Men arrested in Madison among dozens of immigrants detained in South Dakota
It's unknown how many immigrants have been held for removal in South Dakota since President Donald Trump took office in January promising mass deportations, but public jail rosters in the state show more than two dozen being held now.
A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesperson told South Dakota Searchlight that arrest statistics will be updated soon. The most recent figures on its website are from December.
A high-profile ICE operation Tuesday in Madison resulted in the arrests of eight people accused of being in the country without legal permission. Before that, ICE was already using jails in South Dakota as waystations for immigration actions more often since Trump took office, according to Minnehaha County Sheriff Mike Milstead.
'They're not only doing what's been reported on in Madison,' he said. 'They're doing investigations around the clock, with other federal agencies.'
As of Thursday morning, there were 22 people detained at the Sioux Falls jail with pending immigration issues, according to Milstead, who said the figure can change by the hour as inmates come and go.
About half of the current detainees with ICE holds came to the attention of immigration agents after being arrested on state-level criminal charges. The others arrived at the jail for removal actions alone, and Milstead said that activity has increased.
Eight targeted in Madison immigration operation appear in federal court
The jail holds federal inmates for both ICE and the U.S. Marshals Service, which oversees people accused of federal crimes, including those related to immigration. The feds pay the county $112 a day per federal inmate.
People targeted by ICE for removal who don't have criminal charges can only be held at the jail in Sioux Falls for 72 hours before being transferred to an ICE detention facility, Milstead said.
Those facilities are themselves local jails, but Sioux Falls is not designated as a long-term detention facility for ICE.
Unlike inmates targeted for removal alone, inmates with ICE holds and criminal charges can stay in Sioux Falls until their case concludes. An inmate who comes in on an ICE hold and is later charged with a crime is transferred to the U.S. Marshals Service.
'If they're Marshals prisoners, we've held them for years sometimes,' Milstead said.
Milstead's jail has cooperated with ICE for more than a decade as part of the agency's Secure Communities Program, under which participating local jails send booking fingerprints to both the FBI and ICE. The FBI uses the fingerprints to check for federal warrants and federal criminal charges. ICE checks for prior interactions with immigration agents.
The Minnehaha County Jail also sends the names of every foreign-born detainee to be cross-checked for legal status by ICE's Criminal Alien Program.
CONTACT US
The jail has agreed to step up its cooperation. Milstead recently signed a 287(g) agreement with ICE, which will require some of his deputies to take about eight hours of training, after which they'll be able to serve ICE warrants for removal actions. There are several types of 287(g) agreements, all of which enable some measure of cross-deputization to allow local law enforcement to work on behalf of ICE.
Milstead and Hughes County Sheriff Patrick Callahan, in Pierre, both signed up for the warrant service program through 287(g) this spring. It won't be a large change operationally in Sioux Falls, said Milstead, who expects to train around a dozen people.
Inmates brought to the jail by ICE on removal proceedings have already been served removal warrants by ICE agents.
Those who come to jail on criminal charges and are later alleged to be in the country illegally are served removal warrants by ICE agents after those agents obtain warrants from a judge. The Minnehaha County Jail's 287(g) agreement will allow trained deputies to serve those warrants, eliminating the need for an ICE agent to return to the jail for that purpose after asking for them.
Callahan told South Dakota Searchlight he'll be the local officer trained to serve removal warrants. His jail has no inmates with immigration holds.
Pennington County, South Dakota's second-largest county by population, had four inmates with ICE holds as of Thursday afternoon, spokesperson Helene Duhamel said.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
42 minutes ago
- New York Post
NY Dems aim to de-mask ICE agents to scare them off their raids — NOT to protect the public
Supporters claim a bill introduced by Democratic state lawmakers last month banning ICE agents and police from wearing masks during raids will ensure safety and prevent authoritarianism. One backer, Sen. Patricia Fahy, fumes that ICE is 'operating like masked militias' and 'paramilitary secret police' and so must be reined in. Nonsense: The awkwardly and misleadingly named Mandating End to Lawless Tactics Act is actually little more than an attempt to thwart immigration enforcement by making ICE agents fear for their personal safety. It joins similar efforts in other states and in Congress to 'unmask ICE.' In the words of GOP Sen. George Borrello, 'This bill is driven by ideology, not a genuine concern for public safety.' The Left's hypocrisy on this issue is staggering. Progressives — including many of the MELT Act's supporters in the Legislature — have opposed mask bans for criminal suspects and rioters, such as Nassau County's common-sense ban, which has exceptions for law enforcement. Yet for all their sympathy for those involved with the criminal-justice system, they have no qualms about painting cops as criminals and subjecting them to mask bans. If these lawmakers truly cared about public safety, they'd go after the rioters and real criminals who've routinely hidden their identities to evade accountability following the 2020 George Floyd unrest and Oct. 7 demonstrations. ICE and other law enforcement don't mask up because they have machinations of becoming a 'paramilitary secret police.' They do so to keep themselves and their families safe from multinational gangs such as Tren de Aragua. Facial-recognition technology, now rapidly improving due to AI, gives anyone — including nefarious actors like Antifa or cartel members — the ability to reverse image search the unmasked face of an ICE agent. They can then obtain and post their names, addresses and information about their relatives to social media. While the Justice Department can prosecute those responsible for such doxxing, it is nonetheless a frequent threat to agents and loved ones. Addresses of hotels where agents stay during operations are routinely spread on social media so that protesters can harass them. Agitators are so well-organized that an app was created to report and rush to ICE raid locations, as seen in Los Angeles riots this year. The Department of Homeland Security has reported an 830% increase in assaults on ICE personnel this year, attributed to an increase in doxxing and rhetoric against agents. Worse still, even if the MELT Act passes, its effects would be largely symbolic. Lawmakers like Fahy clearly don't understand federalism. Because the Constitution gives federal law precedence, any federal regulation would immediately supersede the MELT Act if passed, rendering it largely symbolic. Additionally, federal agents are immune from state criminal prosecution when acting within the scope of their authority. The MELT Act would also require that all law enforcement agents display their names or badge numbers on their uniforms, hamstringing the plainclothes units of local New York police departments, which now must only provide this information verbally. Some of the bill's supporters mention a more realistic point that masking without wearing identification might allow for easier impersonation of ICE officers. They might also argue that a lack of masking deters possible police misconduct, despite the widespread use of body cameras. Those are valid concerns. But there are ways to protect the public even with masked law enforcement. Public-education campaigns should remind residents that ICE agents and other law enforcement are legally required to identify themselves as police as soon as it is practicable and safe to do so. New Yorkers under arrest should keep in mind their constitutional protections, such as the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. Masked or not, imposters can still pose as ICE or any other law-enforcement officers. Requiring names or badge numbers does nothing if there's no reliable way to immediately verify the person's legitimacy. The answer isn't a largely symbolic law to neuter real agents; it's to strengthen identification through local cooperation. The only way to fully reassure New Yorkers is cooperation between local police and ICE, whether via collaborative task forces, such as through the federal 287(g) program already adopted by several counties, or by having nearby officers accompany raids to keep public order, which would help quickly debunk any imposters. This type of public partnership would not be a political statement about immigration, rather a commonsense way to put the public at ease and ensure all involved in raids are safe. The MELT Act is symbolic theater that punishes law enforcement while doing nothing to realistically stop imposters. New Yorkers would be safer if lawmakers scrapped this bill and instead fostered real cooperation between local police and ICE to deter fraud and protect both the public and the agents doing dangerous work. Paul Dreyer is a cities policy analyst at the Manhattan Institute.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Florida GOP removes new immigration merchandise after Home Depot objects
The Republican Party of Florida on Saturday removed a line of deportation-themed shirts, hats and other tchotchkes for sale on its website that mimicked The Home Depot's logo. The party's line of 'The Deport Depot' merch was themed on the new immigrant detention center Gov. Ron DeSantis unveiled this week that he called 'Deportation Depot.' But the items bore a logo with the same recognizable orange box and stenciled font as the one belonging to The Home Depot. Home Depot spokesperson Beth Marlowe said late Friday that the company had not approved the party to use its branding or logo. 'We have reached out to the RPOF to try to resolve this issue,' she said in an email. As of Saturday afternoon, the items were still for sale, ranging from $15 to $28. Sales count as political contributions to the Republican Party of Florida. The merch, along with a post on X about it, were removed a few hours later, after this story published. Party chairperson Evan Power didn't respond to requests for comment on Saturday. On Friday, before The Home Depot weighed in, he said that the party clears its merchandise through lawyers before selling it. Power said he was confident that 'The Deport Depot' was protected by prior case law, in which 'no reasonable person would think it's the logo of a company.' 'It's proving a point by highlighting a recognizable symbol,' Power said of the party's logo. 'The Deport Depot' was the party's most recent attempt to fundraise off of the state's immigration efforts. When DeSantis unveiled the 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center in the Everglades, the party and state Attorney General James Uthmeier released a corresponding line of shirts, buttons, hats and drink insulators. Companies have taken aggressive approaches to protecting their logos, but The Home Depot could be more sensitive than most. The company's home improvement stores have become ground zero for President Donald Trump's aggressive deportation efforts, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeting the day laborers who gather there seeking work. Raids outside Home Depot stores have been particularly acute in California. The June protests in a neighborhood of Los Angeles were sparked in part by reports of immigration agents chasing people outside a store. On Thursday, a man was struck and killed by a vehicle while fleeing immigration agents at a Home Depot in Southern California. The company has been criticized on all sides for largely staying out of the issue. 'We aren't notified that ICE activities are going to happen, and we aren't involved in them,' Marlowe said. Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Federal immigration agents shoot San Bernardino man's car, authorities say
A San Bernardino family says that federal immigration agents fired multiple shots at their car on Saturday morning before waiting outside of their home for hours. A spokesperson for the Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice says that the incident happened at around 8:40 a.m., when one of the family members was stopped by agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Sometime during their interaction, the civilian's car was struck by gunfire three times, they said. "The individual proceeded to return home, as it was clear the agents did not have a warrant," said a statement from IC4IJ. At the same time, San Bernardino Police Department officers were dispatched to the intersection of Acacia Avenue and Baseline Street after learning of shots fired in the area. "Upon arrival, officers encountered federal agents who advised they were involved in an officer-involved shooting and that the involved suspect had fled the scene in a vehicle," SBPD officers said in a news release. A short time later, police said the suspect called 911 to report that masked men tried to pull him over, broke his car window and shot at him. He told them that he did not know who they were and asked for assistance. Police went to the man's home and found the damaged car. "At that time, it was unclear what the suspect was wanted for. Under the California Values Act, California law enforcement agencies are prohibited from assisting federal officials with immigration enforcement, so our officers left the scene as the investigation was being conducted by federal authorities," police said. Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice says that the federal agents arrived at the home at around 11 a.m., where they remained outside for several hours to "pressure the individual to open the door and come outside." They allegedly did not provide a warrant and did not make attempts to communicate with the suspect or his family. At around 1:15 p.m., SBPD officers were called back to the home upon receiving a request for assistance from agents who said a large crowd had formed outside of the home as they "attempted to arrest the subject for assaulting a federal officer." Police provided crowd control at the home, stating that local law enforcement can help federal officials if officer or public safety is at risk. "In this case, federal agents requested assistance during a lawful arrest for assaulting a federal officer when a crowd created a potential officer safety concern," police said. "This was not an immigration-related arrest, which would be prohibited under California law." Agents left the home a little before 4 p.m., said IC4IJ's statement. They also say that the person who was first stopped by ICE agents has no criminal record. No further information was provided. CBS News Los Angeles has reached out to ICE for further information on the incident but has not yet heard back.
