Rail freight will be less viable without Aratere ferry, critics say
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
The Rail and Maritime Union says the decision to retire the Aratere will sever the rail connection between the North and South Islands for years and make it a less viable freight option.
Interislander's only rail enabled ferry will be taken out of service this year to make way for the construction of new port infrastructure, which is set to see some jobs cut.
Rail Minister Winston Peters said it would cost $120 million to move infrastructure and keep the Aratere in service.
The ship, which first entered service on Cook Strait in 1999, made headlines last year when it
ran aground near Picton
because of an autopilot mistake.
Rail and Maritime Union general secretary Todd Valster told RNZ that his members would not be directly affected as they did land-based work, such as jobs in the Interislander terminals.
But, Valster said it would affect rail for at least four years.
"Disruption to freight for customers, extended times, more risk, but also what a lot of people don't really realise is that a lot of stuff moves between the islands that is essential to keep the rail infrastructure going on both sides."
He said it would make rail a less viable option for freight.
"The customer may just think we'll just leave it on a truck, it might be the easier option and sometimes it's the cheaper option, but it's certainly not supporting the heavy investment New Zealand has done over recent times."
Road freight lobby group Transporting New Zealand chief executive Dom Kalasih said the retirement would cause more risk to Interislander services.
Kalasih said that would particularly be the case if one of its two remaining ferries had to be taken out of service.
He said it would be "fascinating" to see how freight went without any rail enabled ferries in service.
Tangi Utikere
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Labour's rail spokesperson Tangi Utikere said New Zealanders would now have to rely on two ageing boats, which required increased levels of maintenance.
He said there would "clearly" be interruptions to services.
"It is a given that we will see at some time only one of those boats operating, and possibly actually if both of the two existing ships are out of action for whatever reason, it may be that there are no Interislander ferries actually crossing the Cook Strait," he said.
Utikere said Labour's iReX plan would have meant replacement boats arrived much earlier than the current government's approach, and the cancellation of the original deal meant there would be job losses while New Zealanders continued to wait for new ferries to arrive.
"There is no contract in place. We don't know what the final costs will be. The cancellation costs are continuing to rise each day that we continue to wait for those decisions to be taken. There is little certainty, and little confidence I guess, that they will arrive in 2029."
Rail Minister Winston Peters said the government would do required work in Wellington and build a new, double lane linkspan in Picton to serve rail and road for the next 60 years.
"Under iReX, a whole temporary operation was to be built at taxpayers' expense only to knock it down when permanent infrastructure was built, plus 'Taj Mahal' terminal buildings and expensive works across the wider yards in Wellington and Picton.
"That is not good use of funds, and we are getting the taxpayer a superior deal."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
'Butter Is Expensive Right Now. There's No Getting Away From That' - Finance Minister Nicola Willis
The Finance Minister does not believe New Zealanders are getting a "raw deal" on butter, but has accepted there is no getting away from how expensive it is right now. Nicola Willis met with Fonterra's chief executive Miles Hurrell at Parliament on Tuesday evening. While the two meet regularly, there was increased interest in the meeting due to the current price of butter. Willis had earlier said it was something she would discuss with Hurrell. Characterising the meeting as "constructive and engaging," Willis said Hurrell was candid about the way butter was priced in New Zealand. Her summarisation of her meeting with Fonterra largely zeroed in on her drive to increase supermarket competition. The large proportion of what people pay for butter is dictated by global demand, which is something the government could not control. "Were that price to come down, you would expect that to be reflected in the prices that New Zealand shoppers pay," Willis said. Hurrell had told her that butter had once been the hardest product for Fonterra to sell globally, but the increasing demand was due to reporting on its health benefits. "It was once viewed as a bogeyman," she said. The meeting had reinforced Willis' interest in increasing supermarket competition to put downward pressure on the price of butter. "All roads lead back to supermarket competition. I continue to believe that is the most powerful lever that the government has on this issue. We will never be able to control global dairy prices. What we can influence is the amount of competition in New Zealand's grocery sector and we have a lot of work underway to address that." Fonterra had also observed the supermarket competition. "Miles specifically conveyed that Fonterra operates in a number of markets around the world, most of which have a more competitive supermarket sector, and that it does feel different in New Zealand." She would leave it to supermarkets and Fonterra to argue who was charging what margin. "The sense that I got from my engagement with Miles is that it's a constant battle between them. Each party are probably going to point fingers at the other." Hurrell would not answer questions when RNZ approached him outside Parliament on Tuesday night, but a Fonterra spokesperson said the meeting was "constructive". Willis said she had encouraged Hurrell to front, in particular to explain what proportion of the margins go to Fonterra and what goes to supermarkets. Acknowledging that Fonterra's job was to get the best possible price for its shareholders, Willis also accepted New Zealanders saw the downsides of that when they were shopping. "I've been satisfied that I don't think consumers are getting a raw deal. I think that there is good work going on to ensure that there is pressure and competition from Fonterra to try and keep its prices low. But I get it. Butter is expensive right now. There's no getting away from that."
Techday NZ
5 hours ago
- Techday NZ
New Zealand's place in global cyber defence - From medieval knights to cybercriminals
During World War I, the British Expeditionary Force was the first military unit to cross the English Channel. This highly trained army featuring cavalry armed with lances, sabres, and rifles was the last reminder of medieval warfare. They were quickly brought low by machine guns, barbed wire and trenches. By the time the war ended, a mere 13 years after the invention of flight, the skies were filled with fighter planes. Conflict quickly reveals what works and what doesn't. In 2025, global instability has reshaped the battlefield once again. This time, it's digital. The rise of digital guerilla warfare We are witnessing a new kind of conflict: digital guerrilla war. This is where decentralised cybercriminal groups are being funded by shadowy nation states to carry out cyber-attacks. These hidden attackers "live off the land" by using legitimate tools to infiltrate systems and strike when least expected. Government entities are frequent targets, but private and listed companies are just as vulnerable. A major attack on them wouldn't just impact businesses, it could affect national stability and disrupt the economy. New Zealand, like the rest of the world, is locked in a cyber battle where threats can come from anywhere, at any time. Today, the front line is everywhere. This might sound excessive and overdramatic, but that's the reality all business leaders need to understand. A key concept in cyber security is that the investment to prevent harm should be in proportion to the needs of the business. But for many businesses, simple technology choices supported by people and processes are enough to mitigate most threats. But some organisations play integral roles in society and we can't afford for them not have the best security procedures in place. The Government must lead on critical infrastructure Critical infrastructure faces a much bigger threat. Last year, the United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), found proof that a state backed cyber security group, Volt Typhoon, had secretly infiltrated critical infrastructure providers across the Western world. Their goal? To cause disruption at a key moment. Another group, backed by the same nation-state, Salt Typhoon, has infiltrated nine major U.S. telecoms, accessing call data, text messages, and even recordings of prominent national leaders. New Zealanders have a right to know that our infrastructure is being protected, and that the government is investing in national cyber defence before disaster strikes. Cyber threats are no longer just a business problem; they're a national security issue. Is New Zealand doing enough to protect its critical infrastructure? Right now, the answer is no. We're at risk of falling behind. In late 2024, Australia passed sweeping cybersecurity legislation to harden national defences. The new laws require industries to uphold high security standards and give the government powers to intervene in the event of a serious breach. These reforms came in the wake of a string of devastating cyber incidents, including major data breaches at Medibank, Optus, and Latitude Finance in 2022 and 2023. The Latitude breach alone became the second largest in Australian history and the most damaging for citizens. It was also New Zealand's largest-ever data breach, exposing the personal information of 20% of our population. Australia has been put serious effort into building its cyber posture at a national level, with a vision of being a global leader in cybersecurity by 2030. In a world reliant on digital infrastructure, this will be a key competitive advantage. New Zealand has the chance to tell the same story, but only if we act soon. That's why we need the government to enact legislation that will protect our country and people. I appreciate developing legislation is not trivial, but the template has been created in Australia and it's in everyone's interest to reflect that over here. This will require some businesses to invest more to become compliant, but that's the point, that we all incur comparable costs to achieve a common standard. Cyber security is complex to understand. Humans evolved to recognise that a warrior charging at you is a threat, not a remote network of industrialised guerilla fighters with keyboards, backed by nations hiding their true intent. New Zealand must not wait until we're reacting to disaster. We need a nationally unified, proactive cyber defence to protect our people, businesses, and critical systems before it's too late.
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Documents show alleged ties between NZ First and tobacco giant
New Zealand First should be stripped of the tobacco and vaping portfolio, according to an advocacy group set up to keep kids off nicotine. The call comes after RNZ published documents alleging close ties between tobacco giant Philip Morris and New Zealand First. Guyon Espiner broke the story, and spoke to Melissa Chan-Green. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
