Social Security's 75-year unfunded obligation has now reached $28 trillion, up from $25 trillion just a year ago. Medicare is no better. Its costs are projected to rise from 3.8 percent of gross domestic product today to 6.7 percent by the end of the century (8.8 percent under more realistic assumptions). Most of the additional spending will be financed through general revenue, meaning more borrowing and more pressure on the federal budget. As Romina Boccia of the Cato Institute has documented, other countries have taken meaningful steps to address similar challenges. Sweden and Germany implemented automatic stabilizers that slow benefit growth or raise taxes when their systems become unsustainable. New Zealand and Canada have moved toward more modest, poverty-focused pension systems that offer basic support without bankrupting the state. A few weeks ago, Denmark increased the retirement age to 70. These are serious reforms. The U.S. has done nothing. Options exist. Policymakers could gradually raise the retirement age to reflect modern, healthier, longer lives. They could cap benefits at $2,050 monthly, preserving income for the bottom 50 percent of beneficiaries while progressively reducing benefits for the top half. They could reform the tax treatment of retirement income to encourage private savings, as Canada has done with its tax-free savings accounts. Any combination of these reforms would help. But that would require admitting that the current path is unsustainable. It would require telling voters the truth. It would require courage. So far, these admirable traits have been sorely lacking in our politicians. The programs' trustees have made the stakes clear: The only alternatives to reform will be drastic benefit cuts or massive tax hikes. Waiting until the trust funds are empty will leave no room for gradual, targeted solutions. It will force crisis-mode slashing that will hurt the most vulnerable. The ultimate blame is with voters who continue to reward politicians for promising the impossible. A functioning democracy cannot survive if the electorate insists on voting benefits for themselves to the point of insolvency. At some point, reality asserts itself. That moment is rapidly approaching. COPYRIGHT 2025 The post Social Security and Medicare Are Racing Toward Drastic Cuts—Yet Lawmakers Refuse To Act appeared first on
