
Kepler Capital Remains a Buy on United Utilities (UU)
In a report released on May 15, Juan Rodriguez from Kepler Capital maintained a Buy rating on United Utilities (UU – Research Report), with a price target of p1,200.00. The company's shares closed yesterday at p1,114.00.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
Quickly and easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions
Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks straight to you inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter
According to TipRanks, Rodriguez is a 4-star analyst with an average return of 6.5% and a 57.21% success rate.
The word on The Street in general, suggests a Moderate Buy analyst consensus rating for United Utilities with a p1,214.40 average price target, a 9.01% upside from current levels. In a report released on May 15, Morgan Stanley also maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a p1,300.00 price target.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Environment Secretary Steve Reed has suggested that water companies would be 'extremely foolish' to increase salaries to try and get around a bonus ban. Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
PROCEPT BioRobotics (PRCT) Gets a Buy from TD Cowen
In a report released yesterday, Josh Jennings from TD Cowen reiterated a Buy rating on PROCEPT BioRobotics (PRCT – Research Report). The company's shares closed yesterday at $65.05. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Jennings covers the Healthcare sector, focusing on stocks such as Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic, and Establishment Labs Holdings. According to TipRanks, Jennings has an average return of 4.6% and a 52.11% success rate on recommended stocks. The word on The Street in general, suggests a Strong Buy analyst consensus rating for PROCEPT BioRobotics with a $80.20 average price target. PRCT market cap is currently $3.32B and has a P/E ratio of -36.24. Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 43 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is negative on the stock. This means that over the past quarter there has been an increase of insiders selling their shares of PRCT in relation to earlier this year. Most recently, in March 2025, Reza Zadno, the President & CEO of PRCT sold 5,475.00 shares for a total of $312,403.50.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Environment Secretary Steve Reed has suggested that water companies would be 'extremely foolish' to increase salaries to try and get around a bonus ban. Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. Promise made. Promise delivered. — Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) June 6, 2025 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.