US softens criticism of some Trump partner countries in scaled-back human rights report

Straits Times

2 days ago

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The US State Department has scaled back a key US government report on human rights worldwide.
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's administration has scaled back a key US government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some countries that have been strong partners of the Republican President, such as El Salvador and Israel, which rights groups say have extensive records of abuses.
Instead, the US State Department in its widely anticipated 2024 Human Rights Report sounded an alarm about the erosion of freedom of speech in Europe and ramped up criticism of Brazil and South Africa, countries Washington has clashed with over a host of issues.
Any criticism of governments over their treatment of LGBTQI rights, which appeared in Biden administration editions of the report, appeared to have been largely omitted. Washington referred to
Russia's invasion of Ukraine mainly as the 'Russia-Ukraine war'.
The report's section on Israel was much shorter than the previous year's edition and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in Gaza.
Some 61,000 people have died, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, as
a result of Israel's military operations in response to an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023.
The report was delayed for months as Mr Trump appointees altered an earlier State Department draft dramatically to bring it in line with 'America First' values, according to government officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The report introduced new categories such as 'Life', 'Liberty' and 'Security of the Person'.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Business Singapore banks face headwinds in rest of 2025, but DBS is pulling ahead: Analysts
Asia Southern Taiwan shuts down ahead of Typhoon Podul's arrival, hundreds of flights cancelled
Singapore Sengkang-Punggol LRT line back to full service: SBS Transit
Asia From Van Cleef to Vacheron, luxury gifts at centre of probe into South Korea's former first lady
World AI eroded doctors' ability to spot cancer within months in Lancet study
Singapore Yishun man admits to making etomidate-laced pods for vaporisers; first Kpod case conviction
Sport New Hui Fen becomes first Singaporean bowler to win PWBA Tour Player of the Year
Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story
'There were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses,' the 2024 report said about El Salvador, in sharp contrast with the 2023 report that talked about 'significant human rights issues' and listed them as credible reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, torture and harsh and life-threatening prison conditions.
Washington's bilateral ties with El Salvador have strengthened since Mr Trump took office, as the administration has deported people to El Salvador with help from President Nayib Bukele, whose country is receiving US$6 million (S$7.7 million) from the US to house the migrants in a high-security mega-prison.
Critics said the report was politically driven.
'The report demonstrates what happens when political agendas take priority over the facts,' said Mr Josh Paul, a former State Department official and director of non-governmental organisation A New Policy.
'The outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda release than of a democratic system.'
State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said the report was restructured to improve readability and that it was no longer an expansive list of 'politically biased demands and assertions'.
Ms Bruce declined to respond to specific questions about countries and did not say why a list of rights abuses in El Salvador was removed.
Differing assessments
The Trump administration has moved away from the traditional US promotion of democracy and human rights, seeing it as interference in another country's affairs, even as it criticised countries selectively, consistent with its broader policy towards a particular country.
One example is Europe, where Mr Trump officials repeatedly weighed in on European politics to denounce what they see as suppression of right-wing leaders, including in Romania, Germany and France, and accused European authorities of censoring views such as criticism of immigration.
For decades, the State Department's congressionally mandated human rights report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy.
The 2024 report was prepared following a major revamp of the department, which included the firing of hundreds of people, many from the agency's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labour, which takes the lead in writing the report.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio in April wrote an opinion piece that said the bureau had become a platform for 'left-wing activists', saying the Trump administration would reorient the bureau to focus on 'Western values'.
In Brazil, where the Trump administration has clashed with the government, the State Department found the human rights situation declined, after the 2023 report found no significant changes.
The 2024 report took aim at the courts, stating that they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of former president Jair Bolsonaro, among others.
Bolsonaro is on trial before the Supreme Court on charges that he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
Mr Trump has referred to the case as a 'witch hunt' and called it grounds for a 50 per cent tariff on Brazilian goods.
In South Africa, whose government the Trump administration has accused of racial discrimination towards Afrikaners, the current report said the human rights situation significantly worsened.
It stated that 'South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country'.
In the previous report, the State Department found no significant changes in the human rights situation in South Africa.
Mr Trump, earlier in 2025, issued an executive order that called for the US to resettle Afrikaners, describing them as victims of 'violence against racially disfavoured landowners', allegations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by South Africa's government.
South Africa dismissed the report's findings and said it was flawed, inaccurate and disappointing.
'It is ironic that a report from a nation that has exited the UN Human Rights Council and therefore no longer sees itself accountable in a multilateral peer review system would seek to produce one-sided fact-free reports without any due process or engagement,' the South African government said. REUTERS