SPCA investigating starving dog in influencer's viral video
On the X platform, a video of influencer Sasha Tshiamo quickly went viral. But the TikTok had nothing to do with the content creator's flair for fashion or curvy figure.
Instead, an emaciated dog in the background of the clip had social media users up in arms.
The animal's ribcage was clearly visible, and it appeared lethargic.
Many South Africans called on animal rights activists like the SPCA to intervene.
@Zakhele27520120: '@NSPCA_SA Please, that dog is suffering there, do something 💔'
@Nicole_Barlow1: 'Please, do the humane thing and surrender the dog to the nearest @NSPCA_SA. This situation is truly appalling. The blatant cruelty is unimaginable…😡🤬🤬'
Others added:
@Bar1Koekemoer: 'Your dog is starving. You are a despicable human being.'
@JLerubako40: 'It is said that how a person treats their domestic animals says a lot about what type of person they are.
Speaking to The South African, the SPCA confirmed that they were investigating the incident and would inspect the property where the dog was seen.
While the SPCA has promised a thorough investigation, the influence claimed that she was not responsible for the animal.
Sasha Tshiamo shared on an Instagram Story, ' I don't know if I must laugh or cry, guys. That's not my dog.'
Under her TikTok video, a follower appealed to her to feed the dog. She clapped back: 'It's not my responsibility.'
The SPCA has repeatedly warned the public that animal abusers can be criminally charged under the Animals Protection Act 71 of 1962.
The act – which was established to prevent the cruelty of animals – stipulates that those found guilty can face a fine or imprisonment.
Offenders could also face a denial of ownership – preventing them from owning animals – as well as a criminal conviction.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 .
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
13 hours ago
- The Citizen
Parents alarmed as Instagram accounts target Mbombela learners
The recent activation of a number of Instagram accounts has left parents fearing for their children's well-being and lives. According to Lowvelder, the first account, called Exposing Nelspruit, became active on the evening of July 21, when a Grade 10 learner of Hoërskool Nelspruit came across disturbing content shared about fellow learners. The account uses Instagram stories to spread rumours and publicly shame learners from various local high schools. Learners targeted online It appears to target learners from Hoërskool Nelspruit and Hoërskool Bergvlam in particular, often posting unverified claims about their alleged sexual activity and insulting their character. A concerned parent, who asked to remain anonymous to protect her child's identity, told Lowvelder: 'I'm afraid my child might decide to take his own life based on lies.' The group is most active between 17:00 and 21:00, during which time followers submit rumours that are then shared anonymously by the account. The original account was banned after a wave of reports from followers. However, second and third accounts — called Exposing Nelspruit 2 and Nelspruit se Drama — have since been created. Schools respond The targeted schools both shared their views on the matter. Principal Willie van der Merwe of Hoërskool Nelspruit said: 'The school condemns any form of bullying, victimisation and discrimination of any kind, including on online platforms. The school remains proactive in addressing these challenges through awareness campaigns, partnerships and clear policies that prioritise student protection. We also urge learners and parents to use the current systems and mechanisms to report incidences where the school can support them. The school-based support team is available to provide advice and guidance.' Principal Deon Visser of Hoërskool Bergvlam added: 'The school condemns any form of unlawful activity and emphasises that such behaviour will not be tolerated. We believe in upholding the law and ensuring the safety and well-being of all individuals. Bergvlam hopes that the perpetrator(s) will be brought to justice and that the relevant authorities will take the necessary actions to address the situation.' Legal expert weighs in Media law specialist Helene Viljoen expressed serious concern about the social media activity and the wider issue of cyberbullying. 'We all have the right to freedom of speech, but it is legally limited,' she said. 'If someone makes allegations without evidence, they are unlawfully defaming someone and could be sued for up to R500 000. Making statements that amount to personal insults and violate someone's dignity constitutes crimen injuria — a crime punishable by law.' Viljoen also warned that electronic communications may lead to charges of harassment and intimidation. 'Comments must be true and in the public interest before being posted publicly,' she added. Viljoen urged affected parents to visit the magistrate's court with their children to apply for a protection order, which would allow the SAPS to investigate the matter. Court orders Meta to co-operate She highlighted a recent legal development: 'A court recently ordered Meta to grant SAPS access to user data linked to harmful anonymous messages sent via WhatsApp or Instagram. This enables investigations and arrests.' The order was handed down by the Johannesburg High Court in mid-July, following legal action led by Emma Sadleir of the Digital Law Company. 'If you think anonymity protects you from consequences, you're mistaken,' Viljoen concluded. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on
Eyewitness News
13 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Sheba gold mine: 2 out of 24 illegal miners released on bail
BARBERTON - Two of the 24 illegal miners who resurfaced from Sheba gold mine in Barberton, Mpumalanga, on Monday have been released on bail. The pair, both South Africans with valid IDs and private lawyers, were each granted bail of R2,000. The other 22 remain in custody and will return to court next Wednesday. The 22 still behind bars are mostly foreign nationals without passports and they face additional immigration-related charges. All 24 are also charged with theft, trespassing and possession of mining and gold bearing equipment. Wednesday's proceedings were over in minutes after the magistrate mad e the postponement for bail verification and the appointment of legal representation. 'Accused number 20 and 21 in custody, your bail is fixed at R2000 each, normal bail conditions.' The group is part of more than 550 people detained at Sheba gold mine in the past week under Operation Vala Umgodi. The initial 494 arrested last Friday appeared earlier this week and only 26 of them, all south Africans with verified addresses, were granted bail. ALSO READ:
Eyewitness News
13 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Why judicial Commissions of Inquiry are important for the functioning of democracy
Shireen Said 6 August 2025 | 11:46 The judicial commission of inquiry into corruption within the criminal justice system held a media briefing in Sandton, Johannesburg on 28 July 2025. Picture: Katlego Jiyane/EWN There is a lot of commentary in the public discourse, following the decision of the President to establish the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry tasked to inquire into, report on and make findings and recommendations concerning whether criminal syndicates, including but not limited to drug cartels, have infiltrated or exert undue influence over our law enforcement and justice system. Some people have criticised the decision of the president citing various reasons such as potential waste of taxpayers' money and others questioning the effectiveness and rationality of Judicial Commissions of Inquiry in general. It is important for members of the public to understand the nature and rationale for the establishment of Commissions of Inquiry. The first and the most critical reason being the obligation of the President to uphold, defend and respect the Constitution. The founding values of our Constitution, underpinned by the Rule of Law principles, require a government that is open and responsive, accountable, transparent and collectively outlines the principles for public administration, requiring professionalism, efficiency, and responsiveness to people's needs, whilst also encouraging public participation in policymaking. In establishing this Judicial Commission of Inquiry therefore, the President is legally obliged to uphold these constitutional principles. The other important factor that should not be undermined is the fact that one hallmark of a constitutional democracy is a populace that is educated about its rights and responsibilities. While South Africans possess a strong instinct to identify corruption and demand accountability, there remains a gap in engaging effectively with the systems designed for oversight. This is imperative to defend this constitutional democracy. An often-overlooked aspect of Commissions of Inquiry is their role in raising public awareness about widespread corruption. It is unavoidable that the impact of this Commission will be significantly shaped by media narratives throughout its duration, fostering critical discourse on the evidence presented and its implications. In this regard, the public must be fully informed and engaged with the intricate workings of this commission and how its outcomes will impact on their livelihoods and wellbeing. Commissions of Inquiry are integral to the political landscape of constitutional democracies, designed to uncover truths, expose systemic issues, and align governance with legal standards. They also serve as vital 'tools' in the 'toolbox' for constitutional democracies designed to be swift, responsive and effective. They are legal mechanisms designed to hold public officials accountable through inclusive and transparent processes. A Commission of Inquiry can make recommendations aimed at holding public officials accountable and restoring public trust in institutions. By their nature, these commissions play a significant role, providing essential insights into governance challenges and shaping responses to those issues. They are essential to strengthen the systems of governance and building open and accountable institutions. One of the primary advantages of a Judicial Commission of Inquiry is its ability to operate outside the limitations of regular governance systems, including the judiciary. These commissions are typically designed for efficiency, with clear timelines and the authority to summon witnesses and access documents. This capability is crucial for navigating the complexities of corruption and systemic challenges. Their public accessibility fosters long-term accountability and keeps the public informed about the extent of corruption, reducing opportunities for coverups. A Commission's independence is vital for its credibility and legitimacy, as the appointment of impartial leadership is essential. This contributes towards integrity governance and helps restore faith in the criminal justice system. By making constitutional principles more relatable and accessible, the public can better understand their roles within these processes, contributing to a more informed citizenry capable of holding governmental systems accountable. Ultimately, enhancing constitutional and governance literacy among citizens is crucial to combating corruption. The sore point that is always cited as a drawback to establishing Commissions of Inquiry is the issue of cost, yet it is essential to contextualise this investment against the far greater costs of corruption, illicit financial flows, and organised crime. Proper funding will enable them to function expeditiously with the necessary independence, capacity, and efficiency required to uncover the truth, hold wrongdoers accountable, and make credible recommendations for reform. Past experience has shown that well-resourced commissions have the potential to significantly transform governance, expose systemic failures, and guide institutional reforms. The cost of inaction is likely to have far more damaging effects that will extend beyond financial loss affecting national security, social security and overall wellbeing. The landmark case of Corruption Watch and Another v The Arms Procurement Commission has established a new legal framework for Commissions of Inquiry in South Africa, drawing from international best practices. Findings from such commissions can be challenged in court, ensuring that all evidence is scrutinised and validated. Their public nature – where proceedings are often broadcast live and are widely reported on in the media – help to ensure transparency. It also presents an opportunity to leverage technology for enhanced public engagement with legal processes and constitutional rights. What is indisputable is the fact that the public deserves a speedy yet meticulous process and the expeditious implementation of the findings of this commission will be critical to restoring faith in the criminal justice system. The statistics are quite scary, and this process should contribute to getting the country out of the doldrums. For instance, South Africa currently scores 65.9 out of 100, ranking 4th out of 54 countries in Africa according to the Ibrahim Index of African Governance (IIAG). This score, while above the continental average of 49.3, reflects a decline in certain governance areas, particularly in rule of law and civic participation. T The 2022 IIAG report indicates that from 2012 to 2021, South Africa experienced challenges that have eroded public trust in governance institutions. Furthermore, the 2024 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index places South Africa at a score of 41 out of 100, ranking it 82 out of 180 countries, highlighting ongoing struggles with public sector corruption. A recent Human Sciences Research Council survey revealed that public trust in the police has plummeted to an all-time low of 22%, underscoring the urgent need for reform. This Commission of Inquiry could be a pivotal moment for South Africa, elevating the discourse on governance and accountability and helping to address the deepening crisis in a justice system. As we navigate this pivotal moment, we must collectively garner all efforts to safeguard our constitutional democracy. Advocate Shireen Said Deputy Director General: Department of Justice and Constitutional Development
