Mother and Child Narrowly Escape the 'World's Most Dangerous Bird.' See Footage of the 'Close Encounter'
A mom and her child had a close call with a dangerous bird, and their narrow escape was caught on security cameras.
Nearly a month after the "close encounter" in Australia, the Queensland Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation released the footage as a warning about the feathery fiend behind it: the cassowary. Often referred to as the world's most dangerous bird," per the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), the cassowary should not be fed or approached, the government agency warned in the June 18 press release.
In the surveillance footage, the mom and her child walk up to a door in Mission Beach on May 9. The kid picks up his pace to a run after spotting two cassowaries behind them. The mother, who is walking ahead of her child, notices the birds and holds the door open for the kid as he runs inside. The two cassowaries follow closely behind but don't make it in. The birds slow down after realizing the human duo had made it inside, but they still approach the now-closed door, the footage shows.
The birds — one tall and one much smaller — were "a habituated male cassowary and his chick," the Queensland department said, adding that they were "approaching a home in the hopes of being fed." This hope is generated by human interference, which is why authorities "are urging people to avoid unlawfully feeding wildlife," particularly cassowaries.
Commonly found in the wet tropics of Queensland, cassowaries can be fearsome to encounter. According to the press release from Queensland authorities, the flightless birds "can inflict serious injuries to people and pets by kicking out with their large, clawed feet," which led the WWF to draw comparisons to an iconic horror villain.
"They're most active at twilight, have a claw that rivals Freddy Krueger's, and are one of the few bird species that have killed humans," the WWF said of the birds, which can reach 4 to 5.6 feet, on average.
Feeding the birds often alters their behavior and makes them more daring around humans, which has led to multiple cassowary run-ins, like the filmed incident of the mother with her child.
"This incident is one of several cassowary interactions in the area which are linked to unlawful feeding," wildlife ranger Jeff Lewis said in a statement. "Thankfully, the mother and child were able to get inside to safety, but it's an important reminder not to interfere with wildlife."
Another cassowary incident in April saw one of the birds approach a Queensland man in his seventies and kick him in the leg. The man "was treated for a cut to his leg" and "was lucky the injuries weren't worse," Lewis added.
Incidents like these are "stark examples," he said, of the dangers of feeding the birds.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
"Local wildlife rangers have been warning people of the risks, installing signage and providing education, but the unlawful feeding persists," Lewis added in the release. "When cassowaries associate humans with food, they can become impatient and aggressive, particularly when accompanied by chicks."
The Queensland Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation advises people to "never approach cassowaries," especially not chicks, as "male cassowaries will defend them." People living in cassowary-populated areas should also slow down when driving, but not stop to look at the birds (if they are on the road). Dogs living near cassowary habitats should also be leashed or kept behind a fence.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why pilot couldn't handle deadly turbulence
A new report has revealed that a pilot who died in a helicopter crash on NSW's Mid-North Coast region hit turbulence and struggled to regain control as he held food in his hand. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) has released its report into the October 26, 2023 crash that killed experienced pilot Ed Kraft, 54, from the NSW town of Jindabyne. Mr Kraft was flying from Cessnock Airport to Wallis Island Airport, north of Newcastle. The report found that while crossing over the Yacaaba Headland the helicopter hit turbulent air, rolled right and started to climb. Mr Kraft tried to use his left hand to fight back control of the aircraft, as his other hand was occupied. 'The pilot was eating at this time, with the food being held in their right hand,' the report found. This unfortunately impacted his ability to regain control. 'At the time the helicopter encountered turbulence, the pilot's right hand was occupied, resulting in them manipulating the cyclic with their unsupported left hand,' the report found. 'This reduced the pilot's ability to slow the aircraft in a timely manner using co-ordinated flight control inputs. 'The pilot was occupied with non-flying related tasks for much of this time, specifically, mobile phone use and the consumption of food and beverages.' Mr Kraft flew a Robinson R66 helicopter, which was found when it hit the waters of Providence Bay, near Hawks Nest. The horror crash started after the helicopter reached an 'excessive roll angle' that led to an in-flight break-up. The ATSB also found that the aircraft entered a low-G condition due to the turbulence and the pilot's reaction, which was contributed to by an asymmetric horizontal stabiliser design in the helicopter. Following the crash, the manufacturer of the aircraft has developed a horizontal stabiliser that will be fitted to all new Robinson helicopters, while a new safety notice will also be issued to pilots giving guidance on low-G, turbulence, and pilot distraction.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jury deliberating in mushroom murder trial
Jurors in the triple-murder trial of Erin Patterson have been sent out to begin their deliberations on a verdict. The direction, from Justice Christopher Beale, occurred at 1.02pm on Monday just minutes after two jurors were balloted off. The 14-member panel returned to court following a short break to say their goodbyes to the fellow jurors they'd come to know over the past 10 weeks. 'A very warm thank you to those two people balloted off,' Justice Christopher Beale said ahead of the ballot. 'I don't know if you'll feel relieved or frustrated, but rest assured you've made a very important contribution to the administration of justice.' The ballot comes after Justice Beale told jurors that any verdict they reached would have to be unanimous and took the group though the formal process. He said jurors had hopefully brought their luggage with them as they would be sequestered for the duration of their deliberations. The two members balloted off, both men, were led from the court. The remaining 12 jurors, seven men and five women, were then asked to retire and reach a verdict. They will be deliberation from Mondays to Saturdays and given a rest day on Sunday. Earlier Justice Beale said he would take verdicts, if any are reached, between normal court hours of 10.30am and 1pm and from 2.15pm to 4.15pm. Ms Patterson, 50, is facing trial after pleading not guilty to murdering three of her husband Simon Patterson's family members and the attempted murder of a fourth. Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, died in early August, 2023, from multiple organ failure linked to death cap mushroom poisoning. The case centres around a lunch Ms Patterson hosted on July 29, 2023, at her home in Leongatha, in Victoria's southeast, where the accused woman served beef wellingtons containing death cap mushrooms. Prosecutors allege Ms Patterson deliberately sought out and included the deadly fungi intending to kill or at least seriously injure her four guests. Her defence argues the case is a tragic accident, Ms Patterson also fell ill and she did not want to harm anyone. Before jurors were sent out to deliberate, Justice Beale took them through a summary of the prosecution and defence cases, and the elements of each charge. For the charge of murder, the judge said there were four elements; did the accused cause the death, were the acts conscious, voluntarily and deliberate, the acts were intended to kill or cause serious injury and, there was no lawful justification. Justice Beale said what was in dispute in this case was; was the serving up of the poisoned meal deliberate, and was it done with the intent to kill or cause serious injury. For the charge of attempted murder, he said, intent had to be an intention to kill. 'Intention to cause really serious injury doesn't cut it for attempted murder,' Justice Beale said. When the matter returned to court in Morwell on Monday, Justice Beale began by having three jury keepers sworn in to assist jurors over the course of their deliberations. Justice Beale then turned to his summing up of the evidence and arguments in relation to four alleged lies the prosecution argued should be used to assess Ms Patterson's credibility. Those allegedly were that she was 'very, very helpful' to the Department of Health, lies about the reason for the lunch, and lies about telling the lunch guests she had cancer and whether she was planning gastric bypass surgery. Justice Beale turned to Ms Patterson's evidence that she planned to use a possible cancer investigation as cover to receive weight-loss surgery without having to tell her husband's family. Giving evidence, Ms Patterson pointed to a September 2023 appointment she had at the Enrich Clinic in Melbourne she said was a pre-assessment for gastric bypass. Justice Beale told the jury the prosecution had alleged this was the 'starkest lie' Ms Patterson told in the witness box after a last-minute investigation found the Enrich Clinic never offered gastric bypass or any other surgery. Ms Patterson accepted the clinic did not offer this when shown a statement from the practice but said she was 'puzzled' because that's what she thought the appointment was for. She explained it may have been other weight-loss options such as liposuction, which Enrich did offer until mid-2024. Justice Beale told the court the defence argued Ms Patterson was 'honestly mistaken' when she gave the evidence. Turning to the four alleged lies, Justice Beale said if jurors found the accused lied about something, they could use that to determine her credibility on other things she said. 'That is not to say just because you find she lied about one matter that she lied about everything else,' he said. 'It is for you to decide what significance to give these alleged lies.' Justice Beale warned jurors they could not reason that because a person had told a lie about something they must be guilty. D-Day for mushroom trial jury On Friday, Justice Beale told jurors he expected to complete his summing up of the evidence, arguments and legal principles by noon on Monday. Then, he said, the 14-person panel of Victorians would be reduced to 12 with a random ballot before jurors are asked to retire and begin deliberations. 'I'll be completing the charge prior to lunchtime on Monday, at which point we'll have the ballot and away you go so to speak,' he said. At the start of the trial 10 weeks ago, jurors were told they would be sequestered for the duration of their deliberations.


Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
A jury is deciding the fate of an Australian woman accused of 3 murders by mushroom poisoning
WELLINGTON, New Zealand — A jury in Australia began deliberations Monday in the triple murder trial of Erin Patterson, accused of killing her estranged husband's relatives by deliberately serving them poisonous mushrooms for lunch. Three of Patterson's four lunch guests — her parents-in-law Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson — died in the hospital after the 2023 meal at her home in Leongatha, at which she served individual beef Wellington pastries containing death cap mushrooms .