New hi-tech ticket system makes going to the races easier
This upgrade is powered by HID, a Cardiff-based company, and is based on its Event Management Platform, in combination with handheld scanners used at the gates.
Gareth Simpson, head of racecourse operations at Chester Race Company, said: 'Race day starts the moment our guests arrive, so making entry simple is a top priority.
"With this new system, which works on any iOS or Android devices, everything from getting your ticket to getting through the gate is faster and more convenient. We're the first major sports venue in the UK to adopt this kind of end-to-end solution provided by HID.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 hours ago
- Reuters
India's Tata Motors to raise 1 billion euros in equity for Iveco deal
NEW DELHI, July 31 (Reuters) - Tata Motors plans to raise about 1 billion euros ($1.14 billion) of equity to repay the loan funding its $4.5 billion offer, opens new tab to buy Iveco's trucks and bus business, the Indian automaker's chief financial officer said on Thursday. Tata ( opens new tab and Iveco ( opens new tab announced an all-cash deal on Wednesday. It will be the biggest ever transaction for the Mumbai-based automaker, which made its last major acquisition in 2008 when it bought Jaguar Land Rover from Ford Motor (F.N), opens new tab for $2.3 billion. Tata Motors finance chief PB Balaji said Morgan Stanley (MS.N), opens new tab and MUFG will underwrite the $4.5 billion bridge loan to secure the deal. The company, he said, will then look at a capital raise of around 1 billion euros along with some term debt "sometime in the next 18 months" to pay down the bridge loan. "Tata Motors has never been stronger in terms of its financial position to take on such a transaction," Balaji said during a media briefing, adding that both Tata and Iveco's businesses are cash-generating. Shares of Tata Motors fell as much as 2.4% on Thursday morning, reflecting concerns over the amount of debt the company will need to take on for the deal. But they recouped some losses, ending the day 0.4% lower in a weak Mumbai market. Tata Motors' trucks and bus business recorded its highest ever profit of over $750 million in the last fiscal year that ended on March 31. And its consolidated automotive business, which includes Jaguar Land Rover and passenger cars, is debt-free. The deal will immediately triple Tata's commercial vehicles revenue, giving it access to Iveco's markets including Europe - where the Italian group competes with Volvo ( opens new tab and Daimler ( opens new tab - as well as Latin America. It will also allow Tata to launch Iveco's products in India and elsewhere. "We can look at some of Iveco's tippers, vans and buses coming into the Indian market. We can also look at the Latin American market, where some of our trucks or small commercial vehicles can go," Tata Executive Director Girish Wagh said. Iveco and Tata's commercial vehicles business will have combined revenues of about 22 billion euros, with half coming from Europe, 35% from India and the remainder from the Americas. Tata has already identified synergies to boost revenues and cut costs, Wagh said, adding there is some overlap in research and development in the areas of powertrain technologies, electrification and connectivity, which can be combined. Wagh added that Tata can also leverage India's "frugal engineering skills" and bring down material costs at Iveco's European factories. Iveco CEO Olof Persson, meanwhile, told an analyst call on Thursday that Tata had committed to maintaining the "industrial footprint and employee communities". Iveco employs around 36,000 people, including 14,000 in Italy.
Daily Record
13 hours ago
- Daily Record
Exactly who will get emergency alert sent to their mobiles and how to turn it off
The UK Government has confirmed 87 million people across the UK will receive the alert. The UK Government has confirmed that 87 million people will receive an alert to their phones in September. The emergency alert system is set for a test run on September 7 at around 3pm and everyone with a device operating on 4G and 5G will be affected. Devices will sound a loud siren sound for approximately 10 seconds, accompanied by vibrations and a message providing more details about the alert. Typically, this message would be to advise people on how to respond to the emergency, but as this is just a test, people can carry on with their day once the siren ends, reports the Mirror. But, three groups may need to react differently to the emergency alert test. These are drivers, people with hidden phones such as victims of domestic abuse, and those with hearing or vision impairments. Official advice says victims of domestic abuse and others in vulnerable situations with concealed phones can opt out from receiving the emergency alert. This can be done on iPhones and Android phones by navigating to 'emergency alerts' in your settings and disabling 'severe alerts' and 'extreme alerts'. Devices from other manufacturers and software will have different methods to deactivate these settings. More guidance on opting out of the alerts can be found on the website. Mobile devices and tablets will still receive the test notification even if they are not connected to mobile data or Wi-Fi networks. However, devices that are switched off, are Wi-Fi only, or on 2G or 3G networks won't get the alert. Drivers are cautioned not to engage with the alert if it appears while driving. The government said: "It is illegal to use a hand-held device while driving. Find somewhere safe and legal to stop before reading the message." For people who are deaf, hard of hearing, blind, or partially sighted, the government's advice states: "During the test, audio and vibration attention signals will let you know you have received an alert, if accessibility notifications have been enabled on your mobile phone or tablet. "The government will continue ongoing engagement with disability charities and campaigners in the run up to the test." The purpose of this test is to ensure the system works correctly in case of an actual emergency. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Pat McFadden, announced: "At around 3pm on Sunday, September 7, millions of people across the country will read this message on their mobile phones during a critical national test of our Emergency Alerts system." He emphasised the importance of the trial, saying: "Just like the fire alarm in your house, it's important we test this system so that we know it will work if we need it. The alerts have the potential to save lives." Since the initial trial of the emergency alert system in 2023, five genuine alerts have been issued. This includes during significant weather incidents such as Storm Éowyn, when an alert was dispatched to those in red weather warning zones where life was at risk.
Scottish Sun
13 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Husband handed just £325k of wife's £60MILLION family fortune in bitter divorce battle WINS bid to get more cash
He claims to be the victim of 'gender prejudice' DIVORCE ROW Husband handed just £325k of wife's £60MILLION family fortune in bitter divorce battle WINS bid to get more cash A MAN who was awarded just £325,000 of his wife's £60 million fortune has now won a bitter divorce battle. The divorcee blamed "gender prejudice" for his original 0.5% payout during a hearing at the Court of Appeal. Advertisement 3 Jenny Helliwell, 42, was said to have behaved "fraudulently" Credit: Champion News Service 3 Simon Entwistle, 42, was awarded just £325,000 after a 'painful' divorce battle Credit: Champion News Service Simon Entwistle, 42, a financial trader, was awarded just £325,000 at the High Court after a "painful" divorce battle with multimillionaire heiress Jenny Helliwell, also 42. His claim of needing £36,000 a year for flights, and £26,000 for "a meal plan just for himself", was called "aspirational" by the judge. The judge added: "He said to me, 'I can't even cook an omelette,' well my answer to that is 'learn', it is not difficult." "You do not have to be a master chef to learn how to eat reasonably well." Advertisement Now, a judge has found Jenny guilty of "fraudulent" behaviour by failing to declare £48m of her £66m personal fortune. The pair, who were together from 2016 until 2022, enjoyed an "opulent standard of living throughout their relationship." Simon reportedly "enjoyed the trappings of being married into a family of exceptional wealth". This included living in a £4.5m villa in Dubai, and a Parisian wedding ceremony that cost £500,000 in August 2019. Advertisement The villa had been a gift from Jenny's father - Dubai-based British businessman Neil Helliwell. Simon's own assets were worth around £800,000, including a flat in Salford. Teen Mom star Ryan Edwards begs judge not to force him to expose top-secret MTV contract and NDA in nasty divorce When the couple split in August 2022, Jenny hired lawyers to order Simon to leave their home with just 48 hours' notice. It sparked a legal battle that would see Simon asking for £2.5m of his wife's fortune, estimated to be worth £60m. Advertisement Jenny had offered him £500,000, and then £800,000 to avoid a court battle, but he refused in the hopes of an £2.5m award. However, the original judge awarded just a £400,000 payout following a pre-nuptial agreement that stated the pair would keep their own assets. This came to £325,000 after he was made to pay his wife's legal fees. During an appeal, Simon claimed he was a victim of "gender prejudice", and that the agreement had been invalidated by Jenny failing to disclose around £48m in assets when he signed the document. Advertisement His lawyer said: "Had the positions been reversed, it is very unlikely that he would have... so ungenerously assessed the needs of a wife after a six-year relationship." A judge has ruled that this amounted to "fraudulent" behaviour, invalidating the agreement. While Jenny did disclose around £18m in assets, she failed to disclose an additional £47m. It included around £8m of beachfront land in Dubai, and a £1.6m property in Wimbledon. Advertisement This meant that Simon did not sign the agreement with full knowledge of his partner's wealth. She did not make any findings on the gender prejudice argument. The case will now be returned to the High Court, to be judged as if the agreement didn't exist. Lady Justice King said: "Since the husband in the instant case was deliberately deprived of information which it had been agreed that he should have, in my judgment, the agreement cannot stand." Advertisement
