Areas deemed littered at lowest level in five years - but Dublin and Cork have 'deteriorated'
The survey of 40 towns and cities, which is carried out by the environment NGO An Taisce on behalf of IBAL, found that two-thirds of towns were clean overall, an increase on last year.
Naas topped the ranking for the second year in a row, ahead of Ennis and Killarney.
However, the IBAL survey said that while Dublin and Cork city centres have improved in advance of the peak season for visitors, the capital's North Inner City and Cork Northside have both 'deteriorated'.
Cork Northside fell to 'seriously littered', while Dublin's North Inner City, also seriously littered, came out at the bottom of the survey. Only two of the 25 sites surveyed in the area warranted a clean grade – the lowest number in years.
'Considerable improvements' were noted at some Dublin sites previously deemed as heavily littered, including Middle Abbey Street, O'Connell Street, North Frederick Street and beside the Jervis Luas.
Among the litter blackspots found were Spencer Dock, which suffered from dumping of household items; Dorset Lane, where large black sacks, a mattress and clothing items were strewn about; and the environs of the Royal Canal, where sacks of rubbish and other miscellaneous items, including some tents, featured among the litter.
It said that dumping on Dominic Lane and a littered basement on Parnell Square prevented Dublin from attaining 'clean' status.
IBAL
IBAL
'Unfortunately litter was everywhere in the North Inner City, in stark contrast to the City Centre just a few streets away,' IBAL's Conor Horgan said.
Advertisement
Horgan said the negative impact of waste collection by bags instead of bins 'appears greater than ever'.
He added that there would likely be 'no progress' in the North Inner City without a ban on bags, and called on Dublin City Council to convert the city to bin collection services.
Businesses in Dublin city centre
will be banned from leaving their waste in plastic bags for collection
from 16 September.
The top nine places in Ireland that were deemed 'cleaner than European norms' are as follows, and in this order: Naas, Ennis, Killarney, Leixlip, Monaghan, Sligo, Tullamore, Waterford City and Wicklow.
Deposit Return Scheme
Only four areas were branded littered or seriously littered overall, including Ballybane in Galway and Tallaght in Dublin.
An Taisce inspectors found the environs of Dublin Airport, which are 'normally clean', to be moderately littered. Ballymun, Carlow, Fermoy, Longford and Navan were also among some of the areas found to be moderately littered.
The survey noted that plastic bottle and can litter is down 50% on previous levels, a year on from the introduction of the Deposit Return Scheme.
However, it said this kind of litter was still found in 20% of the 500-plus sites surveyed across the country.
'We hope that the scheme will see the disappearance of this litter, but statistics so far do not bear this out,' Horgan said, adding that cans and plastic bottles 'are far from a rare sight on our streets and in our hedgerows'.
The survey also found that the prevalence of coffee cups on streets across the country remains stubbornly high.
But there was a fall-off in disposable vape litter. Last year, Cabinet
approved draft legislation
to ban the sale of disposable vapes in Ireland.
A ban on selling the products in Northern Ireland and the UK came into effect on 1 June.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Irish charity clothes banks are shipping donations as far as Libya
Second-hand clothes dumped in clothing banks and take-back schemes are not staying in Ireland, with items travelling across the globe and likely ending as landfill. Many well intentioned Irish people are discarding clothing in these banks, believing a new home will be found for them close-by. However, VOICE Ireland and the Global Shapers have found that items are being shipped to Kenya, Pakistan, the UAE and Libya. Many are also leaving Ireland for European countries like Poland or Germany, known to be sorting hubs for second-hand clothing. In December, the organisations sewed trackers into 38 clothing items mixed with new and used but wearable garments. They then placed these items in private clothing banks and shop take-back schemes. Charity shops were not included. Of these, 27 gave relevant results, with only two pieces of clothing being reused. Seven months after the garments were given away, seven are still in Ireland waiting to be picked and sorted, four are in the Baltic Sea Region, three are in Poland, and there are two items each in Germany, the UAE and Pakistan. Kenya, Belgium, Libya, Nigeria and Togo each received one of the 27 items. VOICE said this confirms its Threads of Transparency report- which states that clothing discarded through bring banks or take-back schemes enter an opaque global supply chain. It added: 'The end-of-life stage of clothing is in fact an international trade that most people are unaware of, raising many questions about the real fate of textiles that go into the system.' This is a massive concern as the fashion industry is one of the most environmentally damaging globally. It's ranked 4th for climate impact, 3rd for water and land use and 5th for raw material use and greenhouse gas emissions. Since the rise of fast fashion and online shopping, the average person owns 60% more clothing than in 2000, with half of Irish people buying clothes multiple times a month. In Ireland, each person discards on average 35kg of clothes each per year. Some 65% of these discarded textiles are incinerated and put in landfill, with 35% collected through donations and textile banks. However, the charity fears that 80% of what is collected is eventually exported- with little way of knowing where it ends up. Around just 7% of clothing items thrown out each year in Ireland are being resold or reused. A recent Environmental Protection Agency survey found that 73% of people want reassurance that their unwanted clothes aren't ending up in landfill abroad. But VOICE says the 'biggest blind spots' lie with bring banks, where transparency is almost non-existent. The charity is calling for harmonised regulation across the sector, rather than leaving oversight to voluntary, self-reported standards set by private companies. Programme lead at VOICE Solene Schirrer said: 'We shouldn't have to take a company's word for it. The whole sector needs consistent rules, so accountability doesn't depend on who's running the scheme.' The organisation has set up an online tracker for the 27 clothing items, where the public can view the live journey of these items. Schirrer added: 'This map shows what the industry hasn't been willing to: our clothes have a long journey after we're done with them, and that journey often ends with uncertainty, in someone else's backyard.' The live tracker will run until November 2025, with the final analysis supporting recommendations to increase transparency and environmental standards in the used textile collection and trade. Before throwing out an item of clothing, the charity recommends trying to repair it first. When it comes to donating garments, charity shops are best. Selling clothes on online websites such as Vinted and Depop is also a good way to be assured that items are being reused. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here .
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Why the debate around school uniforms is far from simple
Analysis: School uniforms bring together conversations about cost, comfort, sustainability, tradition and identity that warrant closer examination This time of year brings a flurry of conversations around school uniforms, their affordability and even their purpose. For the remainder of the year, uniforms receive little media or parliamentary attention. Yet, within the walls of schools, uniforms can be central to the demands and reprimands of daily life throughout the school year. The concept of school uniforms often evokes images of shirt collars, ties, and polished shoes, a staple in Irish education and beyond. But school uniforms also bring together conversations about cost, comfort, sustainability, tradition and identity that warrant closer examination. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, discussion on the need for the school uniforms When did uniforms become a staple in Irish schools? With a long history of secret schooling (such as hedge schools) and non-school attendance, it wasn't until the early 1900s that Irish school-going children became more visible. Indeed, it was probably the arrival of free post-primary education in 1967 that truly visibilised the Irish school-going population. At that time, school uniforms were adopted by individual schools to varying degrees. Fee-paying post-primary schools were the first to introduce uniformed dress, with a style closely resembling that of private schools in the UK. Ties, collared shirts, pleated skirts, tailored trousers and woolen jumpers introduced then, remain consistent with uniform styles today. By the late 20th century, uniforms had become a feature of all post-primary schools and to a significant extent in primary schools too. Today, uniforms are commonplace across almost the entire Irish primary and post-primary landscape, a practice matched only by the UK, Cyprus and Malta in European terms. The view that uniforms somewhat 'level the playing field', is a commonly presented argument underpinning the Irish embrace of school uniforms. However, 'getting onto the playing field' has cost implications that are more affordable for some than others. From RTÉ Archives, fashion students Orla Langan, Louise Elliot and Cynthia Stewart give their old school uniforms a design makeover in a 1990 epsiode of Head to Toe The hidden cost of 'free' education While education is publicly funded, school uniforms represent an unavoidable expense for many families. The Government's Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance (BTSCFA) provides financial support to some families, but even then it often falls short of actual clothing expenses. In 2017 the Department of Education issued guidelines to reduce uniform costs by encouraging the use of generic uniforms with sew-on crests. But implementation has been inconsistent, with many schools continuing to insist on expensive, branded uniforms. When schools mandate crested or branded items from exclusive suppliers, costs increase further, undermining the principle of equitable access to education. Alongside the egalitarian argument favouring school uniforms lies the argument for sheer convenience. Uniforms provide busy parents with much needed respite from decision making and fashion pressures. While uniforms might be known for their convenience, comfort is a critical dimension, where they may not rate as highly. The material and structural compositions of uniforms are generally at odds with the types of clothing typically worn by children, making uniform clothing feel 'unusual'. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, do school uniforms lead to children getting less exercise? The rigidity of traditional uniform with shirt and tie, and stiff or irritable fabrics, may exacerbate anxiety and discomfort for some students. School uniforms are worn for long hours, yet many policies overlook this comfortability aspect and students' sensory needs. The sustainability question Fast fashion's environmental toll has thrust sustainability into the spotlight, and school uniforms are no exception. Textiles account for a significant portion of landfill waste, but initiatives such as uniform banks and recycling schemes are making strides in promoting reuse. In recent years, uniform banks have gained significant momentum at school and community level throughout Ireland. They provide a model that demonstrates the longevity of certain fabrics, the power of sharing resources and the benefits of putting those resources back into the community in a circular fashion. Uniform banks give schools and communities opportunities to become leaders in sustainable practices while also addressing school uniform affordability. From RTÉ Radio 1's Drivetime, dealing with dirty school uniforms Uniforms as symbols of identity and control Uniforms are more than garments and some believe they symbolise belonging, discipline and even professionalism. Policies often cite benefits like reducing bullying, enhancing safety and fostering a sense of community. Yet, these same uniforms can also become tools of exclusion. Not wearing the correct uniform, or not wearing the uniform correctly, can be a source of tension between students and teachers. Equally, variations like special ties for sports teams or badges for prefects can create visible hierarchies between students. On one hand, uniforms level the playing field by mitigating the pressure to wear trendy or expensive clothes. On the other hand, strict enforcement of uniform policies can stigmatise students who are not complying, often due to financial constraints. For example, when teachers call out students for 'wearing the wrong shoes', are they simultaneously amplifying socio-economic divides? The future In Scotland, national guidance on school uniforms was issued in 2024, prioritising affordability, comfort, and sustainability. This marked a significant step in rethinking the role of uniforms in education there. Ireland, with its similar tradition of uniforms, has an opportunity to rethink the place of uniforms in its schools. The debate around school uniforms is far from simple. It raises critical questions: why has the style of uniforms remained largely unchanged for decades? Why do we persist in dressing students in attire reminiscent of bygone office cultures? Is it about maintaining control, or is there a deeper cultural attachment at play? Have we simply not thought creatively about designing modern day uniforms? Ultimately, reimagining school uniforms is about aligning them with contemporary values and ensuring that they are affordable, inclusive, and sustainable. As schools shape the citizens of tomorrow, it's time for uniforms to reflect the priorities of today.
RTÉ News
a day ago
- RTÉ News
Meet the independent, fierce, proactive women of medieval Ireland
Analysis: Translators of medieval romances reshaped stories to portray Irish women as more independent and proactive than their English counterparts In the 15th century, Ireland experienced a remarkable wave of translations of Continental narratives. But the way these translations were produced differs sharply from modern practices. Like their European counterparts, Irish translators prioritised making texts accessible and appealing to their new audience rather than remaining strictly faithful to the source. Foreign stories were reshaped to suit Irish tastes and conventions, making them distinctly Irish. A striking example is Beathadh Sir Gui o Bharbhuic, the Early Modern Irish version of the Middle English Guy of Warwick, itself a translation of the Anglo-Norman Gui de Warewic. The Irish text survives in a single manuscript, held at Trinity College Dublin, and textual evidence suggests it was produced in the last quarter of the 15th century by Uilleam Mac an Leagha, likely a member of the prominent Leigheas family of scribes and translators of medical texts. Comparing the Irish adaptation of Beathadh Sir Gui with its English source reveals interesting differences between the two versions, as well as important aspects of the socio-cultural landscape of late-medieval Ireland. While structure and style were changed in the process of translation, the most telling cultural insights emerge from differences in content. The plot remains largely the same: Guy of Warwick falls in love with Felice, the Earl of Warwick's daughter, and wins her hand by proving his worth in battles abroad. Soon after their marriage, burdened by his violent past, Guy departs on a pilgrimage of atonement, returning shortly before his death. However, the Irish adaptation shifts the story's focus by placing greater emphasis on piety, chivalry and tournaments. The most fascinating divergence, however, lies in the portrayal of women, especially in the figure of Felice. Across several key moments, the Irish text reimagines her role, making her more independent than her English counterpart. This shift is first visible in Felice's introduction. In the English text, she is a conventional romance female character, praised mainly for her beauty. The Irish version, however, presents a more nuanced figure. While her beauty is acknowledged, greater attention is devoted to her piety, gentleness, and skill in embroidery and handiwork. The focus on these practical skills reflects the social expectations for noblewomen in late-medieval Ireland, where weaving and embroidery were essential elements of their upbringing. Moreover, the Irish Felice shows some agency in her marriage. In the English romance, her father arranges her marriage without her consent. In the Irish version, he consults her, framing the union more as a partnership between equals. This reflects long-standing Irish legal traditions, as early Irish law recognised forms of union such as lánamnas comthinchuir ('marriage of common contribution'), where both spouses contributed equally to shared property, and lánamnas for bantinchur ('marriage on woman contribution'), where the woman brought most of the assets into the union. Irish Felice's active role in her marriage is also seen in how she expresses her love: she only declares her feelings once the marriage is being arranged, when it has legal and practical significance. By contrast, the English Felice, as a typical emotional romance heroine, expresses her love before any formal arrangement, about which she has no say anyway. The Irish Felice channels her sorrow into action and devotes little time to weeping Felice also emerges as more proactive at two of the story's most dramatic moments: Guy's departure for his pilgrimage and his death. In the English version, she is passive and driven by emotion. During her husband's absence, she feels extremely hurt, with a brief mention of her engaging in charitable works. After his death, she is helplessly overcome by grief, isolates herself, and eventually dies of heartbreak. By contrast, the Irish Felice channels her sorrow into action and devotes little time to weeping. During Guy's absence, she commissions chapels and religious establishments to pray for his safe return. After his death, she sets aside her grief to found a monastery attended by 30 priests. Only after completing these works does she allow herself to die. This reflects a reality of late-medieval Irish society, where women could act as patrons of religious foundations and literary production. Another crucial shift appears in the depiction of Felice's burial. In the English version, she is laid to rest with Guy, but the Irish versionspecifies that she is buried alone. Significantly, the Irish word for 'alone', aentuma could imply widowhood, but primarily referred to unmarried women, who could enjoy a certain degree of independence. This idea of women living alone with some measure of autonomy was embedded in early Irish law, notably in the law collection Senchas Már and the legal tract on marriage and divorce Cáin Lánamna. Widows could control dowries and joint property, make wills, enter contracts and act as heads of households without male guardianship. Unmarried women typically remained under male guardianship, but they could manage property if they stayed single past a certain age, usually around 20 years of age (especially if they inherited family land). Although the absence of the exact source text forces us to treat these conclusions as speculations, the connection between the more independent Irish Felice and the socio-legal reality of women's lives in Ireland is strong. It makes a convincing case that her characterisation was a deliberate choice by the translator. This portrayal reminds us that medieval translation was not just about language, but was also a reshaping of stories adapted to a new world, where women were more than just 'faeries'.
