logo
Tourists Will Be Charged $2.25 Per Day to Surf in Hawaii

Tourists Will Be Charged $2.25 Per Day to Surf in Hawaii

Yahoo30-05-2025
In a landmark piece of legislation, Hawaii has become the first state to enact a 'green fee' – or a tax on tourists, aimed at fighting future climatological disasters – set to go into effect January 1st, 2026.
The tax, specifically, will apply to travelers staying in hotels, short-term rental homes, and cruise ships. And how much exactly? The transient accommodations tax (TAT) will be increased by 0.75 percent – translation: a nightly rate of $300 in a hotel will have an extra $2.25 per night added to the bill.
Senate Bill 1396 was signed by Hawaii Governor Josh Green earlier this week, enacting what they are calling the 'Green Fee,' the first-of-its-kind for any state, going into effect next year.
Governor Green said via press release: 'Today Hawaiʻi ushers in the first Green Fee in the nation. Once again, Hawaiʻi is at the forefront of protecting our natural resources, recognizing their fundamental role in sustaining the ecological, cultural and economic health of Hawaiʻi. As an island chain, Hawaiʻi cannot wait for the next disaster to hit before taking action. We must build resiliency now, and the Green Fee will provide the necessary financing to ensure resources are available for our future.'Of course, Hawaii is one of the world's most trafficked hubs for tourism. And all those people take a toll on the historic, and culturally significant island chain. So, this tax is an attempt to get ahead of future environmental impacts the islands may experience – a reserve, of sorts, for future disasters.
'I mahalo the tourism industry for stepping up and collaborating on this initiative, which will preserve Hawaiʻi for kamaʻāina and visitors alike,' continued Governor Green. 'The fee will restore and remediate our beaches and shorelines and harden infrastructure critical to the health and safety of all who call Hawaiʻi home, whether for a few days or a lifetime.'
If you're traveling to Hawaii, and you're staying in a hotel or short-term vacation rental, starting in 2026, it's gonna cost you an extra $2.25 per day to surf. But, instead of an extra fee, consider it an investment in the natural beauty and the future prosperity of this sacred place.Tourists Will Be Charged $2.25 Per Day to Surf in Hawaii first appeared on Surfer on May 30, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. to probe "anti-American" views of those applying for immigration benefits under Trump directive
U.S. to probe "anti-American" views of those applying for immigration benefits under Trump directive

CBS News

time8 hours ago

  • CBS News

U.S. to probe "anti-American" views of those applying for immigration benefits under Trump directive

The Trump administration has directed government officials to probe any "anti-American" views and activities of immigrants applying for immigration benefits like green cards and work permits, further expanding the grounds that can be cited to deny those applications. The policy unveiled on Tuesday by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is the latest front in a broader Trump administration effort to restrict access to legal immigration benefits, including by broadening the levels of scrutiny and vetting to which applicants are subjected. The guidance issued this week directs officials at USCIS to determine whether applicants for certain immigration benefits have "endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused anti-American views or the views of a terrorist organization or group," including on social media. USCIS said those groups could include organizations that espouse or promote antisemitic views and terrorism. If officials find applicants have any ties to these groups or share their views, the directive instructs the officials to consider that an "overwhelmingly negative factor" justifying the denial of an application. The policy will affect requests for immigration benefits that are discretionary, meaning that USCIS can deny them even if applicants meet the qualifications outlined in U.S. law. Those cases include many applications for permanent U.S. residency (also known as a green card), work permits and status changes for foreign students. While it wasn't immediately clear how expansively USCIS will define "anti-American" views and activities, the agency said it would make the determination based on a provision of U.S. immigration law that bans immigrants from becoming U.S. citizens if it is found that they advocate for world communism, totalitarianism, violence against officials or the overthrow of the U.S. government. The guidance issued Tuesday also orders USCIS officials to probe whether applicants improperly used an immigration policy known as parole to enter the U.S. In the immigration context, parole allows for the arrival of immigrants who are otherwise ineligible to enter the U.S. It was used by the Biden administration on an unprecedented scale, mainly to ease pressure at the U.S.-Mexico border by offering migrants a legal way to enter the country. USCIS said it would look into whether applicants' parole applications contained "false or fraudulent" information. Matthew Tragesser, USCIS' top spokesperson, said Tuesday's memo underscored that U.S. immigration benefits should not be granted to people who "despise the country." "U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible," Tragesser added. Stephen Yale-Loehr, an expert in U.S. immigration law, expressed concerns about how USCIS would implement its latest guidance, calling the language in it "very subjective." "This memo gives USCIS adjudicators even more reasons than before to deny a petition on discretionary grounds," Yale-Loehr said. While President Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration central to his second-term agenda, his administration has also tightened access to the legal immigration system. Last week, USCIS said it would expand a "good moral character" assessment in the U.S. citizenship process. That requirement was historically satisfied when applicants lacked serious criminal histories or disqualifying conduct on their record. But now, officials have been instructed to weigh different positive factors, like applicants' involvement in the community, and negative factors, like repeat traffic infractions, to determine whether someone has good moral character. The Trump administration also previously announced measures to more aggressively screen those applying for a U.S. immigration status, including by placing a greater emphasis on the social media activity of applicants.

Trump admin rescinds funding for solar farms
Trump admin rescinds funding for solar farms

E&E News

timea day ago

  • E&E News

Trump admin rescinds funding for solar farms

The Trump administration will scale back support for solar energy projects on farmland, the Agriculture Department announced. In an appearance with Deputy Agriculture Secretary Stephen Vaden in Tennessee on Monday, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins said the department was 'rescinding all programs building solar panels on our farmland.' The USDA today stepped back the comment, saying in a news release that smaller solar energy projects through the Rural Energy for America Program would continue to be funded, and suggesting that only loan guarantees — not grants — would face the most stringent limits. Advertisement 'Our prime farmland should not be wasted and replaced with green new deal subsidized solar panels,' Rollins said in a news release.

Democrats are wary of impeachment even as the GOP uses it to motivate voters
Democrats are wary of impeachment even as the GOP uses it to motivate voters

Politico

time2 days ago

  • Politico

Democrats are wary of impeachment even as the GOP uses it to motivate voters

'There will be some emotional members who want to grab headlines with impeachment, however [House Democratic] leadership has thus far shown that it's not a tool in our box' to hold Trump accountable, the person added, with House Democrats blocking attempts by some members to impeach him. 'Of course impeachment is a tool of the Congress that should always be available and appropriate,' said Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), who also chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus. 'But right now, I think we're in a stage where we're trying to try this case out in the court of public opinion before we do anything else.' Even outside groups that were leading agitators for Democrats to launch impeachment efforts during Trump's first term seem reluctant to deploy that same strategy again. 'Impeachment is good, but it's a symbolic act. It's not enough,' said Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible. So far this year, House Democrats have doomed efforts by their own caucus members to impeach Trump, including a majority of the caucus joining House Republicans to kill an impeachment push from Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) over Iran airstrikes in June. House leadership successfully dissuaded Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) from moving forward with another article of impeachment stemming from Trump's push to annex Greenland and on tariffs. Green plans to keep trying. 'I will not stop and I promise you this president is going to be brought down. He's got to be brought down,' Green said during a press conference this month in suburban Chicago. Speaking alongside several Democrats from the Texas legislature that left the state to prevent a quorum in Austin to pass the new Texas maps, Green vowed: 'He will be impeached again.' For now, Green is considered an outlier among the caucus, but he was in 2018, too. 'Of course impeachment is a tool of the Congress that should always be available and appropriate,' said Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), who also chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus. 'But right now, I think we're in a stage where we're trying to try this case out in the court of public opinion before we do anything else.' | Francis Chung/POLITICO Back then, House Democrats, led by then-Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, were initially uneasy about leaning fully into impeachment talks heading into the midterms. But the burgeoning blue wave that helped Democrats take back the House was propelled by a broader message from the party's base, who harnessed anti-Trump sentiment promising to hold Trump to account.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store