CalMac confirms return date for MV Caledonian Isles ferry
The ferry company confirmed on Tuesday that the vessel - which has been out of action since January 2024 when it went in for its annual service - will now return on Thursday, June 12.
Until Tuesday, the ageing vessel had been expected back on June 9.
The ferry has been undergoing extensive repairs for a year and a half but will enter dry dock this week for the final stages of work.
Following a phased return, she will pick up full service of five returns a day from Ardrossan on Saturday, June 14 except Fridays (six returns) and Sundays (four returns).
READ MORE: Irish pro-Palestine activist 'faces jail' after being detained by Israeli police
A two-vessel service with MV Glen Sannox and MV Alfred will remain in place between Troon and Brodick until the end of Wednesday, June 11, with Glen Sannox remaining on the route following that date.
CalMac has also agreed with Pentland Ferries that the current charter for the Alfred has been extended until the end of October, with details of her deployment being confirmed as soon as possible.
Louis de Wolff, interim fleet management director for CalMac, said: 'We are now in the final stages of the repair plan for MV Caledonian Isles, and we're looking forward to seeing her back in service soon.
"She'll significantly increase capacity and frequency of service for Arran, operating from Ardrossan.
'We are looking forward to seeing the vessel back on the water for sea trials from this Sunday, which, given the length of time she has been off service, will be thorough and will include berthing trials at Ardrossan and Brodick.
'The extension to MV Alfred's charter will give the network much-needed resilience until the end of the summer timetable. Plans for her deployment are being finalised and will be announced soon.'
Ardrossan Harbour has been left without any ferry service to Arran since January this year, when the MV Isle of Arran was redeployed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Cleveland Browns clash with city over plan to move stadium to the suburbs
For Ryan James, co-owner of the Flat Iron Cafe, Cleveland's oldest Irish pub, National Football League game days are a lifeline in an increasingly difficult business climate. 'We open up at 9am, and within a few hours, both floors are full of supporters,' he says. The pub bought a bus to shuttle fans the one-mile drive to the Browns' stadium on the Lake Erie waterfront. 'We carry 150 people on that alone.' He estimates that the eight or nine days a year that the Cleveland Browns play at home account for up to 10% of his annual revenue – a critical amount in a business with such tight margins. But now, James and hundreds of other local businesses in downtown Cleveland are faced with the prospect of taking a major financial hit. Except for a brief spell in the 1990s, fans have thronged downtown Cleveland on Sundays in fall and winter to cheer on their NFL team, the Cleveland Browns, for 80 years. The stadium and team have served as an economic linchpin for the downtown area in good times and bad. In parking and hotel taxes alone, the city is thought to earn about $1m per game. But now, the team wants to move to Brook Park, a suburb south-west of Cleveland, and build a new, $2.4bn domed stadium – half of which its owners are asking to be paid by Cuyahoga county and Ohio taxpayers. It's an issue that communities across the country are facing as major sports franchises move to build or update facilities to make them usable for a range of events, all while asking taxpayers to kick in billions of dollars. The Browns' billionaire owners, Jimmy Haslam and his wife, Dee, maintain that the city of Cleveland has dragged its feet on committing to funding updates to the current stadium, and that the new stadium would drive investment to another part of the region. The city, which owns the stadium, had offered to commit $500m to efforts to renovate the stadium at its current location. 'I don't want to see our taxpayers get fleeced in a deal that socializes the risk back to them and puts the profits in the pockets of a few,' says Chris Ronayne, the Cuyahoga county executive. 'We're talking about something bigger than these teams; we're talking about community vibrancy. The move away is counter to our strategy of keeping the downtown robust.' The Browns and the city have filed lawsuits against each other. Currently, the city of Cleveland pays $1.3m in property taxes and insurance for the stadium annually, with the Browns contributing $250,000 in rent. The team is believed to be worth about $5.15bn, and earns about $100m a year in gate receipts alone. The use of public funds to pay for sports facilities used by billionaire owners is a growing source of contention for cities and their residents around the US. In Kansas City, the Royals (Major League Baseball) and Chiefs (NFL) franchises had teamed up to attempt to persuade local authorities to pay up to $1.7bn through a 40-year sales tax that, in part, would pay for new stadium suites and parking facilities. But last year, voters in Jackson county, Missouri, rejected the proposal. In Chicago, the city's storied Bears (NFL) franchise has been vacillating between building a new facility in the city – a move backed by the city's mayor that would see $2.4bn of public spending – and out of town to a location 25 miles from the city center. In places such as Jacksonville, Florida, and Nashville, Tennessee, taxpayers are contributing billions of dollars to finance facility renovations or entire new stadiums. Dozens of NFL teams, whose average value has doubled in recent years, argue that improving their facilities is only possible with the help of public money. In Los Angeles, however, the owner of the Rams, Stan Kroenke, paid all $5bn for the cost of the SoFi Stadium, which opened in 2020. In Cleveland, county authorities say they are not explicitly opposed to supporting the Browns' stadium needs at its current location. 'We can make a renovation, and you can have a conversation in the future about a new dome stadium downtown,' says Ronayne. '[But] this is the youngest of the three [professional sports facilities] downtown. This mad rush to Brook Park is just a boondoggle.' The state of Ohio, whose legislature has a Republican supermajority, has said it plans to kick in $600m of taxpayer money through bonds, meaning that residents hundreds of miles from Cleveland with no interest in the team or the sport, could find themselves paying for this new stadium, and any interest accrued on those bonds. The state budget that would include hundreds of millions of dollars of funding must be signed into law by Ohio's governor, Mike DeWine, by 30 June. DeWine, a Republican, has previously expressed his opposition to the funding proposal and can veto bills that have cleared Ohio's legislature, though he regularly follows the party line. An investigation by the Ohio Capital Journal recently found that politicians who have voiced support for the new Browns stadium have received tens of thousands of dollars in donations from the Haslams, who also own the Columbus Crew Major League Soccer team and hold a stake in the NBA's Milwaukee Bucks, and are thought to be worth about $8.5bn. This is happening at a time that Ohio politicians are proposing cuts to the state's education budget that would result in a financial hole several hundreds of millions of dollars in size. But some believe that using the Browns' current home, a valuable, visible space in downtown Cleveland just eight or nine times a year for football games, with a few concerts thrown in, is a waste. The Greater Cleveland Partnership, the metro area's chamber of commerce, supports the move, calling it 'more practical' than investing in the Browns' current site. Both Jimmy and Dee Haslam sit on the Partnership's executive committee. In Brook Park, locals say they would welcome the stadium nearby. 'I think it would be good for my business and the people of Brook Park. It's really not even moving out of Cleveland and most of the people who go to the games are in the suburbs anyway,' says Sam Clarke, who runs a graphics design company a short distance from the site of the proposed new stadium. 'But it's not going to matter if the owners are always making the worst moves. They can't really ever seem to get out of their own way. You can play wherever you want but it doesn't change the bigger issue.' For James, a Browns fan who has run the Flat Iron Cafe in downtown Cleveland for 17 years, the stadium drama is about one thing. 'It's just billionaires trying to make more billions, and I can't stomach that,' he says. 'I have no respect for the organization.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Irish GDP jumps 9.7% q/q on pharma exports to US
DUBLIN, June 5 (Reuters) - Ireland's gross domestic product grew by a hefty 9.7% quarter-on-quarter in the first three months of the year due to a surge in pharmaceutical exports to the U.S., likely further distorting the average growth rate across the euro zone. With Ireland's large multinational sector often distorting GDP, officials prefer to use modified domestic demand (MDD) to more accurately gauge the strength of the economy. MDD has expanded strongly in recent years and grew by 0.8% in the first quarter compared with the previous three months, Central Statistics Office (CSO) data showed on Thursday. GDP has at times diverged sharply from activity in the wider economy and an initial estimate of a much lower quarterly growth of 3.2% had already inflated the euro zone average, which grew by a faster than expected 0.4% in the first quarter. Irish GDP was 22.2% higher year-on-year compared to an initial estimate of +13.3%. "This has come directly out of cross-border pharmaceutical exports in March, particularly," Christopher Sibley, Assistant Director General in the Central Statistics Office, told a news conference. Separate data last month showed that exports of medical and pharmaceutical products surged by 154% or 34 billion euros in the first quarter, chiefly due to U.S. drugmakers stocking up ahead of potential import tariffs. More than a dozen of the world's biggest pharma companies have plants in Ireland, where many make medicines or active ingredients for the U.S. market. Exports of pharmaceutical products to the U.S. rose by 243% alone in March. Thursday's data showing a 14.8% quarter-on-quarter rise in goods exports and a 17.1% expansion in the industrial sector, which Sibley said showed that foreign multinationals were taking large profits from their export sales. Ireland's finance ministry last month downgraded its growth forecasts slightly for modified domestic demand this year to 2% if a 10% tariff on European Union exports to the U.S. remains in place, or 2.5% if tariffs are removed. The finance ministry marked up its forecast for GDP - even in the event of the tariffs sticking - to 4.0% from 3.9% before U.S. President Donald Trump's election last November.
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
CalMac's newest ferry Isle of Islay completes first sea trials in Turkey - but will be almost a year late
Sign up for the latest news and analysis about Scottish transport Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The first of four CalMac ferries being built in Turkey is expected to carry its first passengers around a year late after the opening stage of sea trials were completed behind schedule in the latest of a series of delays. Isle of Islay, which is earmarked for the main route to the Hebridean island, completed the tests in the Sea of Marmara on May 30, it was announced on Thursday. The vessel should have been ready for sea trials by the start of the month. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Isle of Islay on its sea trials off Turkey late May | Cmal Scottish Government ferry-buying firm Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (Cmal) said a second set of sea trials would not take place until 'later this summer' and the vessel is scheduled to be delivered between July and September. It was originally due to have been finished in October last year, but was delayed to December, then March, then June. Cmal chief executive Kevin Hobbs has said the vessel would take two weeks after completion to reach Scotland, then need three to four weeks of port trials before entering service, which suggests it will not be carrying passengers until at least the autumn. The ferry, along with its sister vessel for the Kintyre-Islay route, Loch Indaal, and two others for the Skye-Harris-North Uist routes, have suffered a series of delays because of parts supply problems caused by the Ukraine war and instability in the Middle East. Shipyard workers were also being deployed for recovery work following a huge earthquake. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Cmal said the sea trials had been carried out 'successfully' by Cemre Marin Endustri yard in Yalova from May 22 to 30, with Cmal and CalMac staff on board. The body said: 'The first part of the sea trials saw the set up of the propulsion systems, generators, thrusters, stabilisers and associated electrical systems. These were then tested, trialled and measured with [certification authority] Lloyd's Register and the Maritime Coastguard Agency [safety regulator] in attendance. 'Testing evaluated the vessel's performance at full load, including speed, stability, manoeuvrability, anchor deployment/recovery and endurance. The trials also established the effectiveness of the vessel's propulsion plant, automation and navigational systems. 'The second set of sea trials will take place later this summer following the installation of the vessel's battery system and harbour acceptance trials of the hybrid system.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Cmal director of vessels Jim Anderson said: 'This is a great step forward in the build programme of the Isle of Islay. The team at Cemre are working hard to prepare the vessel for delivery.
