
Japanese court convicts a US Marine in sexual assault, sentencing him to 7 years in prison
TOKYO (AP) — A Japanese court has found a U.S. Marine guilty of sexually assaulting a woman on Okinawa and sentenced him to seven years in prison, in a case that has triggered anger and safety concerns on Japan's southern island, which has a heavy American troop presence.
The Naha District Court said Lance Cpl. Jamel Clayton, 22, of Ohio, was sentenced in the case on Tuesday.
Clayton was found guilty of attacking the woman in her 20s in the Yomitan village on the main Okinawa island in May, 2024, chocking her from behind, sexually assaulting her and causing her injuries.
Advertisement
4 US soldiers wait for US President Joe Biden to arrive at the US Marine Corps base in Iwakuni on May 18, 2023.
AFP via Getty Images
In sentencing, Judge Kazuhiko Obata said the victim's testimony, provided remotely and anonymously, was highly credible even though the defendant denied his charges brought by the prosecutors, who demanded 10 years in prison, according to Kyodo News.
'This behavior does not reflect the values of the Marine Corps nor does it exemplify the standards the overwhelming majority of our Marines uphold daily,' Capt. Kazuma Engelkemier, spokesperson for 3rd Marine Division, said in a statement confirming Clayton's conviction emailed on Wednesday.
4 Members of the Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force gather near Mount Fuji.
Getty Images
Advertisement
Engelkemier said the U.S. side monitored the trial proceedings without interfering in the Japanese judicial process. 'We cooperated fully with the investigation process,' he said.
The Marine has been in Japanese custody since his indictment that followed the allegation, he added.
The case was one of a string of sexual assault cases last year in which the arrests of the suspects were initially withheld by local authorities on grounds of protecting the victims' privacy, triggering anger and criticisms of coverups.
Advertisement
Okinawa, where one of the fiercest battles of World War II was fought 80 years ago and under U.S. occupation until 1972, remains home to the majority of about 50,000 U.S. troops stationed in Japan under a bilateral security pact. The island, which accounts for only 0.6% of Japanese land, hosts 70% of U.S. military facilities.
4 Judicial members including Judge Kazuhiko Obata, center back, for a sexual assault case of a U.S. Marine sit at the Naha District Court in Okinawa prefecture's Naha, southern Japan, Tuesday, July 24, 2025.
AP
Frustration runs high on Okinawa because of its continued burden with the heavy U.S. presence that includes noise, pollution, aircraft accidents and crime related to American troops.
Defense Minister Gen Nakatani, who attended Monday's 80th anniversary of the end of the Battle of Okinawa, raised concerns about recent sexual assault cases involving U.S. service members when he met with Lt. Gen. Roger Turner, the commander of III Marine Expeditionary Force, requesting discipline and preventive measures.
Advertisement
4 US Marines wait for President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD 1) during a Memorial Day event in Yokosuka on May 28, 2019.
AFP via Getty Images
There has been growing calls for a revision to the Status of Forces Agreement that gives the United States the right to investigate most accidents and crimes that occur on Japanese soil.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba 's Cabinet on Tuesday adopted a statement showing that the Japanese prosecutors dropped criminal cases against more than 300 U.S. service members in the last decade between 2014 and 2024, including a sexual assault case in Okinawa in 2020.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
33 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
An Insightful Study on the Complexity, Tragedy of Mers El-Kebir
The tragedy at Mers El-Kebir on July 3, 1940, illustrates the complexities of war. When it comes to World War II, most know the surface material that Germany and Soviet Russia invaded Poland in 1939; France fell to Germany in June 1940, resulting in the puppet Vichy France government and a counter Free French government-in-exile; and that Britain fought practically by itself until the Germans invaded Russia in June 1941 and the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor in December 1941. Common knowledge is that there were ultimately two competing sides: the Axis Powers of Germany, Italy and Japan, and the Allied Powers of Great Britain, Soviet Russia, and the United States. And certainly there are complexities within these arrangements, but for the most part, they are rather straightforward. The relationship between the French and the British leading up to and after July 3, 1940, is anything but straightforward. In Ryan K. Noppen's new study, 'Mers El-Kebir 1940: Operation Catapult,' he breaks down the geopolitical and geostrategic complexities that resulted in the British feeling compelled to attack the French fleet in the Mediterranean. Perhaps this attack is known to many readers, but what may not be known is why the attack was deemed completely necessary by the British, but completely unnecessary by the French, and how the attack understandably led to heightened French bitterness toward the British, but also how the attack resulted in increased support from the Americans—a move that arguably saved the British Isles from capitulation. Few Options Readers may already have a preconceived notion about the Mers El-Kebir attack, siding with either the British or the French. Noppen, however, presents both sides: those of the political leaders and the military brass, but also those troops on the ground (or more accurately, sailors at sea) who were caught in the middle of this unfortunate event.

Epoch Times
33 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
75 Years: The American Legacy of the Korean War
In Fulton, Missouri, the great British statesman Winston Churchill stood before a large American audience inside Westminster College. It was March 5, 1946, and it had been less than a year since the end of World War II. The German Nazis and the Imperial Japanese had been defeated. But Churchill arrived in the United States with a dire Churchill was referencing the Soviet Union—the former ally yet familiar foe. Europe was in rubble. Germany was divided in four parts among the Americans, British, French, and Soviets. Before the end of the war, and before that iron curtain had officially cordoned off eastern Europe, another curtain was drawn, but this one was drawn by the Americans. To the Victor Go the Spoils On the night of Aug. 10, 1945—a day after the Nagasaki bombing and five days before Japan surrendered—officers of the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee made the hasty decision to split Korea along the 38th Parallel. The north would be occupied by the Soviets and the south by the Americans. The Red Army had been storming through Manchuria on their way to the peninsula. To the relief of the Americans, the Soviets agreed to the arrangement. Offering a preemptive arrangement now was far better than attempting to force the Russians out later.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Armenian authorities arrest an archbishop and accuse him of plotting against the government
YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) — Armenia's security services arrested one of the country's top religious leaders on terrorism charges Wednesday and accused him of plotting to overthrow the government, the second arrest in a week of a prominent political opponent. Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan, a major figure in the influential Apostolic Church, was arrested by Armenia's Investigative Committee, which accused him of planning to carry out bombings and arson attacks to disrupt power supplies and stage accidents on major roads to paralyze traffic. His lawyer described the charges as 'fiction.' Galstanyan leads the Sacred Struggle opposition movement and has demanded the resignation of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who was the focus of protests last year by tens of thousands of demonstrators after Armenia agreed to hand over control of several border villages to bitter rival Azerbaijan and to normalize relations between the neighbors. Galstanyan leads the Tavush Diocese in northeastern Armenia and spearheaded a movement that opposed the handover of the villages in the country, which was once part of the Soviet Union. Although the territorial concession was the movement's core issue, it has expanded to a wide array of complaints about Pashinyan, who came to power in 2018. The decision to turn over the villages followed a lightning military campaign in September 2023, in which Azerbaijan's military forced ethnic Armenian separatists in the Karabakh region to capitulate. Pashinyan wrote on social media that the security services had foiled a plot by 'the criminal oligarch clergy to destabilize Armenia and take power.' Officials said 13 others also were detained amid raids by police on the homes of dozens of opposition activists. The Investigative Committee said it carried out over 90 searches and recovered evidence that included firearms and ammunition. In addition to disputing the charges, Galstanyan's lawyer, Sergei Harutyunyan, said police searched the cleric's residence for six hours but found only smoke bombs that are commonly used at protests in Armenia. 'They spent time studying every room, every closet, every letter; they recorded everything,' Harutyunyan said. Attempts to impeach Pashinyan were unsuccessful, but the relationship between him and the Apostolic Church has deteriorated. On June 8, Pashinyan called for church leader Catholicos Karekin II to resign after accusing him of fathering a child despite a vow of celibacy. The church released a statement at the time accusing Pashinyan of undermining Armenia's 'spiritual unity' but did not address the claim about the child. Pashinyan's claim sparked fresh anger among the church's followers, including Russian-Armenian billionaire Samvel Karapetyan, who appeared in a video saying that the religious institution was under attack. Karapetyan, 59, was detained June 18, days after the clip was posted online, and accused of calling for seizing power in the country. Pashinyan later said the billionaire's energy company, Electricity Networks of Armenia, would be nationalized.