Instagram bans livestreaming for kids without parental consent
Meta announced on Tuesday new 'built-in protections' for its Instagram Teen Accounts, including a new requirement for parents to consent before children under 16 can go 'live' on the platform or unblur nudity in images they receive in direct messages.
The updates expand on previous restrictions rolled out last year as part of parent company Meta's 'Instagram Teen Accounts' program, which came in response to heightened concern about the harmful effects of social media on children and teen mental health.
With the new features announced Tuesday, teens under 16 will be prevented from using the Instagram Live feature without parental consent. They will also be required to get their parents' permission to turn off a feature that blurs images containing suspected nudity in direct messages.
Meta said the updates will be available in the next couple of months.
Meta also announced on Tuesday it will expand its teen account program to Facebook and Messenger. Teen accounts will first be available in the U.S. UK, Australia and Canada, before expanding to 'other regions soon.'
Meta said the Facebook and Messenger Teen Accounts will include similar features to those included in the Instagram Teen Accounts, which launched in September.
The Instagram Teen Account program includes expanded protections for users under 18, including making the accounts private by default, allowing direct messages only from people they follow or are connected to and limiting sensitive content young users see. Users also get notified when they've been on the app for more than 60 minutes, and 'sleep mode' is enabled at night to disable notifications and to auto-reply to direct messages.
These features are automatically turned on for all teen accounts, but 16- and 17-year-olds can disable the features themselves, and children under 16 can do so with parental consent.
Meta touted the success of the program, saying there are at least 54 million active Teen Accounts globally, since the program launched in September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
Here's how to turn off public posting on the Meta AI app
AI generative images of women kissing while mud wrestling and President Donald Trump eating poop are some of the conversations users are unknowingly sharing publicly through Meta's newly launched AI app. The company rolled out the Meta AI app in April, putting it in direct competition with OpenAI's ChatGPT. But the tool has recently garnered some negative publicity and sparked privacy concerns over some of the wacky — and personal — prompts being shared publicly from user accounts. Besides the mud wrestlers and Trump eating poop, some of the examples CNBC found include a user prompting Meta's AI tool to generate photos of the character Hello Kitty "tying a rope in a loop hanging from a barn rafter, standing on a stool." Another user whose prompt was posted publicly asked Meta AI to send what appears to be a veterinarian bill to another person. "sir, your home address is listed on there," a user commented on the photo of the veterinarian bill. Prompts put into the Meta AI tool appear to show up publicly on the app by default, but users can adjust settings on the app to protect their privacy. To start, click on your profile photo on the top right corner of the screen and scroll down to data and privacy. Then head to the "suggesting your prompts on other apps" tab. This should include Facebook and Instagram. Once there, click the toggle feature for the apps that you want to keep your prompts from being shared on. After, go back to the main data and privacy page and click "manage your information." Select "make all your public prompts visible only to you" and click the "apply to all" function. You can also delete your prompt history there. Meta has beefed up its recent bets on AI to improve its offerings to compete against megacap peers and leading AI contenders, such as Google and OpenAI. This week the company invested $14 billion in startup Scale AI and tapped its CEO Alexandr Wang to help lead the company's AI strategy. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Meta users don't know their intimate AI chats are out there for all to see
A man wants to know how to help his friend come out of the closet. An aunt struggles to find the right words to congratulate her niece on her graduation. And one guy wants to know how to ask a girl — 'in Asian' — if she's interested in older men. Ten years ago, they might have discussed those vulnerable questions with friends over brunch, at a dive bar, or in the office of a therapist or clergy member. Today, scores of users are posting their often cringe-making conversations about relationships, identity and spirituality with Meta's AI chatbot to the app's public feed — sometimes seemingly without knowing their musings can be seen by others. Meta launched a stand-alone app for its AI chatbot nearly two months ago with the goal of giving users personalized and conversational answers to any question the could come up with — a service similar to those offered by OpenAI's ChatGPT or Anthropic's Claude. But the app came with a unique feature: a discover field where users could post their personal conversations with Meta AI for the world to see, reflecting the company's larger strategy to embed AI-created content into its social networks. Since the April launch, the app's discover feed has been flooded with users' conversations with Meta AI on personal topics about their lives or their private philosophical questions about the world. As the feature gained more attention, some users appeared to purposely promote comical conversations with Meta AI. Others are publishing AI-generated images about political topics such as Trump in a diapers, images of girls in sexual situations and promotions to their businesses. In at least one case, a person whose apparently real name was evident asked the bot to delete an exchange after posing an embarrassing question. The flurry of personal posts on Meta AI is the latest indication that people are increasingly turning to conversational chatbots to meet their relationship and emotional needs. As users ask the chatbots for advice on matters ranging from their marital problems to financial challenges, privacy advocates warn that users' personal information may end up being used by tech companies in ways they didn't expect or want. 'We've seen a lot of examples of people sending very, very personal information to AI therapist chatbots or saying very intimate things to chatbots in other settings, ' said Calli Schroeder, a senior counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center. 'I think many people assume there's some baseline level of confidentiality there. There's not. Everything you submit to an AI system at bare minimum goes to the company that's hosting the AI.' Meta spokesman Daniel Roberts said chats with Meta AI are set to private by default and users have to actively tap the share or publish button before it shows up on the app's discover field. While some real identities are evident, people are free to able to pick a different username on the discover field. Still, the company's share button doesn't explicitly tell users where their conversations with Meta AI will be posted and what other people will be able to see — a fact that appeared to confuse some users about the new app. Meta's approach of blending social networking components with an AI chatbot designed to give personal answers is a departure from the approach of some of the company's biggest rivals. ChatGPT and Claude give similarly conversational and informative answers to questions posed by users, but there isn't a similar feed where other people can see that content. Video- or image-generating AI tools such as Midjourney and OpenAI's Sora have pages where people can share their work and see what AI has created for others, but neither service engages in text conversations that turn personal. The discover feed on Meta AI reads like a mixture of users' personal diaries and Google search histories, filled with questions ranging from the mundane to the political and philosophical. In one instance, a husband asked Meta AI in a voice recording about how to grow rice indoors for his 'Filipino wife.' Users asked Meta about Jesus' divinity; how to get picky toddlers to eat food and how to budget while enjoying daily pleasures. The feed is also filled with images created by Meta AI but conceived by users' imaginations, such as one of President Donald Trump eating poop and another of the grim reaper riding a motorcycle. Research shows that AI chatbots are uniquely designed to elicit users' social instincts by mirroring human-like cues that give people a sense of connection, said Michal Luria, a research fellow at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington think tank. 'We just naturally respond as if we are talking to … another person, and this reaction is automatic,' she said. 'It's kind of hard to rewire.' In April, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg told podcaster Dwarkesh Patel that one of the main reasons people used Meta AI was to talk through difficult conversations they need to have with people in their lives — a use he thinks will become more compelling as the AI model gets to know its users. 'People use stuff that's valuable for them,' he said. 'If you think something someone is doing is bad and they think it's really valuable, most of the time in my experience, they're right and you're wrong.' Meta AI's discover feed is filled with questions about romantic relationships — a popular topic people discuss with chatbots. In one instance, a woman asks Meta AI if her 70-year-old boyfriend can really be a feminist if he says he's willing to cook and clean but ultimately doesn't. Meta AI tells her the obvious: that there appears to be a 'disconnect' between her partner's words and actions. Another user asked about the best way to 'rebuild yourself after a breakup,' eliciting a boilerplate list of tips about self-care and setting boundaries from Meta AI. Some questions posed to Meta took an illicit turn. One user asked Meta AI to generate images of 'two 21 year old women wrestling in a mud bath' and then posted the results on the discover field under the headline 'Muddy bikinis and passionate kisses.' Another asked Meta AI to create an image of a 'big booty White girl.' There are few regulations pushing tech companies to adopt stricter content or privacy rules for their chatbots. In fact, Congress is considering passing a tax and immigration bill that includes a provision to roll back state AI laws throughout the country and prohibit states from passing new ones for the next decade. In recent months, a couple of high-profile incidents triggered questions about how tech companies handle personal data, who has access to that data, and how that information could be used to manipulate users. In April, OpenAI announced that ChatGPT would be able to recall old conversations that users did not ask the company to save. On X, CEO Sam Altman said OpenAI was excited about '[AI] systems that get to know you over your life, and become extremely useful and personalized.' The potential pitfalls of that approach became obvious the following month, when OpenAI had to roll back an update to ChatGPT that incorporated more personalization because it made the tool sycophantic and manipulative toward users. Last week, OpenAI's chief operating officer Brad Lightcap said the company intended to keep its privacy commitments to users after plaintiffs in a copyright lawsuit led by the New York Times demanded that OpenAI retain customer data indefinitely. Ultimately, it may be users that push the company to offer more transparency. One user questioned Meta AI on why a 'ton of people' were 'accidentally posting super personal stuff' on the app's discover feed. 'Ok, so you're saying the feed is full of people accidentally posting personal stuff?' the Meta AI chatbot responded. 'That can be pretty wild. Maybe people are just really comfortable sharing stuff or maybe the platform's defaults are set up in a way that makes it easy to overshare. What do you think?'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Meta Invests Big in Startup Scale AI, Brings On Its CEO for AI Development Efforts
Scale AI said Meta has made a "significant new investment" in the company that values the startup at $29 billion. As part of the deal, Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang will join Meta to work on artificial intelligence efforts. The move comes as Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly been frustrated with the Facebook parent's level of AI intelligence startup Scale AI said it received a 'significant new investment' from Meta (META) that values the company at more than $29 billion and sees its chief executive join the tech titan. CEO Alexandr Wang posted on X that he will leave his role at Scale to work on Meta's AI efforts, while remaining on the startup's board. The move comes as Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reportedly been frustrated with the company's level of AI progress. Last month, The Wall Street Journal reported Meta was pushing back the launch of its latest Llama 4 large language model amid concerns about whether enough improvements had been made compared to previous iterations. To speed up development, Zuckerberg is reportedly working to build what has been referred to internally at Meta as a "superintelligence group" that will sit near him at Meta's headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. Shares of Meta are little changed in recent trading. The stock is up 18% for 2025. Read the original article on Investopedia
