logo
Former VB teacher arrested for trespassing, child porn possession, had long history of violations, reprimands

Former VB teacher arrested for trespassing, child porn possession, had long history of violations, reprimands

Yahoo2 days ago

VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (WAVY) — Joseph Molineaux, the former Virginia Beach City Public Schools P.E. teacher recently charged with trespassing on school grounds and possession of child porn, received at least seven reprimands during his time with the school division.
His violations ranged from sending inappropriate texts to a substitute teacher in November 2021 to violating the Individuals with Disabilities Act in April 2006. They also included using 'language/phrases that made [students] feel uncomfortable' in May 2022, according to documents obtained by 10 On Your Side through a Freedom of Information Act request.
FOIA-Response-2025-06-03.pdf-redacted.pdf-redactedDownload
Molineaux was with the school system from August 1999 until he retired in February 2023. In that time, he was repeatedly threatened with dismissal unless he cleaned up his act, according to the documents.
'I cannot overstate how unprofessional and disturbing I find this situation and the need to reprimand you again for your behavior toward students,' an administrator at Kempsville High School wrote to him, less than a year before his retirement.
'To be clear, for you to remain employed, there must not be any additional incidents of this nature,' the letter concludes. 'In the future, if you do engage in inappropriate conduct or violate any other laws or any of the School Division's policies, procedures, or regulations, you will be recommended for dismissal.'
That letter describes allegations made by his own pupils that Molineaux had repeatedly teased certain pairs of students who were friends, accusing them of being in a relationship.
'Where are your boyfriends,' the document recounts Molineaux asking a student. 'Do you need him to go into the bathroom with you,' he allegedly asked another.
In the month before he left Kempsville in January 2023, administrators met with Molineaux to discuss his job performance and 'safety concerns with the learning environment.'
'In addition, you noted that security was called after students observed 'horseplaying' did not respond to a verbal redirection,' the letter documenting the meeting notes, of one of Molineaux's classes. 'As you acknowledged, the behavior observed was due to a lack of instruction planning and use of appropriate behavior interventions.'
A letter dated Nov. 3, 2021 includes pieces of text conversations between Molineaux and a substitute covering his class the previous month. In them, he asked the woman if she was getting an operation to become a man.
The substitute teacher subsequently told administrators she couldn't continue to cover the class.
'I'm going to try to extend my absence based on your experiences,' he texted her, according to the document. 'I don't want to walk into a firestorm.'
In January 2021, Molineaux was disciplined for taking two flashlights from a security locker at Kempsville High. Two months later, he was reprimanded for failing to request a substitute teacher and properly report that he would be absent.
'[T]his left students without adult supervision for 26 minutes,' the letter referencing that incident reads.
In September 2011, Molineaux was admonished for his locker room talk while working at Green Run High School, after the parent of a student reported what he had said.
'Through students' statements and your own admission, it was established you did use profanity (mother f——s) and speak in an overly angry tone toward the students in the locker room,' the letter for that incident reads. 'You later apologized for your behavior.'
In January 2006, Landstown High administrators sent an email to Molineaux referencing 'conduct unbecoming of a School Division Employee.'
'I am formally reprimanding you for making an anonymous phone call to the Virginian Pilot on December, 16, 2005, at 5:10 p.m. in response to an article… titled 'Lessons learned at Landstown?'' it reads. 'The phone call included profanity, and statements that may be construed as threatening.'
An April 2006 letter describes Molineaux's repeated failure to meet with students who had IEPs (Individualized Educational Plans) and to complete the associated paperwork.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supreme Court helps DOGE keep information from watchdog group
Supreme Court helps DOGE keep information from watchdog group

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court helps DOGE keep information from watchdog group

The Supreme Court granted the Trump administration's bid to keep information about the inner workings of the Department of Government Efficiency from being disclosed to a watchdog group while litigation continues in the case. Over dissent from the court's three Democratic appointees, the order follows a temporary reprieve in DOGE's favor on May 23 from Chief Justice John Roberts. Roberts' administrative stay was in effect pending further word from him or the full court, which came Friday when the justices sent the case back to the lower court, reasoning that a judge's order against DOGE was too broad. The high court order was issued along with another order favoring DOGE in a separate case involving access to Social Security data. In this watchdog case, the federal government argued that DOGE isn't technically an agency and is therefore exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. The government argued that a district court judge in D.C. had turned FOIA 'on its head' by ordering DOGE to 'submit to sweeping, intrusive discovery just to determine if USDS [DOGE] is subject to FOIA in the first place.' A federal appellate panel refused to halt the judge's discovery order, and the administration appealed to the justices for emergency relief, as it has done in several cases during Donald Trump's second term. The government urged the justices to reject what it called a 'fishing expedition' into 'sensitive executive-branch functions.' The watchdog group that brought the lawsuit, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, opposed DOGE's urgent bid. CREW said the government was trying to prematurely get the justices to decide that DOGE isn't an agency subject to FOIA, arguing that what's at issue here is the 'far narrower antecedent question: whether the court of appeals clearly and indisputably erred in refusing to disturb a district court order allowing limited discovery to ascertain DOGE's agency status.' It said the government 'has raised a fact-intensive legal issue supported by unreliable evidence, did so in a manner it was explicitly told would lead to discovery, and now needs to respond.' Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on

US Supreme Court keeps DOGE records blocked in watchdog group's challenge
US Supreme Court keeps DOGE records blocked in watchdog group's challenge

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US Supreme Court keeps DOGE records blocked in watchdog group's challenge

By Andrew Chung (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court extended on Friday its block on judicial orders requiring the Department of Government Efficiency to turn over records to a government watchdog group that sought details on the entity established by President Donald Trump and previously spearheaded by his billionaire former adviser Elon Musk. The court put on hold Washington-based U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper's orders for DOGE to respond to requests by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington for information about its operations. The judge concluded that DOGE likely is a government agency covered by the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The brief, unsigned order said that portions of one of the judge's decisions "are not appropriately tailored" and that "separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal Executive Branch communications." The court sent the case back to a lower appeals court to narrow the judge's directives. The court's three liberal justices - Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson - dissented from Friday's decision. In a separate case, the Supreme Court on Friday permitted DOGE broad access to personal information on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. DOGE has played a central role in Trump's efforts to downsize and reshape the U.S. government including by slashing the federal workforce and dismantling certain agencies. The watchdog group, called CREW, said its intention was to shed light on what it called DOGE's secretive structure and operations. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30 and his once-close relationship with Trump has since unraveled publicly, a split that followed Musk's recent attacks on the president's sweeping tax and spending bill and played out dramatically on social media on Thursday. CREW sued to obtain an array of records from DOGE through the FOIA statute, a law that allows the public to seek access to records produced by government agencies. It sought information on DOGE's activities over its role in the mass firings and cuts to federal programs pursued since the Republican president returned to office in January. "While we're obviously disappointed that the Supreme Court chose to revise aspects of our discovery requests, we're pleased that the court allowed discovery to proceed," said CREW spokesperson Jordan Libowitz after Friday's decision. Prior to Friday's order, Chief Justice John Roberts had imposed a temporary pause on Cooper's orders to give the court more time to consider the dispute. The Trump administration contends that DOGE is an advisory entity and not subject to FOIA. In response, CREW sought information to determine whether DOGE is subject to FOIA because it wields the kind of authority of an agency independent of the president. Cooper ruled in April that DOGE must turn over some records sought by CREW and that the group was entitled to question DOGE official Amy Gleason at a deposition. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit declined on May 14 to put Cooper's order on hold. The administration urged the Supreme Court to act, saying that the judge's orders intruded on the powers of the executive branch and compromised the ability of a wide array of advisers to provide candid and confidential advice to the president. CREW told the justices that siding with the administration in the dispute would give the president "free reign" to create new entities that would "functionally wield substantial independent authority but are exempt from critical transparency laws." In one of his decisions, Cooper said DOGE's operations have been marked by "unusual secrecy." In another, the judge said that the language of Trump's executive orders concerning DOGE suggests that it is "exercising substantial independent authority."

Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard does not have document demanded in FOIA lawsuit, attorney says
Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard does not have document demanded in FOIA lawsuit, attorney says

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard does not have document demanded in FOIA lawsuit, attorney says

Attorneys for former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard say they will file an affidavit explaining she does not have records required as part of an ongoing lawsuit. Henyard was required to appear in court Friday at the Daley Center in Chicago to produce documents requested last year by the nonprofit Edgar County Watchdogs that are public via the Freedom of Information Act. Cook County Judge Kate Moreland filed an order holding her in contempt May 23 for repeated violations of court orders. Though Henyard was called to testify, Henyard's attorney, Beau Brindley, told Moreland she would not take the stand due to an ongoing federal investigation into possible misconduct during her tenure as Dolton's mayor. Brindley confirmed after the hearing he is representing Henyard in the federal investigation. 'She does not have these documents,' Brindley said. 'The one document they're asking for, she doesn't remember what it is. She doesn't possess it.' The Edgar County Watchdogs sued Dolton in February 2024 after failing to receive documents requested the month prior. The lawsuit claims the groups made two separate requests Jan. 5, 2024, neither of which received a response from Henyard's office. Attorneys for the Edgar County Watchdogs said Friday the village helped fulfill the first request, copies of all credit card statements since Oct. 1, 2023. However, they still not received copy of a document Henyard showed at a January public meeting while stating trustees canceled the credit card, stating the document was proof. 'We don't believe that someone can just burn a piece of paper or get rid of … the document, and the Watchdogs aren't going to stop until they get it,' attorney Edward Coach Winehouse said after the hearing. Judge Moreland affirmed Friday that Henyard would be fined $1,000 per day as of May 30 until she produced the records responsive to the group's request or filed the affidavit. Brindley said the affidavit would be filed by Monday. After the hearing, Brindley told the Daily Southtown the case represents a 'pretty unfair focus on Mayor Henyard, who has been out of office for awhile now.' 'This is about one piece of paper at a board meeting that she had like a year ago, and they seem to suggest that she's going to still have it,' Brindley said. 'She doesn't even know what it is, and the fact that they've gone to all this trouble and a contempt hearing and everything else is just silly.' Edgar County Watchdogs claim in the lawsuit the only response to their Jan. 5 FOIA requests came from Village Clerk Alison Key, informing them the village administrator at the time, Keith Freeman, instructed staff not to reply to requests that she entered. 'Hopefully, you will get what you are requesting,' Key wrote the day the request was received. Henyard's tenure as mayor, which ended last month, showed a pattern of ignored or denied public records requests. The Daily Southtown reported last year the Illinois attorney general's office received more than 50 related complaints between January 2021 and April 2024 regarding ignored or denied FOIA requests. The attorney general's office also received more than 30 similar complaints from Thornton Township from January 2022 and August 2024, when Henyard was supervisor. The Daily Southtown sought records from Dolton in May 2023, and followed up again in August of that year. While the Freedom of Information Act requests were acknowledged as received, there was no response. In May 2024, lawyers for the Daily Southtown sent a letter to Dolton officials, including Henyard, outlining the lack of response and requesting the village adhere to the law and turn over records. It too was ignored. In February 2024, the attorney general's office issued a binding opinion ordering Dolton to produce records requested by WGN. The village did not, and WGN eventually won a court ruling demanding the documents be turned over. ostevens@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store