ILA, USMX Put Final Stamp on Six-Year Master Contract
Union dockworkers at the East and Gulf Coast ports officially ratified a new six-year deal with their maritime employers Tuesday evening, closing the book on more than two years of negotiations and putting any chance of a strike to bed once and for all.
Nearly 99 percent of rank-and-file members of the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) voted in favor of the new master contract agreement with the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX). The deal impacts 25,000 of the union's 45,000 workers across 14 ports from Houston to Boston.
More from Sourcing Journal
The NLRB Lacks a Quorum. Here's What That Means for Business and Unions.
Unions to Trump: 'The Time to Act is Now' on Chinese Shipbuilding Sanctions
'A Direct Attack on USPS Employees': Unions Slam Reports of Trump Takeover
The extension to the master contract is retroactive to Oct. 1, 2024, and runs through Sept. 30, 2030.
The labor battle between the ILA and the USMX was often contentious in the public arena, and resulted in a three-day strike to kick off October. That work stoppage ended after both parties signed a tentative agreement on wages, extending the original contract to Jan. 15 and putting off any labor action until after.
After a three-month back-and-forth on automation, the ILA and USMX came to a tentative six-year deal a week ahead of the contract negotiation deadline, averting a second strike at the ports.
Automation had been the central sticking point of the negotiations, with the union breaking off talks in November over the impact of technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes (RMGs) at the Port of Virginia and the Port of New York and New Jersey.
In the weeks before the ratification, the union's locals reviewed both the master contract and local port area contracts before giving their stamp of approval.
ILA president Harold Daggett described the new agreement as the 'gold standard' for dockworker unions globally, highlighting that there are 'full protections against automation.'
The union did not provide specific details on the protections, or how hiring practices and technology and automation deployments will complement each other.
No new technology will be implemented until the parties mutually agree to related manning levels as part of a more stringent technology review process, ILA executive vice president Dennis Daggett previously said.
According to a CNBC report after January's tentative deal, ILA members are assured that more workers would be hired that would complement any specific equipment being added.
'This is an incredible contract package,' President Daggett said in a statement, indicating that the estimated cost to the employers surpasses $35 billion. That figure is 'a conservative estimate,' the ILA boss claims.
The ILA-USMX deal includes a 62 percent wage increase, with hourly base rates jumping to $63 from $39.
The agreement also includes accelerated wage raises for new ILA workers; full container royalty funds returned to the union; raises in retirement contributions; and stronger health care, vacation and holiday benefits.
The parties will formally sign the six-year deal on March 11.
Daggett also heaped praise on President Donald Trump for his 'invaluable' assistance in the negotiation process. A month after winning the presidential election, Trump voiced his support for the union and cited the harm he felt automation caused American workers. This likely boxed the USMX in a corner
Trump's stance was similar to his predecessor, President Joe Biden, in that both positioned the negotiations as a clash between U.S. employees versus foreign-owned corporations. None of the USMX container shipping firms are American, and many member terminals are owned by foreign entities.
This dynamic was also inflamed by the fact that the ocean carriers made record profits during the Covid-19 pandemic and again in 2024.
Despite the fiery rhetoric throughout the negotiations, largely coming out of the ILA's camp, President Daggett also praised his USMX counterpart Paul DeMaria in helping to bring about a settlement.
'Thank goodness USMX made Paul DeMaria the lead negotiator for management's side when they did,' Daggett said. 'Paul was uniquely qualified to move negotiations in the right direction and his appointment to this new role was instrumental in avoiding a second strike.'
The USMX has not commented on the deal.
The ongoing negotiations were a major factor in an increase in imports flooding into the U.S. during the summer and winter, as shippers front-loaded their cargo ahead of possible strikes and the expected imposition of tariffs by the Trump administration.
Both the Los Angeles and Long Beach ports had record container handling months in December and January, in clear signs of coastal shifting over the two months to hedge against a second ILA strike.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

27 minutes ago
China appears to downplay US trade deal Trump said was 'done'
HONG KONG and LONDON -- A spokesperson for China 's Ministry of Commerce on Thursday appeared to downplay what President Donald Trump said Wednesday was a "done" trade deal addressing export restrictions on rare earths and semiconductors. Speaking at a press conference, the spokesperson characterized the outcome of this week's trade negotiations in London as a "framework" to consolidate what was agreed to at negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland, in May. This week's talks in the U.K. represented the "first meeting," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson did not offer further details on what was agreed this week, telling reporters, "New progress was also made in addressing each side's trade concerns." On rare earths, the spokesperson said China would issue export licenses based on "reasonable needs" and noted that "compliant applications have already been approved." Trump on Wednesday framed the talks as having reached a deal. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump said on Truth Social, adding that the relationship between the world's two leading economic powerhouses was "excellent." Trump said that the U.S. would get "a total of 55% tariffs" with China's tariffs set at 10%. Trump added, "Full magnets and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)." Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick referred to the agreement as a "handshake for a framework." Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping will now have to approve the framework, Lutnick said. That step would appear to mean there were some concessions that both leaders did not give their negotiating teams authority to negotiate away. "Once that's done, we will be back on the phone together and we will begin to implement this agreement," Lutnick said. "The two largest economies in the world have reached a handshake for framework."
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dollar hits fresh 2025 low as US tariff concerns pick up again
(Bloomberg) — The dollar (DX=F) extended its decline as worries over US tariffs increased after President Donald Trump said he would notify trading partners soon of unilateral levies. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Do World's Fairs Still Matter? The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index slid as much as 0.6% to the lowest level since July 2023 on Thursday, extending the previous day's drop spurred by softer US inflation data. The euro rose to its strongest since November 2021. Traders will be monitoring US producer-price data due later Thursday for confirmation of subdued pressures. Some of its components feed into core personal consumption expenditure, the Federal Reserve's preferred measure of inflation. They will also watch an auction of 30-year Treasuries after yields surged last month on fiscal concerns. 'Dollar weakness has much more room to run,' said Vasileios Gkionakis, senior economist and strategist at Aviva Investors. He added the greenback's weakness despite rising yields show eroding investor confidence in US assets. The dollar's decline spilled into the currency volatility market, reinforcing the inverse correlation between the greenback and hedging costs recently. Demand was particularly pronounced in the one-week tenor, which captures the Fed's June 18 policy meeting. What Bloomberg's Strategists Say... 'Trader pricing still favors more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, although the precise timing flips around depending on the prevailing investor mood. But what is consistent is the US dollar ploughing a path to the downside as FX trader convictions firm.' — Mark Cranfield, Markets Live Strategist, Singapore Currency traders will also be watching the upcoming Group-of-Seven summit for any trade negotiation developments. 'We are watching the G-7 summit closely for pending trade deals between the US and its key trading partners (e.g., Mexico and Canada),' said Alex Loo, macro strategist at TD Securities in Singapore. 'Leaks this week may boost sentiment, especially the likes of Canadian dollar and Mexican peso.' (Updates with pricing, analyst quote and options section.) New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The $11 trillion gap between White House and economists on Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill
An array of economists — from the Congressional Budget Office to the Tax Foundation to the Penn-Wharton Budget Model — have reached a similar conclusion: Trump's signature legislation comes with a price tag in the neighborhood of $3 trillion over the next decade. They're all wrong, the White House says. And not just by a little. President Trump and his aides have instead offered claims that the bill will make money and that the final tally for both the tax-cutting legislation and other parts of the Trump agenda will usher in a new golden age not just for the US economy but also for government debt. The claims from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue go as high as $8 trillion in black ink (an $11 trillion chasm with the experts) in claims that go beyond what even Capitol Hill Republicans are projecting. As for reconciling the two, some economists essentially throw up their hands. "You can't square it because it's ridiculous," Erica York of the Tax Foundation said. "The bill unambiguously will increase deficits, it will not contribute that much to economic growth," she added, noting that the bill is largely focused on extending current tax rates that would not be expected to push the economy significantly upward from current levels. Yet the White House has remained steadfast even as this gap has led to increased tensions as the bill goes through another round of adjustments on Capitol Hill. A Wednesday appearance before Congress by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was marked by lawmakers — mostly Democratic, but some Republicans as well — raising the debt issue. In one colorful moment, Democratic Rep. Mike Thompson of California asked Bessent to point to an independent expert "not on the payroll of this administration" who says this bill will not add to our debt. Bessent then cited Arthur Laffer, the former Reagan official and longtime Trump supporter who received the Presidential Medal of Freedom during the president's first term. The comment led to laughter in the chamber, with Thompson shooting back, "I don't think that one counts." It was a hearing where Bessent declined to repeat some of the administration's most aggressive claims, saying instead that "it remains to be seen" whether the bill will add to the national debt. Others have not been so restrained about the impact of Trump's overall agenda. "We're going to cut the deficit by $8 trillion over the next 10 years," press secretary Karoline Leavitt offered recently on Fox News. And a recent White House memo offered a slightly lower figure of about $6.7 trillion to $6.9 trillion in deficit reductions over the coming decade. One issue is that White House projections rely on a set of assumptions that are often internally contradictory, such as taking credit for taxes spurring economic growth while simultaneously saying they have no cost. Other parts of the bill would enact temporary tax cuts — and then take credit for lower costs there — while also claiming other permanent cuts are free. That's in addition to an overriding assumption at the White House that, essentially, things break historically right for the US economy and sustained 3% economic growth is in the offing. That's above even what House Republicans are projecting, as lawmakers there have rallied behind a lower (but still very aggressive) assumption of 2.6% growth. Both projections are unlikely, Marc Goldwein of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said. "Some people are at 2%, some people are at 1.6% ... that is the neighborhood," he said of a series of projections for growth that hover around 1.8%. He added in an interview that even if sustained 3% growth were to happen, "it would have very little to do with this tax bill." Yet the White House has repeatedly dismissed the experts. Trump budget chief Russ Vought recently told reporters that everything "is part of a coherent fiscal agenda" and that the combination of tax cuts, tariffs, additional promised spending cuts, and "reforms we can do ourselves" to programs like Medicaid will lead to good outcomes for the US bottom line. White House projections also fully embrace recent CBO projections of $2.8 trillion in tariff revenues over the coming decade. But that embrace appears to ignore a prediction in the same report that tariffs will "reduce the size of the U.S. economy" and also lead to a potential inflation increase of 0.4 percentage points in 2025 and 2026. York has calculated that even two seemingly minor adjustments — taking the slightly lower but still very aggressive House estimate of 2.6% economic growth and factoring in the economic costs of tariffs — means the bill "is basically a wash or even negative for GDP." "They're picking and choosing," she added. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet And few are expecting tariffs to stay steady in the coming months, not to mention the coming years. Tariff levels are under active negotiation — two fronts this week are duties on goods from China and India — as the CBO report assumed rates remain steady not just during Trump's term, but also years after he is scheduled to leave office. The tariffs are also under a considerable cloud of legal uncertainty, with an appeals court ruling on Tuesday that Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs could stay in force for now while it considers whether they are legal. "Even if they are upheld by the courts, it still seems like the Trump administration is willing to negotiate them down somewhat," York noted, "and then what happens in four years when a new administration comes in?" Ben Werschkul is Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. David Foster is a graphic artist for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data