logo
'Always On,' How Workers Are Suffering From 'Infinite' Work

'Always On,' How Workers Are Suffering From 'Infinite' Work

Newsweek23-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Though "Infinite Workday," might sound like the title of a sci-fi film, it's a reality for many Americans, according to a recent report from Microsoft. The tech giant released their 2025 Work Trend Index Annual Report this week, which highlighted the relentless nature of the modern workday.
Newsweek spoke to the experts to find out more about the "infinite workday," and how they are impacting Americans.
The Context
The phrase infinite workday refers to being constantly connected to work, from dawn until late at night.
A spokesperson for Microsoft told Newsweek that "The infinite workday perfectly speaks to how we all feel. Work has reached peak inefficiency, and we can't look away."
Composite image of a stressed worker, a clock, a laptop and a note reading, "Back to work."
Composite image of a stressed worker, a clock, a laptop and a note reading, "Back to work."
Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva
What To Know
Microsoft reported that the average employee receives 117 work emails each day, 153 Teams messages each day, has 2 minutes between interruptions (be it a meeting, call or message) and that 57 percent of meetings are called in the moment and do not have a calendar invite.
In an email shared with Newsweek, a Microsoft spokesperson said that U.S. users average 155 chat messages per person each day, which is just above the global average.
U.S. workers averaged 155 chat messages per person per day—just above the global average of 153. For email, U.S. workers send an average of 120 emails per person per day, which again is just above the global average.
The intensity of the workday comes at a time when workplace satisfaction is increasingly low. In May of 2025, Glassdoor released their Employee Confidence Index and found that only 44 percent of U.S. workers feel optimistic about their company's prospects—the lowest reading ever recorded.
Gallup meanwhile reported in a 2024 that employee engagement was at a 10-year low, with enthusiasm and involvement both dropping sharply.
Meanwhile, The State of the Workforce Report from MeQuilibrium, which analyzed findings from 5,477 employees across various industries, found that 35 percent of employees feel worse about their work situation and 49 percent feel worse about their finance.
Why Is Work Stress So Prevalent in America?
Though Microsoft's study is not country specific, the problem of the infinite workday is a pervasive one for Americans.
According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average working week for all employees, including part time employees in private industries as of 2022 was 34.5 hours.
Though the Fair Labor Standards Act sets a standard workweek of 40 hours, for most U.S. workers, there is no federal limit on how many hours you can work in a week.
Newsweek spoke to Juliet Schor author of Four Days a Week: The Life-Changing Solution for Reducing Employee Stress, Improving Well-Being and Working Smarter.
"U.S. workers have longer hours than people in other high-income countries," she told Newsweek via email. As for the factors driving this, Schor pointed to a "lack of legal protections to turn off devices, high numbers of companies with outsourced teams so there's a need to work across time zones, weak levels of unionization, long hours culture and high health care costs borne by employers."
Newsweek also spoke to Ellen Ernst Kossek, distinguished professor emerita of management at Purdue University, who said that U.S. culture itself, "Really emphasizes work," and that "The U.S. identity is linked really heavily to work."
She highlighted the right to request flexible working and right to disconnect laws in other countries like the U.K. and said that by comparison the U.S. is more "always on," and that there is an expectation to be online.
Vili Lehdonvirta, professor of technology Policy in the Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Finland, echoed this point. "In many sectors, like technology and finance, there is an expectation that workers should be available to their employers also outside formal working hours, and this norm is probably stronger in the U.S. than in many places in Europe."
Lehdonvirta pointed to different technology adaptations and urban planning as playing a potential role in this. He said that mobile devices like Slack and Microsoft Teams makes "always-on culture easier to enact in practice."
Speaking to Newsweek over email, Stewart Friedman, emeritus practice professor of management at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, said, "Norms about boundaries between work and the rest of life vary across countries and they are resistant to change."
He said that though people in the U.S. work longer than those in Europe, they are "less burdened," by work than people in South Korea or Japan. "The values underlying national or regional cultures play a big role in determining expectations about the parts of life to which we allocate our attention."
How 'Always On' Work Culture Negatively Impacts Employees
We know that workers are indeed always on, but how is this impacting them?
For Schor, the risks are clear. "Workers burn out, have health problems and as a result do lower quality work and are more likely to quit," she said
Lehdonvirta told Newsweek, "Studies suggest that workers in an always-on work culture experience more work-home-interference, fatigue, and other negative consequences."
A 2019 study from Myers-Briggs surveyed 1,000 people about always-on culture and found that people who were able to access calls and emails for work outside of hours were more engaged in their job, but more stressed.
The study found that 28 percent of always on employees said they couldn't mentally switch off, while 20 percent reported mental exhaustion.
According to Lehdonvirta, the consequences of this vary. "Worker-controlled flexibility over when to carry out duties can even be a positive thing for combining work with other commitments. Organizational culture and the behavior of supervisors as role models matters," he said.
"People do have different styles of working," Kossek said, noting that people may work out of hours to enable taking breaks at other times in order to help balance work-life responsibilities.
"There is a risk to working odd hours," Kossek said, noting that "We can make unhealthy choices," such aa checking emails on weekends or vacations when it's not an emergency.
Kossek highlighted that workers are also bringing the job home with them. "Think about two hands going back and forth, representing emails and texts going into crossing borders into home, home into work," she said,
There is a "high pattern of integration here," Kossek said, and likened the amalgamation of work and home life to trying to text while driving.
The Entry of Artificial Intelligence
Microsoft's report comes as the world of work is being rapidly changed by the increasing prevalence of Artificial Intelligence. AI is a polarizing topic—some liken it to a new industrial revolution, while others are sounding the alarm on ethical and environmental concerns.
But how will it impact the workplace? Will this new technology rebalance the rhythm of the working day, or will it hit the gas pedal on an already unsustainable work pace?
A spokesperson for Microsoft told Newsweek "At a time when nearly every leader is trying to do more with less, we have a real opportunity—not to speed up a broken system, but to refocus on the 20 percent of work that drives 80 percent of the impact, to reorganize into flatter, more agile teams, and to pause long enough to learn how to use AI—not just to support the work, but to transform it."
Schor though, said that "AI can go either way."
"It can lead to job stress, unemployment and higher productivity requirements. But it can also be a way to enhance productivity," she said.
Lehdonvirta shared a similar sentiment. "It depends entirely on what they can do," he said, adding that if these tools "genuinely help people," to off-load tasks then they could help to achieve "sustainable working styles."
However, "If they become yet another notification that interrupts you, or yet another inbox that needs to be dealt with, then the consequences may be different."
Friedman told Newsweek, "To the extent that AI tools give greater freedom and flexibility in determining how we allocate our attention to the people and projects about which we care the most, then they can be useful in helping us produce greater harmony and impact as leaders in all the different parts of our lives."
What's Next
The workforce is rapidly changing, but more change may need to come to tackle always on culture.
"We have to come up with new norms for managing, when we're on and when we're off work and new ways of communicating," Kossek said.
Schor said, "When workloads increase, reducing hours can often make it easier to do all the work," this is because "people are most rested and less burned out."
A good work life balance is key in this, but it takes commitment.
"People are trying to be great employees, but also have a rich personal life," Kossek said.
Friedman told Newsweek that "learning how to manage boundaries between different parts of life," like "work, home, community," is possible. But "it takes conscious effort and continual experimentation."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's tariffs keep coming. Stock markets don't seem to care.
Trump's tariffs keep coming. Stock markets don't seem to care.

NBC News

time5 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Trump's tariffs keep coming. Stock markets don't seem to care.

At least for now, the U.S. stock market is on board with President Donald Trump's increasingly aggressive use of executive power. On Tuesday, major stock indexes hit fresh all-time highs as investors digested an inflation report that was mostly tamer than feared. While the details of the report suggest an overall mixed picture for the economy, it suggested fears of large immediate price increases from Trump's tariffs may no longer be warranted. 'Many prices will end up rising in time due to tariffs, but we don't see inflation pressures persisting,' James Knightley, chief international economist at ING, said in a note to clients. 'We are in a very different situation to 2021/22 when inflation soared to 9%.' While the rate of inflation for some goods exposed to tariffs picked up in July, it was weaker for others, like appliances and apparel. Last month's heavier price increases were instead mainly found in service sectors like airfare and auto insurance rates. 'The strength was concentrated to a few specific components and not broad based,' analysts with Citi said in a note. Tariffs are costs added to imports in the form of taxes. Goldman Sachs analysts have estimated that consumers have been responsible for as much as 22% of the cost increases, with the percentage set to climb as the tariffs work their way more fully into supply chains — though Trump attacked Goldman's estimates Tuesday. Efforts by firms to stockpile goods ahead of the tariffs' impacts, as well as summer discounts and ongoing tariff deadline extensions by Trump, have insulated consumers from further effects. Tariffs continue to get negative reaction in surveys, with a mid-July Fox News poll showing Americans disapproved of Trump on tariffs by a 26-point margin. That was virtually unchanged from April, when Trump revealed shock new tariff levels in his Rose Garden 'Liberation Day' speech announcing soaring new import duty levels. Stocks, meanwhile, continue to shrug them off. After Tuesday's inflation report, traders increased the odds of a rate cut by the Federal Reserve at its next meeting in September. When markets expect the Federal Reserve to loosen financial conditions and make it easier for businesses to borrow money, stocks tend to rise because firms will have to pay less money in interest. Stocks' recent behavior is in stark contrast to their dramatic spring sell-off in the wake of April's 'Liberation Day' speech. Investor reaction was so intense that Trump instituted a 90-day pause to reconsider what was set to be a cornerstone of his second administration's economic policy. Today, Trump's focus on tariffs hasn't abated — but he has dialed back the more maximalist tariff levels he initially outlined. Combined with signs of a shakier labor market, investors are more convinced that the Fed will err on the side of supporting the economy by lowering interest rates to support overall business activity. The performance of the stock market itself isn't a full picture of the broader economy, however. Instead, the gains of the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq increasingly reflect the outsized returns of a handful of tech companies that investors believe will reap massive gains from their investments in artificial intelligence technology. The so-called Magnificent Seven tech stocks — Alphabet (Google's parent), Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla — now account for one-third of the weighted average of the S&P 500, the broadest index of stocks Reuters reported last month, citing data from LSEG Datastream consultancy. According to analysis from Morgan Stanley, at the end of July, just 9% of companies that make up the S&P 500 were at 52-week highs. The index's movements are thus now heavily correlated with changes to the outlook of a handful of companies. If just one of them underperforms, it can take the entire market down with it. 'When a handful of stocks dominate the market ... if you do have a period of disappointment from those stocks, you could see disproportionate impacts on your portfolio from just a handful of company-specific issues,' Michael Reynolds, vice president of investment strategy at Glenmede financial group, told Reuters. Small businesses remain especially vulnerable to the impact of tariffs, since they have less pricing power than larger firms. The National Federation of Independent Businesses, the country's largest small-business trade group, reported Tuesday that a shrinking share of respondents say they are profitable. 'Increased costs are affecting everyone. I believe things will improve, but it will take time — six to 12 months. I just hope small businesses can hold on that long,' the NFIB quoted an unnamed fabricated metal product manufacturing firm in Michigan as saying in a July report. The U.S. economy isn't out of the woods yet, said Kevin Gordon, director and senior investment strategist at Charles Schwab financial group. Wednesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will report a separate measure of inflation that tracks wholesale inflation, or what producers get for their products and which tends to be more closely watched by the Federal Reserve. If it shows more pronounced signs of inflation than what Tuesday's report suggested, stocks could quickly come down from their new highs. Barring that, conditions remain more benign than feared, he said, potentially setting the stage for further stock gains. 'Weaker growth is not a concern at the moment,' he said. 'Yes, there's been some pullback, but it doesn't mean we're in any kind of recessionary scenario.'

CBS Has Said Canceling Stephen Colbert's Show Was 'Financial.' What Does The Average American Think?
CBS Has Said Canceling Stephen Colbert's Show Was 'Financial.' What Does The Average American Think?

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CBS Has Said Canceling Stephen Colbert's Show Was 'Financial.' What Does The Average American Think?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As the supposed fallout of the Paramount/Skydance merger continues, the 2025 TV schedule is the beginning of the end for CBS's The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. With Colbert's surprise cancellation still lingering, and the corporate players proclaiming the move as a 'financial decision,' the validity of that motive has been questioned by not only celebrities and fellow late night hosts, but also the American public. A new poll reported by Yahoo seems to back that viewpoint, as the axing of The Late Show lead to some interesting data. Perhaps the most telling result are the top two results that pollsters pegged for why Paramount/CBS cancelled the almost 10 year program; as well as its legendary late night fixture. 40% of Americans disapproved of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert's cancellation. 35% of Americans surveyed think that Stephen Colbert is 'about right' in sociopolitical content (versus 28% saying he's "too political," and another 3% saying he's "not political enough.") 37% of responses expressed that 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with Trump administration.' 36% agreeing that another cause was 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump.' Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Fallon are tied at 25% for the title of "favorite late-night show host." By the numbers, it would appear that 'the Average American' does not feel that The Late Show with Stephen Colbert's reported financial losses are truly the cause of its cancellation. Which aligns with some of the opinions we've seen from other late night notables. One such example would be Andy Cohen's remarks about the CBS cancellation, in which the Watch What Happens host offered a breakdown of what he felt would have been a more financially motivated strategy. Meanwhile, Skydance CEO David Ellison's alleged feelings on CBS personalities acting 'like they're the IP' poses a counterpoint that appears to be acting in the name of 'fundamentals.' Yet if you trust former Late Show with David Letterman producer Rob Burnett's thoughts, he might tell you the perceived threat to the Paramount/Skydance merger was the true problem. For all of the inside baseball discourse that exists around Stephen Colbert's May 2026 departure, the 'true cause' has certainly seemed to be up for debate. And that debate has hit every corner of the interwebs, from celebrities to the audiences watching at home. As the discourse continues to run around the Internet, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert will continue running -- for at least a few more months -- in its usual 11:35 PM ET slot on CBS, with new episodes heading to streaming for those with a Paramount+ subscription after they've aired. Solve the daily Crossword

In Illinois, Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries says affordability could be key message for the midterms
In Illinois, Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries says affordability could be key message for the midterms

Chicago Tribune

time37 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

In Illinois, Democratic House leader Hakeem Jeffries says affordability could be key message for the midterms

SPRINGFIELD — As national Democrats continue looking for a message that will resonate with the American public enough to put them back in power, U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Tuesday it could be as simple as: 'America is too expensive.' Speaking in Illinois' state capital about President Donald Trump and GOP funding cuts to public aid and benefit programs, the New York City congressman argued high costs continue to plague average Americans. 'Housing costs are too high. Grocery costs are too high. Utility costs are too high. Insurance costs are too high. Child care costs are too high,' Jeffries said, flanked by U.S. Rep. Nikki Budzinski and U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, both of Springfield. 'America is too expensive. We need to drive down the high cost of living. Donald Trump has failed to do it.' Before arriving in Springfield, where he's expected to appear Wednesday with Gov. JB Pritzker at the Illinois State Fair, Jeffries hit the same message on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe.' As dozens of Texas Democrats fled their state for Illinois to prevent Republicans from passing a gerrymandered Texas congressional map to gain GOP seats for the midterm elections, Jeffries said the GOP efforts are happening 'because Republicans don't have any track record of accomplishment that is designed to focus on the American people, to make life better for the American people, to lower costs for the people of Texas and beyond. And so they want to rig the elections to cling on to power.' Jeffries' comments come as the midterms have begun to take shape more than six months after Trump took office. On economic issues, Trump has instituted a wide array of tariffs, which have increased some consumer costs and created uncertainty for businesses and the financial markets. In July, the consumer price index, which measures the average change in pricing over time, rose 2.7% over the last year for all urban consumers, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. During their event in Springfield, Jeffries, Budzinski and Durbin said massive tax breaks for the wealthy and spending cuts that were cornerstones of Trump's domestic legislation will deprive many Americans of federal health care funding, food assistance and early childhood education programs. 'Democrats are committed to fixing a broken health care system and making sure that health care is available to everyday Americans that's affordable and accessible when they need it,' Jeffries said. 'And lastly, we have to clean up corruption in Washington, D.C., and deliver a government that actually works for the people and not for the privileged few.' Although Democrats are out of power in Washington, Jeffries, who has served in the U.S. House since 2013, said he thinks the party has gained traction since Trump won the White House and Republicans took control of both chambers in Congress. Since then, Jeffries noted a Democratic-backed judge won a coveted seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and he said Trump has become 'deeply unpopular,' following the tax break and spending measure. 'There is a reason why Donald Trump has ordered Republicans to engage in mid-decade gerrymandering of the congressional map. It's because he wants to rig the midterm elections,' Jeffries said. 'Republicans are on the run all across America.' Jeffries on 'Morning Joe' also spoke in support of the Texas House Democrats who traveled to the Chicago area and elsewhere to prevent the Texas House from establishing a quorum to vote on a new congressional map pushed by Republicans. Jeffries said the whole saga has shown how voters across the U.S. should be 'able to choose the people they want to represent them in Washington, as opposed to politicians and party bosses choosing their voters.' 'The Texas Democrats are standing up for the principle of free and fair elections,' Jeffries said. 'Nothing is more American than that. We are at an all-hands-on-deck moment. And so, I certainly support the principle that we have to utilize every single tool in the toolbox in California, in New York, here in Illinois, from coast to coast.' The Texas Democrats have been joined by Pritzker and other Democrats in accusing Republicans of kowtowing to Trump, whose administration is encouraging similar actions in other GOP-led states as a means of holding the party's slim majority in the U.S. House in next year's midterm elections for the remainder of Trump's second term. They have noted repeatedly that political maps are usually redrawn only once per decade following the U.S. census, and have said Republicans are trying to change the rules and disenfranchise Texas citizens for purely political reasons. Texas Republicans have countered that the congressional maps in many Democratic states, including Illinois, are gerrymandered. Pritzker has said that Illinois' 14-3 Democratic majority congressional map passed legal muster. As Republicans try to force Democrats back to Texas to vote on the remap, GOP Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and others filed a petition — in what at least one legal expert called long-shot litigation — with a western Illinois court to compel Illinois law enforcement to enforce civil warrants from the Republican Texas House speaker against the Democratic lawmakers who sought refuge in Illinois. On Tuesday, Jeffries also addressed U.S. Sen. John Cornyn's threat from last week of getting the FBI involved in trying to ensure the lawmakers return to Texas — a request from the veteran Texas Republican that he said was granted by the law enforcement agency. Jeffries called Cornyn's actions 'pitiful' as he's trying to 'weaponize the FBI' for political purposes at a time when he faces a contentious primary reelection bid against Paxton, who is vying for Cornyn's seat. 'It's sad because the senator has (presented) himself for decades as someone of integrity,' Jeffries said of Cornyn on 'Morning Joe.' 'And now that he's in the race of his life and is on his way to losing the Texas Republican primary for his own reelection, he is targeting elected officials who he believes are his adversaries solely for political gain.' 'The FBI obviously should be focused on doing other things in terms of targeting child predators, terrorists or drug traffickers, not being used as political pawns in a game that (Texas Gov.) Greg Abbott and John Cornyn and Texas Republican Party bosses are trying to utilize for their own political power,' Jeffries said on 'Morning Joe.' 'This is the same principle connected to the fact that you have more than 100 people who've lost their lives in Texas, including dozens of children, tragically in the historic flooding. There is clear evidence that there has been mismanagement or failure to act decisively.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store