Don't Give Out Your Info: NYSP issue warning on phone scam
NEW YORK (WWTI) – The public is being warned by the New York State Police about a persistent phone spoofing scam in which con artists pose as law enforcement or government representatives to obtain private information from individuals.
According to State Police, people have reported receiving calls in recent days from numbers that seem to be New York State Police phone lines. The callers, posing as law enforcement, have demanded personal information, including Social Security numbers, and have threatened to take punitive action against those who do not comply.
These calls are fake. Legitimate government entities, including the New York State Police, will never call someone and request private information or threaten to arrest them or take legal action.
If You Receive a Suspicious Call:
Do not provide any personal information.
Do not send money or make payments under threat.
Hang up immediately—even if the caller ID appears legitimate.
Save any voicemails and record the phone number if possible.
Verify the call by contacting the agency directly using a trusted number; and
The New York State Police urge all residents to remain vigilant and to report any suspicious activity involving impersonation of law enforcement or government agencies.
Scammers all throughout the country frequently use phone number spoofing to make calls seem like they are from reputable organizations. These scams aim to instill fear and bewilderment in their victims, which frequently results in them complying with requests or disclosing information that could be used to perpetrate additional fraud.
Map: Could we see the northern lights again on Monday?
Schumer vows to fight GOP megabill 'with everything we've got'
North country weather: Monday, June 2, 2025
Don't Give Out Your Info: NYSP issue warning on phone scam
Ryan Blaney races to first NASCAR Cup Series victory of the year at Nashville
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
34 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump wants a manufacturing boom. The industry is buckling.
President Donald Trump is vowing to spark a manufacturing boom with tariffs to protect American workers and industry. So far, it's manufacturers that have borne the brunt of the pain. The president's surprise decision to raise tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to 50 percent will hit domestic manufacturing just as a new report shows the industry is already contracting. Uncertainty about where tariff rates will ultimately land — or where they'll be applied — has forced businesses to make hard decisions that could cut into both profits and hiring. And a leading trade group on Thursday called on Trump to give the companies a break on the tariffs. 'For a president who is intent on building U.S. manufacturing, the tariff strategy he's laid out is remarkably short-sighted,' said Gordon Hanson, a Harvard Kennedy School professor whose groundbreaking 2016 research work, 'The China Shock,' was among the first to sound the alarm about the threat to American industry. 'It fails to recognize what modern supply chains look like.' 'Even if you're intent on reshoring parts of manufacturing, you can't do it all,' he said. 'Steel and aluminum are part of that.' If Trump's tariffs fail to result in a manufacturing renaissance — a central focus of his presidential campaign — it could weaken the prospects of a GOP coalition that's increasingly reliant on working-class voters who supported his protectionist trade policies. But as unanticipated tariffs continue to drive up input costs for companies that need steel and aluminum for production, the warning signs emanating from manufacturers are getting louder. An index published this week by the Institute for Supply Management, which tracks manufacturing, slipped for the third straight month in May as companies made plans to scale back production. A quarterly survey conducted by the National Association of Manufacturers reported the steepest drop in optimism since the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, with trade uncertainty and raw material costs cited as top concerns. Federal Reserve data this month reported weaker manufacturing output. The manufacturers' association on Thursday urged Trump to develop a 'speed pass' that would allow companies to avoid costly new duties on imported raw materials and components that are essential to U.S. producers. 'The steel and aluminum tariffs are almost custom-made to hurt American manufacturing,' said Ernie Tedeschi, a former top Biden administration economist who's now with the Yale Budget Lab. Trump and top administration officials argue that tariffs will encourage investment in domestic manufacturers, which should lead to better-paying jobs, a more resilient economy and more secure supply chains. Exports climbed in April as the president's tariffs took hold, which contributed to an eye-popping decline in the U.S. trade deficit. Indeed, the overall economy remains solid, and businesses are continuing to hire, according to Friday's jobs report for May. Despite the trade headwinds, employment in the manufacturing sector has remained steady since Trump took office. 'As the president says, if you don't make steel, you can't fight a war. He's protecting that industry and bringing it back,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Senate lawmakers this week. 'You're going to see more steel and aluminum furnaces and mills in the history of this country get built over the next three years.' The White House did not respond to a request for comment. Trump welcomed the monthly jobs report, posting on Truth Social: 'AMERICA IS HOT! SIX MONTHS AGO IT WAS COLD AS ICE! BORDER IS CLOSED, PRICES ARE DOWN. WAGES ARE UP!' Still, domestic manufacturers who rely on international supply chains for critical steel and aluminum inputs will face tough choices if they want to maintain their profits while keeping output steady. 'Higher costs are expected. Higher input prices. The question is, what do you do with those costs? How much can you pass along to the consumer? How much can you negotiate with your suppliers?' said Andrew Siciliano, a partner at KPMG who leads the consulting firm's trade and customs practice. The challenges posed by the increase in steel and aluminum tariffs are particularly acute because it's far from clear whether domestic suppliers will be able to meet the demands of domestic manufacturers. Almost half the aluminum used in the U.S. last year came from foreign sources, according to federal data, and roughly a quarter of all steel is imported. Either way, 'input costs are going to be higher,' Siciliano said. 'If they pass it on, it could affect demand. If they don't pass it on, it could affect profitability.' That isn't to say manufacturers won't benefit from tariffs in the long term. To the extent that Trump's overall tariff regime limits imports, U.S.-based industrial production could expand to address unmet demand. The Budget Lab's analysis of Trump's tariff regime — which includes the 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum — projects that manufacturing output could grow by 1.3 percent over the next five years if existing import duties are left in place. But Tedeschi cautioned that growth may exclude segments like electronic and semiconductor production — which tend to generate higher incomes for workers. Meanwhile, output in other sectors like construction or agriculture would likely contract. Julia Coronado, founder of MacroPolicy Perspectives, also said the flurry of new import duties may prompt some manufacturers to actually move their manufacturing facilities offshore rather than subject their supply chains and production processes to multiple tariffs. 'If I have to assemble a bunch of parts and inputs, why don't I just don't do that on the Canadian or Mexican side of the border and then pay the tariff on the final good?' she said. An even bigger challenge may involve finding and training workers who can staff up any facilities that reshore. Most Americans work in the service sector and, to the extent tariffs lead to reshoring, those facilities will likely rely heavily on automation, according to economists at the Bank of America Institute. Finding qualified workers in the U.S. is either too difficult or too expensive. 'Whatever manufacturing production comes back to the U.S. will require far fewer jobs than 30 or 40 years ago,' Hanson said. 'It's just the way the world has gone.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
4 in 10 Republicans worried Medicaid cuts would hurt their communities: poll
At least 4 in 10 Republicans are worried about the consequences of Medicaid cuts on their families and communities, according to a new survey. The KFF poll, released Friday, found a partisan divide in the level of concern. Still, about 40 percent of Republicans said they were concerned Medicaid cuts would lead to more adults and children becoming uninsured and negatively impact hospitals, nursing homes and other health care providers in their communities. The findings also show how politically fraught Medicaid is and the dangers for Republicans who are seeking to cut billions of dollars from the program to pay for President Trump's domestic policy agenda. The House-passed legislation would cut nearly $800 billion from Medicaid, primarily by requiring childless adults up to age 64 to prove they are working, going to school or volunteering for 80 hours a month. It also puts a freeze on provider taxes, a practice used by many states to get increased federal reimbursement that often goes towards paying for Medicaid. The politics of the health insurance program for low-income Americans are changing, and Republicans now risk alienating their own voters. Lower-income, working-class people who rely on Medicaid are now a major part of the GOP base, which has become more populist since the emergence of Trump. While most Medicaid beneficiaries under age 65 are either Democrats or independent, 27 percent said they are Republicans or lean Republican, including 19 percent who identify as Trump's MAGA supporters, according to KFF. Among those GOP Medicaid recipients, the poll found three-quarters are worried that sweeping changes to the program would hurt their family's ability to get and pay for care, and nearly 70 percent are concerned the cuts would lead to an increase in the uninsured and negatively impact providers. Overall, Democrats and independents said they were much more likely than Republicans to worry about potential negative consequences of Medicaid cuts. But nearly a third of Republicans and 26 percent of MAGA supporters who aren't on Medicaid said they were concerned about their or their families' own access to health care, the survey found. Medicaid is also key to keeping many rural providers from closing. In Missouri for instance, which was the most recent state to expand the health program, industry experts said about 10 rural hospitals closed in the years leading up to the expansion vote. Ever since, there haven't been any closures. Overall, about seven in ten rural residents said they were worried Medicaid cuts would lead to more adults and children becoming uninsured, or that it would negatively impact health care providers in their communities, according to the poll. Nearly half of rural Republican respondents said they were worried about providers, while 37 percent of rural Republicans said they were worried Medicaid cuts could affect their access to care. According to the Congressional Budget Office, 7.8 million people could lose Medicaid coverage and become uninsured over the next decade. The survey was conducted May 5-26 among 2,539 U.S. adults. The margin of error was plus or minus 3 percentage points. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's not just Medicaid: GOP eyes possible Medicare cuts in megabill
About a month into his second term as president, Donald Trump told Fox News interviews they shouldn't worry about Republican plans for the nation's largest health care programs. 'Medicare, Medicaid, none of that stuff is going to be touched,' Trump said. As the GOP's domestic policy megabill — the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' — took shape, the president's promise related to Medicaid quickly evaporated. In fact, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the Republicans' reconciliation package would cut Medicaid by hundreds of billions of dollars in the coming years. But as the party tries to advance the legislation in the Senate and GOP leaders scramble to make their arithmetic work, the other part of Trump's promise from February is suddenly in doubt, too. NBC News reported: Looking at new ways to pay for their sprawling bill for President Donald Trump's domestic agenda, Republicans are exploring ideas to slash 'waste, fraud and abuse' in Medicare, several senators said Thursday. And President Donald Trump has blessed the pursuit, they said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune didn't come right out and endorse Medicare cuts, but when asked whether his party would look for savings in the popular health care program, the South Dakota Republican told reporters, 'I think anything that can be — that's waste, fraud and abuse are open to, obviously, discussions.' At this point, some readers are probably thinking that topic this sounds vaguely familiar. After all, didn't The Washington Post already report recently on the GOP megabill and possible Medicare cuts? The answer is yes, but the details matter. The Post highlighted the fact that the Republicans' legislation would add so many trillions of dollars to the national debt that it might automatically trigger 'sequestration' changes that would force massive Medicare cuts. But there are budgetary tactics that Congress could, and likely would, take to prevent that from happening, which helps to explain why the Post's reporting from mid-May didn't have a greater political impact. This week's developments are qualitatively different: We're not just talking about the possibility of Medicare cuts being triggered by automatic budget constraints; rather, Republican senators are making a deliberate choice to look for Medicare savings as a way to pay for the massive tax breaks the party is eager to deliver to the wealthy. Time will tell what, if anything, comes of this, but Republican Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas told the Post that the discussions among GOP members of the Senate Finance Committee have focused on Medicare Advantage, a program through which the federal government pays private insurers to enroll Medicare beneficiaries. The far-right Republican plan was already shaping up to be a political albatross for its proponents. Putting Medicare funding on the table probably won't help matters. This article was originally published on
