Councillor's request to call in plans for new Powys houses
In June, fresh plans were lodged with Powys planners by Dave Davies of Ashvale Contracting Limited to build eight homes with the associated access and drainage works for land west of Penyfoel Farm, in Middletown.
The proposal is for seven three-bedroom properties and one four-bedroom property.
Two of the three-bedroom properties would be earmarked for affordable homes.
The principle of developing the site was agree by Powys planners five years ago in 2020 when they agreed an outline planning application for the site.
However, it has become a struggle to get to a point where building homes on the site is allowed.
A reserved matters planning application lodged by Mr Davies in 2023 was rejected by Powys planners in September 2024 on several grounds including, 'unjustified and unsustainable development in the open countryside:' and 'inadequate' level of affordable housing would be provided by the development.
In August 2023, a previous smaller application for five dwellings on the site had also been rejected by Powys planners.
Cllr Amanda Jenner (Conservative), who represents the Trelystan and Trewern ward, which includes Middletown, said: 'I would like to call in this application due to the history of previous planning applications at this site and concerns about the access into the site.'
Trewern Community Council discussed the application at a meeting in July.
The council said: 'We do not have any objections at this stage, but would like to ask for clarification on a few points.'
They said that they want to know what the difference between this and previous applications is and 'particularly in relation' to development in the open countryside.
Planning agent Lewis Williams of Hughes Architects explained the new application in a planning statement.
He said: 'It is worth noting that the site was granted outline planning for eight dwellings.
'This well-considered and policy-compliant proposal represents a valuable addition to the local area and should be supported.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - UK could tax wealth, via a degree of stealth
LONDON, Aug 15 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Rachel Reeves is wrestling with a huge hole in UK public finances. Britain's finance minister could fill it by squeezing the rich, but it's a dicey time to do so. Taxing the property and pension assets of a wider cohort of UK citizens looks easier. Last October's tax increases, primarily to British companies' social security contributions, aimed to plug a 22 billion pound hole left by the previous Conservative government. Since then, the economy has worsened. Miserly 0.3% second-quarter GDP growth makes it even harder to hit Reeves' self-imposed target that current spending and revenue should balance by 2029/2030. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research reckons that the deficit, excluding any buffer, could be as large as 41 billion pounds. Reeves' pledge not to raise taxes on 'working people' explains current calls, opens new tab for a levy on assets above 10 million pounds. But similar attempts, such as in France, suggest wealth taxes are complex and vulnerable to avoidance measures. While the impact of her abolition of 'non-dom' tax perks is unclear and may even be bearable, opens new tab, she is unlikely to further anger a mobile elite. In contrast, there are large reserves of UK pension and property assets that are untaxed and un-mobile. Brits currently benefit from generous perks to encourage savings for retirement. This cost the government some 52 billion pounds, opens new tab last year. Reducing the proportion of a pension that can be withdrawn free of tax would free up some 5.5 billion pounds, the Institute for Fiscal Studies said in 2023. Meanwhile, some 7 trillion pounds of value is stored in British housing, Savills, opens new tab reckons, of which nearly two-thirds is held by homeowners. The zero-taxation rate on gains for property they live in costs around 30 billion pounds a year, according to the government. Taxing property more aggressively, as happens in the United States, might encourage investment in more productive areas. Reeves could also drill down on death duties. Britain's inheritance tax system is riddled with exemptions, which mean on average estates only pay 13%, rather than the headline 40%. One move would be to pare back former Chancellor George Osborne's allowance for property, which allows up to 350,000 pounds of a home to be passed down tax free, and costs the state 2 billion pounds of tax every year. The big risk is such a raid adds affluent middle-class voters to the ranks of Reeves-haters. Yet targeting them would make it politically easier for her to cut welfare spending. Especially if she does so with a degree of stealth. Follow @Unmack1, opens new tab on X
Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
Net zero delusion has broken Britain's energy system
Britain is today less energy secure than ever before. UK energy production has declined by 67pc over the past two decades. That means we have gone from a position of being a net exporter of energy, creating jobs and tax in this country to importing around half of our energy. British bill-payers are creating jobs and tax revenue in other countries instead. Last year marked a record low for UK energy production – despite there being decades worth of oil and gas left in the country and the Government dishing out billions in subsidies to wind and solar developers. How has this been allowed to happen? The answer is simple: policies from Labour and Conservative governments have been driven by the ideological pursuit of net zero to the detriment of energy security and ordinary taxpayers. Policies like the Energy Profits Levy, also known as the windfall tax, have driven investors away from Britain and towards friendlier environments in the US, Brazil and Norway. Government policy over several decades has deterred the industry from investing in this country and so has widened the gap between our energy demand and production. Our natural gas import dependency is 50pc and by 2030 it is forecast to be 70pc or more. UK oil production has declined by 42pc and our gas production is down by 21pc since 2019. Things are getting far worse. The bureaucrats in Whitehall have decided that it is preferable to shut down domestic production and rely on foreign imports, assuming that this will inspire other countries to take stronger action on climate. Would it make sense as a country for us to get rid of the British Army in the hope of inspiring world peace? Of course not. It simply makes no sense not to utilise what we have in this country. The rest of the world isn't listening to UK politicians' moralistic crowing about decarbonisation either. From 1990 to 2024, the UK's emissions declined by 50pc, while globally emissions have increased by more than 60pc. We are now in a bizarre position where we shut down UK oil and gas fields and then import billions of pounds worth of liquefied shale gas from the US. Britain's oil and gas industry has been the beating heart of our national security for decades. You don't need to look far to find case studies demonstrating the perilous position that Ed Miliband and the Tories have put this vital sector in. Harbour Energy has cut jobs, Apache has said it will quit the North Sea by 2030 and Chevron has headed for the door as well. A recent High Court judgment exemplifies the issue this country faces – where the policy and legal environment work against the UK's national interest. The Gryphon is a floating production vessel in the North Sea which processes 1pc to 2pc of UK oil production and up to 1pc of UK gas production. The vessel was certified for safe production until the end of 2027, and the five fields which feed it have around nine million barrels of oil and gas remaining. The value of this oil and gas is around $300m (£221m), which if produced would have delivered £150m in tax to HMRC. The vessel employs hundreds of people and is a key part of our energy security. The French-owned operator, TotalEnergies, with the blessing of the oil and gas regulator, decided that they wanted to decommission the vessel – despite there being millions of barrels of oil reserves around the site. Nobel Upstream, one of the field's joint venture partners, took the regulator to court. As of this week, a judge in the High Court concluded that the volume of oil and gas remaining was 'relatively modest' and that the regulator reflected the 'materiality of net zero' in its decision making. These fields will now be shut off permanently, leaving tax revenue and opportunities for workers stranded under the sea. How many other fields which could generate £150m in tax and secure 200 jobs are now at risk from High Court decisions. I hope that Nobel Upstream appeals this illogical High Court decision, but Reform UK's response would be very simple: if oil or gas would be economically viable to extract, it will be extracted. Reform UK has already met with British oil and gas firms to tell them to get applications ready for a Reform UK victory at the next general election. We will grant these applications on an urgent basis.
ITV News
a day ago
- ITV News
UK economic growth slows to 0.3% in second quarter of the year, latest figures show
The UK economy grew by 0.3% between April and June, according to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). It's a reduction from the 0.7% growth reported in the first quarter of the year. However, the latest figures are an improvement on some economists' predictions, who were estimating growth could be as low as 0.1%. Growth in the latest quarter was driven by increases of 0.4% in services and 1.2% in construction, while the production sector fell by 0.3%, the ONS said. The ONS also noted that some activity was brought forward to February and March, ahead of stamp duty changes in April and announced US tariff changes, which could have contributed to the slowed growth. ONS director of economic statistics Liz McKeown said: "Growth slowed in the second quarter after a strong start to the year." "The economy was weak across April and May, with some activity having been brought forward to February and March ahead of stamp duty and tariff changes, but then recovered strongly in June." "Across the second quarter as a whole, growth was led by services, with computer programming, health and vehicle leasing growing." The latest figures showed the UK economy grew by 0.4% in June, a welcome boost after the economy contracted by 0.1% in both April and May. The chancellor accepted there was more to do when it came to improving people's living standards. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: "Today's economic figures are positive with a strong start to the year and continued growth in the second quarter. "But there is more to do to deliver an economy that works for working people." "I know that the British economy has the key ingredients for success but has felt stuck for too long." "That is why we're investing to rebuild our national infrastructure, cutting back on red tape to get Britain building again and boosting the national minimum wage to make work pay." "There's more to do and today's figures only fuel my ambition to deliver on our plan for change." Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride, who referred to Reeves as an "economic vandal" on X, accused the chancellor of failing in her role and "taxing your future to fund her failure." Speaking on Thursday morning, he claimed the slowing rate of growth was a result of Labour's tax increases on businesses and repeated the Conservative's claim that further tax rises are inevitable in the chancellor's autumn budget. Today's 0.3% growth figures match the rise seen during the same period under the Conservatives. The slowdown in the economy could increase the likelihood of further interest rate cuts by the Bank of England after last week's reduction to 4%. However, the chancellor has been relying on accelerating growth to help fund future government spending plans.
