‘A dog cemetery would not be treated like this': the fight to preserve Black burial grounds in the US
The nearly two-acre site in the Washington DC suburb covers the historic Moses Macedonia African Cemetery and another burial ground for enslaved people, with the oldest portion dating back to at least the mid-1800s. Hundreds of bones found there may be the remains of enslaved people and their descendants, while more bodies may lie under the parking lot of the Westwood Tower apartment complex.
But like many resting grounds for Black Americans, its preservation is jeopardized by loss of its original community through gentrification and, now, encroaching development. And despite a recent federal law to protect Black cemeteries, they are vulnerable to neglect and eventual destruction.
Coleman-Adebayo is the president of the Bethesda African Cemetery Coalition (Bacc), which since 2016 has aimed to save the site from further development and return the land to the descendant community. It plans to eventually erect a museum or monument there. She first learned about the cemetery a year earlier, when she attended a joint county park and planning commission meeting where she met a longtime resident who recalled playing in the long-forgotten cemetery as a child.
Every week, Bacc members stage a protest at the McDonald's parking lot next door. Separated into several parcels, the portion of the burial ground that was leveled for Westwood Tower's parking lot in the 1960s is now owned by the housing opportunities commission of Montgomery county (HOC), which provides low-income housing. Another part of the cemetery, owned by the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, is overgrown with vegetation. A third section, held by the self-storage developer 1784 Capital Holdings, has incited ongoing Bacc protests since construction for a storage facility began in 2017. The burial site has turned into a legal battleground as the coalition has spent several years in court fighting the HOC.
The dispute at Moses Macedonia African Cemetery serves to 'open up the conversation about what a major problem that African Americans are having at these sites,' said Michael Blakey, a National Endowment for the Humanities professor of anthropology, Africana studies and American studies at the College of William and Mary. For over a decade beginning in the 1990s, Blakey directed the African Burial Ground Project at Howard University, where he and a team of researchers analyzed more than 400 skeletal remains of enslaved and free Africans interred in New York City in the 17th and 18th centuries. His work was guided by the descendants' questions about their ancestors. 'Even when they assert their rights as a descendent community, it's a wrestling match with bureaucracies, sometimes even anthropologists,' he said.
Burial rites reveal a society's values in life and in death, Blakey added. 'The desecration of Black cemeteries is a reflection, whether in slavery or in current development projects … of the lack of empathy with African Americans as complete human beings,' he said. 'And African Americans, from slavery to the present, have defended those cemeteries with sure knowledge of their full humanity and an insistence upon their dignity.'
The Moses Macedonia African Cemetery in Bethesda; the Evergreen Cemetery in St Petersburg, Florida; and the Buena Vista plantation's burial ground in St James parish, Louisiana, demonstrate ongoing fights to preserve Black burial sites in the face of development throughout the US. Amid the scant oversight of Black cemeteries, a growing movement of descendant communities and their allies are protecting the grounds by documenting their existence, protesting development and performing genealogical research on the buried.
On a rainy May evening, Coleman-Adebayo held a large white sign listing violations of what she considers a sacred space. 'Even a dog cemetery would not be treated like this,' she told the Guardian. As an Environmental Protection Agency whistleblower who sounded the alarm on US vanadium mining in South Africa in the 1990s, Coleman-Adebayo has a long history of activism. She also helped spearhead the No Fear Act, which discourages retaliation and discrimination in the federal government.
Bacc contends that, during a 2020 excavation, a dump truck took earth from the cemetery to a landfill. Members followed and say they found 30 funerary objects including pieces of cloth, a hair pick and a tombstone. They have also demanded the return of 200 bones held by a consulting firm in a Gainesville, Virginia, warehouse to no avail. In August, a circuit court will hear a case in which Bacc and several other plaintiffs are requesting $40m in compensation from the HOC for emotional damage and to build a museum.
Coleman-Adebayo looked somberly at the scaffolding erected by self-storage developer 1784 Capital Holdings. 'Look what they're building here on the bodies of African people,' Coleman-Adebayo said. 'How did they die? How did they live? What happened to them? And the county could care less because they're Black.'
The HOC and 1784 Capital Holdings did not respond to requests for comment by publication date.
The River Road community, an African American enclave linked to the cemetery, was a once bustling district with Black land ownership, a school and the Macedonia Baptist church, which opened in 1920. By the 1950s and 1960s, the area was zoned for commercial use. Now, Coleman-Adebayo's husband, the Rev Olusegun Adebayo, chairs Bacc's board and pastors the church, the only surviving institution of the historically Black community.
Black cemeteries have long been threatened. In the 18th century, Blakey said, Black cemeteries were also used to dump waste from pottery factories and tanneries. Historian and anthropologist Lynn Rainville, who has researched Black cemeteries for 20 years, noted that Black bodies were dug up to use as cadavers for 19th-century medical research. But robbers rarely disinterred Black bodies to steal objects or jewelry, as they frequently did to Indigenous burial grounds. After the civil war, Black cemeteries were usually placed in areas with cheaper property values, which later became prime real estate for developers. Some Black cemeteries were also neglected following the great migration of the early 20th century, when 6 million Black people moved from the south to other parts of the US for economic opportunity and to escape racism. As a result, many Black people moved away from their ancestors' graves.
'The Black living communities have long since been forced out of there because of high taxes, high property values,' Rainville said. 'The cemetery is the last of what's left, and then it is at greatest risk.'
The development at the Moses Macedonia African Cemetery shows that American society values certain bodies over others, said Rainville: 'If 2,000 prominent, wealthy people in Bethesda, Maryland, came forward and said, 'Hey, these are my relatives,' it would have been stopped by now. No one's digging up Thomas Jefferson, for example. There is a hierarchy of what and when in American society is considered OK to move.'
During his travels and work throughout the world, Blakey found that development is the paramount threat to Black cemeteries. He recalled discussing with a Howard University colleague in the 1970s about how Black internment sites, he said, 'were the places developers were said to be most fond of because they knew they could dispose of them with greater ease'.
A federal law similar to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), which requires institutions and federal agencies to return human remains and artifacts to their descendant Indigenous tribes, does not exist for Black Americans, said Rainville. Signed into law in the 1990s, the NAGPRA came after hundreds of years of the desecration of Native American graves.
In recent years, a national movement has emerged to protect Black graves by creating a law that parallels the NAGPRA. Enacted into law in 2022, the African American Burial Grounds Preservation Act authorized the National Park Service to fund federal and state agencies, as well as non-profits' efforts, to research and preserve Black cemeteries. But the National Park Service told the Guardian that it has not awarded any grants so far, since Congress has not allocated money to the program.
Seeing a need to prevent the erasure of African American burial grounds in her local community, University of South Florida anthropology chair and professor Antoinette Jackson created the Black Cemetery Network, a database of internment sites throughout the US. Of the 193 cemeteries listed on the site, Jackson said that up to 70% of them face preservation challenges, including threats from development, legal battles or lack of resources.
A lack of Black political power in the early 20th century fueled neglect and subsequent loss of cemeteries through tax sales, she added. 'It was by design, because many of the ones that were lost were in what became a desirable area for that time,' Jackson said. 'Up until the 1965 Civil Rights Act, [Black political] representation wasn't there in many of these governmental agencies, committees and commissions. So, often, there was no one to defend them, and they were easily given away or changed hands without people really being aware.'
She cites a 2021 Florida law that protects abandoned African American cemeteries as a potential model for other states. The law created a taskforce that identified and researched cemeteries, and led an advisory council that provides recommendations for their preservation. Research and academic institutions, non-profits and local governmental organizations may also apply for a grant of up to $50,000 to conduct historical and genealogical research, or to restore and maintain abandoned cemeteries.
Jackson received that state grant to find the descendants of the Evergreen Cemetery – one of three graveyards buried under Interstate 175 and Tropicana Field, a St Petersburg stadium being considered for redevelopment. Through Jackson's work, St Petersburg city council member Corey Givens Jr learned that his great-great-great-uncle was buried in the historically Black cemetery.
Givens wants the city to conduct a ground-penetrating radar survey of the site to see if any burials remain there. That was done for Oaklawn Cemetery, where mostly white people were interred and at least 10 possible graves were recently found. But the Florida department of transportation, which owns the property where Evergreen and another Black cemetery, Moffett, are located, has refused to allow a survey.
Givens hopes that the descendants of people interred in Evergreen and Moffett will have a say in the future of the site. 'Do we just want to leave these bodies there? Or do we feel like we want to spend tax dollars and move these bodies elsewhere?' Givens told the Guardian. 'I really want the community to be in charge of this conversation. I want them to lead it because I don't trust the same governing body that said 'out of sight, out of mind'.'
At the site of the Buena Vista plantation in St James parish, Louisiana, the Louisiana Bucket Brigade and Inclusive Louisiana environmental justice groups are using genealogical research of enslaved people buried on the land to fight the construction of a petrochemical facility.
The Louisiana Bucket Brigade and Inclusive Louisiana learned through a public records request of the Louisiana division of archaeology's emails that a graveyard for enslaved Africans existed on the land where the Taiwanese company Formosa Plastics planned to construct a $9.4bn facility. Lenora Gobert, the Louisiana Bucket Brigade's genealogist, spent years researching the mortgage and conveyance records from plantation owner Benjamin Winchester to learn the names of the enslaved people buried there between 1820 and 1861. In 2024, the non-profit released a report detailing the lives of five enslaved people ages nine to 31. Among them was 18-year-old Betsy, who was buried on the plantation's edge and mortgaged by the Winchesters at least seven times in life and death.
Anne Rolfes, the Louisiana Bucket Brigade's director, hopes that evidence of the graveyard will help further stall or cancel the development. She would like descendant communities to have a say in how the area is memorialized and programming that honors the area's history.
'How about we just stop all this petrochemical expansion? It destroys these really sacred places, and it's not economic development. It's destruction, massive disruption and illness,' Rolfes told the Guardian. 'So let's instead center this. That would preserve the communities. It would provide so many more jobs. It would be deeply meaningful. It would be a beacon to the rest of the country.'
Meanwhile, in Bethesda, about 100 people attended Bacc's 'rebellion' on 19 June, Coleman-Adebayo said, during which the group featured poetry, dancing and speakers who talked about the struggle to protect the cemetery. Bacc also protested at the county's Juneteenth event on 21 June.
At Bacc's Juneteenth event, member Joann SM Bagnerise received an award for her outstanding advocacy. Bagnerise, an 87-year-old from Dumfries, Virginia, has traveled over an hour each way to join the coalition's weekly protests for several years. During a recent May protest, she sat in a chair under an umbrella and said: 'The desecration of hallowed grounds is un-American.' The high-rise apartment at the center of the dispute towered behind her. 'There are young teenagers buried here,' she said. 'There are mothers and fathers.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Was JD Vance's birthday picture photoshopped? Questions raised over GOP's celebratory tweet
When JD Vance turned 41 at the weekend, the GOP posted a picture wishing the vice president a happy birthday. The photo, taken in January when he arrived to take the oath of office on Inauguration Day, seemed harmless enough. However, some eagle-eyed observers have now claimed the picture may have been digitally altered. The most obvious difference between the two images is that a line of stars on the U.S. flag are missing in the birthday picture, over Vance's left shoulder. It gives the impression his whole body has shifted to the left so the white stripe of the flag has moved to a new position. Vance's right arm also looks slightly misshapen in the birthday picture, though this may be a result of imposing the giant text added to it. More subtly, it appears that Vance is slimmer around the waist than he is in the original image, posters on X have claimed. Chris D. Jackson, Democrat party chair in Tennessee, said: 'The photoshop you guys did to his face and then to make his waist smaller is hilarious. LMFAO so embarrassing.' Billie Nelson, another X user, highlighted that Vance 'is not that snatched!' also suggesting he was not as slim in the original image. 'What in the Ozempic Photoshop is this?' she said, referring to the highly popular weight-loss jab currently slashing obesity rates in the U.S. The Independent contacted Vance's office and the RNC for comment on the apparent differences in the two pictures. This is not the first time images of JD Vance have become a talking point on social media. In October last year, Republican congressman Mike Collins of Georgia posted a picture of Vance with a much more chiseled appearance, prompting mockery online. X users then came up with their own, far less flattering, alterations of the future vice president's portrait. And in March, Vance became an internet meme after his face was used in a series of 'baby face' edits on X. His facial features appeared blown out, with puffed cheeks and wide eyes. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Palantir—a company too small to make the Fortune 500—became one of the world's 25 most valuable companies
Alex Karp, the frizzy-haired CEO of defense software company Palantir, has become somewhat of a pro at deflecting criticism. As he sat for an interview in April at the tech policy-focused Hill and Valley Forum in Washington D.C. and a heckler started shouting at him from the balcony, Karp retorted rather calmly, telling the audience he believed it was her right to express her views. But this week—after Palantir reported blockbuster earnings on Monday—Karp took a moment to bask in his company's meteoric rise and take a jab at his critics. Palantir, based in Denver, surpassed $1 billion in quarterly revenue for the first time this week, posting growth figures that blew past analyst estimates. Palantir's stock soared to more than $160 a share, marking a 555% increase from this time last year. By market close on Tuesday, Palantir's market cap had hit nearly $409 billion, making it the 23rd most valuable company in the world, just behind Johnson & Johnson, a company with more than 23 times Palantir's revenue and more than 35x the number of employees. As he started speaking on Monday's earnings call, Karp, who has a PhD in neoclassical social theory, was absolutely delighted—and true to form, a bit snarky, too. 'Well, as usual, I've been cautioned to be a little modest about our bombastic numbers, but honestly, there's no authentic way to be anything but have enormous pride and gratefulness about these extraordinary numbers,' Karp said. As he wrapped up the call, he gave a quippy message to retail investors about the analysts that have 'been wrong about every quarter.' 'Maybe stop talking to all the haters—they're suffering,' he said. Palantir, a software company co-founded by Peter Thiel, has many 'haters,' as Karp puts it. As a tech company that got its start selling to the U.S. military during the War on Terror, Palantir has been fully embedded in some of the most polarizing political debates of modern geopolitics. Particularly now, Palantir has stirred criticism over its software being used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as well as the Israeli military. On the financial side, there's a different kind of critic: those who question how such a relatively small company—one whose revenue and profits are so small in comparison to peers that it doesn't even qualify for the Fortune 500 list—could reasonably become one of the most valuable companies in the world. For Palantir, it has been a slow, albeit volatile, climb to where it is now—marked by contentious legal battles, noisy protests and picket lines, and an eccentric leadership team and employee base who sometimes endearingly refer to one another as 'hobbits,' in credit to the company's Lord of the Rings nomenclature (Palantir is in reference to the seeing stones created by Elves that allow people to see far away or communicate with others). And, more recently, in the last two years, Palantir has ridden the generative AI wave. 'They've got their feet under them—they've got their sales cycle down a little bit more. They're just making things really, really sticky for large multinational corporations,' says Evan Loomis, a venture capitalist who is close friends with Palantir cofounder Joe Lonsdale and whose construction technology startup, ICON, uses Palantir's software platform Foundry. While the company is currently one of the best-performing stocks in the S&P 500, Palantir's stock has also been known to be incredibly volatile, and sometimes dramatically influenced by retail investor activity. Palantir is undoubtedly having a moment—but will it last? 'Two times more expensive' There are a host of near-term data points analysts look at: sales, cash flow, profit, customer retention. If you look at most of these near-term fundamentals, Palantir is trading at a premium. 'They are trading at least two times more expensive on the traditional metrics,' says Mariana Pérez Mora, an equity analyst at Bank of America Securities, who has been following the company since 2022. But, as we speak, Pérez Mora reminds me about another important, longer-term metric for SaaS companies that Karp has repeatedly reminded onlookers to pay close attention to. That metric is called the 'Rule of Forty.' The Rule of Forty figure is calculated by adding the year-over-year revenue growth rate and adjusted operating margin. If those percentages are collectively higher than 40%, you have sustainable growth. If you look at Palantir's last quarter, Pérez Mora points out, the rule of 40 was 94%. 'That is the type of growth they are having. And the reality is that growth is accelerating, and that accelerating growth is not at the expense of profitability. And that is pretty unique,' she says, adding: 'Palantir is trading as the company that they are growing into, and this is why it's more expensive.' There are a few key contributors to these numbers. For one, new government contracts. Palantir has been working with the government since the beginning—its first customer being the CIA—and government contracts still make up a majority of its business. At the end of July, Palantir signed a 10-year contract worth up to $10 billion with the U.S. Army. It was one of the largest software contracts the Department of Defense has ever signed and, by far, Palantir's largest contract to-date. And, ironically, it is the same customer Palantir sued (successfully) almost 10 years ago, accusing the department of unlawfully excluding companies like Palantir from its procurement process. There could be more contracts of this scale on the table, too. The Fostering Reform and Government Efficiency Act, or FoRGED Act, currently on the table would reshape the Department of Defense's procurement process for private contracts, eliminating hundreds of statutes and making it easier for tech companies like Palantir to sell to the government. The legislation, which Palantir has publicly endorsed and which its executives have pushed for in public hearings, would likely cut into the advantage that some of the industry incumbents like Boeing, Lockheed Martin, RTX, and Northrop Grumman have gained over the years. The Department of Defense has been making trims to its budget since Trump named Pete Hegseth to the top role. But Palantir is seemingly benefitting from that, too. Only a couple months after the Department of Defense said it had cut more than $5.1 billion in contracts to consulting agencies, including Accenture and Deloitte, both companies announced new strategic partnerships with Palantir to collectively deliver solutions to government clients. But the lion share of growth at Palantir over the last year is coming from a newer segment of customers—the commercial side of the business. Revenue for the commercial side rose 93% year-over-year this past quarter. And nearly all of those contracts stem from the generative artificial intelligence platform it released in 2023, called 'AIP' (which stands for the ever-original 'artificial intelligence platform'). Perez Mora says that while a lot of companies are building and offering large language models, Palantir has found a way to help companies make use of them—and drive real results for their businesses. On this last earnings call, Karp said that Citibank was onboarding its customers and running the relevant know-your-customer and security checks in seconds, down from nine days. He said that residential mortgage enterprise Fannie Mae is uncovering mortgage fraud in seconds, versus two months. And he said that Lear Corporation is using Palantir's platform to manage tariff exposure. Investors seem to have taken note, as there is a direct correlation between the launch of AIP in 2023 and the steady upward trajectory Palantir's stock has experienced since. But generative AI is still new—and many companies and industries haven't fully explored or realized just what jobs AI will be able to replace or make more efficient. Palantir itself doesn't seem to have it sorted out either. CEO Karp said in an interview on CNBC this week that he thinks Palantir could keep growing revenue while reducing headcount by 500 jobs to about 3,600 people. But if you look at Palantir's headcount, it has been doing the opposite: adding about 200 people between 2023 and 2024, not cutting roles. For all that companies like Alphabet or Salesforce are boasting of the efficiencies they are adding within their ranks by using AI, those same companies have seen their workforces grow. One of Silicon Valley's most controversial companies Palantir's valuation may be climbing to new heights, but the company is as controversial as ever. They've been the target of sit-ins, picketings, and other protests that have pulled in hundreds of people in New York City, Palo Alto, Denver, Seattle, and Los Angeles, condemning Palantir's contract with the ICE (Palantir has been running a six-month pilot contract 'centered on enforcement prioritization and immigration lifecycle management,' the company says.) Palantir has a partnership with the Israeli Defense Forces for 'war-related missions,' which has also come under fire. A report submitted to the UN Human Rights Council in June that singled out companies aiding Israel in the war in Gaza, including Lockheed Martin, said there was 'reasonable grounds to believe' Palantir was providing automatic predictive policing technology and core defense infrastructure to Israel. A Palantir spokeswoman said the company 'does not provide the technology for Israel to conduct missile strikes or targeting operations in Gaza and has no involvement in the Lavendar or Gospel systems. These targeting capabilities are entirely independent of and predate our partnership with Israel's Ministry of Defense.' Karp addressed some of the criticism Palantir has received over the years on the last earnings call. 'Palantir gets attacked just because we help make this country even better, because we support the values, because we defend it,' he said. Earlier this year, Karp and Palantir's head of corporate affairs, Nicholas Zamiska, published The Technological Republic, which criticizes Silicon Valley for spending its time on consumer apps and dodging working with the government and playing a role in defending freedoms and democracy. But there has also been some notable pushback even from former employees in the last couple years. In May, more than a dozen former Palantir employees signed an open letter to the tech community, alleging that Palantir had violated principles core to the company due to its work with the Trump Administration. 'Palantir prides itself on [a] culture of fierce internal dialogue and even disagreement on difficult issues related to our work,' a Palantir spokeswoman said. 'The small number of former Palantir employees—13 of 4,000—raising concerns are certainly entitled to express their views.' Despite heightened criticism on the public stage, Silicon Valley has come to not only accept, but embrace defense tech since 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine. It's one of the hottest sectors around right now, with companies like drone startup Anduril garnering a $30.5 billion valuation in the private markets. Indeed, tech companies used to shy away from defense contracts. But under the Trump Administration, there's been a tidal shift. Meta teamed up with Anduril to start working on helmet and headset projects for the U.S. military. Numerous LLM companies, including OpenAI, xAI, and Anthropic, started working with the Department of Defense on national security. Even Google, which famously stopped working with the government in 2018 after internal upheaval from its employees, has gotten into the military business. In some ways, Palantir—and SpaceX, too—have been a catalyst for the shift. Palantir had initially been rejected from top Silicon Valley venture capital firms when the founders tried to raise initial capital, as Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins both famously passed on the investment. Cofounder Thiel ended up putting in much of his own money and raising capital from former officials from President George W. Bush's administration as well as the CIA's venture capital firm In-Q-Tel. Now, with Thiel protegee J.D. Vance as Vice President of the United States, and a defense-tech-friendly White House in charge, the company has access to the inner circle at the highest levels of power. And Karp, who pens a 'letter to shareholders' that's published on Palantir's site in English, German, and French each quarter alongside the financial results, has a lot of thoughts to share. 'The United States is not, and should not be permitted to become, a soft compromise and amalgam of global values and tastes,' Karp wrote in his most recent letter, referencing a 1943 work by C.S. Lewis which describes 'men without chests.' 'Such men without chests,' Karp says, 'promise to shepherd us forward yet lack much substance and content, even a flicker of an animating worldview or belief structure, other than their own self-preservation and advancement.' For now, at least, Karp's worldview and Palantir's business seem to be defying the critics, the haters, and the chestless. This story was originally featured on


Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Kat Timpf: Is there ever a bad time for Trump?
Greg Gutfeld and the 'Gutfeld!' panelists discuss President Donald Trump's recent media appearances and his efforts to renovate the White House.