logo
Brazil's Lula says proposal to regulate social media platforms is ready

Brazil's Lula says proposal to regulate social media platforms is ready

The Hindua day ago
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said on Tuesday that a proposal to regulate social media platforms in the country is ready and will be sent to Congress.
In an interview with news outlet BandNews, Lula said the proposal will be on his desk on Wednesday afternoon, so the government can send it to Congress.
U.S. President Donald Trump imposed 50% tariffs on imports of Brazilian goods this month, linking the move to a "witch hunt" against former President Jair Bolsonaro and "unfair trade practices" by Brazil, particularly on U.S. companies' digital trade.
Lula said he hopes to one day meet Trump and that they can talk in a civilised way, as two heads of state.
The Brazilian leader on Tuesday said that he had sent a letter to Trump inviting him to global climate summit COP30, which is set to be held in Brazil later this year.
Lula also said that next week he plans to call leaders from France, Germany and the European Union to speak about the deal being discussed between the EU and South American bloc Mercosur.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Give proof, don't use dirty phrases like 'vote chori': EC on Rahul's allegations
Give proof, don't use dirty phrases like 'vote chori': EC on Rahul's allegations

New Indian Express

time30 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Give proof, don't use dirty phrases like 'vote chori': EC on Rahul's allegations

NEW DELHI: Amid relentless attacks by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi over alleged voter data fudging, the Election Commission on Thursday said instead of creating false narrative by using "dirty phrases" like 'vote chori', proof should be given. In a statement, the EC said the law for "one person one vote" is already been in existence since the first elections in 1951-1952. "If anyone has any proof of any person actually voting twice in any election, it should be shared with ECI with a written affidavit rather than colouring all the electors of India as 'chor' without any proof," it said. The poll authority said that by trying to create a false narrative by using "dirty phrases" like "vote chori" for Indian electors, is not only a direct attack on the crores of Indian electors but also an assault on the integrity of lakhs of election staff. Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha, last week cited data to allege that more than one lakh votes were 'stolen' in the Mahadevpura assembly constituency of Bengaluru Central Lok Sabha in the 2024 elections, resulting in the defeat of a Congress candidate. The Election Commission had directed Gandhi to give a written declaration on his claims.

Trump's emerging market behaviour is unsettling investors. How it could hit markets
Trump's emerging market behaviour is unsettling investors. How it could hit markets

Mint

time30 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump's emerging market behaviour is unsettling investors. How it could hit markets

Investors have typically penalized emerging markets such as Turkey, Argentina, and China due to concerns about the independence of the central bank, government intervention in the private sector, and rampant overspending. Now economists and strategists are raising similar concerns about the U.S., which has historically been the paragon of a developed market. They see unnerving parallels to emerging markets in the actions that President Donald Trump is taking in his second term, as he uses the power of the White House in unconventional ways to swiftly upend geopolitical and economic norms. Although stocks and financial assets have grown in value since Trump's second inauguration in January, experts say that if these patterns continue, investors may see a reduction in the premium that U.S. assets have long commanded. That could mean weaker long-run returns for stocks or, more immediately, higher bond yields and a continuation in the weakness of the dollar that has emerged this year. In just the past two weeks, Trump has put new pressure on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to cut interest rates, warned judges to not rule against his tariffs, fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after unflattering revisions to job numbers, called for the ouster of the chief executive of Intel, and sought unprecedented concessions from companies and countries that want to access U.S. markets or avoid export restrictions. Those actions come against newly heightened concern that the U.S. fiscal deficit is unsustainable—and more so after Trump's tax and spending plan became law earlier this year, probably further widening the deficit. 'What is the norm in many emerging markets is becoming the new norm in the U.S. That includes undercutting of agencies that gather data," says Eswar Prasad, formerly head of China research at the International Monetary Fund and currently an economics professor at Cornell University. 'The three elements of an institutional framework that are crucial to the U.S. dollar's dominance are rule of law, a system of checks and balances, and the independence of the central banks, and each of those pillars is significantly being undercut," Prasad says. That dollar dominance has been a factor in the premium that U.S. assets have typically commanded. The stock market has been unfazed, with the S&P 500 and other indexes forging new highs amid optimism about artificial intelligence and the benefits of tax cuts. But economists and strategists caution that policy shifts could begin to weigh on stocks if cracks emerge in the optimism around AI to reshape the economy and fuel corporate spending. Those drawing parallels to emerging markets say that the U.S. isn't susceptible to the type of currency-devaluation crises that send investors stampeding for the exits abroad. Though Prasad and others see challenges ahead for the dollar, they believe that it remains secure as the world's reserve currency. That provides a major layer of insulation against financial shocks, which few see changing anytime soon. Still, some of the changes in Trump's second term are chipping away at the exceptionalism that allows U.S. assets to command a premium. Over the past 15 years, the S&P 500 traded at an average of 17.5 times forward 12-month earnings, compared with 11.5 times for the Shanghai Composite index and Argentina's S&P Merval Index and just seven times for Turkey's Borsa Istanbul 100 index. To be sure, the U.S. market is composed of some of the biggest and most successful technology companies, which helps explain the lofty price of U.S. assets. Even if concerns about policies weaken the U.S. premium, that could be more than offset by the productivity gains coming on the back of AI spending. Stronger economic growth of 3%-plus could also mitigate debt concerns. But stock and bond markets—in the U.S. but also abroad—are likely to become more volatile as the rules-based system that governed trade, corporate decision-making, and global economics is shaken up. 'In a world where the existing rules are not going to be maintained, we are going to have much more volatility," Prasad says. U.S. interest rates are also likely to be higher than they might otherwise be as investors demand a greater premium for holding longer-term assets in the face of uncertainty about how the U.S. handles its widening fiscal deficit. The dollar's reserve-currency status has roughly lowered U.S. borrowing costs by 1.0 to 1.5 percentage points, according to estimates from emerging-markets-oriented Breakout Capital. Even if the dollar maintains its reserve currency status, more countries and institutional investors diversifying away and using other currencies or gold to trade could take away some of that borrowing cost discount, raising rates. Strategists see institutional investors and central banks looking to diversify from their overweighting in U.S. assets, especially amid the uncertainty created by these shifts and questions about central bank credibility. Even if at the margin, that could raise borrowing costs modestly and probably weaken the dollar against other currencies. Free-market purists are alarmed by Trump's growing influence over corporate affairs. An incomplete list of notable moments would include recent warnings by Trump to Walmart and others to not raise prices as they deal with the impact of tariffs, a social-media post urging Goldman Sachs to fire its top economist because of his view that tariffs could boost inflation, and statements that the billions in investment funds that countries have committed as part of initial trade agreements will be spent at the president's discretion. Many countries, notably including China, have long directed investment to critical sectors. The U.S. has also shifted toward a more muscular industrial policy in recent years. The Biden administration boosted spending on renewable energy and domestic semiconductor production. But analysts note that those efforts were backed by congressional legislation that, in the case of chips spending, was bipartisan. Trump, however, is using the power of the presidency to personally direct a reshaping of the economy. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a Fox Business interview on Tuesday likened recent agreements with Japan, South Korea, and Europe to invest billions in critical industries to these countries funding a sovereign-wealth fund—one the president can tap to invest at his direction. The White House has insisted that the president has this power, despite other countries' differing understandings of the nature of the investments. The White House didn't respond to requests for comment for this article. The administration also took an unusual tact in resolving national-security concerns over the acquisition of Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel. The Trump administration took a 'golden share" that allows it to influence business decisions in ways that are still unclear. There are parallels in China. Beijing recently took golden shares in Alibaba Group Holding, Tencent Holdings, and other internet companies following a multiyear crackdown. The use of the golden shares gives Beijing a vehicle of state control over private enterprises. That crackdown began with the abrupt cancellation of Ant Financial's multibillion-dollar public offering in 2020, days after Alibaba and Ant co-founder Jack Ma criticized Chinese regulators. Investors rethought the companies' growth prospects as a result of Beijing's intervention. Chinese internet companies lost billions in market value. Government involvement in companies is typically met with investor trepidation amid worries that capital may not be allocated based on market dynamics. That's one reason Trump's push for concessions and investment pledges raises red flags as companies try to curry favor or steer clear of policies that may impinge on their profitability. While the increased private sector involvement and China-like moves might seem distant concerns for the market, a reaction could come sooner to worries about the unsustainable and widening U.S. fiscal deficit. The U.S. relies on foreign investors to fund that spending, and they may demand higher compensation to stick around. U.S. debt surpassed $37 trillion this week, or 100% of gross domestic product. Though developed-market Japan has a much higher debt load, economists see clear parallels to the U.S.—not just in its debt burden but also in its push to continue to spend by finding ways around fiscal rules and other restraints. Argentina offers a view of the extreme fallout from such practices. It suffered painful bouts of soaring inflation—most recently 140%—as a result of decades of soaring fiscal deficits, facilitated by the central bank's willingness to print money. Argentina is just beginning to recover from the years of lost investor confidence, sky-high inflation, and currency devaluation. While politicians everywhere like to complain about high interest rates, investors need to assess whether the central bank can push back against that pressure. Turkey is an example of what happens when central banks are unable to resist powerful politicians' desire to keep spending despite lenders' concerns. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan fired three central bank heads from 2019 to 2021, eventually installing a central bank board willing to bend to his unorthodox monetary policy view of pushing rate cuts to combat inflation. That effort compromised the economy's health as inflation soared to 85%, prompting Erdoğan to make a U-turn in 2023. The Fed's unique structure makes it resistant to outside pressure. Rates are set by the 12 voting members of the Federal Open Market Committee, who include regional bank presidents not appointed by the president. The Fed isn't likely to bend entirely to Trump's desires for lower interest rates after Powell's term as Fed chair ends in May. But even debating the Fed's independence may make investors question the premium placed on U.S. assets, said Apollo Global Chief Economist Torsten Slø to watch, says Sløk, will be the approach of Powell's replacement to the Fed's dual mandate of inflation and full employment and to organizational structure. If the new chair reorganizes the structure or fires different individuals or heads of departments, Sløk says that could make investors reassess the central bank's ability to withstand pressure. Bessent has suggested such changes are coming. Among his criteria for a new Fed chair is 'the ability to run and revamp the organization, because it's really gotten bloated," he told Fox Business. Economists are closely watching for reactions among foreign investors, who own 30% of Treasuries. While central banks have been diversifying their reserves for years, the dollar's almost 10% decline this year has strategists alert for signs of a broader selloff of U.S. bonds amid Trump's policy shifts. That is putting newfound interest in the appetite for three-year and 10-year bond auctions, which have shown pockets of weakness, though not yet at alarming levels. If demand for U.S. bonds continues at a healthy pace, it gives credence to the idea that the dollar's reserve currency status is providing enough of a buffer against other concerns. But if demand falters, investors could begin to adopt some of the emerging market outlook. That test will unfold slowly. While Joyce Chang, global head of research at J.P. Morgan, expects bond investors to require more payment given the size of the deficit, she notes that Treasury funding needs are well covered this year. But with roughly $5 trillion in new debt set to be issued from 2026 to 2029, bond yields will probably start to be a concern for markets next year, she says. Deficit worries are hardly new. But strong U.S. institutions have helped keep those concerns from driving up bond yields. Now, that may be changing. 'When politics stop respecting institutions, the ability of institutions to create a better policy environment diminishes," says Raghuram Rajan, finance professor at the University of Chicago and former head of India's central bank. Write to Reshma Kapadia at

Yes SIR or no? Bihar electoral roll revision row explained in 10 simple points
Yes SIR or no? Bihar electoral roll revision row explained in 10 simple points

Hindustan Times

time30 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Yes SIR or no? Bihar electoral roll revision row explained in 10 simple points

Political temperatures are soaring as the Bihar elections draw closer, with Congress leader Rahul Gandhi accusing the ruling side of vote 'chori' (theft) and demanding answers from the Election Commission. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), in turn, has defended the poll body, framing Gandhi's very allegations as proof of the need to clean up the voter list under the state's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi claimed on Wednesday he had tea with 'dead voters' from the Bihar voter list. (AICC) The SIR exercise in Bihar has emerged as a major flashpoint between the Congress and the BJP in the run-up to the polls in the state, which has 243 assembly seats and is currently governed by the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), led primarily by the Janata Dal (United) and the BJP. Bihar SIR row explained in 10 points – Bihar SIR exercise: In June, the Election Commission of India initiated a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the assembly elections. In a letter dated June 24, the ECI said the last intensive revision in Bihar was done in 2003, adding voters not in this list had to submit one of 11 specific documents – excluding Aadhar, voter ID, or ration cards – by July 25. -Why EC launched the SIR exercise: The EC cited concerns about bogus, duplicate, and ineligible voters – including deceased individuals and 'illegal immigrants' – being present on the electoral rolls. The SIR was launched to remove these entries and ensure the list is accurate and updated, according to EC. There were unverified complaints about illegal immigrants from Nepal, Bangladesh, and Myanmar being registered as voters. – The 11 documents for SIR: The 11 documents that the ECI said were allowed to applying for inclusion in the electoral roll are: 1. Any Identity card/Pension Payment Order issued to regular employee/pensioner of any Central Govt./State Govt./PSU; 2. Any Identity Card/Certificate/Document issued in India by Government/local authorities/Banks/Post Office/LIC/PSUs prior to 01.07.1987; 3. Birth Certificate issued by the competent authority; 4. Passport; 5. Matriculation/Educational certificate issued by recognised Boards/universities; 6. Permanent Residence certificate issued by competent State authority; 7. Forest Right Certificate; 8. OBC/SC/ST or any caste certificate issued by the Competent authority; 9. National Register of Citizens (wherever it exists); 10. Family Register, prepared by State/Local authorities; 11. Any land/house allotment certificate by Government. –Why SIR was objected to by some: This move drew criticism from civil society, with petitioners—including Association for Democratic Reforms ('ADR'), People's Union for Civil Liberties, TMC MP Mahua Moitra, RJD MP Manoj Jha, and activist Yogendra Yadav – arguing that the directive excludes widely held documents like Aadhaar and ration cards, disproportionately affecting poor and rural voters. – Supreme Court intervenes: The Supreme Court intervened and on July 10 refused to stay the ongoing SIR process, but issued an interim directive urging the Election Commission (EC) to consider Aadhaar, EPIC (voter ID), and ration card as valid documentation. It also set deadlines for parties to file counter-affidavits and rejoinders. – Latest SC hearing: During the latest hearings in the case on August 12 and 13, the Supreme Court reiterated that it retains the power to nullify the entire SIR process if widespread irregularities are found. It also described the EC's list of 11 acceptable documents as 'actually voter‑friendly' and said the EC's exclusive authority over revision timing and method. – EC says no to include Aadhar: Days after the Supreme Court asked EC to consider inclusion of Aadhar and other commonly held documents, the poll body defended its told the top court that these cannot be accepted as proof of voter eligibility and asserted its constitutional authority to demand evidence of citizenship. – Rahul Gandhi's vote chori charge: The SIR row gained steam with Rahul Gandhi leading the opposition in accusing the Election Commission of a facilitating 'vote chori' (vote theft). In a press briefing on August 7, Rahul Gandhi, citing some Lok Sabha constituencies, claimed before the media that an analysis of the voter data showed that elections were rigged by the Election Commission at the behest of the BJP to help the saffron party 'steal' votes and win the seat in the 2024 general elections. Rahul led symbolic protests, including having 'tea with dead voters', mocking the EC for marking live people as dead on rolls. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi along with INDIA bloc leaders in Bihar will embark on a 'Vote Adhikar Yatra' across the state starting August 17, while the party planned a countrywide 'vote chor, gaddi chhorh' rally on August 14. – Why is Opposition against SIR despite fake voter charge: While Rahul Gandhi, the Congress and other opposition parties like Rashtriya Janata Dal have repeatedly flagged concerns about 'vote chori' (vote theft) and the presence of bogus or fake voters, they remain opposed SIR because they allege the process itself is being weaponised for political end and is not a genuine clean-up, but instead a targeted exercise aimed at disenfranchising real voters – particularly Dalits, OBCs, minorities, and migrant workers, who are less likely to have the specific documents demanded. While Rahul Gandhi had "tea with dead voters" of Bihar on Wednesday, the BJP has accused Congress of trying to save 'infiltrator' vote bank. – Latest update by EC: The Election Commission of India on Thursday said it has received a total of 23,557 claims and objections over the draft voter list after the SIR of the electoral roll in Bihar, out of which 741 complaints have been disposed. According to the press note by ECI on Thursday, after 14 days, no claim or objection has been submitted by any political party. The EC has previously asked Rahul Gandhi to acknowledge his allegations under oath or apologise publically.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store