NOAA delays the cutoff of key satellite data for hurricane forecasting
Meteorologists and scientists warned of severe consequences last week when NOAA said, in the midst of this year's hurricane season, that it would almost immediately discontinue key data collected by three weather satellites that the agency jointly runs with the Defense Department.
The Defense Meteorological Satellite Program's microwave data gives key information that can't be gleaned from conventional satellites. That includes three-dimensional details of a storm, what's going on inside of it and what it is doing in the overnight hours, experts say.
The data was initially planned to be cut off on June 30 'to mitigate a significant cybersecurity risk,' NOAA's announcement said. The agency now says it's postponing that until July 31. Peak hurricane season is usually from mid-August to mid-October.
NOAA didn't immediately respond to a message seeking more details about the reason for the delay. The Navy confirmed the new date and said only that the "program no longer meets our information technology modernization requirements.'
NOAA — which has been the subject of hefty Department of Government Efficiency cuts this year — said Friday the satellite program accounts for a 'single dataset in a robust suite of hurricane forecasting and modeling tools' in the National Weather Service's portfolio.
The agency's 'data sources are fully capable of providing a complete suite of cutting-edge data and models that ensure the gold-standard weather forecasting the American people deserve,' a spokesperson said.
But Union of Concerned Scientists science fellow Marc Alessi told The Associated Press on Friday that detecting the rapid intensification, and more accurately predicting the likely path, of storms is critical as climate change worsens the extreme weather experienced across the globe.
'Not only are we losing the ability to make better intensification forecasts, we are also losing the ability to predict accurately where a tropical cyclone could be going, if it's in its development stages,' Alessi said. "This data is essential.
'On the seasonal forecasting front, we would see the effects," he added, "but also on the long-term climate change front, we now are losing an essential piece to monitoring global warming.'
___
Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ast.john@ap.org.
___
Read more of AP's climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/climate-and-environment
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
3 hours ago
- CNET
Meet Surya, a New AI Model From NASA and IBM That Can Predict Solar Flares
Today's solar flare forecasting is pretty straightforward: Earth has several instruments pointed at the sun that monitor it, and when a solar flare erupts, NOAA predicts whether it'll hit Earth and reports it via the Space Weather Prediction Center. But NASA and IBM may be able to do this faster and with a little more accuracy thanks to a new artificial intelligence model named Surya. Surya, which is Sanskrit for "Sun," is a 366M-parameter AI model developed for the purpose of analyzing the various cool things the sun does. It's an open-source model available on GitHub for anyone to play with. Per the GitHub page, the model "learns general-purpose solar representations through spatiotemporal transformers, enabling state-of-the-art performance in solar flare forecasting, active region segmentation, solar wind prediction and EUV spectra modeling." The AI model has been trained on data about our nearest star, and uses that data to predict things like whether a solar flare is likely to hit Earth. IBM says that it's trained using data from NASA's Solar Dynamic Observatory, which has been monitoring the sun since 2010, along with eight other research centers. "We want to give Earth the longest lead time possible," said Andrés Muñoz-Jaramillo, solar physicist at SouthWest Research Institute and lead researcher on Surya. "Our hope is that the model has learned all the critical processes behind our star's evolution through time so that we can extract actionable insights." In short, researchers are hoping to use AI to forecast when a solar flare may hit Earth, giving the longest possible warning that a geomagnetic storm is approaching. Of course, since aurora borealis comes from the effect that geomagnetic storms have on the Earth's magnetic field, that would also mean we would know when auroras are happening much further in advance. Filling in the blanks The primary reason for NASA's Solar Dynamic Observatory was to piece together the underlying physics of the sun, but as IBM notes, the process has been slow going and science still doesn't know as much as it would like to about how the sun works. Prior to Surya, NASA was using things like flashes of light in the sun's corona to partially predict solar flares. NOAA has its own prediction methods as well that work well, but have limitations. IBM says the inclusion of Surya may help make those predictions more accurate and timely. "We've been on this journey of pushing the limits of technology with NASA since 2023, delivering pioneering foundational AI models to gain an unprecedented understanding of our planet Earth," said Juan Bernabé-Moreno, IBM's director in charge of scientific collaboration with NASA. "With Surya we have created the first foundation model to look the sun in the eye and forecast its moods."
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Bones of ancient child suggest humans could have interbred with Neanderthals earlier than thought
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Modern humans and Neanderthals were interacting 100,000 years earlier than previously thought, according to researchers who used CT scans and 3D mapping to study the bones of a child they believe was the result of interbreeding between the two distinct groups. The child, described in a recent study published in the peer-reviewed journal L'Anthropologie, was buried in a cave in Israel some 140,000 years ago. Because no ancient DNA was extracted from the fossilized remains, it's impossible to confirm the child's origins, but scientists say microscopic details in the bones indicate the child had traits of both groups. When the bones were first excavated from Skhul Cave in northern Israel in 1931, archaeologists recognized that the child belonged to neither Homo sapiens, who had arrived in the region from Africa, nor Neanderthals, who arrived from Europe. They concluded it was a separate species indigenous to the area. But the new 3D mapping allowed researchers to study small details of the skull that had previously been difficult to see or decipher. Researchers were able to examine distinctive traits such as the construction of the inner ear and the imprint of blood vessels that supplied the brain. By comparing known characteristics of both Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, the researchers concluded the child was the result of interbreeding. Previously, the earliest known example of interbreeding between the groups was around 40,000 years ago in central Europe, explained Israel Hershkovitz, the lead researcher of the study and a professor of archaeology and human evolution at Tel Aviv University. A new glimpse into ancient relations The new research helps shed light on when the two groups began interacting and offers clues about their relationships. 'What we're saying now is that there was an extensive relationship between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals that started around 140,000 years ago,' and the two groups 'managed to live side by side with no evidence for hostile encounters,' Hershkovitz said. The interbreeding and shared cultural practices, including burials and tool construction, challenge the notion of Homo sapiens as 'intolerant' to other human groups due to their eventual dominance, Hershkovitz said. Without DNA, it will be impossible to prove that the child was a hybrid human, said Pascal Gagneux, an evolutionary biologist studying human origins at the University of California San Diego who was not involved in the research. Still, he said, the details revealed by the mapping, including the internal structure of some bones and several features, support the hybrid hypothesis. Peering inside an ancient skull Researchers took thousands of isolated scans of the skull and jaw of the child and then created a virtual 3D model of the fossil. The model allowed them to analyze tiny details that are impossible to see on the fossilized bones, including delicate parts inside the skull. Blood vessels, for example, make a small imprint on the inside of a skull. While some of the grooves are visible to the naked eye, the 3D scans allowed researchers to see the blood vessels like 'tributaries of a river,' Hershkovitz said. The patterns are distinct between the two groups, because Neanderthals and Homo sapiens have different brain shapes that require different blood delivery. The virtual mapping created a more accurate reconstruction of the child's skull than could be built from the bones and plaster when the remains were originally excavated. The new reconstruction is much more elongated, which is more typical for Neanderthals, Gagneux said. However, the detailed reconstruction does not answer many of the questions surrounding the discovery, Gagneux said. Were the parents of the child also interbred? Or was one Neanderthal and the other Homo sapien? Why was the child, or anyone else, buried in the cave? Thomas Levy, a professor in cyber-archaeology also at the University of California San Diego, said he was impressed by the study's use of 3D models. The advances in scientific visualization allow more accurate measurements and comparisons of specimens, said Levy, who was not involved in the research. The technology also offers archaeologists a fresh opportunity to review conclusions from objects excavated many years ago. Living in harmony Skhul Cave is one of three caves in the region that represent some of the oldest known intentional burials in the world, dating to more than 100,000 years ago, in the middle of the Paleolithic era. Multiple sets of remains were found at each site, and some are still being painstakingly excavated with tiny drills, which could provide more clues in the future. In ancient times, Israel was a land bridge and point of interaction between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. Because Homo sapiens eventually replaced Neanderthals in the region and across the world, many people speculate that their interactions were violent and hostile, with Homo sapiens eventually responsible for the 'total elimination' of Neanderthals, Hershkovitz said. 'What Skhul is telling us is that Homo sapiens are not a vicious, aggressive creature, but one that managed to live in peace' with other groups, he said. 'Our aggressive behavior, which continues today in our long history, is a recent phenomenon that has cultural roots and not biological roots.'
Associated Press
5 hours ago
- Associated Press
Photos from Egypt show archaeologists and divers recovering ancient artifacts from the seabed
ALEXANDRIA, Egypt (AP) — Archaeologists and divers worked together to retrieve statues, Roman coins and other relics from the Mediterranean seabed in Alexandria, Egypt on Thursday. Among the finds were a headless statue, a sphinx and an unknown priest figure. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.
