Brandon Pretorius murder: Investigating officer tells court accused are safer behind bars
The two men charged in connection with the death of Brandon Pretorius (27) will remain behind bars until June 3.
Pretorius, a father from Jansen Park, succumbed to his injuries on 6 May, several days after an assault that reportedly stemmed from an incident at Malbroer Pub and Grill in North Rand Road.
The accused, Ruan Beetge (30) and Gordon Westraad (45), continued their bail application at the Boksburg Magistrate's Court today (May 27).
During proceedings, the investigating officer, Sergeant Millicent Tshabalala, once again took the stand.
Tshabalala testified that she had profiled the two accused and revealed that there were three assault cases against Beetge (accused one), although he had never been convicted.
She stated that one of the cases involved the assault of a uniformed police officer, while another was related to domestic violence.
In the matter involving the police officer, Tshabalala explained that the investigating officer never submitted the docket to court for a summons.
The second case, she said, was withdrawn as a result of mediation. The third case was closed at the police station, with a reason provided.
The officer also testified that Beetge gained more followers on TikTok following the assault, which led to him to receiving money.
According to her further testimony, the second accused, Westraad, has no prior convictions and she stated both should not be granted bail.
'According to my observation, their lives are in danger. My duty is to protect them and the community. While they are in prison, they are not in danger. Outside, the community poses a danger to them,' she said.
Beetge's advocate, Marius van Wyngaard, began his cross-examination of Tshabalala.
Among other questions, he quizzed her about the post-mortem report and an accident Pretorius was involved in prior to being taken to hospital.
The bail application will resume on June 3.
Also Read: Young father dies after assault
Also Read: Malbroer assault: It's been a nightmare – Mother of slain son
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
‘Using k-word is illegal': Northern Cape teacher fired for racist outburst loses reinstatement battle
He was dismissed last year after being found guilty at a disciplinary hearing of calling two African pupils the k-word. A teacher in the Northern Cape has failed in his attempt to return to work after being dismissed for using a racial slur against two black pupils. Gerhard Louw took the Northern Cape department of education to the Education Labour Relations Council, arguing that his dismissal was unfair. At the time, Louw was employed at Technical High School Kimberley, where he taught technology and automotive subjects. He was dismissed in November last year after being found guilty at a disciplinary hearing of calling two African pupils the k-word. The arbitration proceedings were held on 8 April and 22 May. Pupils testify after Northern Cape teacher appeals dismissal over k-word During the hearings, the provincial department called two pupils to testify. The first witness, a Grade 12 at the time of the incident, said she was among seven girls who were transferred from the Northern Cape High School hostel to the Technical High School hostel on the evening of 23 June 2024. Upon their arrival, Louw – who was one of the supervisors at the hostel – emerged from his residence and expressed displeasure at the girls being relocated to 'his hostel'. She testified that Louw conveyed his frustration to their driver, Mr Tshabalala. After Tshabalala returned to the vehicle, Louw allegedly approached her and another pupil and accused them of tarnishing the school's reputation, then called them the k-word. ALSO READ: Racism in schools: born-free generation faces lingering inequality challenges She said that both she and the other pupil were shocked, as they had done or said nothing to provoke such language. She also indicated that a third pupil might have overheard the incident. The pupil added during cross-examination that they reported the incident to their families and the hostel's centre manager instead of Tshabalala, who was the groundsman and head of security. Tshabalala later advised them to report the matter to the authorities once schools reopened. The second witness, who was the third pupil mentioned, confirmed the first witness's testimony and added that Louw had yelled at the girls in the presence of his wife. Northern Cape teacher denies using racial slur Louw testified as the sole witness in his own defence. He stated that at the time of the incident, the hostel was occupied by boys attending winter school and that he felt it was inappropriate for girls to stay there as well. The teacher claimed to have warned the girls that they would be asked to leave if they did not behave. Louw insisted he could not recall using the k-word. He also contended that neither school management nor Tshabalala informed him of the allegations and he only became aware of the matter weeks later when he was served with legal documents. READ MORE: Eastern Cape teacher fails to get job back after being fired for fabricating marks of 200 matric pupils According to Louw, he never saw the girls again after the incident. During cross-examination, Louw admitted to being angry during the interaction, but again denied using the racial slur. He also said he could have called his wife and a second person to support his version of events, as they were present during the conversation. Louw asked for reinstatement on the grounds of what he claimed was unfair dismissal. Arbitrator upholds dismissal In a 5 June ruling, the arbitrator found that the testimonies of the two pupils were credible and consistent, making them reliable witnesses. 'A mere denial by the applicant is not enough to sustain a plea of not guilty when faced by allegations of this nature. 'The usage of the word 'k****r' is not just illegal and degrading to the humanity and dignity of the learners, but it reminds us all of the horrible past of our country,' the award reads. The arbitrator also pointed out that Louw agreed with almost every detail of the pupils' accounts, except the use of the racial slur. 'If the applicant was really truthful about this, surely his wife and Mrs van der Lith would not have deemed it troublesome to come to this council and to corroborate his version.' Describing Louw's conduct as 'despicable', the arbitrator concluded that the teacher being fired was an appropriate sanction and 'a matter of last resort'. Therefore, the dismissal was 'substantively fair'. 'In this democratic South Africa, people like the applicant are anti-transformation and should not be allowed near children and the good citizenry of our society.' NOW READ: Can you get fired for being racist? Here is what employers and employees need to know
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
SPCA investigating starving dog in influencer's viral video
The National SPCA are investigating an influencer's viral TikTok video, which featured a notably starving dog in it. However, the woman – Sasha Tshiamo – claims she is not responsible for the animal. On the X platform, a video of influencer Sasha Tshiamo quickly went viral. But the TikTok had nothing to do with the content creator's flair for fashion or curvy figure. Instead, an emaciated dog in the background of the clip had social media users up in arms. The animal's ribcage was clearly visible, and it appeared lethargic. Many South Africans called on animal rights activists like the SPCA to intervene. @Zakhele27520120: '@NSPCA_SA Please, that dog is suffering there, do something 💔' @Nicole_Barlow1: 'Please, do the humane thing and surrender the dog to the nearest @NSPCA_SA. This situation is truly appalling. The blatant cruelty is unimaginable…😡🤬🤬' Others added: @Bar1Koekemoer: 'Your dog is starving. You are a despicable human being.' @JLerubako40: 'It is said that how a person treats their domestic animals says a lot about what type of person they are. Speaking to The South African, the SPCA confirmed that they were investigating the incident and would inspect the property where the dog was seen. While the SPCA has promised a thorough investigation, the influence claimed that she was not responsible for the animal. Sasha Tshiamo shared on an Instagram Story, ' I don't know if I must laugh or cry, guys. That's not my dog.' Under her TikTok video, a follower appealed to her to feed the dog. She clapped back: 'It's not my responsibility.' The SPCA has repeatedly warned the public that animal abusers can be criminally charged under the Animals Protection Act 71 of 1962. The act – which was established to prevent the cruelty of animals – stipulates that those found guilty can face a fine or imprisonment. Offenders could also face a denial of ownership – preventing them from owning animals – as well as a criminal conviction. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Drug and substance awareness campaign to mark Youth Day
The Kuyenzeka Empowerment organisation is planning a drug and substance awareness campaign for Youth Day. This campaign is taking place in Clewer Community Hall on June 16, and it kicks off at 09:00. There is a full programme that includes messages of support, motivational talks and different departments will be available for more information. Contact Dora Mtshali for more information: 072 217 1516. Breaking news at your fingertips … Follow WITBANK NEWS on our website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or TikTok Chat to us: info@ At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
