Diabetic MP's bid to ensure her condition is not included as cause for assisted death
Sarah Bool, the new Tory MP for South Northamptonshire, laid an amendment to Kim Leadbeater 's controversial bill last week to highlight the issue, and is calling for a list of conditions that should or should not included.
Currently, there are no specific illnesses which are listed in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. However, the draft legislation only specifies that someone should be diagnosed as having six months or less to live. The bill committee is due to debate the amendments on 4 February.
Ms Bool told The Independent: 'I had a type 1 diabetes diagnosis three years ago, but the way the bill is drafted as it stands, I am caught potentially, because type 1 diabetes is a progressive illness that is not reversible by treatment. It's something that I can only manage.
'If I stop taking treatment, and there's no obligation for me to take it under this bill either, then I could reasonably die within six months, and actually die much quicker.
'I think one of the amendments that we've tried to put forward as well is potentially having the idea that actually there should be a list of conditions that that should or shouldn't be included, but this is one of my concerns.'
The Tory MP first got the symptoms of diabetes in May 2021 and noticed she was eating a lot but losing weight. Type 1 diabetes is the most serious form and is incurable requiring daily medication. It was a condition former prime minister Theresa May also lives with.
Ms Bool said: 'I've had a lot to come to terms with and I think that's possibly why I feel even stronger now about some of these issues because I looked and I was like, 'well, hold on a minute. I should never come within the remit of this bill'.
'I just know how vulnerable other people who have disabilities are, that there is that sort of expectation and that sort of pressure.'
Critics of the bill, which passed its second reading in the Commons before Christmas, have previously raised concerns that the public perception it only applies to serious diseases like cancer rather than just manageable health conditions is wrong.
Former multi gold medal winning paralympic athlete turned disability campaigner Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson argued that the bill could apply to her if she had a sore that failed to heal properly.
Added to that section 15 of Bill would allow for someone else other than the patient to sign the relevant document as a proxy requesting termination of their life, which critics believe potentially opens it up to abuse from bad families and doctors.
The draft bill does say that mental illness should not be included but even with this clause, Ms Bool, a trained lawyer, has warned that the language does not properly protect people with mental health problems.
Ms Bool pointed out that the mental health caveat used the language ' for the avoidance of doubt, a person is not to be considered if they have one or both of a mental disorder or a disability.'
However, she noted: 'That wording 'for the avoidance of doubt' is just legalese. It's not binding. There was no weight behind it.'
Ms Leadbeater, the MP behind the historic bill, has previously said she is 'very open' to hearing how safeguards can be strengthened. She said some 40 people have been invited to give evidence to the committee when it meets next month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
How the world is failing to tackle plastic pollution that's literally strangling the life out of our seas
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Plastic. It's everywhere. So much so that it often passes us by. A few years ago, I tried to go without plastic for a month. I was doing well until I bought sandwiches presented, by the supermarket, in a paper bag. Or so I thought. Inside, the sandwiches were nestled in single-use plastic. That defeat is, for me, a metaphor for the challenge we face in trying to tackle what has become one of the biggest obstacles to a healthier climate and planet. And why I believed it was vital that our UK Government took the lead in the UN Global Plastics Treaty talks which took place in Geneva until Friday. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Unfortunately, that didn't happen. The talks ended having made no progress, no statement, and no real promise of improvement in the state of our oceans and the threat to wildlife. Instead, it seems the attraction of oil production wealth won out. Plastic pollution is a growing and global problem (Picture: Christopher Furlong) | Getty Images Oil wealth wins the day Representatives from more than 170 countries had been aiming to finalise a legally binding treaty to address plastic pollution. The negotiations followed five previous rounds of talks that also failed to produce any agreement. Although more than 100 countries support cuts to global plastic production, it was that wealth from oil which encouraged some nations to hold out against any production caps and blocked progress. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ironically, I can see some justification for limited production. We do need some oil to see us through the just transition to a greener economy, and to have the capability to manufacture things like pharmaceuticals. In terms of plastic itself, it is still essential in some areas which we wouldn't want to see undermined, such as medical devices. There must be limits. All around us, despite the fact that so many everyday plastic items are now recyclable, they are still turning up on our beaches, in the stomachs of dead marine animals or around the necks of young seals, literally strangling the life out of our seas. Like so many people, for me it was Sir David Attenborough's documentary series, The Blue Planet, which drove home the reality of the danger to our environment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Perhaps it is our island existence which make us more aware as a community of the value of protecting our marine environment, but if we are to succeed, we needed to make the case more effectively in Geneva. So much hope In a recent Commons debate, my colleague Alistair Carmichael reminded us that 'plastics as an industry emits more carbon than the entire global aviation and shipping industries'. Just one crucial reason why so many of us had invested so much hope in the Geneva talks to come up with an agreement. Greenpeace and the Environmental Investigation Agency had defined one of the things they wanted to see as 'a global target to reduce production of primary plastic polymers and related elements, such as reporting and national measures'. They had also called for phasing out of harmful chemicals in plastic, improvements in the design of plastic products to protect human health and financial support for least developed economies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad That the Geneva conference should have failed so abjectly to fulfil any of those goals should be yet another wakeup call. We have to hope we get another chance.
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
SNP government faces £36m black hole over refusal to copy Westminster benefits crackdown
PA Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland's benefits agency could force a £36 million black hole in public finances over the SNP's refusal to follow Westminster's benefits crackdown. MPs are currently considering new legislation that would claw back debts incurred by fraud or overpaid welfare claims. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, social justice cabinet secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has refused to back the move by UK Labour as it is not in line with the ethos of the more 'dignified' Social Security Scotland (SSS). As the Scottish Government has insisted on diverging from the Westminster plans, the SNP administration will need to transfer the debts to SSS and rapidly develop a debt recovery scheme or write off the £36m owed. This has caused consternation among MSPs concerned about the strain on Scottish finances when the government is still operating under emergency spending controls introduced last year. Under plans outlined in the proposed new Public Authorities (Fraud, Debt and Recovery) Bill, the DWP would have powers to retrieve owed money directly from a person's bank account. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If they were without sufficient funds, the DWP could then impose sanctions such as applying to the court for the temporary suspension of their driving licence. The dispute is detailed in letters acquired by The Scotsman from the DWP under freedom of information legislation. Identical requests for information were lodged with both the Scottish Government and the UK Government. However, while the DWP handed over letters from Mr Weston to Ms Somerville, the Scottish Government chose to entirely redact the contents of all correspondence from the SNP cabinet secretary to her Westminster counterpart. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government did not respond to a question about the refusal to provide the requested information. In the letters provided to The Scotsman by the DWP, it is made clear that Ms Somerville does not approve of introducing these debt recovery powers in Scotland. In correspondence from Andrew Weston, the UK minister for the DWP, from May and June this year it is explained to Ms Somerville that the DWP will no longer be able to recover debts on behalf of Social Security Scotland when a current arrangement comes to an end in spring 2026. Another letter details that 4000 current debts could be pursued using the new legislative powers and then around 1500 debts each year in the coming years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When the plans were first announced in January this year, they were described by Labour as 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation' targeted at 'benefits cheats'. Mr Weston writes: 'This flow of new cases will decline as the Scottish Government continues to roll out its own benefit system and DWP does not administer benefits on your behalf.' He goes on to say that the 'continued recovery of debt under a separate system is not cost effective, even if this was limited to the recovery of debts already in repayment.' The MP adds that the DWP will not be able to continue to recover debts under any new long-term agreement or extensions to the current agreement between governments. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The debt recovery situation is also expected to have a knock-on effect on benefits claimants. Those who currently have stable repayment arrangements with the DWP are now in limbo waiting for news of the SNP's plans. Scottish Conservative shadow cabinet secretary for social security Alexander Stewart MSP criticised the Scottish Government's 'secrecy' and said its debt recovery position 'defies belief'. 'No wonder Scotland has a ballooning and unaffordable benefits bill when the SNP Government won't even try to recoup money fraudulently claimed or overpaid,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'This is taxpayers' cash that has been handed out in error. It defies belief that Shirley Anne Sommerville has no desire to get any of this money back. It's an insult to hard-working, over-taxed Scots. 'It's clear the SNP has no plan or even desire to rein in Scotland's soaring welfare bill. 'The abject lack of transparency from the social justice secretary over her correspondence with her Westminster counterpart is also depressingly predictable from an SNP government addicted to secrecy.' In one letter from May, Mr Weston thanks Ms Somerville for an in-person meeting and says there are 'several complex challenges' involved in her requests for separate legislation - or 'carve outs' - for Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The MP attempts to reassure the cabinet secretary that measures in the legislation would be used only as a 'last resort'. With other devolved benefits, the DWP transfers information about claimants to SSS. In order for SSS to take on debt recovery, it would require the cases to be transferred between agencies as well as resource debt enforcement. The Scottish Government pays the DWP for the exchange of information under the partially-devolved system. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In December last year, flawed information sharing between the two organisations led to nearly 40,000 Scots missing out on the newly devolved winter heating payment. The oversight came to light as a result of 'urgent number crunching' by the Scottish Government after the introduction of emergency spending controls across government departments. A Scottish Government spokeswoman said Scottish Ministers can seek debt recovery through the civil court process 'where an individual does not voluntarily repay and is no longer in receipt of benefit'. However, the most recent update from Social Security Scotland says the organisation does not yet have the provisions in place to be able to recover debt through the sheriff courts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Its debt management strategy from 2023 lays out that the agency tries, where possible, to make voluntary arrangements to recover debt. Speaking to Holyrood's finance committee in January this year, SSS chief executive David Wallace said money that was overpaid would not be reclaimed where the benefit recipient could not have reasonably known they were being paid too much. He added: 'We have the powers to enforce deduction from on-going benefits, but we have not yet used them.' 'The Scottish social security system is focused on treating people with fairness, dignity and respect,' the government spokeswoman added. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Scottish Ministers have been clear they cannot support UK Government proposals to take powers to recover directly from an individual's bank accounts without requiring a court order, or to potentially suspend driving licences.' The spokeswoman said there is 'no hole in the Scottish Budget' but did not elaborate on where the money would be found to write off the £36m in fraud and overpayments. She added: 'Given both governments could not find an agreement on this issue, the Scottish Government is looking at what steps now need to be taken in the devolved social security system. There is therefore no impact on the Scottish Budget.'
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Why Russia is desperate to capture eastern Ukraine's industrial heartland
The future of Ukraine's industrial heartland in the east of the country is uncertain, after Vladimir Putin reportedly demanded it be handed to Russia during his meeting with Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday. The Russian leader demanded that Ukrainian forces withdraw from Donetsk as part of any ceasefire deal, and said he would be prepared to stop fighting on the rest of the frontline if Kyiv gave in to the demand and addressed the 'root causes of the conflict'. The Ukrainian president has said that Putin wants to take the remaining 30 per cent of the eastern region, which has been the location of some of the fiercest battles in the three-and-a-half-year war. But losing Donetsk would give Russia control of almost all of the Donbas, the collective name for Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland, which has been long coveted by Putin. Earlier this week, Zelensky vowed that Ukraine would 'never leave' the Donbas and warned that Putin could use it as a springboard for a future invasion. However, sources close to the meeting told The Independent that the dramatic move appears to have been endorsed by Mr Trump as a means to bring an end to the war. As Kyiv fights to keep the Donbas from Trump's so-called 'land swap' deal, here's all you need to know about the region. Where is the Donbas? Situated along Ukraine's eastern border, the Donbas takes its portmanteau name from 'Donets Basin', a further abbreviation of 'Donets Coal Basin', in reference to the coal basin along the Donets Ridge and River. The Donbas stretches across the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, two large regions of Ukraine that have been on the front line of the war that followed Russia's invasion. How long has it been occupied? The Donbas has been partially occupied by Russia since 2014, around the same time that Putin annexed the Crimean peninsula. Russian-backed separatists broke away from the Ukrainian government to proclaim the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk independent 'people's republics' and, as a result, Moscow captured more than a third of Ukraine's eastern territory. Russia classes inhabitants of the Republic of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Luhansk People's Republic, the Donetsk People's Republic, and the regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson as subjects of the Russian Federation. Ukraine insists these territories are part of Ukraine. It is believed that around 88 per cent of the Donbas is under Russian control. This includes almost all of the Luhansk region and 75 per cent of the Donetsk region, according to Reuters. Approximately 6,600 sq km is still controlled by Ukraine, but Russia has been focusing most of its energy along the front in Donetsk, pushing towards the last remaining major cities such as Pokrovsk. A key strategic region in the war The hyper-industrialised Donbas economy is dominated by coal mining and metallurgy. The region has one of the largest coal reserves in Ukraine. When conflict broke out in 2014, Ukraine's coal-mining enterprises saw a 22.4 per cent decline in the production of raw coal compared with 2013, according to the Kyiv Post, showing the country's reliance on Donbas as an energy powerhouse. But as well as its economic significance, Donbas has been described as a 'fortress belt' by the Institute for the Study of War in terms of its strategic value. Donetsk forms the main fortified defensive line across the front line, stretching through Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, and Kostiantynivka. 'Ukraine is holding a key defensive line across Donetsk,' says Elina Beketova, a fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis, describing a 'fortified zone buildup over years because the war began 11 years ago'. She adds that Russia hasn't been able to break through since 2014, and has lost many people there. The entire region is heavily mined, and Ukrainian troops have been preparing it for years. 'It's not just trenches, it's a deep, layered defence with bunkers, anti-tank ditches, minefields, and industrial areas built into the terrain. The area includes dominant heights, rivers, and urban zones that make it extremely hard to capture,' explains Beketova. She says that losing this fortified line would have 'catastrophic consequences' for Ukraine, as it holds back Russia's advancement into central and western parts of the country. 'The front would shift approximately 80km west, and Russia would gain open ground – flat steppe with no natural barriers – giving it a direct path towards Kharkiv, Poltava, and Dnipro.' What Zelensky has said about the Donbas Zelensky has repeatedly rejected calls from Russia to give up the Donbas. In response to Putin's request that Ukraine withdraw from eastern Donetsk, Zelensky vowed that his people would 'never leave' the Donbas, and warned that Putin's troops could use it as a springboard for a future invasion. 'We will not leave Donbas. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the first part – our territories are illegally occupied. Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive,' he said.
