The truth behind the pro-Palestine march that brought Sydney to a halt
Just days prior, police and authorities moved to hastily block the march from going ahead, going as far as taking event organisers, Palestine Action Group, to the Supreme Court.
At 10am on Saturday, the march received the green-light from Justice Belinda Rigg who said arguments that the protest would cause disruption were not enough to stop it.
'It is in the nature of peaceful protests to cause disruption,' she said.
At that stage, only 10,000 people were expected to show up. A number which drastically rose to 50,000 following the court proceedings.
It wasn't until 1pm on Sunday that people realised the sheer scale of Sydney's March for Humanity.
Looking around, I saw ordinary Australians, young and old, who like myself, had turned out in some of the worst weather of the year to demand an end to the growing humanitarian crisis within Gaza.
These were men, women and children who stand beside you in day-to-day life. They were your colleagues, your friends, the people you catch the bus with and the parents you see at school drop-off.
Parents marched with their children on their shoulders, hearts heavy with the unshakeable truth that in another life, it could be their little ones they were fighting to save.
Our teenagers stood at the front lines, their voices trembling but fierce, carrying words that echoed far louder than their years.
Elderly marchers walked slowly but steadfastly, faces lined with the memory of wars they thought they'd left behind.
'I'm too old to be protesting this sh*t', said the sign of one lone elderly man.
'My parents marched against the Vietnam War, now I march for the war in Palestine,' said another sign.
Chants of 'We are all Palestinian' echoed across the masses, proving one simple point: We are all human.
Police reported upwards of 90,000 people attended but anyone who was there knows it was more like 300,000.
Acting Assistant Commissioner Adam Johnson told the media last night that he had 'never seen a more perilous situation' in his 35 years in the job, despite no arrests or injuries.
It's not often a crowd of that size is able to be on their best behaviour like that, especially in the face of confusing instructions from police halfway through.
At around 3pm protesters received a geo-targeted text messaging telling them the march needed to stop due to public safety and to await further instruction.
At 3.20pm, police sent out another message asking everyone to stop walking north.
'As soon as the march has stopped, we will look at turning everyone around back towards the city BUT it needs to be done in a controlled way in stages to keep everyone safe,' it read.
Due to the sheer number of people, diverting the original course when so many people had already made it across the bridge was tricky, but people handled it well and avoided crushing each other towards exit points.
Instead, they patiently awaited the direction of police, some even snacking on sandwiches and cucumber sticks and striking up conversation with others around them.
Others, offered ponchos and umbrellas to those who had gone without.
We saw better behaviour from almost 300,000 people in a confined space than we often see from fans at NRL games.
The march was endorsed by hundreds of organisations and individuals, most notably: Amnesty International Australia, NSW Greens, Jewish Council of Australia, Arab Council Australia, Julian Assange, Bob Carr, Craig Foster and NSW Nurses and Midwives Association.
It did not suggest Australia turn its back on our Jewish community – many of whom stood proudly alongside their Palestinian friends yesterday.
Rather, it suggested that ordinary Sydneysiders refused to stay quiet while thousands starve to death within the occupied Gaza Strip.
The truth is, no matter where you are from, or what 'side' you agree with; innocent people are starving and being gunned down at aid points. Innocent civilians are displaced and thousands are dead.
Politics aside – what makes these people any different from you and I? When did we stop caring about what happens to our fellow human beings?
It's a concerning divide that has only appeared to deepen in recent years. But yesterday, offered a glimmer of hope for the future.
This morning, the protest was the hot topic of conversation for Chris Minns and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley, who opposed the closing of the bridge in separate press conferences.
But don't fear Chris and Sussan, Palestine Action Group has confirmed there are 'no plans for another pro-Palestine protest over the Sydney Harbour Bridge in future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
23 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘On notice': NSW government pushes ahead in early childcare sector inquiry
Childcare and early learning centres in NSW have been put on notice that the 'days of pretending to improve while nothing is done are over', with centres failing children to face a crackdown. Acting Education and Early Learning Minister Courtney Houssos has announced a list of changes coming for the sector, including the launch of an independent regulator agency and providing parents with 'increased information' and 'transparency for the community'. Former deputy NSW Ombudsman Chris Wheeler was commissioned to conduct an independent review into the sector in February after a rise in safety breaches in the sector last year. A list of proposed reforms was released in June. Speaking to media on Wednesday, Ms Houssos welcomed feedback for its reforms into the childhood sector. 'We will be increasing the fines on individual centres,' she said. 'And we will be, as the Wheeler Review recommended, establishing a trial of CCTV cameras.' Ms Houssos said while there were many early 'fantastic' learning centres across the state, the underperforming centres had been put on notice. 'The time for the days are pretending to improve while nothing is done are over,' she said. 'We are really clear that we will be cracking down on those centres who are not delivering for those safe and quality environments for parents and for children. 'We take this responsibility incredibly seriously, that's why we have such a comprehensive program of reform.' However, in response to the reforms, early educator Rebecca Saville argued the changes were a 'Band-Aid fix', In a letter penned to the federal Early Childhood Education Minister Jess Walsh, Ms Saville said the sector didn't need announcements, but rather an 'overhaul' of 'how the sector is funded, staffed, regulated, and respected'. 'I was prompted to write the letter because I was hearing of other educators' concerns within the sector and how the new safety measures don't address the issues at heart and are a Band-Aid fix,' she said per The Daily Telegraph. Ms Houssos told media on Wednesday the government was working with ministers from across the country on the reforms, which she hopes would be 'pursued at a national level'. 'We have a sense of urgency for the reforms that we're pursuing,' she said. 'And we are going to get these changes under way.' 'We are hamstrung by the national law, but this is law that does pass through each of the individual parliaments,' she added. 'I want to be clear under performing centres that the time of pretending to improve while nothing is done are over.'
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
‘It's largely meaningless': Marco Rubio rebukes Australia's support of Palestinian Statehood
'It's largely meaningless': Marco Rubio rebukes Australia's support of Palestinian Statehood Published 13 August 2025, 9:32 am The Australian Government maintains Palestinian statehood will isolate Hamas, after Hamas praised the move to recognition. The Prime Minister is under pressure to explain how he will ensure the Palestinian Authority can deliver on its assurances to demilitarise and uphold democracy.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Australia and Vanuatu agree to $500m deal, but details remain scarce
Senior ministers from Australia and Vanuatu have trooped to the top of an active volcano on the island of Tanna for a ceremony to celebrate a major new pact between the two countries. Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles and Pacific Minister Pat Conroy joined their counterparts from Vanuatu on the top of Mount Yasur to "initial" the landmark Nakamal Agreement ahead of formal signature by prime ministers next month. Australia is set to funnel some $500 million into Vanuatu over a decade under the pact, which will supplant a bilateral security agreement that was effectively scrapped by the Pacific nation after it was signed in 2022. While most of the details in the agreement are not yet public, Australia has labelled it "transformational", and Mr Marles said it reflected the two nations had a "shared destiny". "What this agreement really does is, for the first time, acknowledge what has always been the truth, and that is that as two nations, we are family, and that our future is very much bound together," Mr Marles said. The Prime Minister of Vanuatu Jotham Napat declared the deal a "win-win" for both countries. "The agreement that has entered today will transpire into a lot of great benefits between the two countries, whether it be the security agreement, economic transformation, with some specific focus on the mobile labour mobility and financial support," Mr Napat told journalists in Tanna. Under the agreement, Australia is expected to funnel funding into a host of areas, including climate resilience, key infrastructure, security support, labour mobility and budget support. There were some last-minute negotiations to secure an in-principle agreement ahead of the ministers' arrival, with officials from Vanuatu telling the ABC that both sides had to make some late concessions in order to secure the pact. Mr Marles would not be drawn on exactly what financial commitments Australia had made, but said the Nakamal Agreement "acknowledges our shared economic connection". He added it "makes clear that it is core business for Australia to be engaged in the human development of Vanuatu". It is also not clear if the arrangement will make it easier for Ni-Vanuatu to travel to Australia. Ahead of the agreement, Mr Napat declared he would not sign unless Australia agreed to introduce "visa-free" travel for his country's citizens, an arrangement which Australia has never introduced for any Pacific island nations. When asked whether Australia had offered any concessions on this front, Mr Napat said there would be an "agenda item" on visa-free travel in the Nakamal Agreement, but also suggested the subject was still being discussed — saying Australia "would get back to us on that". While Australia has not outlined its position publicly, the ABC has been told that while a "visa free" arrangement was not on the table, the government was willing to discuss liberalising broader travel requirements for citizens of Vanuatu. Griffith Asia Institute Adjunct Associate Professor Tess Newton Cain said the question around travel was a "real issue for the Vanuatu government and for the prime minister personally". "He has said that this is a 'must have' as far as he is concerned and he knows that if it doesn't transpire, it will reflect badly on him," Dr Cain told the ABC. She also said other Pacific nations would be watching the discussions between Vanuatu and Australia closely. "If, and it's a big if, Australia does grant some degree of visa-free access, for example, for Vanuatu officials, it will be very significant because we would expect to see pressure from other Pacific island countries for the same," she said. The agreement comes as Australia pushes back against China's efforts to embed itself as a major commercial and security partner for Vanuatu. Vanuatu has leaned heavily on Chinese institutions to fund major infrastructure projects and Beijing recently gifted it a sprawling new presidential palace, which was estimated to cost $31 million. China's police training teams have also been playing an increasingly visible role in the Pacific island nation. Vanuatu is not expected to hand Australia any "veto" rights over security partnerships with outside countries under the Nakamal Agreement, as both Nauru and Tuvalu have done in their strategic pacts with Canberra. But federal government officials nonetheless hope the substantial commitments on security within the pact will help enshrine Australia's position as Vanuatu's top security partner. Dr Cain suggested the Nakamal Agreement would likely have greater staying power than the 2022 bilateral security agreement signed by former Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau, which first stalled in parliament before being effectively dumped by Mr Napat. "The process is the main difference — this has been signed off by both the National Security Council and the Council of Ministers, which did not happen in 2022," she said. "It also is being designated as much broader than simply a security agreement with commitments made across several domains, including climate resilience, economic development and budget support."
