logo
#

Latest news with #UnitedUtilities

United Utilities (UU) Gets a Buy from Bank of America Securities
United Utilities (UU) Gets a Buy from Bank of America Securities

Business Insider

time4 days ago

  • Business
  • Business Insider

United Utilities (UU) Gets a Buy from Bank of America Securities

Bank of America Securities analyst Julius Nickelsen maintained a Buy rating on United Utilities today and set a price target of £13.00. The company's shares closed today at p1,118.00. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Nickelsen covers the Utilities sector, focusing on stocks such as Pennon Group plc, Severn Trent, and Elia System Operator SA/NV. According to TipRanks, Nickelsen has an average return of 45.7% and a 100.00% success rate on recommended stocks. Currently, the analyst consensus on United Utilities is a Moderate Buy with an average price target of p1,226.29. Based on United Utilities' latest earnings release for the quarter ending March 31, the company reported a quarterly revenue of p1.06 billion and a net profit of p161.6 million. In comparison, last year the company earned a revenue of p967.5 million and had a net profit of p10.1 million Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 42 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is negative on the stock. This means that over the past quarter there has been an increase of insiders selling their shares of UU in relation to earlier this year.

Why has there been a surge in water pollution?
Why has there been a surge in water pollution?

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Climate
  • Yahoo

Why has there been a surge in water pollution?

After years of protest, promised action, and bill increases, it would be reasonable to expect the sewage scandal to have improved. In fact, it's done the complete opposite: A 60% increase in pollution incidents between 2023 and 2024. Water firms admit they're not doing well enough, but point out, correctly, that 2024 was a wet year. Wet weather means a greater likelihood of sewage spills from pipes that carry both rainfall and sewage. Environment Agency data reveals that the excuse doesn't wash. Serious pollution incidents are up 30% since 2016. And this is the third consecutive year in which they've increased. Their latest report reaffirms what we already know: Persistent underinvestment and poor asset maintenance are why the sewage system can't cope. The share of the problem varies widely from company to company, with United Utilities and Northumbrian Water having the fewest pollution incidents. Then it's Southern, Anglian, and Thames Water, England's largest water firm, topping the pollution pop charts. There was some good-ish news. Transparency seems to be improving almost across the board, with more companies "self-reporting" pollution incidents than ever before. It's notable, however, that for the 11 most serious - Category 1 - pollution incidents in 2024, only four were reported by water companies themselves, the other seven by third parties. It's easy, of course, to blame the water companies. But the Independent Water Commission, due to report next week, is expected to call for a radical shake-up of the sector, including the possible dismantling of water regulator Ofwat. The buck, ultimately, rises higher than that before stopping. Read more:' Successive governments pressured Ofwat to keep bills low, yet denied it the power to limit water company financial engineering. The resulting lack of real engineering - of our sewers and water supplies - has left a problem for which there can now be no quick or cheap fix.

Why has there been a surge in water pollution?
Why has there been a surge in water pollution?

Sky News

time5 days ago

  • Climate
  • Sky News

Why has there been a surge in water pollution?

Why you can trust Sky News After years of protest, promised action, and bill increases, it would be reasonable to expect the sewage scandal to have improved. In fact, it's done the complete opposite: A 60% increase in pollution incidents between 2023 and 2024. Water firms admit they're not doing well enough, but point out, correctly, that 2024 was a wet year. Wet weather means a greater likelihood of sewage spills from pipes that carry both rainfall and sewage. Environment Agency data reveals that the excuse doesn't wash. 1:56 Serious pollution incidents are up 30% since 2016. And this is the third consecutive year in which they've increased. Their latest report reaffirms what we already know: Persistent underinvestment and poor asset maintenance are why the sewage system can't cope. The share of the problem varies widely from company to company, with United Utilities and Northumbrian Water having the fewest pollution incidents. Then it's Southern, Anglian, and Thames Water, England's largest water firm, topping the pollution pop charts. There was some good-ish news. Transparency seems to be improving almost across the board, with more companies "self-reporting" pollution incidents than ever before. It's notable, however, that for the 11 most serious - Category 1 - pollution incidents in 2024, only four were reported by water companies themselves, the other seven by third parties. It's easy, of course, to blame the water companies. But the Independent Water Commission, due to report next week, is expected to call for a radical shake-up of the sector, including the possible dismantling of water regulator Ofwat. The buck, ultimately, rises higher than that before stopping. Successive governments pressured Ofwat to keep bills low, yet denied it the power to limit water company financial engineering. The resulting lack of real engineering - of our sewers and water supplies - has left a problem for which there can now be no quick or cheap fix.

‘Getting a water meter cut my bill in half'
‘Getting a water meter cut my bill in half'

Times

time5 days ago

  • Business
  • Times

‘Getting a water meter cut my bill in half'

Soaring water bills led more than 100,000 homeowners to request water meters in the first four months of the year. Some suppliers said they had two or three times as many applications as they had in the first few months of 2024. Water bills are based on an archaic system that hasn't been updated since 1990 and many customers find that switching to a meter can cut their costs in half. United Utilities, which has 8 million customers across the North West of England, said there had been 44,640 applications for water meters between January and April, up from 23,176 last year. Wessex Water, which has 2.9 million customers across the South West, said it has had 8,000 applications since sending out annual bills in February — double the number it had between February and July last year. The Consumer Council for Water, a watchdog, said that three other big suppliers had almost 75,000 meter applications between them from January to April, up from about 42,000 last year. The council has a calculator on its website that allows you to work out if a water meter will save you money — 312,630 used it between February and June, up from 111,763 over the same months last year. Tim Clarke from the Consumer Council for Water said: 'Suppliers appear to have had unprecedented interest in water meters as customers look for ways to combat the largest increase in bills since privatisation.' Average annual water and sewage bills went up 26 per cent in April to £603 — the biggest rise since 1989, according to Water UK, a trade association. And bills are set to keep on rising for the next five years after the heavily indebted water companies struck a deal with the water regulator, Ofwat, to fund infrastructure improvements. There is unlikely to be any respite even after that. Water companies are under huge pressure from politicians and campaign groups to cut down on sewage leaks that have led to pollution of rivers and seas. The Environment Agency said there were a record 2,801 pollution incidents caused by water companies in England last year, including 75 which posed 'serious or persistent' harm to fisheries, drinking water and human health. This was a 60 per cent rise on the 2,174 in 2023. With a water meter, you pay for the water you use, and some fixed charges for sewage and infrastructure. If you don't have a water meter, your bills are usually, and rather bizarrely, based on your home's rateable value — an estimation made some time between 1967 and 1990 of how much it could be rented out for. Once you have a meter, your bills are based on your previous year's usage. If you think you have been overcharged, you can challenge your direct debit payments. As with energy bills, you should not need to always be in credit because your usage can vary throughout the year. • Water companies 'to impose surge pricing' in summer Households with a meter use about 29 per cent less water than those without one on average, according to Discover Water, an information site run by industry bodies such as Water UK and Ofwat. This is probably because those who choose a meter use less water in the first place and are then more conscious of their usage. The general rule of thumb is that you will save money having a water meter installed if there are more bedrooms in your home than people. The Consumer Council for Water said that those whose bills were lower after getting a meter saved an average of £150 a year. If your home is suitable, it costs nothing to get a water meter and your supplier has to fit it within 90 days. You usually have the right to switch back to unmetered bills within two years, but this varies between suppliers. Victoria Larkou hadn't given much thought to getting a water meter until her supplier, Affinity Water, suggested it, but 18 months after switching her bills have halved. Larkou, 50, from Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, had a meter put in to her four-bedroom house where she lives with her husband Athos, 47, and daughter Tillie, 21 in 2023. 'We probably wouldn't have done it of our own volition,' said Larkou, a saleswoman for an anaesthetic company. 'Maybe it's through being too lazy, but it's the sort of thing you put off because you think it will be a pain.' Before the meter was installed they paid £58 a month, £696 a year — £248 more than the average bill in 2023-24. In 2024-25, their first full billing year with a meter, they paid £29 a month — saving £348 a year. They used 278 litres a day, 6.4 per cent below the 297-litre average for similar households, according to Affinity. 'I'm not going to be going on holiday with the savings, but it's the sort of thing that you think was definitely worth doing,' Larkou said. The share of households with a water meter in England and Wales went from 58.4 per cent in the 2020-21 financial year to 62.7 per cent in 2023-24, according to the Consumer Council for Water. Most of those households without a meter are likely to be on the rateable value system. If you cannot have a meter fitted, because you live in a block of flats with a shared water supply, for example, you can ask to be moved off the rateable value system to an assessed volume charge. This is where your fixed bill is based on how many people live in your household and how big it is. In the past, water companies have pushed their customers to have meters installed because they say they can help to detect leaks and encourage lower usage. If you are a high water user, you probably shouldn't get a meter. Tom MacInnes from the charity Citizens Advice said: 'Switching to a water meter can be a great way for people to only pay for what they use, but it isn't always a practical or cheaper option. While water meters can help some to save money, they are not a silver bullet and we know many people will find it hard to afford their bills regardless.'

Thirlmere wild campers fined for felling trees and lighting fire
Thirlmere wild campers fined for felling trees and lighting fire

BBC News

time5 days ago

  • General
  • BBC News

Thirlmere wild campers fined for felling trees and lighting fire

Wild campers have been fined for cutting down trees and lighting a large fire in a wooded Council said the group had caused "significant" and "unnecessary" damage to the area when they camped in Thirlmere, in the Lake District. Those involved were fined £100 and made a voluntary donation of the same value to wildlife conservation charity the John Muir Trust, to support tree replanting in the councillor Denise Rollo said wild camping would "not be tolerated" when it led to "litter, fire damage and abandoned gear". "Although wild camping itself isn't an offence, damaging the environment is," she said. "Cumberland Council has zero tolerance for environmental harm and anyone breaching the public space protection order risks a fine or prosecution." The council said it was able to fine those involved with the help of the landowner, United Wright, the water firm's woodland officer, said the company regularly finds trees that have been "hacked down by wild campers"."As well as destroying habitats, they are also creating a fire risk which is extremely dangerous," he said."We work together with the council, National Park and other partners to engage with visitors and remind them that camping is only allowed in designated areas and urge them to leave only footprints." Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store