logo
Germany To Start Saving for Gen Alpha's Retirement

Germany To Start Saving for Gen Alpha's Retirement

Newsweek18 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
For the youngest generations, saving for retirement isn't at the top of the agenda. But in Germany, youngsters are getting a leg up from the government to begin putting cash away for later in life.
The country's new government plans to roll out an "early start pension," giving children as young as 6 a head start on retirement savings. Under the proposal, students aged 6 to 18 who are in school would receive 10 euros—about $11—each month from the government. Over 12 years, this would total 1,440 euros per child, not including any additional gains from investing the funds.
When they reach 18 years, account holders will be able to add in their own funds, subject to annual limits. The profit will be tax-free until retirement, when the money becomes accessible. Germany's current retirement age is 67—and could increase in the future—meaning these savings could grow over more than 60 years.
While relatively speaking in the scope of saving for retirement, 1,440 euros is a relatively small sum—but when interest comes into the mix, there are potentially large gains to be made by the time retirement comes around.
"The idea is very forward-thinking," said Aaron Cirksena, founder and CEO of MDRN Capital. "Especially in a world where I believe time is your biggest asset."
Indeed, time is the key ingredient behind the idea—the financial snowball effect where early, steady savings can yield exponential gains over time, and starting in childhood gives that snowball a massive head start. According to Cirksena, the long-term benefits of such a policy could be transformative.
"The positives could be huge…a shift toward long-term planning for a whole generation."
"The risks are also very real," Cirksena warned. "If the funds are mismanaged or politically steered, you're setting up a system that could easily lose the trust of the public. Plus, if families can't contribute regularly, it might widen the wealth gap rather than close it."
Generation Alpha typically refers to individuals born between 2010 and 2024.
Generation Alpha typically refers to individuals born between 2010 and 2024.
Photo-illustration by Newsweek
This concern becomes even more pressing when imagining a similar system in the U.S. Millions of Americans—particularly gig economy workers and low-income families—already struggle to save for retirement. Without strong government support, a U.S. version of the early start pension could reinforce existing disparities.
"For this to work in the U.S., there'd need to be automatic contributions or government matching," Cirksena explained. "Otherwise, it just becomes another plan only the financially stable can benefit from."
Still, the long-term appeal is certainly enticing. With Social Security under strain and Americans living longer, a supplemental, privately funded retirement system could reduce reliance on public benefits—if designed well and made widely accessible.
"In theory, a funded system could relieve some future burden by creating personal retirement wealth that doesn't rely on Social Security," Cirksena said. "But it takes decades to see that impact.
"It's not a replacement, but it might be a smart layer on top if done right."
As it stands, there is no similar program for young people to get saving early for retirement in the U.S. But some lawmakers want to make building a nest egg easier.
In May, Texas Senator Ted Cruz introduced the Invest America Act, which would establish a private tax-advantaged account with a $1,000 seed investment from the federal government for every American child when they are born.
Cruz said the change would "trigger fundamental and transformative changes for the financial security and personal freedoms of American citizens for generations."
"Every child in America will have private investment accounts that will compound over their lives, enhancing the prosperity and economic participation of the vast majority of Americans," he said in a statement. "When people years from now talk about the changes created by Republican efforts this Congress, this is one of the landmark achievements they will talk about."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gen Z Wants To Own Homes—So Why Is It Still Out of Reach for Most?
Gen Z Wants To Own Homes—So Why Is It Still Out of Reach for Most?

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Gen Z Wants To Own Homes—So Why Is It Still Out of Reach for Most?

Gen Z is falling behind on the path to homeownership. In 2025, they made up just 3% of all homebuyers, according to the National Association of Realtors®, the smallest share of any generation and a sharp contrast to baby boomers, who accounted for 42% of buyers. While high interest rates and higher home prices have made it harder for young adults to break into the market, new research suggests another force might be working against Gen Z: how they manage their money. Advertisement According to PYMNTS Intelligence, a payments data provider, despite valuing homeownership, Gen Z's top financial goal isn't buying a home. It's paying off debt. The average Gen Z adult carries an average of $94,101 in personal debt, with credit card debt being the most common. With so much of their income tied up in monthly payments, even high earners in this generation are struggling to save for a down payment or qualify for a mortgage. Debt, not disinterest, might be the real reason Gen Z is falling behind—at least for now. 4 Gen Z's biggest financial concern is how they are going to pay off their debt. Getty Images Advertisement 'Though Gen Z Americans may dream of homeownership, still-high housing costs mean that stepping onto the property ladder may not be possible at this point in time,' says Hannah Jones, senior economic research analyst at 'By prioritizing paying off debt, Gen Z prospective buyers are setting themselves up for success when homeownership does become more feasible.' The 2 financial personas and where Gen Z fits in PYMNTS Intelligence identifies two key money management mindsets: Planners , who proactively save and pay off credit cards , who proactively save and pay off credit cards Reactors, who handle bills as they come and often rely on credit or loans Advertisement Gen Z overwhelmingly falls into the latter group. A striking 73% of Gen Zers are classified as reactors, making them more likely to live paycheck to paycheck, carry high-interest debt, and struggle to build savings. That reactive approach can seriously undermine major financial goals, like buying a home, because it prioritizes short-term survival over long-term stability. Even more surprising, the reactor mindset is gaining ground among high earners across generations. Since February 2024, the share of six-figure earners who identify as planners has dropped by 25%. Now, 52% of top earners are reactors, a shift that underscores how widespread short-term financial thinking has become, even among those typically viewed as having the means to plan ahead 4 Even high earners in this generation are struggling to save for a down payment or qualify for a mortgage. Getty Images/iStockphoto Risk over security: The Gen Z money mindset Unlike baby boomers, 54% of whom are planners focused on long-term stability, Gen Z is chasing growth. According to the PYMNTS report: Advertisement Just 7.7% of Gen Z cite retirement saving as a top financial priority, compared with 22.1% of baby boomers. Nearly 7% of Gen Z say their No. 1 goal is starting a business, making them eight times more likely than boomers to focus on entrepreneurship. 'Gen Z Americans have time on their side and may be more willing to take big swings financially, while older generations are more risk-averse,' says Jones. While starting a business can lead to long-term wealth, it typically comes with short-term financial instability, exactly what makes it harder to qualify for a mortgage or build up a down payment. Irregular income, high credit utilization, and limited savings make it much harder to qualify for a mortgage under traditional lending models. Even high-earning Gen Z entrepreneurs might struggle to demonstrate the consistent income or financial reserves lenders expect. This risk-oriented mindset might be a reaction to the current conditions of the housing market. Buyers now need to earn 70% more than they did just six years ago to buy a home, to say nothing of the difference between buying a house now than in the 1960s and '70s, when many baby boomers bought their first homes. These conditions have made many in Gen Z feel that shooting for the moon in business is a more realistic goal than saving for that white picket fence. 4 Gen Z is more willing to take risks than previous generations. Getty Images/iStockphoto Why buying a home is still a priority—just not the first one Homeownership hasn't fallen off Gen Z's radar, but it's taking a back seat to paying off existing debt. Buying a house ranks as this generation's second most important financial goal, with 14.1% of Gen Zers ranking it as a priority. But deprioritizing homeownership, even temporarily, can come at a long-term cost. In a market where prices keep climbing, every year spent focusing elsewhere can make the eventual buy-in more expensive. And because lenders heavily weigh savings, credit usage, and income consistency, Gen Z's current financial behaviors—like revolving debt and low reserves—can delay homeownership even further, regardless of intent or income. Advertisement In other words, Gen Z still wants to own, but the reactive financial path they're following makes it harder to get there. Without a shift in priorities, many might find themselves stuck in a cycle where the dream of owning a home never quite catches up to their ambition. 4 The generation is mostly concerned with first paying off existing debt, putting homeownership on the back burner. Getty Images What Gen Z can do differently To bridge the gap between ambition and ownership, Gen Z might need to rethink how they prioritize and manage their money. The good news is that paying off debt, Gen Z's top financial priority, will eventually help them buy a house by lowering their debt-to-income ratio. The area where they can make the biggest changes, though, is in moving from a reactive mindset to a planning mindset. Here's how they can get started: Advertisement Automate savings to gradually build up a down payment. Track spending patterns to identify areas to cut back. Use credit strategically, aiming to pay in full each month. Pursue both goals in parallel—treat debt repayment as a priority, but not at the cost of building a safety net to support future homeownership. Gen Z hasn't turned away from homeownership, but when the top priority involves risk or volatility, it can make the second one harder to reach. With the right habits and tools, Gen Z can build both the freedom to pursue big dreams and the foundation to one day own a piece of them.

Musk Vs. Trump: Poll Says This Is The Person To Support In Feud, While Near Majority Say They Would Publicly Support Neither
Musk Vs. Trump: Poll Says This Is The Person To Support In Feud, While Near Majority Say They Would Publicly Support Neither

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Musk Vs. Trump: Poll Says This Is The Person To Support In Feud, While Near Majority Say They Would Publicly Support Neither

A highly public feud between Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump took the world by storm last week and sent shares of the electric vehicle company lower. As the feud continues on, here's a look at where Benzinga readers stand. What Happened: A back-and-forth between Musk and Trump across social media platforms saw the two well-known individuals escalate a feud related to differences on the "Big Beautiful Bill." Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — The feud comes after Musk left his White House position working for the Department of Government Efficiency to spend more time working on his other companies, such as Tesla. Benzinga recently asked readers who they side with in the battle, which includes Musk criticizing the new debt the country will take on if the bill that Trump supports is passed by Congress. "In the feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, who are you more likely to publicly support?" Benzinga asked. Here are the results: Neither: 44% Elon Musk: 25% Donald Trump: 17% Both: 14% The poll found that a near majority said they would publicly support neither Trump or Musk in the feud between former friends. Of the two well-known candidates, Musk received the largest support with 25% of the poll, ranking ahead of Trump at 17%.Why It's Important: Over the weekend, the battle between Musk and Trump minimized some with the Tesla CEO deleting some of his tweets that brought some claims against the current president. Tweets about ending the SpaceX Dragon program were also deleted. A battle between Trump and Musk over the long run could see many losers, including the country's space program and the launch of robotaxis, with Musk a leader in both sectors and Trump able to slow down progress made by the billionaire. Tesla stock saw its largest one-day market capitalization drop last week on the heels of the feud. Tesla stock trades up 1.61% at $299.72 at publication on Monday versus a 52-week trading range of $167.42 to $488.54. The stock has fallen 15% over the last five days and is down 22% year-to-date in 2025. Read Next: Are you rich? Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? The study was conducted by Benzinga from June 5, 2025, through June 9, 2025. It included the responses of a diverse population of adults 18 or older. Opting into the survey was completely voluntary, with no incentives offered to potential respondents. The study reflects results from 259 adults. Photo: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Musk Vs. Trump: Poll Says This Is The Person To Support In Feud, While Near Majority Say They Would Publicly Support Neither originally appeared on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage
Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage

June 10 (UPI) -- The federal minimum wage would rise to $15 per hour, with annual cost-of-living increases based on inflation, in a proposed bipartisan measure. Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Peter Welch, D-Vt., co-sponsored the bill that they have named the "Higher Wages for American Workers Act" and would increase the federal minimum wage from its current $7.25 per hour for non-exempt workers. "For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline," Hawley said on Tuesday in a joint press release with Welch. "One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day," Hawley added. Welch said inflation and rising costs are making it too hard for families to afford basic necessities. "We're in the midst of a severe affordability crisis, with families in red and blue states alike struggling to afford necessities like housing and groceries," Welch said. "A stagnant federal minimum wage only adds fuel to the fire," he continued. "Every hardworking American deserves a living wage that helps put a roof over their head and food on the table -- $7.25 an hour doesn't even come close." "Times have changed, and working families deserve a wage that reflects today's financial reality," Welch added. Hawley said the current federal minimum wage is less than what a worker earned in 1940 when adjusted for inflation. If the proposed federal minimum wage increase is passed into law, it would take effect on Jan. 1 and allow cost-of-living increases that match inflation in subsequent years. Many states have respective minimum wage laws that exceed the current and proposed federal minimum wage, but a dozen still were at the federal minimum wage in 2024. Many large employers also have higher minimum wages, including Walmart, which has paid its workers at least $14 an hour and often more since 2023. President Joe Biden in 2021 ordered the federal government to pay contract workers at least $15 an hour. California lawmakers in 2022 raised the state's minimum wage for many fast-food workers to up to $22 an hour.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store