JAC Act reform requires comprehensive review, constitutional amendment
KUALA LUMPUR: Any reform to the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) Act 2009 would require a comprehensive review, including amendments to the Federal Constitution.
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said explained that the Act was tabled and passed in Parliament without any corresponding amendments to the Federal Constitution.
'Our current discussion revolves around whether one is satisfied or dissatisfied with the existing structure of the Act. If there is an intention to amend it, a comprehensive review must be undertaken, which includes amending the Constitution or introducing a new Act along with constitutional amendments.
'The issue here is that no law may override the Constitution. That is the rule of law,' she said during a Townhall session with law students at Universiti Malaya, today.
She was responding to a question regarding her views on the Chief Justice, Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat's proposal to amend the JAC Act to remove the Prime Minister's role in advising the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on judicial appointments.
Azalina emphasised that regardless of any views expressed, the Federal Constitution remains supreme over any Act of Parliament.
'Nonetheless, if we are to consider the future direction of the JAC Act, an in-depth evaluation is necessary. Should the government so direct, the Legal Affairs Division policy unit is capable of undertaking one,' she said.
At present, the appointment of judges is governed by Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, which provides that such appointments shall be made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister after consulting the Conference of Rulers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Philippine VP Sara Duterte's Malaysia trip won't stall impeachment process
House of Representatives spokesperson Princess Abante addresses issues about the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte during a press briefing on Tuesday (June 10, 2025). Abante said House prosecutors are fully prepared to fulfill their constitutional duty once the Senate opens the trial of the impeachment case against Duterte. - Photo courtesy of House Press and Public Affairs Bureau MANILA: The House of Representatives on Tuesday (June 10) said Vice President Sara Duterte's personal trip to Malaysia would not derail the impeachment proceedings against her, even as it urged the Senate to proceed with its constitutional duty to try the case. 'What is important is for the Senate to start the trial for the prosecutors to know the next step to take and what will happen to the impeachment process,' House spokesperson Princess Abante said in a press briefing. Abante explained that procedural rules account for situations in which personal service of the Articles of Impeachment cannot be made. 'I believe in the impeachment rules, it is provided how to serve and notify the accused. The requirement is personal service, but the rules also provide on what to do if personal service cannot be made,' she said. The statement came after the Office of the Vice President confirmed that Duterte had left for Malaysia on a personal trip with her family. The OVP did not disclose when Duterte departed but said she is also expected to attend the Philippines' Independence Day celebration in Kuala Lumpur on Thursday (June 12) and will engage in a consultation programme with overseas Filipino workers during her trip. Duterte's travel comes just days before the impeachment proceedings against her are set to begin, with the Senate scheduled to convene as an impeachment court on June 11. Senate President Francis Escudero took his oath as presiding officer, while the rest of the senators are expected to take theirs as judges. Under Senate rules, the chamber will read the Articles of Impeachment on June 11 and issue a summons to Duterte. She will then have 10 days to respond, followed by five days for House prosecutors to file their reply. Duterte was impeached by the House of Representatives on Feb 5 on charges of culpable violation of the Constitution, betrayal of public trust, graft and corruption, and other high crimes. The impeachment complaint also cited her public admission of an alleged assassination plot against President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez; alleged bribery of DepEd officials; unexplained wealth; failure to declare assets in her Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth; and supposed links to extrajudicial killings during her father's administration. As mandated by the 1987 Constitution, a conviction requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of all members of the Senate, or 16 out of 24 senators. If convicted, Duterte would be removed from office and barred from holding any future public position. Meanwhile, Abante said the House prosecutors are fully prepared and continue to review the case ahead of the formal trial. 'The House is ready to fulfill its role in the impeachment trial. The House prosecutors have fully prepared and continue to prepare. We are just waiting for the formal start of the impeachment trial,' she said. - PNA via Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Rakyat Post
4 hours ago
- Rakyat Post
Anwar Ibrahim Granted ‘'Interim Stay,'' Won't Appear In Court On 16 June
Subscribe to our FREE Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is granted an The three-member bench chaired by Justice Supang Lian said Anwar had shown special circumstances to justify the grant of the application under Section 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. Anwar was supposed to attend a court hearing on 16 June regarding an alleged sexual assault case against his former research assistant, Muhammad Yusoff Rawther, the grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris. Yusoff previously accused Anwar of assaulting him at the latter's home in Segambut in October 2018. Yusoff is seeking general, special, aggravated, and exemplary damages, including interest, costs, and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the accusations and filed a countersuit. Early this month, Anwar's legal team sought to refer to eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court under Article 128(2) of the Federal Constitution. Anwar framed the case as a matter of protecting the prime minister's office from politically motivated litigation instead of an attempt to seek personal immunity. The court found Anwar's legal questions did not meet the requirements under Section 84 of the Courts of Justice Act 1964 and ordered him to pay RM20,000 in costs, and ruled the trial should proceed as scheduled on 16 June. READ MORE: Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
UPSI bus crash: Azalina calls for corporate manslaughter law to punish deadly negligence
KUALA LUMPUR, June 10 — The government should consider introducing a new law to hold companies liable for serious safety failures that result in loss of life, according to Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. She cited the United Kingdom's Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 as a possible model for Malaysia, noting that it was introduced following a series of fatal workplace incidents where corporations escaped criminal liability. 'The UK introduced this law in response to several fatal workplace incidents where no corporation could be held accountable, particularly in the transport sector, despite the fact that such negligence cost human lives which are invaluable,' she said in a Facebook post. Azalina also backed Transport Minister Anthony Loke's call for firm action following Monday's tragic bus crash in Gerik that claimed the lives of 15 students from Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). She urged the government to review the effectiveness of current enforcement measures and consider amendments to the Penal Code to strengthen accountability for corporate negligence. Yesterday, Loke said the Land Public Transport Agency (APAD) had issued a show-cause letter to the bus operator involved in the crash at KM53 of the East-West Highway near Tasik Banding, Gerik. He said the Road Transport Department (JPJ) is also conducting safety audits and inspections of the company and the bus involved, under the Road Transport Act 1987 and the Land Public Transport Act. 'Firm action will be taken once investigations are complete. Every life lost is not only a tragedy for the family, but a loss for the nation's future,' Loke said in his own Facebook statement. — Bernama
