FBI accuses Chinese researchers of smuggling toxic fungus into US
Two Chinese researchers are accused of smuggling toxic fungus into the US for their work at a University of Michigan laboratory, the Department of Justice says.
The department said the biological pathogen, known as Fusarium graminearum, is classified as a potential agroterrorism weapon.
This fungus causes "head blight" or "head scab" which is a disease of wheat, barley, maize, and rice.
The department said it could cost billions in economic losses worldwide each year.
The pathogen could also lead to vomiting, liver damage and reproductive defects in humans and livestock if it gets into food.
Yunqing Jian, 33, and Zunyong Liu, 34, have been charged with conspiracy, smuggling goods into the US, false statements and visa fraud.
The University of Michigan website shows that Ms Jian is a research fellow specialising in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
Ms Jian allegedly received funding from the Chinese government for her work on this pathogen in China.
Her boyfriend Mr Liu worked at a Chinese university where he conducted research on the same pathogen, according to the FBI's criminal complaint.
"He first lied but then admitted to smuggling Fusarium graminearum into America, through the Detroit Metropolitan Airport, so that he could conduct research on it at the laboratory at the University of Michigan, where his girlfriend, Jian, worked," the FBI said.
FBI director Kash Patel alleged that a signed statement on her phone indicated Ms Jian had expressed loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party.
Chinese Embassy spokesman Liu Pengyu said he did not know the specific situation but "would like to emphasise that the Chinese government has always required overseas Chinese citizens to abide by local laws and regulations and will also resolutely safeguard their legitimate rights and interests".
Ms Jian appeared in court on June 3 and was returned to jail to await a bond hearing on Thursday.
The ABC has contacted the University of Michigan for comment.
The FBI said Mr Liu was turned away at Detroit airport and sent back to China after changing his story during an interrogation about red plant material discovered in his backpack in July 2024.
The university does not have federal permits to handle Fusarium graminearum, according to the FBI.
The US does not have an extradition treaty with China, which makes Mr Liu's arrest unlikely unless he returns.
ABC/AP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
Break it Down: EBR completes first US commercial implants of WiSE CRT system
Stockhead's Break it Down brings you today's leading market news in under 90 seconds. In this episode, host Tylah Tully looks at news from EBR Systems (ASX:EBR), who have implanted its first US commercial patients with the WiSE CRT System. The first US cases reflect two key uses for EBR's technology. Treating patients previously untreatable due to a non-functional C-S lead and patients with pacing-induced heart failure following a Micra leadless pacemaker implant. Watch the video to learn more. While EBR Systems is a Stockhead advertiser, it did not sponsor this content. Originally published as Break it Down: EBR completes first US commercial implants of WiSE CRT system

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Trump trade, immigration policies clouding World Cup preparations
When the United States, Mexico and Canada launched their joint bid for the 2026 World Cup in the shadow of the Statue of Liberty, the prevailing mood was unmistakeably upbeat. Peace, love and harmony: three countries joining forces in a "United Bid" to roll out the welcome mat for the most popular sporting carnival on the planet, a beacon of hope in a polarised world. "We don't believe sport can solve all the issues in the world," US Soccer chief Sunil Gulati told an audience at a Manhattan skyscraper. "But ... we believe this is a hugely positive signal and symbol of what we can do together in unifying people, especially in our three countries." Fast forward eight years, and the soaring optimism that accompanied the bid's launch in 2017 has run into some stiff geopolitical headwinds, the re-election of President Donald Trump casting a pall of uncertainty over preparations for the event in ways that few could have imagined. While Trump has been a staunch backer of the World Cup from the outset, the US leader has nevertheless taken a combative stance to co-hosts Mexico and Canada since returning to the White House, from trade wars to border crackdowns, while simultaneously calling for Canada to become the "cherished 51st state" of the US. That in turn has led to Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney vowing to pivot away from the US, declaring in March that "the old relationship we had with the United States -- based on deepening integration of our economies and tight security and military cooperation — is over." - 'Tension's a good thing' - Trump, who enjoys a close friendship with Gianni Infantino, the president of world football's governing body FIFA, the organisers of the World Cup, has laughed off suggestions that trade turmoil could impact the tournament. "Tension's a good thing, I think it makes it much more exciting," Trump said in March when asked how his administration's tariffs against Canada and Mexico might affect the World Cup. Trump's policies, though, already appear to be hurting US tourism, with hotel search site Trivago last month reporting double-digit percentage declines in bookings to the US from visitors from Japan, Canada and Mexico. Figures from the US government's National Travel and Tourism Office released in April found an 11.6% decline in visits to the US from overseas in March compared to a year earlier. Andrew Zimbalist, an economics professor at Smith College in Northampton, Massachussetts whose books include "Circus Maximus: The Economic Gamble Behind Hosting the Olympics and the World Cup", believes Trump's economic policies could reduce the number of international fans travelling to the World Cup. But, Zimbalist added, "in terms of the actual playing of the games, the tariffs don't affect athletes." "So unless the political situation internationally deteriorates further and people decide to boycott the games in large numbers, I wouldn't anticipate a very large impact," he told AFP. - 'Seamless experience' for fans? - Other commentators have questioned whether World Cup fans will be deterred by the Trump administration's hardline border crackdown, which has seen visitors from countries including France, Germany, Australia and Canada either turned away at the border or subjected to harsh interrogation and detention. "Will soccer fans really want to crisscross our borders right now — and be squinted at by guards simply because they speak a Romance language or risk being held on a cold floor in a detention cage?," Washington Post columnist Sally Jenkins asked recently. The Trump administration's 2026 World Cup Task Force last month insisted all fans would be welcome, saying football supporters could look forward to a "seamless experience" when visiting the US. Vice President JD Vance though cautioned that foreign visitors would have to leave at the end of the tournament. "We'll have visitors, probably from close to 100 countries," said Vance, the vice-chair of the World Cup task force. "We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. But when the time is up, they'll have to go home." John Zerafa, a Britain-based sports communications strategist, believes the Trump administration may need to "short circuit" current visa processing wait times in order to facilitate large numbers of foreign fans at the World Cup. "I think the US and the Trump administration will go out of their way to try and make that process as smooth as possible," Zerafa told AFP. "But there's also the other part of how that stacks with the MAGA agenda and closing borders. There's a real dichotomy there for Trump and the MAGA base -- you're letting the world in but at the same time you're trying to shut the world out," Zerafa added. "Those two things are very difficult to co-exist, and which one is going to win the day? I can certainly envisage examples of fans applying for tickets, but not being granted visas. And you only need a couple of those stories to emerge in the runup to the World Cup to start painting a difficult backdrop for FIFA and the US."

News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Who gets JD Vance?': Whole world laughing at Trump and Musk as wild feud erupts
It's the messy public break-up taking the internet by storm. After a brief and unlikely bromance, Elon Musk and Donald Trump's relationship has hit rock bottom, with the US President and the world's richest man trading blows in a bitter social media feud on Thursday (US time). Tensions broke out earlier in the day after Mr Trump told reporters in the Oval Office he was 'very disappointed' in the South African-born billionaire, who has repeatedly criticised his 'big, beautiful' spending bill. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Mr Trump said. Mr Musk, who wrapped up his time leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) last week, swiftly hit back with a barrage of posts on social media, including one in which he claimed the Republican 'would have lost the election' without him. 'Such ingratitude,' he wrote. As tensions escalated, Mr Trump took to Truth Social to take his own swipes. He claimed Mr Musk 'went crazy' and threatened to cut his government contracts – a major move which was met with swift retaliation from Mr Musk, who said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft. Amid the heated back-and-forth, Mr Musk took a moment to 'drop the really big bomb' and claimed Mr Trump 'is in the Epstein files' – a reference to US government documents on disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, who committed suicide in jail while awaiting trial for sex crimes. The spat has drawn reaction from social media users around the world, public figures and Mr Musk's ex Ashley St. Clair, with whom he shared a nine-month-old son. Here are the best reactions to the dramatic fallout. hey @realDonaldTrump lmk if u need any breakup advice — Ashley St. Clair (@stclairashley) June 5, 2025 Who gets JD Vance in the divorce — PointlessHub (@HubPointless) June 5, 2025 dammit, now what am I gonna do with this? — Rory Johnston (@Rory_Johnston) June 5, 2025 — Whale Psychiatrist â'¢ï¸� (@k_ovfefe2) June 5, 2025 Another child of this divorce — Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) June 5, 2025 The funniest possible outcome is definitely Trump deporting him. — Franklin Leonard (@franklinleonard) June 5, 2025 Who gets custody of Joe Rogan? — Olivia Julianna 🇰🇸🦅🗳ï¸� (@0liviajulianna) June 5, 2025 — Anonymous (@YourAnonCentral) June 5, 2025 Rest of the world right now: — Mando (@rektmando) June 5, 2025 Are men maybe too emotional for positions of leadership? — Sam Stein (@samstein) June 5, 2025 My brother is not enjoying this — Zack Voell (@zackvoell) June 5, 2025