logo
Judge to rule in sexual assault case that shook Canadian hockey

Judge to rule in sexual assault case that shook Canadian hockey

France 243 days ago
The players stood trial over allegations they assaulted a woman in a hotel room following a June 2018 celebration for a national men's junior team.
Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube, Carter Hart and Callan Foote have denied wrongdoing, insisting the accuser -- whose identity is protected -- consented to a variety of sex acts.
The complainant, 20 at the time, met McLeod at a bar in London, Ontario, before having sex with him.
That initial encounter is not at issue in the trial, which is about events that occurred after McLeod messaged a team-wide group chat asking if anyone was interested in a "three-way."
The players have confirmed participating in sex acts with the complainant and an initial police investigation produced no charges.
Media investigations then revealed Hockey Canada, a governing body, used funds from subscription fees paid by ordinary families for a $3.55 million CAD ($2.6 million USD) out-of-court settlement with the woman.
Public outrage forced the resignation of Hockey Canada's board, and London police, under a new chief, re-investigated the case led by a female detective with expertise in sexual assault.
Western University law professor Melanie Randall, who has closely followed the case, told AFP the flawed initial investigation included an "inappropriate fixation" by the detective on the complainant's alcohol consumption.
Randall added the first detective didn't apply up-to-date understandings of consent under criminal law, the issue that defined the trial.
"Consent has to be voluntarily and freely given, and it has to be contemporaneous with each and every sexual act," Randall said.
"You can't give consent in advance and you can't give it retroactively," she added, calling that a "powerful shift in (Canadian) law."
Consent video
The trial heard that players made videos of the complainant saying she was OK with what happened.
Prosecutors argued the decision to make a video indicated concern the sex was not consensual.
Hart, a former NHL goaltender, testified such videos were common practice among professional athletes.
Randall noted, "the idea that you could film someone afterwards and say -- 'hey, this was all consensual, right?' -- to prove that there was consent is actually completely discordant with how consent is defined (in Canadian law)."
In a landmark 1999 decision, Canada's Supreme Court barred defense lawyers in sexual assault cases from a tactic it called "whack the complainant."
Scholar have defined this as withering cross examination attacking a complainant's credibility through outdated stereotypes about sexual encounters.
Raising their entire sexual history, alleged promiscuous behavior, or questions about why they did not resist are prohibited.
For Randall, defense lawyers in the hockey case committed "a pretty egregious and blatant example of whack the victim, full force," citing "nine days of brutal cross-examination."
Hockey culture
Some commentators have rejected claims the case exposed broader issues in hockey culture, arguing the sport remains a positive force for hundreds of thousands of young Canadians despite a disturbing incident involving several players.
But Simon Darnell, a professor of sport for development and peace at the University of Toronto, told AFP "it would be a problem to say that these five men were somehow bad apples and that there's nothing systemic here."
Regardless of whether the judge finds the players guilty, Darnell said the conduct in the hotel room needs to be addressed.
"Young, elite male hockey players grow up in an environment, where they are told both implicitly and explicitly that they are really important," he said.
"They probably grew up feeling like sexual conquest was this thing that they're owed as a result of being a hockey player," he added, urging more work to foster a sports culture that emphasizes "a positive form of masculinity."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NFL players, employees fined for selling Super Bowl tickets: reports
NFL players, employees fined for selling Super Bowl tickets: reports

France 24

time4 hours ago

  • France 24

NFL players, employees fined for selling Super Bowl tickets: reports

ESPN reported that players who sold allotted tickets will be fined one-and-a-half times the face value of the tickets sold and be barred from receiving tickets to the next two editions of the Super Bowl. Players amongst those caught will be given the option of purchasing tickets if their team reaches the Super Bowl in 2026 or 2027. Players who decline to pay the fines face being suspended, ESPN cited league and union sources as saying. ESPN quoted an NFL memo sent to teams which said employees and players had sold tickets to "bundlers" working with a ticket resale site. Tickets to the Super Bowl are consistently one of the hottest -- and most expensive -- tickets in North American sport, fetching as much as $10,000 on resale sites. "Our initial investigation has determined that a number of NFL players and coaches, employed by several NFL Clubs, sold Super Bowl tickets for more than the ticket's face value in violation of the policy," NFL chief compliance officer Sabrina Perel wrote in the memo. Perel cited "long-standing league policy" which "prohibits League or club employees, including players, from selling NFL game tickets acquired from their employer for more than the ticket's face value or for an amount greater than the employee originally paid for the ticket, whichever is less." Perel added that the league will enhance mandatory training before Super Bowl LX for all league personnel to emphasize the rules and "the broader principle that no one should profit personally from their NFL affiliation at the expense of our fans." The league, meanwhile, also planned to improve training to avoid a repeat, with the possibility of stiffer sanctions for future offenses. "No one should profit personally from their NFL affiliation at the expense of our fans," Perel wrote in the memo.

Rubiales forced kiss could drive Spain on in Euro 2025 final: England's Toone
Rubiales forced kiss could drive Spain on in Euro 2025 final: England's Toone

France 24

time8 hours ago

  • France 24

Rubiales forced kiss could drive Spain on in Euro 2025 final: England's Toone

Spain beat England 1-0 in 2023 to win the Women's World Cup for the first time, with Olga Carmona scoring the only goal of the game. However, the headlines later were dominated by the forced kiss by former Spanish football federation chief Luis Rubiales on player Jenni Hermoso. Rubiales was eventually fined 10,800 euros ($11,670) for sexual assault in February this year. "It was a difficult period for the Spanish players and I think for what they did in the World Cup, for that to then be the main talking point, was really tough and something they shouldn't have had to go through," Toone told reporters in Zurich on Friday. "They should have celebrated what was an amazing tournament for them." Toone played in the World Cup final and is now hoping England can avenge their defeat that day, as well as repeat their victory in the final of the last European Championship in 2022. "Both of us want to win obviously -- they have their reasons, we have ours and I think it is going to be a very tough game," said the 25-year-old Manchester United midfielder. "We have so much respect for them and the quality they have, but we also believe in ourselves, that we can really step up." England have made a third consecutive major tournament final off the back of two heart-stopping victories in the knockout rounds in Switzerland. After coming back from two goals down late on to beat Sweden on penalties in the quarter-finals, they defeated Italy 2-1 in extra time in the last four. The Lionesses were trailing in that game in Geneva until Michelle Agyemang's 96th-minute effort forced extra time. Chloe Kelly then converted the winner in the 119th minute as penalties loomed. "I think we have it in us all individually and as a team that we want to fight, not stop running," said Toone, who scored England's first goal when they beat Germany 2-1 at Wembley in the Euro 2022 final. "You have seen that in games where sometimes you might feel like we are down and out and it is 90-odd minutes and then someone comes on and we take that moment. © 2025 AFP

Judge to rule in sexual assault trial that rocked Canadian hockey
Judge to rule in sexual assault trial that rocked Canadian hockey

France 24

time2 days ago

  • France 24

Judge to rule in sexual assault trial that rocked Canadian hockey

The accused -- who all previously played in the National Hockey League -- stood trial over allegations they assaulted a woman in a hotel room following a June 2018 celebration for a national men's junior team. Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube, Carter Hart and Callan Foote have denied wrongdoing, insisting the accuser -- whose identity is protected -- consented to a variety of sex acts. The complainant, 20 at the time, met McLeod at a bar in London, Ontario, before having sex with him. That initial encounter is not at issue in the trial, which is about events that occurred after McLeod messaged a team-wide group chat asking if anyone was interested in a "three-way." Prosecutors argued the players engaged in sex acts with the complainant without taking steps to ensure her consent. Defense lawyers said the woman willingly participated and only made the assault allegations after regretting her choices. Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia will deliver her verdict from 10:00 am local time (1400 GMT) in front of what is expected to be a packed London courtroom. Criminal trials in Canada are often decided by a jury, but the case shifted to a judge-only trial after two juries were dismissed. Defining consent An initial police investigation into the allegations produced no charges. But subsequent media probes revealed Hockey Canada, a governing body, used funds from subscription fees paid by ordinary families for a $3.55 million CAD ($2.6 million USD) out-of-court settlement with the woman, forcing the resignation of Hockey Canada's leadership. London police, under a new chief, re-opened an investigation led by a female detective with expertise in sexual assault. The trial has been shaped by legal definition of consent which, in Canada, "has to be voluntarily and freely given, and it has to be contemporaneous with each and every sexual act," Western University law professor Melanie Randall told AFP. She dismissed the relevance of so-called consent videos made by McLeod, which were presented at trial. "The idea that you could film someone afterwards and say -- 'hey, this was all consensual, right?' -- to prove that there was consent is actually completely discordant with how consent is defined," Randall said. Hockey culture Some commentators have rejected claims the case exposed broader issues in hockey culture, arguing the sport remains a positive force for hundreds of thousands of young Canadians despite a disturbing incident involving several players. But Simon Darnell, a professor of sport for development and peace at the University of Toronto, told AFP "it would be a problem to say that these five men were somehow bad apples and that there's nothing systemic here." Regardless of whether the judge finds the players guilty, Darnell said the conduct in the hotel room needs to be addressed, urging more work to foster a sports culture that emphasizes "a positive form of masculinity." © 2025 AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store