Harvey Weinstein's next retrial could happen this fall
Manhattan Judge Curtis Farber said that he could sentence Weinstein on 30 September, but only if there's no retrial on a rape charge that the last jury failed to decide.
If there is a retrial, the judge wants it to happen this fall.
Weinstein, 73, was convicted in June of forcing oral sex on TV and movie production assistant and producer Miriam Haley in 2006. The charge carries a possible sentence of up to 25 years in prison.
At the same time, the same jury acquitted him of forcing oral sex on model Kaja Sokola, but couldn't decide a charge that he raped hairstylist and actress Jessica Mann in 2013.
Manhattan prosecutors reiterated on Wednesday that they and Mann are ready for another trial on the rape charge. In this case, any conviction is punishable by up to four years in prison.
Prosecutors requested a January trial date, but Farber proposed the fall.
'The case needs to be tried this year,' Farber said.
Weinstein lawyer Arthur Aidala agreed, urging the judge to set the earliest possible date.
If a fall trial happens, it would likely put Weinstein's high-profile #MeToo case back in court as Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is in the final stage of his reelection bid.
Bragg, a first-term Democrat who made prosecuting sex crimes cases a priority, has expressed satisfaction with Weinstein's conviction on a criminal sex act charge related to Haley. Bragg has said Mann deserves a verdict on her part of the case.
'This work, first and foremost, is about the survivors, and that's why we're prepared to go forward," Bragg said in June.
Weinstein also stands convicted of sex crimes in California. He is appealing that verdict and continued to deny all of the allegations against him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ohio Man Plants Massive 13-Acre Corn Maze with Secret Marriage Proposal Hidden Inside
'I wanted to do something big, something she'd never forget," farmer Tim Sullivan told ABC6 NEED TO KNOW Circle S Farms in Ohio recently revealed its 2025 corn maze design: a 13-acre marriage proposal from farmer Tim Sullivan to his now-fiancée, Caroline Liggett 'I wanted to do something big, something she'd never forget. Seeing her face when she realized what it said — I'll never forget that moment," Sullivan told ABC6 The elaborate maze was planted using a computerized tractor, and will be open to the public this fall An Ohio man's marriage proposal was a little corny. Farmer Tim Sullivan and his girlfriend, Caroline Liggett, privately flew over a 13-acre maze, which he designed to grow a hidden question: "Will You Marry Me, Caroline?" Ohio-based family farm Circle S Farms shared via it's 2025 corn maze design reveal Facebook post Aug. 5 that the surprise proposal was successful, as Liggett said, "Yes!" 'I wanted to do something big, something she'd never forget," Sullivan told ABC6. "Seeing her face when she realized what it said — I'll never forget that moment." The elaborate maze was complete with three pumpkin designs. Speaking with The Columbus Dispatch, Sullivan explained that he and other workers began planting the acres of corn using a computerized tractor on June 3. Later that month, the message was visible from the air. Sullivan was admittedly "super nervous" that someone else would fly over the field and spoil the surprise by posting a photo of it on social media, but luckily no one did. With the engagement ring in his pocket, Sullivan convinced Liggett to fly over the cornfield with him by pretending to have an interest in flying. Initially, Liggett missed the message — but after a second pass, she said saw the secret proposal and happily accepted. "I was just like so amazed that somebody put that much effort in planning into a proposal like that," Liggett told the local news outlet. "I expected he would do something quite elaborate and intentional, but nothing to that extreme by any means." The couple work at competing agricultural companies — Sullivan with Corteva Agriscience and Liggett with WinField United — so Liggett said, "It was only fitting that our proposal would happen with the cornfield." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The maze opens to the public "this fall" at Circle S Farms, allowing visitors to wander the romantic rows. "See you soon for a season full of fun, memories, and a little extra love in the air!" Circle S Farms wrote on Facebook. Sullivan and Liggett's wedding is planned for early summer 2026. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why you're probably better off just avoiding Rashee Rice in your fantasy football drafts this season
The 'will he, won't he' nature of Rashee Rice's potential and inevitable suspension saga took another turn Thursday morning. ESPN's Adam Schefter reported that Rice's disciplinary hearing with the NFL will take place on Tuesday, Sept 30 in New York, which means his suspension would only begin sometime after that date. When Rice entered into a plea bargain stemming from the 2024 multi-car crash in Dallas back in July, fantasy gamers assumed the NFL's disciplinary process would begin soon and Rice would serve his suspension — estimated anywhere from four to eight games — at the start of the season. That's now completely out the window, as he'll be eligible to play in the first four games of the 2025 NFL season. Those matchups include a Week 1 Brazil game with the Chargers, a Super Bowl rematch with the Eagles in Kansas City, a trip to New York vs. the Giants and a home game against the Ravens. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Beyond the fact that this has been a super laborious and drawn-out disciplinary process for someone who deserves immense scrutiny for what he did, this is straight-up bad for fantasy drafters considering Rice. I firmly believe fantasy content creators have gotten too over-focused on 'the weeks that matter' toward the end of the season rather than hammering how important it is to win in September, as I outline in my Draft Day Blueprint mega-article. However, it's objectively true that the easiest time to fill in the gap around a suspended or injured player is earlier in the season. There are no bye weeks to consider, you haven't sustained injuries yet and the most appealing waiver-wire heroes are often made apparent in the first few weeks of the year. Essentially, you have your whole lineup at your disposal to fill in the gaps. That will no longer be the case if Rice serves his four-to-eight-game suspension anywhere between Weeks 5 and 18. Not that the Chiefs have a Week 10 bye that can't count toward a suspension and there's no guarantee the league hands out punishment right after the September 30 hearing before their Week 5 kickoff against the Jaguars on October 6. We've seen this before. Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott was suspended six games during the 2017 NFL season over accusations of domestic violence. Elliott was originally suspended for the first six weeks of the season but after appeals and court litigation pushed it off, he ended up serving the suspension from Weeks 10 to 15. The process for both situations is an apples-to-apples comparison but the point is the same: You're in the Wild West of projecting when the player will miss time. Yahoo drafters were taking Rashee Rice at an ADP of 61st overall. That seemed more than fair enough of a risk/reward proposition for a player who has been ultra-productive in a terrific offensive ecosystem. Since he entered the league in 2023, Rice has been targeted on 27.4% of his routes, sixth-most among wide receivers who have run 300-plus routes, and ranks seventh in first downs per route run. I do have my concerns about Rice holding up to that level of production long-term, given that he doesn't have the complete WR1 skill set as a man-coverage-beating or downfield receiver that every other name in the top 10 of those two metrics brings to the table. The YAC-based zone-beaters who struggle to beat man coverage can be susceptible to environmental changes more than traditional WR1s. Just look back to JuJu Smith-Schuster's rise and fall for an example of this; I think they're incredibly similar players. However, that's more of a dynasty concern. If Rice is on the field for this Chiefs offense, he's likely ticketed for another year of heavy volume of layup targets as the team's power slot receiver, unless Xavier Worthy takes a massive leap forward. Before Thursday's update, I had Rice ranked 52nd overall and was willing to take the plunge in Round 5 even if he was set to miss the start of the season. Now that the suspension is a complete unknown from a timing perspective, the calculation has to change. I've hammered this over and over again this offseason but the Rounds 5-8 wide receiver draft board is just so appealing. There are even appealing picks all the way into the 110-to-120-overall range. None of those bets are flawless but at least I'm not walking into the season carrying a massive burden of unknown and locking myself into multiple missed games during crucial bye weeks. I won't sink Rice past that 120 overall range or anything like that, but a big dip into the 90s and outside the top-40 wide receivers feels appropriate. There's likely a way to take Rice, start him in the first four weeks and insulate your wide receiver corps with the deep pool of WRs this year to make up for his absent weeks. However, I question if the reward of such a pursuit is as great as the fantasy community may imagine. That's because there is another significant risk factor to Rice's profile that we haven't touched on here yet — and is way too often ignored in the fantasy circles. Rashee Rice is coming off a major injury that ended his 2024 season after less than four games. One of the (slightly galaxy brain) takes in some circles of the fantasy community over the last month — when Rice pled guilty in July — was that missing the first few games of the season may actually be good for Rice. This would allow him to get healthier coming off the significant injury and you wouldn't have to start him in the games he may be working back into form. Instead, you'd just plug him into the lineup when he's close to fully operational after four, six or however many games he missed. I'm not sure if that ever made sense but either way, that's out the window now. You're now getting Rice for those first four games when he may indeed be working back from that injury. And just because he's been practicing, you've seen some nice-looking clips of him and the team is saying he looks good, does not mean you are guaranteed anything close to 100% Rice when the real games begin. Drafters made this exact same mistake with Tank Dell last season for all the same reasons listed. Despite participating fully in the offseason, Dell was not productive to start the year, averaging 32.3 yards per game, 9.7 yards per catch and scoring just once in the first seven weeks of last season. It took no time at all when turning on the film in September to see that, while there was a wide receiver out there wearing No. 3 for the Houston Texans playing a normal snap count, that guy didn't play anything like the Tank Dell we saw cut through secondaries as a rookie before going on IR with a lower body injury. Dell eventually returned closer to form as the year wound down, but this still provides a cautionary tale when discussing Rice's projections early in 2025. We act like these guys are names on a spreadsheet, or players in Madden. They're not. Just because they're out there on the field doesn't mean they are capable of performing at their normal level when working back from something significant. Sometimes, it's the year after the year following the injury. Rice's 'ramp up back to normal in-game performance' phase could be in the first four weeks when he's eligible to play and is then whisked away from your lineup the moment he's turning the corner. That's not to mention how coming back from an injury like this may, at best, temporarily sap some of his explosiveness early in the season, which is troubling for a wideout who doesn't win down the field with nuance or separation, but rather as a hammerhead with speed and power in the open field. Maybe all of that worry is for naught and he's fantastic in the first four weeks of the season. That's within the range of outcomes. However, the risk is present and I don't see any of that discussed in the analysis of him from a fantasy standpoint, nor is it at all baked into either his current ADP or even where he was going in best-ball drafts prior to the July plea bargain. Rashee Rice is one of the riskiest propositions on the board in fantasy football drafts this year. It would be one thing if it were a simple four-game suspension to start the year. It's not. It's an unknown length of absence that will come in the middle of the season for a player working back from a significant injury, a player who inhabits a somewhat fragile role as a YAC-based zone-beater for an offense that desperately needs to find a downfield dimension. What if Xavier Worthy takes off in Year 2 as a vertical threat at the start of the season and only cements himself further while Rice is suspended? Are we absolutely confident that Rice returns to the type of outrageous volume he was getting in Weeks 1 to 3 last year? You have to be certain to wade into the incredibly clouded waters that now define his 2025 season. With how strong the wide receiver board is after Round 5, with a litany of appealing bets — some early in their career and others undervalued veterans — there are just too many ways the Rice selection can go wrong. He's a pretty easy avoid for me inside the top 90 selections and there are too many analysts focused on that per route efficiency for me to imagine he falls farther than that.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Government data is now in question. Here's where macro investors are turning to fill the gaps.
The firing of the BLS head by President Donald Trump has spooked some macro investors. Trump's nomination of a partisan economist may push investors to rely more heavily on other data. Sources like ADP, Homebase, and MIT's Billion Prices Project have become critical, traders say. No savvy investor makes a decision off a single data point, but there are some numbers that carry more weight than others. For many macro investors, the North Star has long been the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unit within the Department of Labor that measures, among other things, inflation, unemployment rates, and wage growth. Those in charge of the BLS have long been non-partisan economists, but President Donald Trump's firing of Commissioner Erika McEntarfer on August 1 and his top pick for her replacement, chief economist at the right-leaning Heritage Foundation, EJ Antoni, have many concerned with the validity of future government data, especially as Antoni floated pausing monthly jobs reports. Love Business Insider? Log in to Google and make us a preferred source. It's concerning for macro traders who rely on this data to make their bets, but there are non-governmental data sources that many already use. While helpful, these alternative databases can't replicate the widespread foundation BLS numbers provided for decades, where all market participants worked for the same set of basic facts about the state of the world's biggest economy. Still, traders are ramping up their use of this data in light of Trump's moves. "What's going to be tricky here is how to judge numbers coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics moving forward," said Andreas Steno Larsen, onetime macro investor and researcher, on his weekly podcast. He compared the firing to something that would happen "in Latin America" and predicted that investors would "look for alternative sources" to get a second opinion on the official data. Four macro investors pointed to the well-known ADP jobs report, which comes out monthly and tracks payroll from private employers, and MIT's Billion Prices Project as ways to track employment and inflation, respectively, in the US. The investors declined to be named because their firms don't authorize them to speak publicly. Some investors tap datasets that constantly scrape e-commerce prices, such as PriceStats, and track how different products rise and fall over time. This is a useful tool to understand Trump's tariff policies' impact, given the volume of online goods that US consumers buy from overseas. Payroll and scheduling company Homebase tracks more than 150,000 small businesses and produces monthly employment reports. LinkUp has tracked online job postings since 2007. Numerator has become a key source for in-person consumer data at places such as restaurants and home improvement stores. "Given the recent BLS conversations, we've recently seen demand for our data increase," Homebase CEO John Waldmann said in a statement. Not a replacement These alternative data sources are just that — alternative. They were used to get a sneak peek or a deeper look at inflation or unemployment figures that the government would release, not replace them entirely. They also sometimes vary. For example, ADP's payroll figures often diverge from the BLS's monthly jobs report, and MIT's Billion Prices Project can capture inflation trends sooner than the official CPI but is less comprehensive. "We don't see them replacing economic statistics altogether in the near future," said Julie Meigh, the head of ESG & macro research at alt-data platform Neudata, about non-traditional datasets. Even if BLS data becomes less trustworthy, the different macro investors who spoke with Business Insider said they'll still need to use it in some fashion unless there's a structural change in financial products. For example, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, change when the Consumer Price Index from the government is announced. For those who have exposure to these types of assets, ignoring the BLS is not possible even if the data becomes untrustworthy. As one trader at one of the world's biggest macro hedge funds said, he was surprised markets weren't more spooked by Trump's firing. Equity markets were near record highs, and bond yields stayed mostly steady. "I think it's clear that institutions are not as strong as many had thought," this individual said. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
