Iran asks people to delete WhatsApp, hints that app is leaking location data to Israel military
In the midst of war with Israel, Iran has suffered a number of high-profile assassinations in the recent days. The accuracy of these attacks on high-profile target has stunned not just the Iranian government but also the rest of world. Now, Iran is hinting that its officials might have been targeted on the basis of location data leaked by apps and phones, including through WhatsApp. And the company has issued a directive to its citizens asking them to remove WhatsApp from their phones. advertisementIranian state television on Tuesday called on citizens to delete WhatsApp from their phones. The announcement claimed that the messaging app could be leaking user information to the Israeli military. Although this claim has been strongly denied by the app's parent company, Meta Platforms.According to an Associated Press report, the state TV broadcast warned that WhatsApp is allegedly 'gathering user information' and sharing it with Israel. The platform is currently one of the most widely used messaging platforms in Iran. Although the broadcast offered no concrete evidence, it has stirred growing fears over digital privacy and national security in the country.
Commenting on the allegation, WhatsApp described the claims as 'false reports' and expressed concern that such statements could be used as justification to block the platform entirely. 'We are concerned these false reports will be an excuse for our services to be blocked at a time when people need them the most,' the company said.advertisementWhatsApp has also reiterated that it uses end-to-end encryption. This is a security standard many messaging platforms follow to ensure only the sender and recipient of a message can read its contents. 'We do not track your precise location, we don't keep logs of who everyone is messaging, and we do not track the personal messages people are sending one another,' the statement read. 'We do not provide bulk information to any government.'Meanwhile, many experts are pointing out that end-to-end encryption does not eliminate all security concerns. Gregory Falco, a cybersecurity researcher and assistant professor at Cornell University, told the Associated Press that metadata — information such as when a message is sent and to whom — can still be leaked. Such concerns can be particularly troublesome in case there is a tacit or unknown co-operation between American tech companies and different militaries. In the past we have seen tech companies like Google, Microsoft and others work with Israeli government and its military to provide certain services, although tech companies deny that their services are used for military purposes by Israel.At the same time, Israeli companies like NSO — of Pegasus spyware fame — often target apps like WhatsApp to hack into people's phones, including iPhones. WhatsApp had earlier slammed NSO and had filed cases against in a US court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
16 minutes ago
- India Today
PM Modi fact-checks Trump, the only way it could have been done
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday told US President Donald Trump that India has never accepted mediation, does not accept it, and will never do so in the doing so, PM Modi firmly nullified Trump's repeated, unsubstantiated, and seemingly fictional claims of mediating the India-Pakistan ceasefire during the May one-on-one discussion also appeared to be the most appropriate channel to refute the claims made by the Being candid is never easy, not even with friends or colleagues. That's why the Prime Minister's message directly to the President of the US is notable, particularly when the recipient is someone as famously blunt and uncouth as Donald must also note that diplomatic norms rarely see friendly nations publicly accusing each other of dishonesty or lies. Had PM Modi chosen to respond via social media, as Trump often does, it would have been perceived as a pointed snub. Unlike Trump, Modi avoided the "fastest finger first" approach, opting for a more measured and statesmanlike was domestic political pressure, too. The Opposition demanded clarification on the US's repeated assertions — perhaps fair, given the US's persistence — but it might have been a major diplomatic blunder for the PM to issue an official statement declaring the ceasefire a strictly bilateral issue, with no involvement of the have been instances when heads of state have commented on each other's policies, actions, or interventions, often with negative repercussions. For example, in 2002, former French President Jacques Chirac's opposition to the US invasion of Iraq caused strained Franco-American in 2013, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel's criticism of US surveillance policies during the Obama administration also created temporary frostiness between the US and Germany, despite their strategic that the Prime Minister, whom Trump calls his 'friend', has delivered a firm rebuttal, there is little left to two leaders were scheduled to meet at the G7 Summit in Alberta, Canada, but ended up speaking on the phone for about 35 minutes on Wednesday after Trump's visit was cut short due to the Iran-Israel Secretary Vikram Misri stated in a media briefing on Wednesday that Trump invited Modi to visit the US on his return journey from Canada. However, Modi declined due to prior commitments. In turn, the Prime Minister invited Trump to visit India for the upcoming Quad Summit, likely later this as he rejected the US's claims, he simultaneously opened the door to future cooperation by inviting Trump to a strategic meeting — a deft diplomatic development coincides with Pakistani Field Marshal Asim Munir's lunch meeting with Trump in a closed-door session, where the media isn't rebuttal of Trump's mediation claims also highlights the transparent diplomatic relationship between the US and India — as opposed to Pakistan's more opaque dealings with Washington. Pakistan has historically leveraged such ambiguity to manufacture false narratives and perceived international timing is also notable: India made the two leaders' conversation public just before the very unpredictable duo — Trump and Munir — are set to meet. Modi's firm stance could preempt any emerging claims and blunt Pakistan's backchannel also worth noting that Pakistan attempted to spin a narrative claiming Asim Munir was invited to the US's Army Day Parade. In reality, there was no official confirmation of his visit until his arrival in the US — where he was met by protests from Pakistani-Americans outside his Washington, DC, hotel over Pakistan's military a few hours from now, Trump will host Munir for meal may be sumptuous, but given their proclivity for economising with the truth, it's quite possible that both of them will reiterate their falsehoods and once again contradict India. But you know, social has nothing to do with truth. Especially Truth Watch
India Today
16 minutes ago
- India Today
May, may not, nobody knows what I'll do: Trump on joining Israeli attacks on Iran
President Donald Trump on Wednesday refused to confirm whether the United States would join Israeli strikes on Iran or target its nuclear infrastructure, saying, "I may, I may not. Nobody knows what I'm going to do."He added that while Tehran had reached out, "it's very late to be talking," and hinted at imminent action: "Next week will be big, maybe less than a week."advertisement"There's a big difference between now and a week ago," Trump said during an interaction outside the White House. "Nobody knows what I'm going to do." The President claimed that Iran had proposed holding talks at the White House, though he did not elaborate on the nature or timing of the outreach. He went on to describe Iran as "totally defenceless, with no air defence whatsoever". The Republican also said that he asked Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu to "keep going", implying that he asked the Jewish nation to keep attacking asked about Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayotallah Ali Khamenei, Trump simply said, "Good luck." He added that his administration's patience with Tehran had worn thin. "Patience has already run out," he said amid Iran's intensifying conflict with swirling reports that the United States was working in concert with Israel on plans to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Trump had earlier claimed that Washington knew exactly where Khamenei was "hiding".advertisementWhile stopping short of confirming any imminent strike, Trump asserted that the US would not "take him out" at this stage, but issued a stern warning that American patience was "wearing thin". He aslo demanded Iran's "unconditional surrender" and said that Iran can't ever have nuclear escalating tensions and US demands for Iran to surrender, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei firmly rejected the prospect on Wednesday, declaring that Iran would never capitulate. He warned that any American military intervention would be met with a crushing response, inflicting "irreparable damage" on the United a televised message on Wednesday, a day after Trump called for Iran's "unconditional surrender" amid its conflict with Israel, Khamenei said Tehran would stand firm against an "imposed war"."Intelligent people who know Iran, the Iranian nation, and its history will never speak to this nation in threatening language because the Iranian nation will not surrender, and Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage," the Supreme Leader Israel and Iran continued to trade missiles for the sixth consecutive day on Wednesday, leaving over 600 dead. Iran has suffered the maximum damage, with the Health Ministry putting the death toll at in the day, Iran claimed to have fired the Fattah-1 hypersonic missile at Israel, the first in the ongoing conflict. Explosions were also heard in Tel Aviv, with Israel claiming that Iranian attacks have resulted in 24 deaths and over 1,300 injuries in the so far. Israel's strikes on Wednesday were mostly centred around Jewish nation also claimed to have struck Iran's internal security agency InMust Watch
Hans India
17 minutes ago
- Hans India
Inside Iran's impenetrable fordow nuclear site: Buried deep and built for war
Nestled within the mountains near the holy city of Qom, Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant is one of the most fortified and secretive nuclear facilities in the world. Recent satellite imagery reveals only five visible tunnels, a major support structure, and a sweeping security perimeter—clues to a facility that has sparked global concern for over a decade. Fordow came to international attention in 2009, when then-U.S. President Barack Obama, joined by France's Nicolas Sarkozy and Britain's Gordon Brown, revealed the existence of the site to the world. Its vast underground chambers—estimated to be 80 to 90 meters (262 to 295 feet) below ground—place it beyond the reach of conventional aerial bombs, including those in Israel's arsenal. While Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, experts and global leaders remain skeptical. The sheer scale and secrecy of Fordow have fueled fears that it could be used to rapidly convert enriched uranium into weapons-grade material. The facility, analysts say, may play a crucial role should Iran accelerate towards building a nuclear weapon, especially amid recent Israeli airstrikes that have rattled Iran's leadership but reportedly left Fordow unscathed. Construction of Fordow began in the early 2000s, during what experts call Iran's 'crash nuclear weapons program.' Satellite images as far back as 2004 show the early development of tunnel entrances and ventilation systems. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has even deeper archival images dating to 2002. According to David Albright, head of the Institute for Science and International Security, 'The idea was they [Iran] would make weapon-grade uranium in that plant and obtain low-enriched uranium from the civil nuclear program.' Iran told the IAEA in a 2009 letter that Fordow was built underground due to 'threats of military attacks' and was intended as a backup to its Natanz facility—another key uranium enrichment site. Today, the facility is believed to be capable of housing up to 3,000 centrifuges. Though its true scale and status remain closely guarded secrets, Fordow stands as a symbol of Iran's determination—and defiance—in the face of mounting international scrutiny and pressure.
