Shaping The Future-Ready Mobility: In Conversation With JLR And TCS
The conversation explored pivotal themes that are shaping the future of manufacturing and mobility, including AI-driven transformation, software-defined vehicles (SDVs), and the evolution of supply chains. Leaders also addressed the rapid shift toward electrification and sustainability, highlighting innovations in EVs, battery ecosystems, and green mobility solutions. The role of AI and digitalization in smart factories, automation, and digital twins was also a focal point, alongside the critical need for a future-ready workforce through upskilling, DEI initiatives, and talent transformation.
A key highlight was the Tata Group's cross-industry synergies, emphasizing collaboration and innovation across sectors. The conversation reinforced the importance of leadership in navigating transformation and building the future of automotive and mobility through digital innovation and strategic partnerships.
This insightful discussion underscored how industry pioneers are driving the next wave of change, leveraging technology and collaboration to shape a more sustainable, intelligent, and connected future of mobility.
Watch the full conversation here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI-Ready Supply Chains Prove More Resilient Amid Rising Global Risk
AI adoption drives resilience, as 98% of mature users feel ready for geopolitical disruption, compared to 0% with no AI plans REDWOOD CITY, Calif., Aug. 5, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Ivalua, a global leader in spend management, today released the results of a U.S.-focused study revealing that U.S. supply chain leaders are facing mounting geopolitical disruption, yet the most resilient organizations are not retreating from innovation, but adapting their strategies to strengthen it. According to the survey of 100 supply & procurement decision makers, organizations are grappling with mounting pressures: 91% expect disruptions from new trade policies, and 85% say international instability is impacting decision-making. Yet, those that have embraced artificial intelligence (AI) are not just surviving, but leading. Preparedness appears to go hand in hand with innovation, according to respondents: 98% with fully deployed AI tools say they feel prepared for geopolitical risk, and nearly half describe themselves as very prepared. Preparedness drops sharply to 21% among those still implementing AI. Only 11% of those merely considering AI implementation feel very prepared to deal with disruption. And 0% for companies with no AI plans say they are prepared to deal with disruption. "The desire for AI adoption across organizations is strong, but geopolitical instability and rising costs are pressuring organizations to shift priorities," said Alex Saric, CMO of Ivalua. "There's a real risk that near-term disruption becomes a long-term excuse to pause innovation. However, risk is a constant in global supply chains, and the real differentiator is how leaders respond. The most resilient organizations adapt their strategies without abandoning them, acting decisively to innovate and strategically to become stronger and more competitive." Despite widespread AI implementation, as 77% of respondents say they are currently rolling out AI tools in procurement or supplier management, only 36% view AI as a top supply chain priority today. While many are currently focused on cost control and risk mitigation, these efforts don't have to come at the expense of innovation. In fact, the two should go hand in hand: 73% of U.S. company leaders agree they must invest more in technology to help identify and mitigate geopolitical risks. Yet, 65% of U.S. businesses say that trade policy uncertainty is causing them to pause or decrease investment. 59% still cite innovation as a priority, indicating that leaders aren't abandoning transformation, but many are adjusting timelines under pressure. The shift reflects a defensive posture in response to near-term threats, but the data suggest that innovation is translating into tangible business benefits for the most advanced organizations. Companies with mature AI strategies handle geopolitical risks and cost pressures better than those without. While 78% of unprepared companies expect profit hits from rising costs, this decreases to only 50% for well-prepared companies that share this concern. A notable gap also exists between C-suite and frontline managers, as 67% of owners and 56% of C-level executives say their organizations are "very prepared," only 17% of senior managers and 10% of junior managers agree — highlighting the need for clearer execution and communication across teams. Ivalua's findings suggest that innovation can be a powerful risk response. Rather than putting transformation on pause, resilient organizations are leveraging it to close preparedness gaps, strengthen operations and build competitive advantage during uncertain times. About the ResearchSapio Research conducted the survey on behalf of Ivalua in April 2025. The survey was based on responses from 100 Supply & Procurement decision makers in the United States. About Ivalua Ivalua is a leading provider of cloud-based, AI-powered Spend Management software. Our unified Source-to-Pay platform empowers businesses to effectively manage all categories of spend and all suppliers, increasing profitability, improving sustainability, lowering risk and boosting employee productivity. We are trusted by hundreds of the world's most admired brands and recognized as a leader by Gartner and other analysts. Learn more at Follow us on LinkedIn and X. Global Media Contact Corporate Communications media@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Ivalua Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reading Supporters' Trust 'disappointed' as club appoint gambling partners
Supporters Trust at Reading [STAR] have hit out at the club's decision to appoint an official betting sponsor for the new season. The relationship between gambling and football is something which has proved controversial in recent years, akin to the relationship between tobacco and alcoholic sponsors in other sports such as snooker and rugby. Premier League clubs have voted to withdraw gambling sponsorships on front of shirts as of next season, although there are currently no limitations for sleeve sponsors or advertising hoardings. Last week, Reading confirmed a new partnership with PricedUp, a UK-based online sports betting and gaming brand which will feature on training wear for the 2025/26 and 2026/27 seasons. The club state: "As part of the agreement, PricedUp will collaborate with the club to deliver exclusive offers and rewards designed to engage and benefit Royals supporters, while also working closely with Reading FC to promote and support responsible gambling practices." However, STAR have admitted that they are 'disappointed' with the decision. "We were as disappointed as I'm sure a lot of fans were, to see that we have a new betting sponsor," Chair Sarah Turner commented in her newsletter. " [It is]Not ideal, and I'm sure we'd rather a sponsor from other areas. "I think we have to be pragmatic and think that the club are working on improving things and the costs are huge. We have banged on about wanting to be sustainable - and that means using income from sponsorship. "It is, however, positive that the press release mentions that PricedUp will be working closely with Reading FC to promote and support responsible gambling practices and we look forward to seeing how this develops." Some supporters have also been less than impressed with the decision, although many have gone on to praise the club's pragmatism. Tim Kilpatrick, Head of Commercial at Reading, commented: 'We are naturally pleased to welcome PricedUp as our Official Betting Partner – in what is an important financial agreement for the club. To work with a UK company, who are forging their own story in their industry, aligns with our own growth ambitions and we're looking forward to supporting each other in reaching our goals.'
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ofwat chief Black to step down ahead of watchdog's abolition
The chief executive of Ofwat is to step down within months as Britain's embattled water regulator prepares to be abolished by ministers. Sky News has learnt that David Black is preparing to leave Ofwat following discussions with its board, led by chairman Iain Coucher. The timing of Mr Black's exit was unclear on Tuesday afternoon, although sources said he was likely to go in the near future. An official announcement could come within days, according to industry sources. Insiders say the relationship between Mr Coucher and Mr Black has been under strain for some time. Water industry executives said that Steve Reed, the environment secretary, repeatedly referred to the regulator's leadership during a meeting last month. It was unclear on Tuesday who would replace Mr Black, or whether an interim chief executive would remain in place until Ofwat is formally scrapped. The complexity of the impending regulatory shake-up means that Ofwat might not be formally abolished until at least 2027. Mr Black took over as Ofwat's permanent boss in April 2022, having held the position on an interim basis for the previous 12 months. He has worked for the water regulator in various roles since 2012. If confirmed, Mr Black's departure will come with Britain's privatised water industry and its regulator mired in crisis. Water companies are under increasing pressure from Mr Reed, the environment secretary, over their award of executive bonuses even as the number of serious pollution incidents has soared. The UK's biggest water utility, Thames Water, meanwhile, is on the brink of being temporarily nationalised through a special administration regime as it tries to secure a private sector bailout led by its creditors. In a review published last month, the former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe recommended that Ofwat be scrapped. He urged the government to replace it with a new body which would also incorporate the Drinking Water Inspectorate and absorb the water-related functions of the Environment Agency and Natural England. Speaking on the day that Sir Jon's recommendations were made public, Mr Reed said: "This Labour government will abolish Ofwat. "Ofwat will remain in place during the transition to the new regulator, and I will ensure they provide the right leadership to oversee the current price review and investment plan during that time." A white paper on reforming the water industry is expected to be published in November with the aim of delivering a reset of the industry's performance and supervision, according to industry sources. A handful of water companies have challenged Ofwat's price determinations, which in aggregate outlined £104bn in spending by the industry during the 2026-30 regulatory period. Anglian Water, Northumbrian Water and Southern Water are among those whose spending plans are now being assessed by the Competition and Markets Authority. Responding to the Cunliffe report last month, Ofwat said: "While we have been working hard to address problems in the water sector in recent years, this report sets out important findings for how economic regulation is delivered and we will develop and take this forward with government. "Today marks an opportunity to reset the sector so it delivers better outcomes for customers and the environment. "Ofwat will now work with the government and the other regulators to form this new regulatory body in England and to contribute to discussions on the options for Wales set out in the report. "In advance of the creation of the new body, we will continue to work hard within our powers to protect customers and the environment and to discharge our responsibilities under the current regulatory framework." Ofwat has been contacted for comment about Mr Black's future, while the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has also been approached for comment.
