Khoi and San to take part in National Dialogue
The Greater Aboriginal Community Council of South Africa, says their participation in the National Convention, does not end any differences, that exist.
They've been invited to the national dialogue, after initially writing to the chairperson of the preparatory task team, Nkosinathi Biko.
Kevin Smith, is the national leader of the Greater Aboriginal Community Council of South Africa had a discussion with eNCA on this topic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
27 minutes ago
- The Citizen
National Dialogue has big gaps in it
A properly managed national dialogue, which could be an inclusive participatory exercise for all groups, would be beneficial. With so many top leaders and prominent South Africans boycotting the National Dialogue, it risks losing credibility if it continues in its current form, says an expert. He added that President Cyril Ramaphosa should listen to the dissatisfied leaders and review the process. Mbeki's vision: Civil society at the helm Political economy analyst Daniel Silke said instead of forging ahead, President Cyril Ramaphosa should review or reconstitute it to bring everybody on board. He said at the core of it all was widespread dissatisfaction with President Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership – both within and outside of the ANC. Former president Thabo Mbeki, who first floated the idea of a National Dialogue, indicated during a special congress of the SA Communist Party in December last year that he expected Ramaphosa would merely announce the process, while civil society would occupy the front seat 'for the first time'. Mbeki said the process would be different to the Convention for a Democratic South Africa, which was initiated and dominated by political parties and the elite. ALSO READ: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans Foundations and key players boycott National Dialogue The multi-stakeholder two-day national convention, which kicked off the National Dialogue, commenced on Friday in Pretoria, despite a stay away by six legacy foundations belonging to prominent anti-apartheid stalwarts, along with the FW de Klerk Foundation. The foundations, which cited rushing and centralising of the process by Ramaphosa, demanded that it should be led by civil society or citizens themselves. They were later joined by the Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation, which pulled out but cited that its mandate had nothing to do with pursuing political projects. Motlanthe was quoted by the Sunday Times as saying: 'We work in accordance with the deed of trust and the foundation's work.' Among other boycotters were the DA and Freedom Front Plus. Non-participation by these parties meant most whites have no voice in a dialogue on their country's future. Several other parties were not at the event. ALSO READ: Still no confirmation on cost of controversial National Dialogue Ramaphosa unshaken by absentees At the gathering, Ramaphosa seemed unperturbed by the senior leaders' absence, emphasising the significance of his role in the process, saying he has to be 'allowed to be the president'. This was seen as a broadside against Mbeki, whom some accused of trying to outshine Ramaphosa. Silke, said the credibility of dialogue is bound to be undermined since it was being boycotted by to crucial players in the political setup. 'This is a botched attempt at something that could have been beneficial to SA,' Silke said. ALSO READ: The credibility of the National Dialogue is at stake Dialogue perceived as ANC-controlled A properly managed national dialogue, which could be a 'listening exercise' for the government and an inclusive participatory exercise for all groups, would be beneficial. But the process had clearly been seen as an attempt by the ANC to steer the discourse. Silke added: 'What is astonishing is that ANC-linked organisations are increasingly frustrated with the style of leadership of Ramaphosa and the way his ANC is steering South Africa. 'It seems the ANC cannot rely on the veterans any more to provide it with support. It seems it's free for all on all sides of the ANC in terms of self-criticism and very publicly so.' Political analyst Dr George Tsibani backed the view that Mbeki should give Ramaphosa a chance as president to lead the process. READ NEXT: National Dialogue: Concerns about financial transparency and hotel bookings for delegates
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Criticism from National Convention delegates important
Youth leaders, activists and groups representing the blind all made their voices heard, pushing for greater representation and real inclusion in national decision-making. Former member of Parliament, Lindiwe Mazibuko, now part of the Eminent Persons Group guiding the process, said that criticism from delegates was an important part of the journey. "So their cynicism is valuable, it's important, it's feedback, and we must use it. But the process hasn't begun yet." With the steering committee expected to be appointed in the coming days, community-level engagements will roll out in all 4,000 wards across the country. These will feed into a second National Convention, designed to consolidate South Africa's path forward.
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Pull the plug and start dialogue over
It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. While the National Dialogue saga seems destined to generate little more than more hot air – as if we don't have enough already from our verbose politicians – it does provide some fascinating material for pondering our parlous political situation. First, the foundations associated with the elders of recent South African history – those who negotiated the way towards ending apartheid – have pulled out of the process. What the National Dialogue should've been One of the prominent critics of the dialogue process is former president Thabo Mbeki. He was the man who set in motion this idea of a national dialogue, and, in his own words, it should have been civil society in the driving seat, not President Cyril Ramaphosa and the ANC. That would seem, at first glance, to be noble and wise, as befitting Mbeki's status as an elder statesman. However, what if Mbeki realised that his own legacy – despite the collapse which followed after he left office – was going to be less than shining? Even ignoring the Aids debacle, where an estimated 250 000 people died while he dithered about antiretroviral medications, Mbeki is regarded by many critics as having moved the country onto a neocolonial, capitalist-friendly course, failing to deal with critical issues like land restitution. Perhaps he needs the dialogue to rebuild his legacy into one of 'the man who saved South Africa'. Yet, whatever his motive may be, Mbeki is correct – and so are the others who withdrew – that this dialogue should not be steered by Ramaphosa and the ANC. People, not political parties, should air their views on the future. That is why it is concerning that organisations like the DA and Freedom Front Plus, which represent many in the white community, have also chosen to stay away. It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. READ NEXT: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans
