Rhino horns turned radioactive to fight poachers in South Africa
The group, from the University of the Witwatersrand, said the process is harmless to rhinos but will allow customs officers to detect smuggled horns as they're transported across the world.
South Africa has the largest rhino population in the world, and hundreds of the animals are poached there every year.
The university's venture, called the Rhisotope Project, was launched on Friday after six years of research and testing.
"Our goal is to deploy the Rhisotope technology at scale to help protect one of Africa's most iconic and threatened species," said Jessica Babich, head of the Rhisotope Project.
"By doing so, we safeguard not just rhinos but a vital part of our natural heritage."
Tests conducted in the pilot study, which involved 20 rhinos, confirmed that the radioactive material was not harmful to the animals.
"We have demonstrated, beyond scientific doubt, that the process is completely safe for the animal and effective in making the horn detectable through international customs nuclear security systems," said James Larkin a professor at Wits University who is also part of the project.
The horns of African rhinos are often exported to Asian markets were they are used in traditional medicine and also seen as a status symbol.
White rhinos are considered threatened, while black rhinos are critically endangered.
You may also be interested in:
World's first IVF rhino pregnancy 'could save species'
Illegal trade booms in South Africa's 'super-strange looking' plants
PODCAST: Women in South Africa and Zambia protect wildlife from poachers
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
BBC Africa podcasts
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
20 hours ago
- Forbes
A Biologist Spotlights The Strangest ‘Bird Of Prey' On Earth (Hint: It Hunts Venomous Snakes On Foot)
Birds of prey typically fit into a common mold: they are sharp-beaked, talon-wielding aerial hunters who attack their prey from the sky. The bald eagle is a good example of a bird of prey. The red-tailed hawk is another. But not all raptors follow this script. Some are different – evolutionary oddities that break the mold. Perhaps the best example of this is the secretary bird: a long-legged raptor that doesn't soar so much as stomp. With its distinctive form and terrestrial hunting style, the secretary bird (Sagittarius serpentarius) is one of the most fascinating birds of prey on the planet. Here's what science can tell us about it. The Secretary Bird – A Raptor Like No Other Standing nearly four feet tall with a wingspan over seven feet, the secretary bird resembles a crane more than a typical raptor. A cousin of eagles and hawks, it belongs to the order Accipitriformes but stands alone in its own family, Sagittariidae. It's also the only bird of prey that hunts primarily on foot, and the only one known to stomp its prey to death, making it one of the most distinctive raptors in the world. The secretary bird can cover up to 20 miles a day in search of its next meal. Its prey? Mostly snakes – venomous ones included. It also hunts lizards, rodents, small birds and even insects. A 2014 paper published in Biodiversity Observations reported the dissection of a secretary bird that died after flying into a power line near Balfour, South Africa. Researchers found eight snakes and 13 grasshoppers in the bird's digestive tract, likely consumed in a single day. The snakes included two spotted grass snakes (Psammophylax rhombeatus) and six cross-marked grass snakes (Psammophis crucifer). While based on a single specimen, the finding highlights the secretary bird's ophiophagous tendencies. When it spots a target, the secretary bird strikes with lightning-fast kicks, using its powerful legs to stun or kill its prey. Secretary bird kicks aren't just fast, they're explosively powerful. In a 2016 study published in Current Biology, researchers trained a captive secretary bird named Madeleine to strike a rubber snake on a force plate. The bird delivered kicks with forces up to 195 newtons, roughly five times its body weight, in just 15 milliseconds (faster than the blink of an eye). This combination of precision and power is crucial when subduing venomous snakes, where even a slight misstep could prove deadly for the bird. Interestingly, the strike happens too fast for feedback from the bird's own muscles and nerves to guide the movement mid-kick. That suggests secretary birds rely heavily on visual targeting and pre-programmed motor patterns to land their deadly blows. Scientists believe that understanding this behavior could even inspire new advances in fields like robotics and prosthetics. The secretary bird's most unusual adaptations are its legs. Long and powerful, they are armored with tough scales that help protect against snakebites. Its claws, while not as curved or fearsome as those of a hawk, are still sharp enough to grip prey. Unlike its raptor cousins, the secretary bird rarely flies while actively foraging. It will take to the skies to roost in trees, moving between feeding grounds, or escape danger, but hunting is mostly done on foot. With its long legs and vivid orange facial skin, the secretary bird is one of the most striking raptors in the world. Its common name has two proposed origins. One theory points to the long black feathers projecting from the back of its head, which reminded early European observers of quill pens tucked behind a scribe's ear. Another theory traces the name to the Arabic phrase saqr at-tair, meaning 'hunter bird' or 'falcon of the hunt.' Unlike sociable raptors (like the black kite), secretary birds are often solitary or found in pairs. They hunt during the day and return to their tree-top roosts at night. Their calls are more stork-like than hawk-like: deep, croaking barks that carry over the African grasslands. In many African cultures, the secretary bird symbolizes protection and vigilance. Renowned for its snake-hunting skills, it appears in folklore and is depicted on ancient Egyptian artifacts dating back to 3200 BC. Today, it features prominently on the coat of arms of both Sudan and South Africa. Historically, farmers even relied on secretary birds to help control pests. Like many birds of prey, the secretary bird faces numerous conservation challenges. Habitat loss from agriculture and development has reduced its range and populations have declined in recent years. The bird is currently listed as Endangered by the IUCN. Are you an animal lover who owns a pet, perhaps even a pet bird? Take the science-backed Pet Personality Test to know how well you know your little friend.
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Common sweetener could hold untapped potential to fight aggressive cancer, study finds
A household sweetener could hold the potential to create an anti-cancer treatment. New research from Hiroshima University in Japan revealed that stevia leaf extract could help fight pancreatic cancer cells. The leaves of the stevia plant (Stevia rebaudiana) are used to make stevia extract, a naturally sweet substance commonly used as a sugar substitute. The study, published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, investigated the anti-cancer properties of stevia leaf extract when it is fermented with a certain strain of bacteria. In laboratory research, the fermented extract exhibited "significantly enhanced antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity" against pancreatic cancer cells, the researchers revealed. This led them to believe that this substance could serve as a "promising candidate for pancreatic cancer treatment." Paul E. Oberstein, M.D., medical oncologist and assistant director of the Pancreatic Cancer Center at NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center, shared his thoughts in an interview with Fox News Digital. "This is an interesting study because it evaluated something derived from a natural plant (stevia) and showed that it may have utility in stopping cancer cells from growing in the laboratory," he said. "As the authors point out, the actual stevia plant does not seem to have any benefit for stopping cancer, so they had to use a chemical process to change the plant and make it stronger with a fermentation process." "This is the process of how we discover new treatments – some of which turn out to be absolute game-changers." Oberstein recommended approaching this with caution, as it is unknown whether altering the plant will lead to side effects or toxicity. The study was not performed on humans, so there is "still a lot that's unknown about whether this will help patients," the oncologist added. As stevia extract alone does not have an impact on cancer cells, Oberstein said these findings most likely will not lead to any immediate changes in treatment plans. "The study suggests that if the stevia can be changed in the lab, it may have an impact, so hopefully they will further test this and determine whether this effect happens when tested in people and if it doesn't cause new side effects," he added. "I hope the researchers keep testing this in various formats and in people." Dr. Kristen Arnold, a surgical oncologist and pancreatic cancer specialist at the Orlando Health Cancer Institute, reacted to these study findings in a separate interview with Fox News Digital. "Pancreatic cancer is a very aggressive malignancy," she said. "And we know that even with the most aggressive of therapies, unfortunately, our outcomes are not good." "As a pancreatic cancer community, we spend a lot of time and there's a lot of ongoing effort into trying to find better modalities to treat this disease." Although more research is needed to confirm these preliminary findings, Arnold said she is encouraged by the study. "I think the data's very early to know if it's ultimately going to be a game-changer, but it's very exciting to know that we're finding some positive pre-clinical data," she said. "This is the process of how we discover new treatments – some of which turn out to be absolute game-changers and make dramatic changes in the lives of our patients." "Not all of it pans out, but it's a process of discovery," Arnold added. For those with pancreatic cancer, Arnold recommends seeking out appropriate clinical trial opportunities as new science develops. "The clinical trials are ultimately what determine how we treat patients on a day-to-day basis," she added. Fox News Digital reached out to the study authors for comment.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
French bill clears path to return artefacts looted during colonisation
A bill to make it easier for France to return cultural objects taken during the colonial period was presented at a ministerial council in Paris this week by Culture Minister Rachida Dati. Despite a pledge by President Emmanuel Macron in Burkina Faso in 2017, and follow-up reports, only a small number of items have been returned so far. The new bill would allow artefacts to be given back by government decree, without needing a full vote in Parliament each time. It would apply to objects taken from their countries of origin under conditions described as "illicit". A similar bill planned for 2024 was blocked by France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d'Etat, and its review was postponed. On 30 July, the French government said its goal is to speed up restitution. The bill would set out clear rules for what counts as looted, and would cover items acquired between 1815 and 1972. It cites theft, looting or forced transfer as reasons for return. The word "colonisation" is not used, but the references point directly to France's colonial past. France passes law to allow return of Ivorian drum stolen by colonial troops Scientific commission Dati said the bill would apply mostly to African countries, but could be used for objects taken from anywhere. France will be among the first countries to pass such a law, said Catherine Morin-Desailly, a senator and member of the French Senate Culture Committee. "Apart from Belgium so far, such a framework law has not yet seen the light of day," Morin-Desailly told RFI. Asked whether the process would really be faster, she said: "Yes and no". "I'm going to be nuanced because for each object it is also necessary to examine the request and to have a scientific, historical and legal study that allows us to affirm that it is indeed the right object," she explained. What's new in the bill is that objects can only be returned if their acquisition is proven to be illegal. If that hasn't yet been shown, a scientific commission can be set up to help. It would bring together French and international experts to research the object's history and trace its true origin. How an RFI investigation helped return an ancient treasure to Benin "There will be a lot of work [for the] special commission to allow these restitutions. But what is important is that it will avoid specific laws that clutter the parliamentary agenda and make it take time," Morin-Desailly said. She said public attitudes have changed, and that a shift is now possible. "Not all objects from foreign countries were necessarily acquired illicitly," she added. "This is where we will have to look closely." The aim of each return should be either "reparation" or "reappropriation". These terms were not included in the last bill, which was more cautious and referred only to "international relations" or "cultural cooperation". Thousands of requests France has returned only 27 works to African nations in the past six years. This includes 26 royal treasures from Dahomey handed back to Benin in 2021, and one item returned this year from Finland, though it belonged to a French collection. At least 10 countries have filed official requests for thousands of other items, including Algeria, Madagascar and Côte d'Ivoire, based on 2023 data. The new law would allow the principle of "inalienability" to be waived by decree in these cases. That rule normally bars French public museums from giving away state-owned items. Many of the objects are still held in French collections and have never been properly listed or documented. Lack of transparency Experts and lawmakers have criticised the lack of transparency around how these items ended up in France. "France has not yet finished its process of coming to terms with its colonial past," Pierre Ouzoulias, a Communist senator from Hauts-de-Seine and a member of the Senate Culture Committee, said on Wednesday in an interview with France Culture. He wants to see a permanent, independent commission created. 'Titanic' task of finding plundered African art in French museums "It is absolutely essential that these restitutions are carried out with complete transparency," he said, "and that opinions are made public, to assure Parliament and the nation – who own these items – that everything has been done according to the rules and in accordance with a codified code of ethics that will be upheld regardless of future governments." Saskia Cousin, a sociologist and anthropologist at the University of Nanterre, also supports the plan. She has long studied the issue of looted African heritage. Cousin said thousands of artefacts have been returned to African nations from other parts of the world, but that France is "lagging behind". Netherlands prepares to return looted Benin bronzes to Nigeria "This is an issue that goes beyond cultural diplomacy," she told France Culture. "We must return to the primary stakeholders – especially the youth, their heritage and matri-heritage – so they can reclaim not only this history but also a sense of pride." The bill is due to be debated by the French Parliament during an extraordinary session in September, after the summer break.
