logo
New Virginia clean slate law will create high demand for legal aid, experts say

New Virginia clean slate law will create high demand for legal aid, experts say

Yahoo18-05-2025

RICHMOND — A new 'clean slate' law set to take effect next year will shield some past crimes from public viewing.
Advocates say that matters for people whose convictions haunt them for years after they've served their time. And legal experts say there's much to be done to prepare for the influx of people who will want to have their previous convictions sealed.
Attorney Scott Surovell, a Democratic state senator representing Fairfax, said people were already lining up to take advantage of the new law.
'I've got a list of about 30 people who contacted me over the last five years that want me to file sentence sealing petitions for them,' Surovell said Wednesday when he joined a panel of lawmakers and advocates to discuss the law's impacts. 'I have one client I've been waiting for 20, 30 years to do this… He's going to be the first one I file for.
'He had a petty larceny conviction for a $205 bag of baseball equipment when he was in high school and (it's been) following him around the rest of his life.'
The clean state law says qualifying misdemeanors and felonies can be sealed after seven years and 10 years, respectively, assuming the person doesn't commit any new crimes in the intervening time period.
The legislation has a delayed start date in part to accommodate the computer programming required to get the system up and running. Previously, the law had been delayed by four years to allow for the $20 million rebuild of the system for criminal recordkeeping and to give legislators time to mend some holes in the law. There won't be another delay; Surovell said the law will take effect July 1, 2026 'come hell or high water.'
Many past criminal convictions — including some felonies — to soon be sealed in Virginia
'I won't feel truly free until I can vote': Legal case challenges Virginia's voting restoration system
Youngkin moves to delay controversial law sealing criminal, court records from public view
There are other hurdles. Some offenses, such as marijuana possession, will automatically be sealed after the required waiting period. But most offenses that are eligible to be sealed require people to petition to do so, and that could prove challenging for an already strained legal system.
'There is a backbreaking demand out there, particularly within the low income population, for free and low cost legal services,' said Christa Gantz, director of Access to Legal Services at the Virginia State Bar, at Wednesday's panel. 'If (the case) is at all complicated, particularly the petition-based part of it, then utilizing an attorney will make a major difference in their ability to get relief.'
Over 1 million Virginians qualify for legal aid, Gantz said, and though there are legal assistance programs in the civil space that could help with conviction sealings, they would require significant staff and technology resources.
'Because this is a new law, what that means is it would require new programming, and I think that the challenges there are primarily funding,' she said. 'People in need are going to be contacting the courts, but then the next step is going to be the Virginia State Bar's Access Department, and they're going to say 'where can I get help?' What I would typically do as the director is refer to them to a program.
'We don't have that yet.'
Gantz said people able to pay for legal work can get started through the Virginia Lawyer Referral Service, and those who can't can get brief advice using the state bar's Virginia Free Legal Answers clinic. She thinks attorneys who do pro bono work in Virginia will be eager to help with sentence sealings, in part because they are limited in scope, don't take a ton of time and could have a big impact.
George Townsend, a criminal defense attorney, founded the law firm Clean Slate Virginia in preparation for the law's passage. He estimated that over 100,000 people could qualify for automatic or petition-based sentence sealing, with the caveat that it's a difficult number to project.
'I guess one of the good things about the delay is we have more time to let people know about it,' he said. 'There's going to be a huge volume, so getting ready for that…I've done criminal defense all my career, and I've told hundreds, maybe thousands of people 'you have a conviction, there's nothing we can do.' And I found out about the law and knew it was going to be a huge change.'
In preparation for the new cases, the General Assembly approved funding for an additional staff position in each clerk's office, effective as of July.
'This added capacity will help clerks manage the increased workload associated with the new law,' Townsend said. 'In my view, it would be highly beneficial if clerks permitted petitions to be filed in advance of the July 1, 2026 implementation date.
'Allowing early filings would enable a phased rollout, helping to avoid a surge of thousands of petitions on a single day and long lines forming outside courthouses across the commonwealth.'
Once a conviction record is sealed, it won't show up on public background checks for things like apartment and loan applications. Some employers, like police agencies, would still be able to see the details of the criminal record.
A dozen states, including Virginia, and Washington, D.C. have clean slate laws. Some legal experts maintain these kinds of laws prevent access to valuable insight on how fair the court process is and pose First Amendment right of access concerns. The counter argument is that there is a compelling public interest to have certain records sealed because of their prolonged impact.
The law also indirectly addresses barrier laws, which say, for example, that people convicted of felony drug possession could not then go on to become drug counselors. The barrier laws remain in effect, but if those convictions are sealed, they will not preclude people from doing that kind of work.
Kate Seltzer, kate.seltzer@virginiamedia.com, (757)713-7881

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles
Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles

Axios

time12 minutes ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles

Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) led the entire Senate Democratic in writing to President Trump Sunday, demanding he remove all military forces from Los Angeles and cease threats to further deploy troops, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Padilla was physically removed from a press conference held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and handcuffed Thursday, triggering a five-alarm fire for Democrats. The letter from Padilla and 46 other Senate Democrats asked Trump to "immediately withdraw all military personnel that have been deployed to Los Angeles in recent day." Trump federalized California's National Guard without the state's consent and mobilized more than 700 Marines to the state to try to quash protests over his mass deportation program. "Respect for our Constitution and for our civilian law enforcement demands nothing less," the Senate Democrats wrote. Driving the news: A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled that the Trump administration's deployment of the California National Guard can continue, for now. The Pentagon said on Friday that U.S. troops will not be responsible for law enforcement at the Los Angeles riots. Instead, they will protect federal property and personnel. Protests over the deportations have spread to numerous cities across the country, and Trump has warned that he may deploy troops to different areas. The Democrats asked Trump to "cease any further threats of deploying National Guard or other active duty military personnel into American cities absent a request from the Governor." Between the lines: The fight against the White House's deportation program is becoming a rallying point for Democrats who have largely been split over how to push back against Trump. Padilla's incident at the Noem presser on Thursday added more fuel to the flames. Democrats almost universally panned the manhandling of a sitting U.S. senator.

America Is Finally Getting A Fascist Dictator Parade, Courtesy Of Donald Trump
America Is Finally Getting A Fascist Dictator Parade, Courtesy Of Donald Trump

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

America Is Finally Getting A Fascist Dictator Parade, Courtesy Of Donald Trump

WASHINGTON — After years of admiring autocrats like Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping and envying the sort of military parade they get to enjoy, President Donald Trump is finally getting one of his own. America's capital city will resemble Pyongyang, Beijing and Moscow's Red Square on Saturday evening, with tanks and missile launchers rolling down the street, thanks to Trump's $45 million birthday gift to himself at taxpayer expense. 'I don't really think the symbolism of tanks and missiles is really what we're all about,' Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul told HuffPost. 'If you ask me about a military parade, all the images that come to mind, the first images, are of the Soviet Union and North Korea.' Trump and his administration claim that the parade was actually organized for the U.S. Army's 250th birthday, not Trump's 79th. Both the Navy and the Marines also have founding date anniversaries this year, however, and there has been no discussion about holding $45 million celebrations for either. White House officials did not respond to HuffPost queries on the matter. Democracy advocates warn that Trump's use of the military to honor himself should not be downplayed as harmless, particularly given his deployment of thousands of troops in Los Angeles to put down protests against his deportations, his repeated attacks on judges, his use of his executive power to attack critics and his willingness to defy a Supreme Court order for months. 'The military parade is a blatant adoption and celebration of authoritarian power display,' said Amanda Carpenter, a former aide to Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz who is now with the group Protect Democracy. 'Given this is coupled with the deployment of U.S. troops to police American streets, by no means should it be considered as only optics.' John Bolton, Trump's third of four national security advisers during his first term, said Trump has been infatuated with the idea of his own parade after attending France's Bastille Day celebration in 2017 at the invitation of that country's president, Emmanuel Macron. Bolton said Trump's advisers were able to talk him out of ordering one back then. 'He was dissuaded by a number of factors, not the least of which was how much it would cost, and how bad that would appear, and what damage the tank treads would do to the streets of Washington,' he said. Gen. Paul Selva, the vice chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time, reportedly told Trump that a military parade was 'what dictators do.' The United States has had few military parades in its history, the last one taking place in 1991 during the presidency of George H.W. Bush after U.S. forces successfully pushed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, which he had invaded. 'It was a parade to celebrate winning the war, which is a good reason to have a military parade,' Bolton said. 'That's not what this is about. It's about Donald Trump.' Patty Murray, a Democratic senator from Washington state, said during a hearing Wednesday that Trump's casual use of the military should alarm Americans. 'President Trump is promising heavy force against peaceful protesters at his D.C. military parade. Those sorts of actions and that sort of rhetoric from a president of the United States should stop every one of us cold. Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented,' she said. 'It is unconstitutional and it is downright un-American. We should all be speaking out against this and demanding accountability now.' Despite his frequent claims of support for the armed forces and service members, Trump has a decades-long history of disrespect, even disdain, for both. As a young man, Trump had the opportunity to fight in the Vietnam War but instead avoided service with a diagnosis of 'bone spurs' from a doctor who was a friend of his father. In 2015, running for president, Trump declared that Arizona Sen. John McCain, who spent nearly six years in a Hanoi prison undergoing routine torture, was not a war hero just because he was captured. Trump said he preferred those who were not captured. During his first term in office, when he was unable to get fellow Republicans running both chambers of Congress to approve billions of dollars for a border wall he had repeatedly promised Mexico would pay for, Trump instead raided a Pentagon fund for service members' housing and schools to pay for it instead. Also in those years, Trump disparaged those in the military who had died for the United States as 'suckers' and 'losers,' according to his own chief of staff. And just months into his second term, Trump broke the tradition of the commander-in-chief shaking the hand of every graduating cadet at a military academy by immediately leaving West Point after his speech and returning to his golf resort in New Jersey. Trump's predecessor Joe Biden spent 70 minutes congratulating each graduate last year, as Trump himself had done five years earlier, although he later complained about how many times he had to raise his arm to salute. To this day, Trump still does not seem to understand military protocol. On his recent trip to the Middle East, Trump saluted Saudi military officials, just as he had saluted North Korean officers during his summit meeting with Kim in 2018. Protect Democracy's Carpenter said Americans need to take Saturday as a warning of things to come. 'Americans should see this plainly for what it is: Troops in the streets are troops in the streets, whether it's a parade or a raid,' she said. Trump Says Protesters At Weekend Military Parade Will Face 'Very Heavy Force' GOP Senator Says Trump's Military Parade Reminds Him Of North Korea Trump's Real War Is Against America

Israel-Iran conflict poses new dilemma for Democrats
Israel-Iran conflict poses new dilemma for Democrats

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Israel-Iran conflict poses new dilemma for Democrats

Democrats on Capitol Hill can't catch a break. Just as Sen. Alex Padilla's (D-Calif.) physical clash with Trump administration security officials had given them cause to unite on the otherwise divisive issue of immigration, Israel's attack on Iran has shifted the national gaze onto yet another radioactive topic that has long split the party. While many Democrats quickly condemned conservative Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for launching Israel's assault on Thursday night, many others hailed the decision as a necessary step to put a halt to Tehran's nuclear expansion. The disagreement is an unwelcome one for Democratic leaders, who had rallied forcefully behind Padilla on Thursday afternoon and were hoping to take that unified front into the weekend, when President Trump is staging an elaborate military parade, and then into next week's holiday, when the House is on a long recess and lawmakers will be back in their districts to confront voters. Instead, Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear program — a mere coincidence of timing — has dragged Democrats back into the quarrelsome discussion over Netanyahu's aggressive military strategy, which has already been a topic of internal strife amid Israel's demolition of Gaza in search of the Hamas terrorists who attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. On one side of that debate are Israel's closest congressional allies, who quickly cheered Netanyahu's preemptive attacks as an imperative effort to make the region, and the world, a safer place. 'The October 7 attacks showed that Israel can leave nothing to chance — the threats they face are real, and inaction can cost lives,' Rep. Steven Horsford (D-Nev.), a former head of the Congressional Black Caucus, said in a statement. 'The strikes that began last night in Iran targeted military leaders and nuclear facilities that posed a clear risk for Israel and for future peace in the region.' Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) sounded a similar note, warning that allowing Iran to develop nuclear weapons 'would place Israel, the United States, and partners in the region under direct and constant danger.' 'Iran could have prevented this. They chose this path,' Moskowitz said in a statement. 'Democratic and Republican administrations have all agreed that Iran should never obtain a nuclear weapon, and this will help that bipartisan goal.' Many liberal Democrats have a decidedly different view. Those voices have long criticized Netanyahu, especially as the death toll in Gaza has soared beyond 50,000 people, including thousands of children. And they wasted no time blasting the Israeli government's latest foray into Iran. 'Israel's reckless, escalatory strikes on Iran risk igniting a larger regional war, & undermine planned negotiations for a potential new nuclear deal,' Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the former head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, wrote on X. 'Netanyahu must not be allowed to pull America into another forever war. Instead, we must immediately push for negotiated de-escalation.' Sen. Jack Reed (R.I.), the senior Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, piled on, warning that 'Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence.' 'These strikes threaten not only the lives of innocent civilians but the stability of the entire Middle East and the safety of American citizens and forces,' Reed said in a statement. 'While tensions between Israel and Iran are real and complex, military aggression of this scale is never the answer.' The Democratic divisions are not mirrored on the other side of the aisle, where Republicans — with a very few exceptions — are united in lockstep behind Netanyahu's attacks. 'What Israel's preemptive strike ensured tonight is that Iran's next attack will not be with a nuclear weapon,' said Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Keeping the issue in the headlines, Iran responded on Friday by launching a series of retaliatory ballistic missile strikes, some of which targeted Tel Aviv. Tehran also backed out of its plans to meet with U.S. officials in search of an elusive nuclear deal. Those talks had been scheduled for Sunday in Oman. The conflict — both abroad and within the Democratic Party — was not what Democratic leaders had in mind as Congress was leaving Washington on Thursday afternoon. Hours earlier, Padilla had confronted Kristi Noem, the secretary of the Homeland Security Department, at a press conference in Los Angeles, where residents have been facing off against law enforcers to protest Trump's immigration raids. Noem's security detail grabbed Padilla and pushed him into an adjacent hallway, where he was shoved to the ground and handcuffed. The scuffle sent alarm bells through the Capitol, where Democrats have been scrambling to locate a unified response to Trump's aggressive enforcement crackdown in Los Angeles, which has featured the activation of the National Guard without the governor's consent, and the deployment of hundreds of Marines. Some Democrats have leaned into the conflict, hoping to keep the focus on Trump's controversial actions, including some who have called for impeachment. Others have used it to revisit Trump's role in the Capitol attack of Jan. 6, 2021. Still others have warned against highlighting a contentious topic — one that had helped propel Trump to the White House — for fear of alienating voters in battleground districts. And party leaders have sought a delicate balance, condemning Trump's tactics in L.A. while fighting to shift the conversation back to the president's legislative agenda, including Medicaid cuts and tax cuts for the wealthy. 'He sees the protests in Los Angeles as an excuse to unleash more chaos and distract the American people from the failing economy and his plans to cut Medicaid and food assistance,' Rep. Pete Aguilar (Calif.), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, said earlier in the week. The Padilla affair, in contrast, became a rallying cry. And Democrats in both chambers quickly united in defense of their colleague, accusing the administration of abusing its powers and demanding an investigation into how a sitting U.S. senator could be knocked around by officials of the same government he represents. Many called it an assault. 'The Trump administration is a disgrace. Secretary Noem is a disgrace. The manhandling of Senator Alex Padilla was a complete and total disgrace,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) told reporters on the steps of the Capitol on Thursday afternoon. A short time later, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) organized a march from the House chamber across the Capitol, to the office of Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), demanding a response. When Thune wasn't there, they retraced their steps and marched into the office of Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who declined to see them. While the effort was led by the CHC, many other Democrats participated, including top figures like Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.), the Democratic whip; Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee; and the heads of the Black and Asian Pacific American caucuses. 'I want to really emphasize that this is an all-caucus-wide movement and outrage against the authoritarian, violent behavior of this administration,' Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.), a former head of the Hispanic Caucus, said outside the Speaker's office. Hours later, after the Capitol had emptied and lawmakers had headed home, Israel launched its strikes on Tehran. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store