In a win for tribes, Forest Service halts commercial huckleberry picking in forest
Josephine WoolingtonHigh Country News
The U.S. Forest Service announced Monday that it will temporarily prohibit commercial picking of huckleberries this summer in Gifford Pinchot National Forest in southwestern Washington.
Commercially picked berries have fueled an entire huckleberry industry, flavoring ice cream, sodas, pies, jams, vodkas and wines – at the expense of Yakama Nation tribal members, as detailed in High Country News' March feature.
'Huckleberries are a vital cultural and ecological resource, and we must ensure their sustainability for generations to come,' Johanna Kovarik, Gifford Pinchot's forest supervisor, said in a written statement. 'This change allows us to work more closely with tribal governments, and local stakeholders and law enforcement to improve management while reducing conflicts.'
The announcement comes after years of complaints from members of the Ḱamíłpa Band of the Yakama Nation about the agency's commercial program. Gifford Pinchot is the only national forest that allows large-scale commercial harvest of huckleberries, which are a traditional food for the Yakama Nation and other Pacific Northwest Indigenous peoples. Members of the Yakama Nation have reserved rights under their 1855 treaty with the U.S. government to harvest huckleberries in Gifford Pinchot National Forest.
'Our elders, I think, are smiling about this,' said Trina Sherwood, a 60-year-old Ḱamíłpa member and food gatherer.
'It's like a dream come true,' said Elaine Harvey, 48, who is Sherwood's niece and also a food gatherer from the Ḱamíłpa Band. Harvey and others in her family have pushed the Forest Service to ban commercial picking for years, which she said has infringed on tribal members' treaty rights to harvest. Both Harvey and Sherwood hope that the Forest Service will permanently prohibit commercial harvesting.
Federal officials will conduct an assessment and consult with tribes this year before making any long-term changes to the commercial program. Forest Service officials were not immediately available for an interview.
Most commercial pickers descend from Vietnamese and Cambodian families who came to the U.S. in the 1970s and found work picking huckleberries for low wages. Pickers sell berries directly to individual commercial huckleberry buyers, who are often small business owners or contractors for wild food companies, like Mikuni Wild Harvest, a Canadian corporation with a distribution center in Tacoma. Those companies then sell to private customers, chefs, wineries and other companies that create huckleberry products. Tillamook Creamery, according to a Forest Service official, buys berries harvested from Gifford Pinchot for the company's huckleberry ice cream. In its press release, the Forest Service said that commercial pickers take 50,000 to 70,000 gallons of berries from the forest each year.
Huckleberries grow only in the mountains and have resisted Western scientists' decades-long attempts to cultivate their genes to grow them on farms. That's why the berries fetch a high price — up to $200 a gallon. Commercial pickers pay either $60 for a two-week permit with a 40-gallon limit, or $105 for a seasonal permit with a 70-gallon limit. Gifford Pinchot sold 928 permits last season, totaling $83,445 in revenue.
During annual meetings with Forest Service officials, Harvey and other Yakama Nation leaders have said that commercial pickers leave few berries for tribal members. They threaten elders, who are mostly women, by blocking roads, picking closely off the same bush and bringing dogs to the fields. Some also damage the shrubs, using illegal rakes to quickly strip berries from the bushes. Tribal members have observed commercial pickers harvesting berries before the commercial season begins in mid-August and encroaching on areas reserved for exclusive tribal harvest. 'We've always explained it, year after year, that the situation is getting worse,' Harvey said of meetings with agency officials. 'There was always the question of, 'Why do we have to have commercial harvest?''
In the past, Sherwood could harvest four to six gallons of berries per day. But with the increase in commercial pickers, she's lucky if she can pick one-and-a-half gallons for herself. 'It just has really changed the landscape with all this commercial picking,' she said. 'I go back to places where I used to see berries in abundance, and it's all just taken away.'The Forest Service cited 'sustainability concerns, enforcement challenges and escalating conflicts among harvesters,' as reasons for not issuing commercial permits this season but did not specifically mention the program's impact on Yakama Nation members' treaty rights to gather. Drought, habitat loss and invasive species, such as the spotted winged drosophila, a small fruit fly whose larvae have been found inside huckleberries, are also among the agency's cited concerns.
Harvey and Sherwood want to see more Forest Service officers within the fields this summer to enforce the ban and protect tribal pickers who may face intimidation or harassment from those who oppose the temporary commercial closure. But the Forest Service has struggled to adequately patrol the fields for years, citing a lack of funding. And as the Trump administration has slashed the federal workforce, including Forest Service employees, Harvey worries that the agency won't be able to increase patrols. 'Hopefully people will be safe this summer,' she said.
Harvey was part of a volunteer federal committee appointed under the Biden administration that developed amendments to the Northwest Forest Plan, many of which center on cultural resource management. In those committee meetings, Harvey regularly brought up the impacts that Gifford Pinchot's commercial huckleberry program has had on her community. 'I think that's when the real push came,' Harvey said, and Forest Service officials started to listen. But federal officials told committee members earlier this month that the agency will likely disband the group. With fewer federal employees, Harvey is concerned about how that will affect the temporary commercial harvesting ban and the Forest Service's ability to complete the Northwest Forest Plan update.
Sherwood is proud of the efforts over the years by her family, including her niece Elaine Harvey, to advocate for the protection of huckleberries. 'It's always been instilled in us, by our elders, our mothers, our grandmothers,' Sherwood said of speaking up for traditional foods. 'We're very protective of our resources.'
The Ḱamíłpa Band has a long history of defending their treaty rights to gather huckleberries and other traditional foods that have been threatened by Forest Service mismanagement. Ḱamíłpa Chief atway William Yallup established what's known as the Handshake Agreement in 1932, which reserved part of the berry fields in Gifford Pinchot for exclusive tribal harvest. Nearly 50 years later, Sherwood's family pushed the Forest Service in the 1980s to allow the Ḱamíłpa Band to reestablish a traditional huckleberry feast in the fields to commence berry season, in late July or early August. Her brother and Ḱamíłpa Chief, atway Fred Ike Sr., worked with Cielo Chief atway Howard Jim, along with elders, including Sherwood's parents, Moses Dick Sr. and Elsie Billy Dick, to host an annual feast. 'We wanted to revitalize that history and recognize it and make sure our presence was known,' Sherwood said.
She now helps organize the feast with Harvey and other family members, gathering berries and enough food to feed the longhouse for a few days. Her grandmother, atway Susie Walsey Billy, lived for weeks at Sawtooth Mountain in Gifford Pinchot during huckleberry season. 'They'd stay there until it snowed,' Sherwood said. 'I think about that a lot, and that's what's pushed me forward.'
Harvey, as well as Ḱamíłpa Chief Bronsco Jim Jr. and Yakama Nation Tribal Council member Jeremy Takala, will discuss the commercial huckleberry program and the Forest Service's latest change at an event hosted by High Country News and the Native Arts + Cultures Foundation on April 9 in Portland, Oregon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
Russia launches another large-scale drone and missile attack on Ukraine, killing 3 and wounding 13
KYIV, Ukraine -- Russia attacked two Ukrainian cities with waves of drones and missiles early Tuesday, killing three people and wounding at least 13 in what President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called 'one of the biggest' strikes on Ukraine's capital in the 3-year-old war. The attack struck Kyiv and the southern port city of Odesa. In an online statement, Zelenskyy said Moscow's forces fired 315 drones, most of them Shaheds, and seven missiles overnight. 'Russian missile and Shahed strikes are louder than the efforts of the United States and others around the world to force Russia into peace,' Zelenskyy wrote, urging 'concrete action' from the U.S. and Europe in response. A maternity hospital and residential buildings in the southern port of Odesa were damaged in the attack, regional head Oleh Kiper said. Two people were killed and nine injured, according to the regional prosecutor's office. Another person was killed in Kyiv's Obolonskyi district, regional head Tymur Tkachenko wrote on Telegram. 'Russian strikes are once again hitting not military targets but the lives of ordinary people. This once again shows the true nature of what we are dealing with,' he said. Explosions and the buzzing of drones were heard around the city for hours. The fresh attacks came a day after Moscow launched almost 500 drones at Ukraine in the biggest overnight drone bombardment of the war. Ukrainian and Western officials have been anticipating Moscow's response to Kyiv's audacious June 1 drone attack on distant Russian air bases. Russia has been launching a record number of drones and missiles in recent days, despite both sides trading memoranda at direct peace talks in Istanbul on June 2 that set out conditions for a potential ceasefire. However, the inclusion of clauses that both sides see as nonstarters make any quick deal unlikely, and a ceasefire, long sought by Kyiv, remains elusive. The only tangible outcome of the talks has been the exchange of prisoners of war, with a swap that began Monday for soldiers aged between 18 and 25. A second group was exchanged Tuesday, focusing on seriously wounded and sick Ukrainian service members, Zelenskyy said on Telegram. 'Exchanges must continue. We are doing everything to find and return everyone who is in captivity,' he said. Among them were soldiers captured over three years ago in the battle for Mariupol, the Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War said on Telegram. All of those freed had severe injuries and illnesses, including amputated limbs and vision problems, it said. Russia's Defense Ministry said it also received a second group of exchanged soldiers in the deal. Amina Ivanchenko was reunited Monday with her husband, a POW for 18 months, in the initial release. She said was grateful to Ukrainian officials for supporting her. 'My struggle was much easier thanks to them. Our country will definitely return everyone. Glory to Ukraine! Thank you!' Anastasia Nahorna waited in the Chernyhiv region to see if her husband, who has been missing for eight months, was among those being released in the latest swap. 'This pain is more unbearable every day,' she said. 'I really want to hear some news, because since the moment of his disappearance, unfortunately, there has been no information. Is he alive? or maybe in captivity? Has someone seen him?' she asked. Anna Rodionova, the wife of another Ukrainian POW, also was waiting. 'I just want him to come back soon and for this to all be over,' she said. 'We are tired of waiting, we come every exchange and he is not there.' A similar exchange was announced for the bodies of fallen soldiers held by both sides, although no schedule has been released. Asked to comment on the exchange of dead, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was unclear when it could take place and how many bodies Ukraine would hand over. He again accused Kyiv of dragging its feet on the exchange. 'There is one unarguable fact, we have had trucks with bodies standing ready for it on the border for several days,' he told reporters. Plumes of smoke rose in Kyiv as air defense forces worked to shoot down drones and missiles Tuesday. Viktoriia Melnyk, 30, vented her anger at the Russians after her building in the Obolonskyi district was struck by a drone. 'I want them to leave our territory, to leave us alone, to leave our families alone," she said. "Small children are dying. This is not normal. It's not normal that (the world) is turning away. This is not normal for the 21st century.' Mariia Pachapynska, the 26-year-old manager at a T-shirt company in the same district, decried that her workplace was struck. 'There were no military facilities here,' she said, noting that 'everything and half of me, half of my soul, burned down.' Seven out of 10 districts were damaged in the attack, said Maryna Kotsupii of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, adding that 16-story and 25-story residential buildings were hit. Residents took shelter and slept in metro stations during the long attack, including Nina Nosivets, 32, and her 8-month-old son, Levko. 'I just try not to think about all this, silently curled up like a mouse, wait until it all passes, the attacks. Distract the child somehow because it's probably the hardest thing for him to bear," she said. Krystyna Semak, 37, said she was scared by the explosions and ran to the metro at 2 a.m., carrying a rug. Fires broke out in at least four Kyiv districts after debris from downed drones fell onto residential buildings and warehouses, according to the Kyiv City Military Administration. 'I was lying in bed, as always hoping that these Shaheds would fly past me, and I heard that Shahed (that hit the house),' said Vasyl Pesenko, 25, standing in his damaged kitchen. 'I thought that it would fly away, but it flew closer and closer and everything blew away.' The attack sparked 19 fires across Ukraine, Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko wrote on Telegram. 'Russia must answer for every crime it commits. Until there is justice, there will be no security. For Ukraine. And for the world,' he said. The Russian Defense Ministry insisted its attack targeted arms plants in Kyiv, as well as military headquarters, troop locations, air bases and arms depots. 'The goals of the strikes have been achieved, all the designated targets have been hit,' it said in a statement. The death toll rose Tuesday from previous Russian strikes. In Kharkiv, rescuers found a body in the rubble of a building that was hit Saturday, Mayor Ihor Terekhov wrote on Telegram. The discovery brought the number of dead there to five, with five others potentially under the debris, Terekhov said. In the northern city of Sumy, a 17-year-old boy died of his injuries Tuesday after a June 3 attack, acting Mayor Artem Kobzar wrote on Telegram, bringing the number killed to six. The Russian Defense Ministry reported downing 102 Ukrainian drones over Russian regions and Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula Moscow illegally annexed from Kyiv in 2014. The drones were downed both over regions on the border and deeper inside Russia, including central Moscow and Leningrad regions, according to the Defense Ministry. Flights were temporarily restricted at multiple Russian airports, including all four in Moscow and the Pulkovo airport in St. Petersburg, the country's second-largest city.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Burkina leader's 'anti-West speech' is AI generated
"Best speech of the 21st century. If Captain Traore wins this time, not only Burkina Faso, but the whole of Africa will win," says a Bengali-language Facebook post on May 28, 2025. The accompanying video, which has racked up more than 1.9 million views, purportedly shows Traore attacking Western propaganda, exposing media lies and declaring a new era for Africa. "The Africa you showed us wasn't real. The story you told us was a lie. The fate you imposed on us was a script you had written for years," he says in English, apparently referring to multiple news organisations. "You're not free press, you're corporate press, your bosses are billionaires." Since Traore swept into power, Burkina Faso has turned away from former colonial master France and moved closer to Russia (archived link). A steady stream of viral social media posts -- many misleading or outright false -- has portrayed him as a fearless reformer who defied Western powers and reclaimed his country's dignity. The AI footage also surfaced in posts from South Africa and Kenya. A reverse image search on Google using keyframes found it earlier posted on YouTube on May 25, 2025 with a note that it was "entirely fictional" (archived link). The platform has marked the clip as "altered or synthetic content" while the channel has previously uploaded AI clips of Traore (archived link). An analysis of the circulating footage spotted visual errors that are hallmarks of AI. The fingernails on Traore's hands disappear at the 6:30 mark and his hand blurs at the 11:55 mark. Despite the meteoric rise in generative AI, errors persist and checking them is one way to tell the content is not genuine. AFP has debunked more misinformation around Traore here and here.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can Trump unilaterally abolish 2 controversial monuments in Utah?
An advisory opinion issued Tuesday by the U.S. Department of Justice says protections for land designated as monuments can be abolished by a sitting president because it is not expressly forbidden in law. The 1906 Antiquities Act — long a thorn in the side of Utah and other Western states — gives the U.S. president the authority to create a monument to protect cultural artifacts, precious landscapes and more. But the act was clear in that it has to be 'right sized' for the area it is meant to protect, which is where the controversy comes in. The law was passed and put into motion by President Theodore Roosevelt, who designated Yellowstone as a protected and cherished space. The first of its kind. Utah has five national parks — 'mighty' attractions for the state. The parks would not be affected by this order. It also has land designated as national monuments. Zion National Park, the state's first, comprises 146,597 acres. It was a monument first but to become a national park it had to go through Congress, which is what happened. Arches National Park, with the world's most intense concentration of more than 2,000 sandstone arches, is just over 76,000 acres. So when the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument and its 1.7 million acres was designated by President Bill Clinton in 1996, it felt like a slap in the face to many Utah politicians and rural families. When President Donald Trump was in his first term in office, he sent an envoy to survey Grand Staircase and Bears Ears National Monument, another controversial designation. The Interior Department secretary at the time, Ryan Zinke, rode through portions of the monument on horseback. He also did a flyover. All he could simply say: 'It is big.' Bears Ears, a 1.35 million-acre monument was created by President Barack Obama, reduced in size by Trump then restored by President Joe Biden. This advisory opinion says there is nothing in the law, or sitting precedent, to preclude a presidential action to completely reverse or alter previous monument designations. It cites a variety of actions taken over the years. In 1911, President William Taft reduced the size of the 60,776-acre Petrified Forest National Monument by 25,625 acres, stating only that a geological survey allowed the relevant land to be 'more particularly located and described.' In another instance, President John F. Kennedy acted to 'exclude(d) from the detached Otowi section of the' Bandelier National Monument 'approximately 3,925 acres of land' that he concluded 'contain(ed) limited archeological values which had been fully researched,' as well as because the land was 'not needed to complete the interpretive story' of the monument. The question that has been stirred by this advisory opinion centers on the balance between public lands protection and the vitality of industries that include ranching, mining, and even harvesting fish off the East Coast. Environmental groups were quick to call the advisory opinion an assault. 'This legal opinion is (Pam) Bondi's desperate attempt to re-write a century of caselaw in order to feed America's national monuments into the ravenous maw of the fracking and mining industries,' said Taylor McKinnon at the Center for Biological Diversity. 'The MAGA fixation on enriching polluting extractive industries at the expense of our natural heritage is a national embarrassment and an insult to every single American. These monuments protect some of our most iconic landscapes and cultural treasures. We'll fight like hell to safeguard their future.'