Uniqlo owner's profit misses estimates on weak China sales
Operating profit was ¥146.7 billion ($1 billion) in the three months ended May, trailing the ¥150 billion average of analyst estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Net income came in at ¥105.5 billion during the period.
Revenue in mainland China declined by approximately 5% for the third quarter from a year earlier, while operating profit decreased by around 3%, the company said. The apparel maker had in April raised its full-year forecast, counting on demand for its Uniqlo brand of clothing in newer markets beyond the traditional strongholds of Japan and China.
Still, the retailer kept its full-year operating profit forecast of ¥545 billion.
The sales drop in China was due to weaker overall consumer sentiment and continuation of low temperatures through early May, Chief Financial Officer Takeshi Okazaki said in a post-earnings briefing Thursday. The company, which is overhauling its China operations, is beginning to see the impact, he said.
'We are implementing a scrap and build strategy to improve operational efficiency of each, individual stores,' Okazaki said. 'We are tailoring our product assortment and store layouts to suit each region. Some stores are seeing 1.5 times higher sales.'
Operating profit of overseas Uniqlo business rose 1.5% to ¥72.1 billion for the three months ended May, while operating profit for the brand in Japan rose 4.7% to ¥52.9 billion for the period, it said.
Fast Retailing released its earnings after markets closed in Tokyo. Its stock has dropped around 13% this year, partly weighed down by President Donald Trump 's tariffs. Earlier this week, Trump said he will slightly raise across-the-board tariffs on Japan to 25% starting on Aug. 1.
Still, Fast Retailing revised the impact of US tariffs on the company's operating profit to 1% for the second half of the year. Previously in April, it said the impact was approximately 2% to 3%, based on the assumption that they remain at the previously announced level.
The company is closely monitoring the situation and the balance between price and value of products for US consumers to maintain sustainable business, while securing profits, Okazaki said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
European automakers stuck in an impasse
The automotive industry has always been cyclical. Boom periods have routinely been followed by spectacular drops in sales and profits, which are driven by economic conditions or phases when car models are renewed. The turmoil the sector is experiencing today, however, has little in common with its past upheavals. The current crisis is a structural one, and it is uncertain how French brands will manage to pull themselves out of this rut. While, up until recently, Renault and Stellantis (Peugeot, Citroën, Fiat, Chrysler, Opel, etc.) boasted about their profitability, which was unprecedented for the industry, both manufacturers posted heavy half-year losses of several billion euros in the first quarter. The setbacks have since mounted. Dealerships have their inventories pile up, and these cars must be cleared out at steep discounts, which undermines profits. Renault also faces the depreciation of its stake in the Japanese company Nissan, which is also going through a difficult period. The European car industry is also paying the price for not having prepared for the transition to electric vehicles and for the rapid rise of its Chinese competitors. This painful shift had been further exacerbated by the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump. With the specter of decline looming, car manufacturers have desperately scrambled to contain the crisis, which threatens millions of jobs. According to them, the main culprit was the European Union's decision to ban the sale of combustion-engine cars from 2035. This measure has been criticized as a purely political choice, disconnected from the market's realities, and the 2035 deadline has been targeted by intense lobbying efforts aimed at pushing it back. Automakers have already succeeded in postponing penalties for exceeding CO 2 emissions limits, as they were initially scheduled for 2025 before being pushed back to 2027. Everyone has understood that this is just a step, as the real goal is to challenge the entire regulatory timetable. Bargaining for a reprieve, and thereby focusing on the short term, has proven to be a strategic misstep. European carmakers had 15 years to prepare for the transition. That is the time it took for China's automotive industry to become the undisputed world leader in electric vehicles and achieve a decisive technological lead over Western companies. Those Western companies instead chose to keep one foot in the old world by continuing to sell large SUVs, which generate higher profit margins but are now too expensive for most consumers. The Chinese strategy was to go for mass production with affordable models, allowing them to achieve unbeatable production costs and a highly effective pace of innovation. European car manufacturers now argue that the European market is not meeting expectations. Yet, in about 10 countries where a favorable ecosystem has been created for electric vehicles, with tailored tax policies, available infrastructure and affordable charging costs, the percentage of electric vehicles in total sales is ahead of schedule. Rather than making the transition out to be a scapegoat for the sector's problems, car manufacturers should redirect their lobbying efforts to demanding public policies to support the transition. Pushing back regulatory deadlines would only widen the lag behind their Chinese competitors, who will not stop innovating simply because Europeans have decided to extend the life of outdated combustion technology at any cost. This backward-looking perspective only worsens the impasse in which the sector now finds itself.
AFP
2 days ago
- AFP
Posts mislead on Toyota's hydrogen-powered cars
'Toyota has just changed the game! A WATER ENGINE That Will DESTROY the EV industry! In a groundbreaking move that could redefine the global automotive industry, Toyota has unveiled an engine powered by water – running on hydrogen produced through electrolysis!' This is how a Facebook post from June 21, 2025, begins. The post further claims that the supposed engine would not use lithium, would not require charging stations, and would emit only water vapor. 'With this move, Toyota is not just competing with electric vehicles but is announcing the end of the battery era,' reads another post from July 11, 2025. Similar claims appear in many other Facebook posts – for example here, here and here – shared thousands of times on the platform. The claim spread previously on other social networks such as Telegram -- here and here, TikTok, YouTube, as well as in online articles such as this one. False and misleading claims like the Bulgarian one are circulating in many other languages, including English, and have been seen by millions of users worldwide across social media platforms. In a race for zero emissions cars that pits electric vehicles (EVs) against hydrogen ones, the claim that water instead of fuel can be used to power cars, has resurfaced sporadically over the past decades, but has never been supported by factual evidence. A handful of Bulgarian inventors are sometimes mentioned in relation to the supposed creation of a water‑fuelled engine, but there is no verified evidence that such a technology has ever existed. Such claims fuel and accusations that the automotive and oil industries deliberately conceal "revolutionary" technologies to preserve their profits, either by buying up and hiding patents or by allegedly making their inventors , as explained in this article on the Bulgarian fact-checking platform (archive). The claim, however, is false. Toyota told AFP that the company is not developing a 'water engine' and described the claim as 'fake news.' Experts also explained that such a system would be inefficient and very difficult to implement in real-world conditions. The Japanese car manufacturer produces vehicles that use hydrogen as fuel; the vehicles are at specialized stations and are equipped with lithium-ion batteries. The claim was also debunked by the Australian fact-checking platform AAP FactCheck. Image Screenshots of Facebook posts spreading false information. Taken on 28 July 2025. The red crisscrossing lines were added by AFP Toyota is not developing a 'water engine.' 'We are indeed not developing anything that could be described as a 'water engine,' said Jean-Yves Jault, from the Toyota Motor Corporation, in an email to AFP on July 23. Jault described the claims as 'fake news", mainly in dubious Facebook posts likely created to generate engagement by spreading false but sensational content, and referred to a Forbes article that debunks the claim. The author of that article is Robert Rapier, a chemical engineer, who explains that water is not a fuel but a product of hydrogen combustion, which is the actual source of energy. 'The idea that water can power a car is absurd,' he writes. The process of electrolysis Electrolysis i when water is split into hydrogen and oxygen. The process requires a significant amount of electricity and is efficient only when there is a stable power source. Electrolysis does not release energy – it consumes it in order to produce hydrogen, which can later be used as fuel to power vehicles. T Experts say that water is not used as fuel who works with his students on hydrogen fuel cell projects, that the hydrogen used as fuel is not produced on board the vehicle. 'All of these vehicles generate electricity in fuel cells that use pure hydrogen preloaded in tanks,' he stated in an email from July 7. 'I am not aware of any such vehicle, and even theoretically it would be extremely inefficient and impractical,' he added. 'It is technically possible to use electrolysis to utilize residual energy from a moving vehicle, but it is economically unjustified,' said Prof. Dr. Eng. Boriana Tsaneva from the Technical University of Sofia in an email to AFP on July 7, 2025. According to her, this is due not only to the high cost and additional weight of the electrolysis cell and its control electronics but also the generation of an explosive gas mixture that cannot be stored and must be fed into the fuel system immediately after being produced and the negligible amount of usable energy generated when the gas mixture is burned. Water as a cooling medium (and byproduct?) The Toyota Mirai is a mass-produced vehicle that uses a hydrogen fuel cell to generate electricity, which powers an electric motor (archives here and here). The vehicle is refueled at high-pressure specialized stations, and the only by-product of converting hydrogen into electricity is water vapor. The vehicle does not have an electrolysis system to produce hydrogen from water. It is also equipped with a lithium-ion battery. As part of its long-term vision for carbon-neutral mobility, Toyota is pursuing a multi-pathway strategy that includes hydrogen fuel cells, hydrogen combustion engines, and the development of solid-state batteries Toyota also uses electrolysis to produce hydrogen at some of its facilities, but this process takes place externally and not inside its vehicles. Battery electric vehicles currently dominate the zero-emission market due to lower costs, better energy efficiency, and more developed charging infrastructure. However, hydrogen cars are seen by some car manufacturers, including Toyota, as a complementary solution for heavy-duty transport and long-distance travel, though their widespread adoption faces challenges from high costs and limited refueling networks. Industry analysts widely expect that zero-emission transport will involve a mix of technologies – with batteries remaining the main option for most passenger cars, while hydrogen may play a niche role in sectors like heavy trucks and industrial transport (archive). AFP has previously debunked other claims alleging the existence of cars that run on water here and here.
Fashion Network
3 days ago
- Fashion Network
Marc Jacobs: What are the strengths of the American brand today?
The potential sale of Marc Jacobs by is back in the spotlight. According to the Wall Street Journal, the No. 1 luxury goods group is in talks with a number of possible buyers, including American groups Authentic, owner of Reebok and Champion, WHP Global, owner of Bonobos and Vera Wang, and Bluestar Alliance. The deal could be worth a billion dollars (850 million euros). But, what is the American brand, founded almost 40 years ago by Marc Jacobs, really worth, and what are its strengths? In the spring of 2024, the first indiscretions circulated about a probable contact with interested investors, but LVMH firmly denied at the time that it was considering selling Marc Jacobs. Today, with the luxury goods market in sharp decline, this hypothesis seems more than plausible, especially as the group has already recently sold Off-White and Stella McCartney. Moreover, the investments made in Marc Jacobs over the past ten years do not seem to have yielded the expected results. The luxury house has lost ground "in terms of relevance to the consumer," according to Bernstein analyst Luca Solca, who believes that "the market would favor greater concentration of LVMH's activities. Especially at a time when even the main houses seem to be suffering, Dior in particular." In almost four decades, the label has had its ups and downs. In the 2010s, in particular, it experienced a decline that led it to restructure in depth and focus on more commercial products. But today, its aura remains intact and it has succeeded in renewing its customer base, appealing to Gen Z. In 1986, the eponymous designer launched his brand with Robert Duffy via the Jacobs Duffy Design company, backed by the Japanese Onward Group. But it wasn't until a little later that he took off, co-founding his own Marc Jacobs International design and licensing company with Robert Duffy at the end of 1993, followed in April 1994 by his first collection, described as "grunge, trash and chic." The label soon caught the eye of LVMH, who recruited Marc Jacobs in 1997 to launch Louis Vuitton 's ready-to-wear line. The French luxury goods group subsequently bought a majority stake in the brand. That same year, the label opened its first boutique in the SoHo district of Manhattan. Buoyed by the ebullient talent of its creator, who stands out for his free-spirited, eccentric, and playful fashion, Marc Jacobs expands on all fronts with his recognizable pop, cool and chic style, blending retro and vintage seventies influences, a touch of punk, and daring couture creations. The brand broadened its audience, notably with its young and accessible Marc by Marc Jacobs line launched in 2001, while multiplying its lines and diversifications (accessories, beauty, perfume, watches, children's). But the company began to run out of steam after the designer left Louis Vuitton in 2013, after sixteen years as artistic director. Marc Jacobs restructured, returning to its fundamentals to refocus on a more coherent and simplified offering. Marc by Marc Jacobs is discontinued in 2015, integrating an entry-level and high-end range into its core brand. At the same time, Robert Duffy left the company. In 2017, the men's line was discontinued. It was at this point that former Kenzo CEO Eric Marechalle, who is still in place, took the helm. The manager will have to face, among other things, the Covid-19 crisis, which led Marc Jacobs to resize by closing a series of boutiques and reducing its teams, before putting the brand back on track. Today, the brand has 130 mono-brand boutiques worldwide and is distributed through a selection of top multi-brand retailers. The house continues to parade in New York, winning press acclaim each time, while consolidating its creative image and reputation. Since 2021, this "Runway" couture line has been distributed exclusively by the American chain Bergdorf Goodman, and since this year in Japan by Isetan department stores. In parallel, in 2019 the company introduces The Marc Jacobs, a more affordable contemporary line with ready-to-wear and accessories, and in 2020 launches Heaven, a more commercial, youthful, and inclusive line of clothing and accessories that breaks away from genres and surfs on nostalgia for the 1990s and 2000s and the craze for grunge style, of which the designer was a precursor. Success followed, resurrecting the brand's coolness. During the pandemic, the New York designer also reviewed his approach to digital and social networking. He was one of the first to capitalize on his community on TikTok, giving free rein to the platform's young influencers to create their own content and make the brand their own. It managed to engage the youngest with all kinds of initiatives, while relying on feedback from the Chinese app's followers to adjust its offering and better target Gen Z. Alongside its more accessible clothing offer, the company counts on licenses and above all accessories and beauty products. Very early on, it diversified into the jewelry segment, with fragrances (2001), watches (2004), eyewear (2004) with Safilo, which last year renewed its licensing agreement until the end of 2031, and children's fashion (2005), while in 2010 the Bookmarc bookstore was inaugurated in New York. Launched in 2007, the Daisy fragrance is a hit, as is Perfect (2020). In 2014, the label makes its debut in cosmetics with Marc Jacobs Beauty via LVMH subsidiary Kendo Brands. Discontinued in 2021, this beauty line has just been relaunched under the aegis of Coty, the label's perfume licensee from the outset, which has renewed its contract for a further 15 years in 2023, adding the cosmetics component. Last June, when he left the company to take up the presidency of Alexander Wang, Marc Jacobs merchandising director Robert Rizzolo described his four years at the house as "one of the most profitable and transformative periods of the company." "I witnessed Marc's creative genius behind the scenes every season and helped shape some of the brand's great moments - the meteoric rise of Tote Bag, the revival of Stam and Beauty, the relaunch of ready-to-wear, shoes, and jewelry, the cultural impact of Heaven," he wrote in a post on LinkedIn. While waiting for a change of ownership, the brand should be in the news again soon with the documentary on Marc Jacobs directed by his long-time friend Sofia Coppola, which will be presented at the Venice Film Festival in September.
